Section 5: Bike and Pedestrian

Similar documents
Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

Living Streets Policy

COASTAL RAIL TRAIL ROSE CREEK BIKEWAY PROJECT COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 AUGUST 15, 2013

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Section 9. Implementation

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

Multimodal Transportation Plan

C C C

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Vision. Goals and Objectives. Walking

Walking & Bicycling Questionnaire for Candidates

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Chapter 3 DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS

Final Sidewalk Feasibility Study

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

10A. DATE: October 5, Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Section 8. Partnerships and Funding

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council March 19, 2018

Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY

Lake to Lake LAKE YORK. CYCLING ROUTE and WALKING TRAIL FEASIBILITY and DESIGN STUDY LAKE. CITY of REGION ONTARIO SIMCOE TORONTO

TxDOT Bicycle Tourism Trails Study Update. April 2017 BAC Meeting April 10, 2017

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Active Transportation on the Rise

DRAFT. System Components. Greenway Trails. Introduction. Trail Types. Zebulon Greenway Master Plan

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY Exhibit A to Ordinance

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Priority 1: Ala Wai Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Mobility Project

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

RZC Appendix 8A Marymoor Subarea Street Requirements

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Trail Feasibility. 1. Introduction FINAL. October What s inside?

General Design Factors

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Shifting Gears for a Healthier City.

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

LANCASTER CITY BICYCLE NETWORK

and older adults and people with disabilities still face barriers when using the pedestrian network and public transportation.

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

SR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements. Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016

DRAFT. Table of Contents. Background

Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study

Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Pre Bid Meeting Portsmouth, NH August 15, 2013

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Peterborough Council on Aging

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Orinda Bicycle, Trails and Walkways Master Plan

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Sandwich Pedestrian/Bicycle Planning

City of Madison: 2017 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Plan

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

2018 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Application Presentation to Palm Beach TPA BRANT BRIDGE CONNECTION LOOP EXTENSION ON CARL BOLTER DR

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

CITY OF PITTSBURGH. City of Pittsburgh Active Transportation Profile REGIONAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA

Best Southwest Transportation Committee. North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department

Ajax: The Road to Complete Streets

2.0 Existing Conditions

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

FMATS Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized Project Nomination Form

Bikeways Network and Facilities

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

Duwamish Way-finding and CTR Report

Transcription:

Section 5: Bike and Pedestrian Existing Conditions: One defining feature of Glynn County appreciated by both residents and visitors is the extensive sidewalk and bike path system. The City of Brunswick, St. Simons Island, and Jekyll Island have many miles of sidewalks and bike paths. The flat terrain and the temperate year-round weather make recreational activities such as walking, cycling, skateboarding, and in-line skating popular. Figure 5-1 illustrates the extensive bike and pedestrian system that exist within Glynn County. Figures 5-2 and 5-3 show the Coastal Route (State Bike Route 95) and the Southern Crossing Route (State Bike Route 10) that serves Glynn County. The Coastal Route follows U.S. 17 through the county, connecting Brunswick with Effingham and Camden Counties. The route runs through 25.8 miles of Glynn County and features the Hofwyl- Broadfield Plantation. The Southern Crossing Route traverses through 24.9 miles of Glynn County entering from Brantley County on U.S. 82 and connects with the Coastal Route on U.S. 17. The Southern Crossing Route features Jekyll Island, where the route terminates. It begins in the southwest corner of the state and passes through Bainbridge, Thomasville, Valdosta, Waycross, and ends in Glynn County. Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Study Brunswick Area Transportation Study, or BATS, hired the consulting firm Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., or PBS&J, to conduct a local assessment of bicycle and pedestrian needs within the county. The firm issued its final report entitled Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Study. General Recommendations in the plan included: Bicyclists and pedestrians should have a safe and convenient way to travel throughout the county, whether for recreation, fitness, commuting, running errands, etc. Motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians need to be better educated in the laws and ordinances which govern their movements and the interaction between modes. Bicyclists and pedestrians, in general, should be separated wherever possible. American Association of State and Highway and Transportation Officials, and Georgia Department of Transportation design standards for bicycle facilities should be followed, unless extenuating circumstances render these standards impractical or impossible. Construction of new pedestrian facilities and reconstruction of existing facilities should meet American Disabilities Act, or ADA, requirements at all times or Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-1

alternate solutions should be implemented in unusual situations if design standards prove impossible to maintain. Bicycling and walking should be encouraged as alternative modes of transportation which have significant health benefits and are environmentally friendly. To encourage use of these alternative modes, auxiliary facilities should be provided where feasible, such as bicycle storage areas at major destinations, water fountains, and comfort stations along major routes and shower/changing facilities at places of work. Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-2

Figure 5-1 Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-3

Figure 5-2 Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-4

Figure 5-3 Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-5

Recommended improvements and new facilities are depicted on the figures on the following pages. Projects will be completed based on the importance of the link established in the overall network, the elimination or reduction of one or more safety hazards, cost, intangible benefits to the community, and the practical time frame for implementation based on related planned or programmed projects. Construction costs for sidewalks and bicycle paths are estimated to be $ per linear foot or $ per square foot in dollars. Sources of funding that were identified in the PBS&J study included Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act Enhancement Program funding, the incorporation of bicycle and pedestrian facilities into the overall design for larger scale roadway projects, and ordinance(s) requiring developers to install facilities, special assessments on abutting property owners, public and private fundraisers, and volunteer efforts by civic organizations and advocacy groups. East Coast Greenway: The Coastal Georgia Land Trust developed a plan for a 450-mile regional trail system which would link the Coastal Georgia region to Florida and South Carolina. The 450- mile section through Georgia is called the East Coast Greenway, Georgia s portion of the trail is called the Coastal Georgia Greenway, and Glynn County s portion is the Golden Marshes Trail. The network will link towns, attractions, recreational sites, historic and cultural sites, waterways, and natural habitats of the coast. A series of trails suitable for bicycles, joggers, equestrians, canoeists, kayakers, and other non-motorized users will be built. The centerpiece of the Coastal Georgia Greenway is a continuous trail connecting South Carolina to Florida. The route will follow various north-south routes, including the U.S. Highway 17 corridor, abandoned rail corridors, and historic canal corridors. Figure 5-4 shows the recommendations for the Glynn County portion of the system include greenways, on-road bicycle facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, equestrian trails and ferries. Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-6

Figure 5-4: East Coast Greenway Source: http://www.eastcoastgreenway.org The plan suggested that the following locations be considered for Glynn County as part of a regional recreation trail network: Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-7

Altamaha Boulevard Greenway Trail (Harry Driggers Blvd.) linking Spur 25 to U.S 17 (5.75 miles of 7-foot wide paved multi-purpose trail)- North Glynn County Park is designated trail head (Phase 1: 3.4 miles is complete; 2.35 miles remaining) U.S. 17 from the McIntosh County Line to the Camden County Line Jekyll Island Causeway Water route from Jekyll Island to St. Simons Island (already provided by private water taxi service) Brunswick-Altamaha Canal Old Jesup Highway U.S. 341 from Old Jesup Highway to Downtown Brunswick, then deviating from U.S. 341 to Coffin Park and U.S. 17 GA 99 from U.S. 17 to U.S. 82 Atlanta Gas Light easement U.S. 17 to Perry Lane Road Old Highway 25 from Everett to Sterling CSX Rail corridor from McIntosh County Line to Camden County Line U.S. 82 from GA 99 to the CSX Rail Corridor Georgia Coast Rail-Trails: The Georgia Coast Rails to Trails project will transform the rail corridor between Riceboro and Kingsland into hiking and biking trails that winds through marshes and forests, and across rivers and creeks. The trail would offer coastal residents and visitors a healthy outdoor adventure, access to an unspoiled ecological system, and exceptional educational opportunities. Figure 5-5 shows the section that would spread through Glynn County. Glynn County s contribution would be 21.8 miles long. The section starts at the Camden County and Glynn County line and runs to the south bank of the Altamaha River. This section has been divided into four segments: Camden County/ Glynn County Line to US 82 This is approximately 4.4 miles long and varies in width. There is one 50-foot long concrete bridge. Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-8

U.S. 82 to GA 32- this segment is approximately 5.5 miles long and 25 wide. There are two bridges in this section. GA 32 to U.S. 341- This segment is approximately 7.7 miles long and varies in width. There are eight bridges in this section of the route. US 341 to Altamaha River park- This segment is approximately 3.5 miles long and varies in width. There are four bridges in the section of the rail corridor. Construction of the proposed route would cost approximately $22,747,725 just for the four sections in Glynn County. Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-9

Figure 5-5: Rails-to-Trails Glynn County Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-10

Future Direction There are several bicycle and pedestrian planning efforts underway in the BATS area. The connectivity between the proposed improvements in order to create a safe and efficient multimodal network must be monitored as the various improvements are selected for funding and are implemented. The bicycle and pedestrian network must provide connectivity not only within itself, but to other modes of transportation such as the transit network and to appropriate activity centers and neighborhoods. Figure 5-6 shows potential expansion and connectivity of facilities. BATS staff will work with Glynn County and the City of Brunswick to develop ordinances requiring the construction of sidewalks near activity center development such as schools, subdivisions, retail centers, medical centers, and intermodal facilities. Maintenance of the existing and new bicycle and pedestrian facilities is critical to the development of a safe, useable transportation network. The incorporation of ADA standards in the construction of these facilities is imperative to ensure the accessibility by all persons desiring to use the system. The implementation of bicycle or sidewalk facilities should be incorporated into larger roadway projects when possible to reduce the mobility costs associated with the construction of such facilities. All buses serving the BATS area should be equipped to carry bicycles to ensure multimodal connectivity. Finally, amenities such as bicycle racks, drinking fountains, and benches should be included at activity centers to promote bicycle and pedestrian friendliness in the BATS area. Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-11

Figure 5-6 Long Range Transportation Plan 2010-2035 5-12