A Single-Point Mooring System for Direct Pumpout of Hopper Dredges

Similar documents
DREDGING RESEARCH PROGRAM DREDGE MOORING STUDY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PHASE I REPORT. SOFEC, Inc Rothway, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77040

An Ocean of Possibility

Planning Considerations for Nearshore Placement of Mixed Dredged Sediments

CLIENT NAME: LOCATION: CALM BUOY INSPECTION:

Innovative and Robust Design. With Full Extension of Offshore Engineering and Design Experiences.

TARPON A Minimal Facilities Platform

Deepwater Floating Production Systems An Overview

Minimal Structures for Marginal Nova Scotia Developments

Cook Inlet pipeline crossing is about making the best choices

CB-40 Data Buoy Quick Start Guide

(12) United States Patent

The SDS Skip. Subsea Deployment Systems Ltd.

MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC. Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP)

Dynamic Positioning: Method for Disaster Prevention and Risk Management

Response Boat & Barge

Port Infrastructure to Support Floating Offshore Wind West Coast USA

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

NAUTICAL TERMINOLOGY

BIG RIVER COALITION RED RIVER VALLEY ASSOCIATION Sean M. Duffy, Sr. Executive Director

R. Randall Center for Dredging Studies Texas A&M University

UMass Boston Waterfront at a glance

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

Special projects are mainly capital equipment purchases and improvements to the inlet. Most improvements are cost shared with FDEP and FIND.

GUIDELINES FOR SURVEY OF OIL FLOATING STORAGE VESSELS FIXED AT ANCHORAGE

Risk Reduction in Offshore Decommissioning Chevron s Success in the Gulf of Mexico

CB-50 Data Buoy Quick Start Guide

Ocean Structures and Material Prof. Dr. Srinivasan Chandrasekaran Department of Ocean Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

792 T J Jackson Drive Homeland Security.~}' National Vessel Documentation Center Falling Waters, WV 25419

LNG TANDEM OFFLOADING A KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGY TO MAKE LNG PRODUCTION OFFSHORE HAPPEN

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE USE OF ROTARY DRILLING, VIBRATOR AND CEMENT HOSES

CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Development of Self-Installing Deepwater Spar. Ashit Jadav February 2017

S0300-BV-CAT-020 AIR COMPRESSOR SYSTEM, SUB SALV, 1150-CFM, 500-PSI. System - DS0130. System DS0130 7/8/2018 2:56:57 AM

Flory et al. (45) Feb. 15, (72) inventors: John F. Flory, Morristown, N.J. Colin, N. Assistant Examiner-Gregory W. O'Connor

Rates and Charges Operative from 1st January 2019

OLYMPUS TLP TOW-OUT Shell s First Use of Synthetic Rigging Results in Operational and HSSE Benefits PROJECT OVERVIEW CASE STUDY

Fully Submersible Heavy Lift Vessel

TOWN OF DENNIS 10 YR COMPREHENSIVE DREDGE PERMIT SEPTEMBER 10, 2013

Offshore Wind Vessels. Steven Kopits Douglas-Westwood LLC

{ } Jack Holland Page 1 of DOC

Learn more at

National Maritime Center

National Maritime Center

Maltester Channel Dredging. Shoreline Marina Committee. November 18, 2008

LIBERATING A TECHNICAL CHALLENGE

TECHNICAL CIRCULAR. Circular No: S-P 32/13 Revision: 1 Page: 1 of 7 Date:

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps In Reply to Application Number CENAB-OP-RMS (NATIONAL HARBOR (FORMERLY PORT Baltimore District AMERICA])

PROVEN, RELIABLE PRODUCTS FROM A TRUSTED PARTNER Samson Heavy-Lift Slings

Subsea Tooling Services Range of Dredgers

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF BARGE FLOATER WITH MOONPOOL FOR 5 MW WIND TURBINE

RPSEA UDW Forum June 22 & 23, Secure Energy for America

Dredging Keeping Our Underwater Highways Open

Challenges in Ship Design to Maintain Thrusters inside Ship

RIGID RISERS FOR TANKER FPSOs

CHAPTER 4: BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

Are All Floating Structures Vessels? Stephanie Showalter, J.D. Sea Grant Law Center University of Mississippi

Edit this text for your title

North Sea,

A NEW DEEPWATER TANKER LOADING SYSTEM FOR WEST AFRICA

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE USE OF LONG LENGTH AND SPLICED HOSES

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Fairport Harbor, OH

Site-Specific Assessment of Jack-Ups Part 5: When Things Go Wrong Lessons and Mitigations

This training is intended to be educational and should not be construed as legal guidance. It is provided as a courtesy to our customers and others

Ship Resistance and Propulsion Prof. Dr. P. Krishnankutty Ocean Department Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Environmental. Effects of Dredging

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT MOORING SYSTEMS ON HYDRODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF AN OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE

Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

Charlottetown Marine Terminal Pipeline Decommissioning Project Description

STRIDE PROJECT Steel Risers in Deepwater Environments Achievements

BRUCE HAMMER SUCCESS STORY, BRIDGE PILING Model SGH-4719 Pile Hammer (Max. Energy 89.3 ton.m)

Low Cost Flexible Production System for Remote Ultra-Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Field Development

Procedure for Setting a Mooring

1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED

BULK-LOADING SOLUTION

Pile Gripper Systems

RESULTS FROM PARACHUTE SEA ANCHOR DRAG TESTS FOR A SPACE CAPSULE, Jan. 10, 2013

Break in the Bahamas. Cutters Head to the Caribbean to Wire Saw Sunken Pier. A 25-foot by 25-foot steel pier section had sunk into the water.

Barging in on Trent. Mexico s deep dilemma Tiny Timor joins the fray Double first for Baobab

PRESS PACK n. 1 January 2010

(Refer Slide Time: 0:25)

Hangt de baggerindustrie aan een (zijden) draadje

New Innovative Anchor Solution for Deepwater Mooring Gravity Intalled Anchors Reduce Time and Costs of Marine Operations Jon Tore Lieng CTO

Deployment of subsurface FADs from small vessels for fishing communities in Choiseul

Port Sections Guide Section 01

ROV Development ROV Function. ROV Crew Navigation IRATECH SUB SYSTEMS 2010

Protectingpipelinesfor

Passing Vessel Analysis in Design and Engineering. Eric D. Smith, P.E. Vice President, Moffatt & Nichol

THE USE OF SPIN FIN PILES IN MASSACHUSETTS

EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL

Fall Protection Refresher Orientation. Fall Protection Refresher Orientation 1

Function: Navigation at the support level

Rule Change Notice For: RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE UNITS

Appendix 11-B Anchor Handling Systems, Set Up and Handling

Three Lines of Defence

Capt. Daley's Sea Stories

Evaluation of Placement Alternatives for Matagorda Ship Channel Bottleneck Removal

ADANI PORTS & SEZ LTD. ++ MUNDRA PORT ++ GENERAL INFORMATION

Fully Submersible Heavy Lift Vessel

Navarre Beach & Dune Restoration Project Status Report to be regularly updated June 17, 2016 Report

Vacutrans Instructions

Transcription:

..-0. -..- DRP-3-08 November 1992 Dredging Technical Research Notes A Single-Point Mooring System for Direct Pumpout of Hopper Dredges Purpose This technical note describes a direct pumpout (DPO) system for use with hopper dredges, operating and design criteria for the DPO, initial mooring system designs, and the final DPO and mooring system selected. Short descriptions are provided of how the system operates, including transportation, assembly, and installation. Background The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers performs maintenance dredging with its four hopper dredges and also contracts for maintenance dredging by fifteen industry-owned hopper dredges. Annually the Corps dredges about 250 million cu yd of maintenance material from United States waterways. Significant amounts of this dredged material could be used for beneficial uses if an easier and less expensive means were available to deliver the dredged material to a site where it could be used. For example, clean sand could be placed on eroding beaches or fine-grained materials could be used to supplement wetlands. The Corps desires to increase beneficial uses of dredged material by lowering the delivery cost, making cost sharing with local sponsors a more attractive option. Present equipment used to perform direct pumpout of hopper dredges was not designed for this purpose; existing equipment was adapted to meet the specific need. With increasing opportunities for beneficial uses of dredged material, the Corps desired a commercially available mooring system able to provide open-ocean DPO for the U.S. hopper dredge fleet. The Corps of Engineers contracted with SOFEC, nc. to describe several DPO systems capable of meeting Corps requirements; with Corps input, select a single system that would best meet Corps requirements; and provide a detailed preliminary design of the entire DPO system including the buoy, swivel, floating and underbuoy hoses, mooring hardware, and suggested transportation and installation procedures. The intent of this effort US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199

was to allow a Corps district office or contractor with the need for such a system to use the preliminary design as a vehicle for developing final design and fabrication drawings. The results of the study are contained in two reports (SO.~C, nc. 1992a, 1992b). Additional nformation For additional information, contact Mr. James E. Clausner, (601) 634-2009, or the manager of the Dredging Research Program, Mr. E. Clark McNair, Jr., (601) 634-2070. Direct Pumpout Direct pumpout is a common method of removing dredged material from hopper dredges. A hopper dredge fills its hoppers as it dredges the bottom. The dredge then moors to a structure, buoy, or multiple buoy berth. Hoses connected to a pipeline extending to shore are attached to the hopper dredge discharge manifold. The dredge mixes the dredged material with water to form a slurry and pumps the slurry from its discharge manifold through the hoses and pipeline to a designated discharge location. Design Criteria The mooring system design was based on three Corps hopper dredges, the Wheeler, Essayons, and McFarland. Design loads and system analysis were based on the displacement and draft of the largest of these vessels, the hopper dredge Wheeler. Because the Wheeler is one of the largest hopper dredges in the Unites States, the mooring system design is applicable to most of the U.S. hopper dredge fleet. The Wheeler is 408 ft long and has a 78-ft beam and a 29.5-ft draft. Operational weather conditions were chosen to fit the maximum operating environment for the dredges. The mooring was designed for the following operational and survival conditions: Design Environmental Conditions* Significant wave height ~ ft Wind velocity, knots Current velocity, knots 2 2 * Directions of the environmentalforces were chosen to be consistent with nearshore conditions: current parallel to the shoreline, and windand waves perpendicular to the shoreline.

The mooring system was designed for operation in a water depth of 30 to 45 ft; however, operation is possible in water depths up to 75 ft with a slight reduction in capabilities. The distance of the mooring system from shore is limited by the hopper-dredge pumping capaci&. The shallow slopes along parts of the east and gulf coasts will often require the dredge to operate in water depths very close to its maximum draft of approximately 30 ft. The following operational criteria were also required for the mooring design: Transportable by truck or rail. Assembled rapidly. nstalled with a minimum of lift support and diver assistance. Recoverable and reusable. Mooring Concepts Four concepts were considered for mooring the hopper dredge. Guyed tower.. Tension leg platform (TLP). Single-anchor leg mooring (SALM). Catenary-anchor leg mooring (CALM). A CALM system was chosen for further study and preliminary design due to its ability to be transported in truck-size packages and assembled quickly. Also, it proved to be the least costly to fabricate. SOFEC S Phase report (1992a) gives additional details of the various mooring systerns considered. The DPO System _ The DPO buoy in Figure 1 is a capsule-shaped buoy that is 28 ft long by 11 ft 6 in. wide by 7 ft 6 in. deep. Although not the conventional shape of a mooring buoy, the shape was chosen to facilitate towing the buoy and placement on flatbed trucks. The buoy CM be disassembled into four components: buoy hull, fluid piping, fluid swivel, and mooring table. The buoy hull serves as the foundation for the fluid piping. Slurry from the dredge enters the buoy through a floating hose connected to the fluid piping just above the water at the outer edge of the buoy. Piping is designed to contain a minimum amount of bends to reduce areas of high

abrasion. Slurry travels through the piping to a fluid swivel. Slurry leaves the buoy through an underbuoy hose that is connected to the fluid swivel and leads to a submerged steel pipeline to the discharge area. The fluid swivel is an in-line swivel currently used by the dredge industry. t contains bronze bushings that reduce the need for seals or the exte-nsive need for maintenance ~hat roller bearings would require. The lower end of the fluid swivel contains a quick-release flange to assist in connecting the underbuoy hose. 2S*-C 1-1 if -b- ~ F. 0 c1 8ALAST COMPARTMENT FLOOD(NGVALVE o a TOWiNGBRACKET SOLTEDWATERTGHTMANHOLE 2r MA. WNG SWVEL ASSEMBLY \ 1 9 /l b H -H Figure 1. DPO system mooring buoy

Near the fluid piping/floating hose connection, a mooring padeye provides for connection of a mooring hawser. The hawser transfers the mooring forces from the dredge to the buoy. The buoy is designed for a 28-in. pipeline. As a general rule, dredges with discharge pipe diameter within M in. of the shore discharge pipeline can efficiently use the shore discharge pipeline. Thus, this DPO buoy design is suitable for use with dredges having discharge pipe diameters ranging from 26 to 30 in. This range of diameters covers most of the U.S. dredge fleet with DPO capability. The buoy rotates about a shaft that runs through the centerwell of the buoy. The center shaft contains two permanently lubricated bronze bushings located at the top and bottom of the centerwell of the buoy. A 48-in. - diam flange is located at the bottom of the center shaft. This flange provides the mechanical connection between the buoy and the mooring table. The mooring table extends below the buoy and provides locations for connecting the mooring chains to the buoy. The mooring table also provides a bell fairing to reduce chafing of the underbuoy hose. Floating and underbuoy hoses for this mooring system are standard commercially available hoses currently used in the dredging industry. The mooring chains consist of four legs, each 600-ft-long, 2-in.-diam ORQ (Oil Rig Quality) stud link chain. Mooring anchors may either be 10,000-lb Navy Navmoor or 6,000-lb Bruce nternational FFTS anchors. Figure 2 shows the installed mooring system during the DPO process. \ / \ / \ / / 28 UNOER BUOY HOSE 26 SUBMARNEPPEUNE & -To shore \ \ \ [ ANCHORLEO \ 2& FLOATNG HOSE P AN Figure 2. System general arrangement 5

System Operation Transportation The CALM system can be transported by truck, rail, or barge to the assembly location. Figure 3 shows the CALM buoy packaged for transport by truck. Components of the system can be consolidated and transported on standard flatbed tractor trailer rigs. The entire system can be transported by as few as six trucks. For ocean transport the entire system also can be arranged on a standard 60- by 120-ft cargo barge. @ @ Assembly Figure 3. Mooring buoy truck transport configuration.. The CALM system is assembled by attaching the mooring platform to the 48-in.-diam flange located at the bottom of the buoy (Figure 4). The fluid swivel (Figure 1) is then attached to the buoy top deck, followed by the attachment of the piping to the fluid swivel and to the buoy deck at the outer edge of the buoy. The buoy is then lifted into the water by a shore-based crane. For short tows, the floating hose can be attached to the piping before towing. Assembly requires 300 ft of dock space adjacent to a 250- by 300-ft staging area. Minimum crane lifting capacity required for assembly and launch is 60,000 lb at 20 ft. The buoy can be assembled and installed on site in one week. Additional dock space, a second crane, and additional personnel can reduce the total time for assembly and installation by one or two days. 6

BUOY PPNG /.- T MOORNG TA8LE~ CENTERWELL / d ASSEMBLY SUPPORTS i U Figure 4. Mooring buoy assembly 7

.. nstallation Once the CALM buoy is assembled, a tow tug is connected to the towing padeyes on he buoy deck opposite the piping. The capsule shape of the buoy allows the buoy to be towed at greater speeds and provides a more stable tow than a conventional cylindrical buoy. While the buoy is under tow to the installation location, an anchor-handling tug is used to install the four mooring legs and the mooring anchors. The crew of the tug will tension the chains to set the anchors before buoy arrival. Chains will be laid close to the pipeline /underbuoy hose connection. Pickup buoys will be attached to each mooring leg. As the chains are being installed, the pipeline will be assembled on the shore, floated into position, and lowered to the sea floor. Any pipeline stabilization required will be undertaken while the buoy chains are being attached. When the buoy arrives at the tached to the mooring platform nary is achieved. installation location, the chain legs are stand tensioned until the proper chain cate- The underbuoy hoses are then pulled through the guide on the mooring platform and connected to the lower end of the fluid swivel. f the floating hoses were not installed at the shore, the connection is made between the floating hoses and the buoy piping. The hawser is connected to the mooring padeye to complete the system installation. Assembly and installation procedures are described in greater detail in SOFEC S Phase report (1992b). Conclusions.- A detailed preliminary design for a DPO system for use with U.S. hopper dredges has been developed. To. meet operational requirements of use in shallow (30 ft) and logistical requirements for rapid transport (lightweight, easy assembly, and truck transportable), a capsule-shaped buoy using a CALM mooring system with a separate mooring platform was designed. The buoy is 28 ft long by 11 ft 6 in. wide by 7 ft 6 in. deep, and weighs approximately 30 short tons. Subsequent detailed design and fabrication of this system will depend on Corps district-specific requirements. Acknowledgements The following Corps of Engineers staff provided important contributions during development of this system: Messrs. Ron Kreh and Robert Johnson (U.S. Army Engineer Dis&ict, Philadelphia), Mr. John Kelly (U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans), M-r. Jerry Gompers - (U.S. Army Engineer District, Portland), Mr. Thomas Chisholm (U.S. Army -

Engineer Waterways (U.S. Army Engineer Experiment Station), and Ms. Virginia Pankow Water Resources Support Center). References - SOFEC, nc. 1992a (May). Dredge Mooring Study, Conceptual Design; Phase Report, Contract Report DRP-92-1, report prepared by SOFEC, nc., for the U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. SOFEC, nc. 1992b (May). Dredge Mooring Study, Recommended Design; Phase Report, Contract Report DRP-92-2, report prepared by SOFEC, nc., for the U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS..-,