Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water Anne Jurek. Abstract: Discussion:

Similar documents
Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water By Headspace Calibration of Mixed Gases Anne Jurek

Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water Anne Jurek

ASTM WK Standard Test Method for Dissolved Gases. Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

Rapid and Reliable Detection of Dissolved Gases in Water

OMCL Network of the Council of Europe QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENT

GCMSD-Headspace Analysis SOP

Demystifying the Process of Calibrating your Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography System using Compressed Gas Standards.

ASTM 3612/TOGA/Dissolved Gas GC Revised October 2013

Optimizing Vial Pressurization Parameters for the Analysis of <USP 467> Residual Solvents Using the 7697A Headspace Sampler

Retention Time Locking: Concepts and Applications. Application

Multiple Gas#5 GC configuration Jan 2016

Gases&Technology. Measurement of Impurities in Helium Using the Dielectric Barrier Discharge Helium Ionization Detector. FEATURE.

Ghost Peaks: How to Fix a Haunting Problem. Jacob A. Rebholz Teledyne Tekmar VOC Product Line Manager

Versatility. Accuracy. Compact. Versa. Automated Headspace Vial Sampler

extraction of EG and DEG from the matrix. However, the addition of all diluent at once resulted in poor recoveries.

DETERMINATION OF TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE IN AMBIENT AIR BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH A PFPD DETECTOR COUPLED TO A PRECONCENTRATION TECHNOLOGY

Simplified Backflush Using Agilent 6890 GC Post Run Command Application Note

Development of DMS and Acetonitrile, and Formaldehyde gas standards. Gwi Suk Heo, Yong Doo Kim, Mi-Eon Kim, and Hyunjin Jin

Environmental Petrochemical, Pharmaceutical, Foods & Flavors, Chemicals, Personal Care, Forensics,...and more!

Low-Pressure Retention Time Locking with the 7890A GC. Application. Authors. Abstract. Introduction HPI

Jaap de Zeeuw Restek Corporation, Middelburg, The Netherlands. Copyrights: Restek Corporation

METHOD 204F--VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS CONTENT IN LIQUID INPUT STREAM (DISTILLATION APPROACH) 1.1 Applicability. This procedure is applicable for

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Engineered Solutions, Guaranteed Results.

Laboratory Hardware. Custom Gas Chromatography Solutions WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Custom solutions for your analytical needs.

Agilent 7697A Headspace Sampler

Three Columns Gas Chromatograph Analysis Using Correlation between Component's Molecular Weight and Its Response Factor

Automated Liquid Handling Station

LINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPLIED TO THE CALIBRATION OF ANALYTES IN VARIOUS MATRICES USING A TOTAL HYDROCARBON (THC) ANALYZER

UNITY 2 TM. Air Server Series 2 Operators Manual. Version 1.0. February 2008

Varian 3300 Gas Chromatograph Abbreviated Operating Instructions

APPLICATION NOTE. GC Integrated Permeation Device

5890II GC Standard Operating Procedure 9/2/2005

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD Nº 67

Experiment GC : Analysis of BTEX by GC-FID

Determination of Dissolved Gases in Ground Waters. By Ray Martrano Laboratory Director Seewald Laboratories Inc.

NCASI METHOD IM/CAN/WP IMPINGER/CANISTER SOURCE SAMPLING METHOD FOR SELECTED HAPS AND OTHER COMPOUNDS AT WOOD PRODUCTS FACILITIES

General Specifications: Forensic. Petrochemical Environmental. Lab Quality Analyses in the Field, It Goes with you Anywhere!

APPLICATION NOTE. Fast Analysis of Coal Mine Gas Using the INFICON 3000 Micro GC ABSTRACT

FROG-4000 TM Chemical Analysis System

METHOD 3C - DETERMINATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE, METHANE, NITROGEN, AND OXYGEN FROM STATIONARY SOURCES

Gas Chromatographic Applications of the Dielectric Barrier Discharge Detector

Air Quality 2b - PFGC/FID Analysis of Benzene and Toluene in Automobile Emissions

Applied Technology and Best Practices in CEE. Conference

A New GC/MS System Designed for Helium Carrier Gas Conservation

Standard Test Method for Residual Acrylonitrile Monomer Styrene-Acrylonitrile Copolymers and Nitrile Rubber by Headspace Gas Chromatography 1

SOP: Buck Scientific BLC-20P HPLC Operation

Title: Standard Operating Procedure for Measurement of Ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) in Ambient Air by Reduced Gas Detection (RGD)

Quantitative Analysis of Hydrocarbons by Gas Chromatography

Determination of Oxygenates in Gasoline by Gas Chromatography and Oxygen Selective Flame Ionization Detector Method

3 Flow and Pressure Control

Application Note. Rapid performance verification of AZURA systems with refractive index detector. Summary. Introduction

High Automation of Thermo Scientific FlashSmart CHNS/O Analyzer using the MultiValve Control (MVC) Module

FROG-4000 TM Chemical Analysis System

May 1, By John Heim,Doug Staples

Flare Gas Composition Analysis and QA/QC Lessons Learned and Lessons Lost SPECTRUM ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC 1

The instrument will process the samples one by one till all the samples have been cleaned up.

System Overview. TCD Detector temperature setpoint Regulator

Liquid Handling Systems

6890 GC Site Preparation

The HumiPyc - Model 1 - Gas Pycnometer; Density, Moisture, Permeation Analyzer; RH sensor Calibrator

Buck Scientific, Inc.

no peaks missing peaks too small peaks increasing retention decreasing retention

6890 GC Not Ready Messages (A16010)

Gas Diluter Portable Gas Dilution System User s Manual

This GC has two columns (I think new columns can be ordered from Restek)

Appendix: Simplified Instructions for Operating the HP 5890 GC/FID and Air Sampling Systems

METHOD 21 - DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND LEAKS. 1.2 Scope. This method is applicable for the

Converting Helium Carrier Gas GC Methods Nitrogen and Hydrogen

Agilent G Rebuilt Electron Capture Detector

Increasing the productivity of ICP-OES with the Thermo Scientific Qtegra ISDS Software

CHE 4115 Chemical Processes Laboratory 2 Experiment 1. Batch Distillation

Advancements in Gas Chromatography Analyzers - Keeping up with New Technology. Chuck Runkle Gas Phase Product Specialist ASTS June 2013

Figure 1: Plug in ion inlet of mass spec

New improved robot for gas kinetics

CP-3800 GC Operator s Manual

Impact of Air Leaks on the Productivity of GC and GC/MS Systems

FRANZ CELL TEST OF NANO GLUTATHIONE WITH HPLC ANALYSIS

Best Practice for Identifying Leaks in GC and GC/MS Systems

Sorbent Pen Heavy & Labile SVOC s Taints, Off-Flavors, Odors

A Column-Flow Independent Configuration for QuickSwap. Application. Authors. Abstract. Introduction

METHOD: 1024, Issue 2 EVALUATION: FULL Issue 1: 15 August 1987 Issue 2: 15 August 1994

7820A GC Site Preparation Checklist

ISO 7941 First edition

FROG-5000TM Chemical Analysis System User s Manual

Carrier Gases in Capillary GC

CHM250 Calibration and Measurement Lab. Balance Calibration

International Journal of Generic Drugs ANALYTICAL METHOD PROCEDURES THIS SOP IS 'SWITCHED : OFF : ON'

The Preparation of Low Concentration Hydrogen Sulfide Standards Gulf Coast Conference September 12, 2002 Galveston, TX Paper 050,12:45 pm Moody F

User guide for operating the Agilent 6420A QqQ mass spectrometer by direct infusion/injection

Detector Carrier Gas Comments Detector anode purge or reference gas. Electron Capture Nitrogen Maximum sensitivity Nitrogen Argon/Methane

The Tekran Series 2600-IVS Difference!

AKTA ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY SOP Date: 2/02/05 Author: A DeGiovanni Edited by: C. Huang Reviewed by:

Considerations and Best Practices for Maintaining Your Agilent GC s Split/Splitless Injection Port

The instrument should have a mass range from 2 to 2000 m/z or better Interface

MV5: Automated concentration system

Agilent 7890 Series Gas Chromatograph

This standard is due for Five Year Review. This process is required by the SEMI Regulations to ensure that the standard is still valid.

Agilent 1100 Series Analytical and Preparative Scale Fraction Collectors. User s Guide

Carrier Gases in Capillary GC

NOTE: Performance of this method should not be. attempted by persons unfamiliar with the operation of a gas

Transcription:

Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water Anne Jurek Abstract: The RSK-175 standard operating procedure was developed in order to determine the amount of dissolved gas in water. Due to the expansion of natural gas drilling through horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, there has been increased interest in this procedure. However, since the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) does not have a method for this analysis and the RSK-175 procedure is a standard operating procedure and not a formal method, there have been many interpretations and modifications of RSK-175 in order to determine the amount of gas dissolved in the water. This paper will consider three different approaches for dissolved gas calibration and analysis and the respective pros and cons. Discussion: Dissolved gas calibration can be done in assorted ways, all of which have their own positives and negatives. One method is to direct inject a known concentration of gas mix at different volumes and/or dilutions directly onto the GC column using the GC inlet. The advantage of this technique is its simplicity. There is no calibration sample preparation involved. A gas standard and several gas tight syringes are all that is required. The disadvantage is the time involved to run a curve. Since the curve is injected manually, the analyst needs to be present in order to run the calibration curve. Furthermore, as the calibration is done using a gas mix and not a saturated solution, any samples that are run would be in a different matrix than the calibration. Thus, the analyst would need to convert the results to the saturated gas concentration. This calculation is done using the Henry s Constant which will be discussed later. A second method would be to spike a gas mix at different volumes and/or dilutions into the headspace of a sample vial filled with a specified volume of water. Next, using a static headspace auto-sampler, the calibration curve can be injected onto the GC column for analysis and calibration. The advantage of this method is the calibration curve preparation can be done prior to analysis. The prepared curve can then be loaded onto the auto-sampler and the auto-sampler can do the work of injecting the curve. The disadvantage of this technique is the same as the direct inject calibration technique. Since the matrix of the curve and the matrix of the samples are different, the results need to be converted.

The third and final method for calibrating dissolved gases involves saturating water with the gas to be calibrated and performing a serial dilution of the saturated water. A headspace autosampler can then be used to inject the sample headspace onto the GC column for analysis. The benefit of this technique is that the calibration curve matrix and the sample matrix are the same. Since both matrices are the same, there is no need to convert the sample results using the Henry s constant. The disadvantage of this technique is the curve preparation, as every gas needs to be calibrated separately. The sample results would then be analyzed for each gas using the corresponding gas curve. Once a calibration curve is established, the RSK-175 SOP specifies samples to be run by static headspace. As the compounds that are being analyzed are light gases and go into headspace easily, there is no need to concentrate the compounds by purge and trap. Thus, static headspace is the sampling technique of choice for this analysis. The RSK-175 standard operating procedure for dissolved gas samples involves displacing 10% of the sample volume with high purity helium, shaking the sample for 5 minutes and injecting the headspace of the sample onto the GC column for separation with detection performed by a Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) or Flame Ionization Detector (FID). The concentration of the dissolved gas in the sample is then determined using the Henry s Constant, the headspace volume versus the sample vial volume, and the temperature of the sample 1. Saturated Gas Calculation 1 : TC = C AH + C A Where: TC = Total Gas Concentration C AH = Aqueous Gas in Headspace after Equilibration C A = Aqueous Gas in Water after Equilibration C A = (55.5mol/L)*((Experimental Results/Henry s Constant)*MW)*10 3 mg/g = Conc. gas in mg/l Water Where: MW = Molecular Weight of the gas 55.5 mol/l is the molar concentration of water C AH = (HS vol./(total vol.-hs vol.)) * Experimental Results * (MW/22.4 L/mol)*((273K/(Sample Temp. + 273K)) * 10 3 mg/g = Conc. Gas in mg/l Water Where: MW = Molecular Weight of the gas 22.4 L/mol is the vol. of 1 mol gas at Standard Temperature and Pressure (Note: multiply TC by 1000 to get the final answer in µg/l)

Using the sample temperature and the slope of the lines below, the Henry s Constant of Methane, Ethane and Ethylene can be determined 2. 60000 Henry's Constant vs. Temperature Henry's Constant 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Temperature ( C) Methane Ethane Ethylene Methane Henry s Constant = 748.33(Temp.)+22738 Ethane Henry s Constant = 751.33(Temp.)+11740 Ethylene Henry s Constant = 241.43(Temp.)+5375.7 LGX50 Sampling System: The LGX50 sampling system was designed to accommodate individual laboratory preferences for dissolved gas calibration while adapting closely to the RSK-175 standard operating procedure for dissolved gas samples. For gas mix calibration, a sample vial can be spiked with a mixed gas and placed in the LGX50 sample tray. The LGX50 will take an aliquot of the headspace of a vial spiked with mixed gas standard and transfer the analytes to the GC. See figure below. Therefore, the system enables automatic calibration of a mixed gas standard. However, for this type of calibration, the sample results need to be converted using the Henry s Constant and the equations established previously. LGX50 Headspace Sweep of Gas Standard

For saturated gas calibration standards and dissolved gas samples, the LGX50 can displace a pre-programmed volume of saturated gas standard, heat and mix the standard and then take an aliquot of the headspace and transfer it to the GC/FID for separation and analysis. See Steps 1, 2 and 3 for descriptions. Step 1: Empty vials are placed in one tray while samples from the field or dissolved gas standards are placed into full vials and placed in the second tray. The system transports the empty vial, which may contain a stir bar, to the heated sampling station and it is moved onto the sample needle. The vial is swept with helium to remove any air and CO2. A Vacuum is pulled by displacing the helium in the vial equal to the volume of the sample to be added. Step 2: The arm moves over to the full sample vial and the syringe removes the programmed amount of sample. Internal standard is added by injecting either a gas or a liquid into the sample as it is transported to the vial on the sampling station. Step 3: The sample may be heated and stirred for a specific period of time. Once completed, a sample loop is filled with a portion of the headspace and sent to the GC for analysis. Experimental: The LGX50 Autosampler was configured with a two milliliter loop and interfaced with a GC/FID. The GC column used for this analysis was a Restek RT Q-bond 30m x 0.53mm x 20µm. The LGX50 Autosampler settings and the GC/FID experimental parameters are listed in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.

LGX50 Autosampler Parameters Settings Sample Type DGA Sample Fill Mode Loop Sample Volume 20ml Syringe Prime 3 sec. Syringe Needle Rinse 20ml Rinse Cycles On/1 Sample Temperature 65 C Stirrer On/Medium Sample Equilibration Time 10 min. Vial Pressurization Time Loop Fill Time Loop Equilibration Time Valve Temperature 65 C GC Line Temperature 85 C GC Cycle Time 15 min. Rinse Water Temperature 65 C Table 1: LGX50 Autosampler Settings GC/FID Agilent 5890 Inlet Temperature 250 C Inlet Pressure 9psi Gas Helium Inlet Split/Splitless Split Ratio 20:1 Column Flow 14.33ml/min Column Restek RT Q-bond 30m x 0.53mm x 20µm 45 C hold for 1 minute, ramp 16 C/min to Oven Program 180 C hold for 1.06 min, 10.5 min total runtime FID Temperature 250 C Table 2: GC/FID Parameters Gases were ordered from our local gas suppliers. All of the gases were high purity with the exception of propane which was a standard tank used for gas grills. Water was purged with the designated gas for at least one hour in order to saturate the water with the gas. The water was held at room temperature for the propane, however for the methane, ethane and ethylene gases, the water was kept in an ice water bath. The saturated gas concentrations were determined using the values found in References 1 and 2. Using the serial dilutions listed in Tables 3 through 6; the saturated gas curves were made.

Saturated Methane Gas Solution Curve Preparation Standard Amount Final Concentration Saturated Solution 50ml 19.80ppm Saturated Solution 25ml 9.90ppm Saturated Solution 5ml 1.98ppm Saturated Solution 1ml 400ppb Saturated Solution 500ul 200ppb Saturated Solution 100ul 40ppb Saturated Solution 50ul 20ppb *Samples Prepared in a 100ml Volumetric Flask Table 3: Methane Dissolved Gas Standard Preparation Saturated Ethane Gas Solution Curve Preparation Standard Amount Final Concentration Saturated Solution 25ml 32.92ppm Saturated Solution 10ml 13.08ppm Saturated Solution 5ml 6.54ppm Saturated Solution 1ml 1.32ppm Saturated Solution 500ul 660ppb Saturated Solution 100ul 132ppb Saturated Solution 20ul 26.4ppb Saturated Solution 5ul 6.6ppb *Samples Prepared in a 100ml Volumetric Flask Table 5: Ethane Dissolved Gas Standard Preparation Saturated Ethylene Gas Solution Curve Preparation Standard Amount Final Concentration Saturated Solution 25ml 70ppm Saturated Solution 10ml 28ppm Saturated Solution 5ml 14ppm Saturated Solution 1ml 2.8ppm Saturated Solution 200ul 560ppb Saturated Solution 50ul 140ppb Saturated Solution 10ul 28ppb Saturated Solution 2ul 5.6ppb *Samples Prepared in a 100ml Volumetric Flask Table 6: Ethylene Dissolved Gas Standard Preparation Deuterated methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE-d3) was chosen as the Internal Standard (IS) and added to the IS vessel on the LGX50. The saturated gas standards were poured into 40ml vials with no headspace and loaded on the second tray of the LGX50 while a series of empty vials with stir bars were placed in the first tray. After the vials and IS were loaded, a sample sequence was set up and the LGX50 did all the work. The results of the calibration curves, IS precision, and carryover are listed in Tables 7 through 9. Figures 2 through 5 display a sample chromatogram of each of the gases tested.

Compound Curve Range Curve %RSD Curve R² Average RF Methane 20ppb to 19.8ppm 13.27 0.999 0.588 Propane 8ppb to 38.4ppm 12.50 1.000 0.469 Ethane 6.6ppb to 32.9ppm 8.95 1.000 0.415 Ethylene 5.6ppb to 70ppm 8.23 0.999 0.451 Table 7: Saturated Gas Curves Results IS Reproducibility Compound through Curve Range (%RSD) Methane 6.0 Propane 2.6 Ethane 4.4 Ethylene 4.1 Table 8: Internal Standard Precision Compound High Level Standard Level %Carryover Methane 19.8ppm 0.08 Propane 38.4ppm 0.07 Ethane 32.9ppm 0.07 Ethene 70.0ppm 0.06 Table 9: Percent Carryover after High Gas Standard Figure 2: 9.9ppm Methane Standard Chromatogram

Figure 3: 19.2ppm Propane Standard Chromatogram Figure 4: 13.1ppm Ethane Standard Chromatogram Figure 5: 14.0ppm Ethylene Standard Chromatogram The LGX50 Autosampler was configured with a one milliliter loop and interfaced with a GC/FID. The GC column used for this analysis was a Restek RT Q-bond 30m x 0.53mm x 20µm. The LGX50 Autosampler settings and the GC/FID experimental parameters are listed in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.

LGX50 Autosampler Parameter Setting Sample Type Screen Sample Fill Mode Loop Sample Volume 10ml Syringe Prime 3 sec. Syringe Needle Rinse 5ml Rinse Cycles Off Sample Temperature 60 C Stirrer On/Medium Sample Equilibration Time 10 min. Vial Pressurization Time Loop Fill Time Loop Equilibration Time Valve Temperature 65 C GC Line Temperature 85 C GC Cycle Time 15 min. Rinse Water Temperature 65 C IS 5µl Table 1: LGX50 Screen Autosampler Settings GC/FID Agilent 5890 Inlet Temperature 250 C Inlet Pressure 9psi Gas Helium Inlet Split/Splitless Split Ratio 20:1 Column Flow 14.33ml/min Column Restek RT Q-bond 30m x 0.53mm x 20µm 45 C hold for 1 minute, ramp 16 C/min to Oven Program 180 C hold for 1.06 min, 10.5 min total runtime FID Temperature 250 C Table 2: GC/FID Parameters A high purity gas mix was ordered from a local gas supplier. The gas mix was dispensed into a Tedlar bag for ease of use. Ten milliliters of water was poured into a 40mL vial. The vial was capped tightly and spiked with the gas mix in order to prepare the calibration curve. See Table 3. Gas Mixture Curve Preparation in 40ml VOA with 20ml Water Standard Amount Final Concentration 1% Gas Mix 1000µl 1000ppm 1% Gas Mix 500µl 500ppm 1% Gas Mix 200µl 200ppm 1% Gas Mix 100µl 100ppm 1% Gas Mix 50µl 50ppm 1% Gas Mix 20µl 20ppm 1% Gas Mix 10µl 10ppm Table 3: 1% Gas Mix Standard Preparation

Deuterated methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE-d3) was chosen as the Internal Standard (IS) and added to the IS vessel on the LGX50. The mixed gas standards were loaded in the sample tray of the LGX50. Ten milliliters of DI water was then transferred to the sample vial along with the IS in order to make a total water volume of 20mls. After a curve was established a series of seven replicate 10ppm mixed gas standards were run in order to establish method detection limits for the method. Next, a series seven of 500ppm standards were run in order to determine the precision and accuracy of the method. The mixed gas experimental results are listed in Table 4. Figure 2 displays a sample chromatogram of a 500ppm mixed gas standard. Compound Curve Range Curve R² Gas Mixture Results MDL Spike Level (ppm) MDL (ppm) Precision Spike Level (ppm) Accuracy (% Recovery) Precision (%RSD) Methane 10ppm to 1000ppm 0.998 10.00 5.18 500 96.29 8.93 Ethane 10ppm to 1000ppm 0.998 10.00 2.47 500 95.65 8.08 Ethylene 10ppm to 1000ppm 0.998 10.00 2.37 500 94.68 8.39 Table 4: Saturated Gas Curves Results Figure 2: 500ppm Mixed Gas Standard Chromatogram After the mixed gas calibration was established, seven replicate dissolved gas samples were prepared for each of the gases calibrated. The dissolved gas samples were placed on the LGX50 and run using the dissolved gas parameters listed in Table 5. Please refer to application note Automated Determination of Dissolved Gases in Water at www.estanalytical.com for an explanation on dissolved gas sample preparation and LGX50 automated sampling. Finally, using the gas calibration results for the saturated gas samples, the Henry s Constant and the saturated gas calculation established above, the amount of dissolved gas in the samples could be established. The calculated amount of gas was then compared to the known amount of dissolved gas in the sample. The results are listed in Table 6 below.

Compound Standard Level Accuracy % Recovery Methane 1.5ppm 108 Ethane 4.4ppm 98 Ethylene 10.0ppm 114 Table 6: Calculated Dissolved Gas Results Conclusion: The LGX50 is an ideal instrument for dissolved gas analysis. The system can accommodate two different calibration techniques and add liquid or gas internal standards to the samples. The LGX50 was developed to closely mimic the established standard operating procedure of RSK- 175 while still having the capability to automate the sampling process. For more information on the LGX50 visit estanalytical.com or click below: References: http://www.estanalytical.com/products/environmental/lgx50_for_rsk_analysis 1. Hudson, Felisa, RSKSOP-175, Revision No. 2, May 2004. 2. EPA New England, Technical Guidance for the Natural Attenuation Indicators: Methane, Ethane, and Ethene. Revision 1, July, 2001. 3. Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID), PADEP 3686, Rev. 0, April 2012.