Salem City Council November 9, 2009

Similar documents
Quiet Zones: Silencing Train Horns at Railroad Crossings

Is Train Horn Noise a Problem in your Town? By: John P. Redden, P.E., senior railroad engineer, Hanson Professional Services Inc.

Ann Arbor, Michigan Quiet Zone Assessment

Is Train Horn Noise a Problem in your Town?

ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY

Will Kempton, Chief Executive Officer. Update on Proposed Implementation of a Wayside Horn System Along the San Clemente Beach Trail

8 th Annual Spring Transportation. April 9, 2010

Rapid City Quiet Zone Assessment

GRANDFORKS MILSPURFEASIBILITYSTUDY. GrandForksandEastGrandForksMPO. FINALReport. August2010

Train Horn Noise Mitigation

Orange County Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Enhancement Program. City of San Juan Capistrano April 17, 2012

Welcome! CHICAGO TO ST. LOUIS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Public Meeting.

Environmental Review Binder Documentation McGilchrist Street SE: 12th Street SE to 25th Street SE Project City of Salem, Marion County, Oregon

Designing Safety into Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Projects

ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Glossary of Terms. ABANDONMENT The permanent cessation of rail activity on a given line of railroad.

City of Crystal, Minnesota Quiet Zone Notice of Intent

VIII. Project Prioritization & Implementation

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad and Light Rail Transit and Signals Technical Committees

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

Wyoming Quiet Zone Study

Government of the District of Columbia Department of Transportation

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

ON-SITE ENGINEERING FIELD REPORT Part 2. All Aboard Florida

Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Analysis for Corridor Planning Projects

Colerain Avenue Roadway Improvements. Sponsored by Hamilton County Engineer

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Project Team. Refined Pedestrian Crossing Toolbox. Problem Statement. Aerial of Study Corridor. Crossing Accommodations and Pedestrian Fatalities

Welcome to the Sellwood Bridge Project Open House!

Frequently Asked Questions

EXHIBIT R1. Neighborhood Cul-de-Sac Implementation

MEMORANDUM. Background

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

Part 8. TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR RAILROAD AND LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE CROSSINGS

Creating the Future Bruce B Downs Blvd

Mineral Avenue Corridor Assessment. ITE 2017 Western District Annual Meeting San Diego, CA June 21 st

GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN SUBMISSION TO THE RAILWAY SAFETY ACT REVIEW PANEL

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

ADA on Construction. Guidance for Section C Plan Preparers

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

Hospital Link Project Project Update September 2017

Accommodating Pedestrians in the Work Zone

TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Railroad and Light Rail Transit and Signals Technical Committees

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Malvern Borough Local Traffic Calming

Elon Bicycle, Pedestrian and Lighting Plan. Pedestrian Rail Crossings Study

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

Appendix Work Zone Traffic Control

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

City of Memphis On-Street Parking Modification Guidelines

Types of Crossings. Passive Crossings.

Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Report

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

Improvements Infrastructure Gap Assessment and Improvements Street Striping

Recommendations. Central Salem Mobility Study

Public Involvement Outreach Requirements for Public Information Open House Meeting: C.N , HSIP-5003(12) 132 nd and West Center Road, Omaha

(This page left intentionally blank)

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.

Table 1.0 Grade Crossing Enhancements PVL San Jacinto Branch Line

2004 Traffic and Safety Notes. Cross Reference between the Old Note Number and the New Note Number

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Task Force Meeting #5, August 3, Prepared by DKS Associates

A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Multi-Modal Traffic Analysis. Parisi and Associates

County of Spartanburg South Carolina

II. EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS

Traffic Calming Policy

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

HIGHWAY- RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING SAFETY PROJECT SELECTION

PART 10. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

City Council Work Session

M-58 HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT STUDY Mullen Road to Bel-Ray Boulevard. Prepared for CITY OF BELTON. May 2016

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

APPENDIX E GRADE CROSSING LOCATIONS

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Environmental Assessment Findings & Recommendations. Public Hearing November 13, 2014

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

For Signals Training Consortium Use Only

New Construction - Transportation Guide

Montclair s Complete Streets Experience

MINERAL AVENUE CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT STUDY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

PennDOT Access Management Model Ordinances Training

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Prepared By: Town of Waxhaw Traffic Calming Policy

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

Washington St. Corridor Study

Town of Orangetown Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program

PRESS RELEASE San Joaquin Council of Governments

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

4 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

Construction Update. Local Officials Briefing March 2016

A5.1 Permitted activities

Residential Traffic Calming Handbook

11,000. P.M. Peak Hour Vehicles/Hour 10,000 9,000 8,000. Year

Transcription:

Salem City Council November 9, 2009

$1.212 million of the $100 million bond was set aside for Railroad Crossing Safety Improvement Projects Construct projects to improve both vehicular and pedestrian safety at street crossings with the Union Pacific and Portland & Western Railroads. Funds can be used to reduce potential for pedestrian trespassing on railroads between crossings as well. Projects to be approved by City Council. There is interest from residents of inner neighborhoods to see if sufficient safety measures could be implemented to create a horn-free or railroad quiet zone.

On April 27, 2005, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) published the Final Rule on the Use of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings. Effective on June 24, 2005, the Final Rule requires that locomotive horns be sounded at all public grade crossings 15-20 seconds before entering a crossing, but not more that one-quarter mile in advance. The pattern for blowing the horn remains two long, one short, and one long sounding to be repeated as necessary until the locomotive clears the crossing. The Final Rule also provides public authorities the option to establish quiet zones, provided certain supplemental or alternative safety measures are in place, and the crossing accident rate meets FRA standards.

A segment of rail line comprising of one or more at-grade highway-rail crossings where trains are ordered not to routinely sound the horn. Although, the engineer may still sound the horn if they believe there is a danger.

Only the Public Authority with jurisdiction for the roadway at the crossing may request the Quiet Zone. Because multiple authorities are involved All agencies must agree Actions must be taken jointly Other agencies include the Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division, and the Union Pacific Railroad

The segment must be at least ½ mile in length All crossings must, at a minimum, be equipped with automatic gates and flashers Established based upon an analysis of risk

1. Select Area of Proposed Quiet Zone 2. Identify All Crossings 3. Determine Method of Application of Quiet Zone 4. Analyze Public Crossings 5. Diagnostic Review 6. Update National Railroad Crossing Inventory City Council Project Approval 7. Design Improvements Identified by the Diagnostic Review Team 8. Construct Improvements 9. Submit Notification and Install Quiet Zone Signage at All Crossings

1. Select area of the proposed Quiet Zone Staff has reviewed the at-grade crossings within the City and evaluated crash history Determined focus on UP line between Mill Street SE and Market Street NE based upon: Number of Trains Traffic Volumes Existing Safety Measures Train/Vehicle Collisions Proposed Safety Measures May include Madison Street NE if funding allows

Corridor Selection Mill Street SE to Market Street NE (1.1 mile) Include Madison Street NE (If funding allows)

Inventory all Crossings All crossing have gates and flashers Mill Street SE (two-way, 2-lane) State Street (one-way, 3-lane) Court Street NE (one-way, 4-lane) Chemeketa Street NE (two-way, 2-lane) Center Street NE (one-way, 2-lane) Marion Street NE (one-way, 2-lane) D Street NE (two-way, 2-lane) Market Street NE (two-way, 2-lane) Madison Street NE (two-way, 2-lane)

Determine method of application of Quiet Zone Since the City s at-grade crossings within the proposed QZ contain pedestrian crossings, the Supplemental Safety Measures (SSM) method with the diagnostic review must be used. Implement Supplemental Safety Measures (SSM) at every public crossing within the proposed Quiet Zone. Installing SSMs at all public crossings means NO risk calculation is necessary Lack of horns is fully compensated at all crossings

SSMs are pre-approved safety improvements applied at a public at-grade crossing to reduce the risk of a collision and fully compensate for the absence of the train horn. 4-quadrant gates Gates with raised median or channelization devices One-way streets with gates Permanent Street Closures

Install gates on both sides of the crossing to fully block traffic.

Fully closes the crossing (risk reduced 77-92%) No impact on local access High implementation and maintenance costs Requires Railroad coordination, approval, and construction.

Install medians bounded by not-traversable curbs or channelization devices on both approaches. Minimum curb height is 6-inches.

Deters ability to drive around gate (risk reduced 50-75%) 100 feet long, or 60 feet with existing intersection Lower implementation and maintenance cost Intersecting streets and driveways within 60 feet must be closed or relocated May require Railroad coordination and approval

Several crossings within the proposed Quiet Zone corridor are already one-way streets with gates: State Street Court Street NE Center Street NE Marion Street NE These may only require a Alternative Safety Measures (ASM)

Wayside Horn A stationary horn system designed to sound like a Train Horn Mounted at the Crossing Considered a one-for-one substitute for the train horn Improves safety for motorists and pedestrians Reduces noise impact by over 95% at all noise levels

Quiet Zone Indicator Wayside Horn

Can a Quiet Zone be established without any Supplemental Safety Measures? Yes, provided it qualifies and the associated risk is below the national standard. Drawbacks? Requires annual review No guarantee the QZ will remain qualified 3 years to requalify Liability may be shifted to City by Railroad

Step 6 Begin Diagnostic Review (November 2009 March 2009) A Diagnostic Review Team (DRT) refers to a group of knowledgeable individuals from the department, road authorities, railroads, and others who meet and, using crossing safety management principles, evaluate conditions at existing grade crossings. These teams assist the department in making consensus determinations concerning crossing safety needs. The team will be comprised of the following: City Staff ODOT Railroad Division Union Pacific Railroad representatives Federal Railroad Administration

Step 6 Update the National Railroad Crossing Inventory (concurrent with DRT) (November 2009 March 2010) Step 6b City Council Project Approval (Early April 2010) Step 7 Design Improvements Identified by the Diagnostic Review Team and receive ODOT, Union Pacific, and FRA approvals (April 2010 March 2011)

Step 8 Construct Improvements (one year) Step 9 Submit Notification and Install Quiet Zone Signage at all Crossings (60-days after all improvements are completed) Step 10 Enjoy the quiet

With Council consent of proposed Quiet Zone, proceed with design and implementation of the Supplemental Safety Measures to establish a quiet zone.