Maltester Channel Dredging. Shoreline Marina Committee. November 18, 2008

Similar documents
Water Resources Report RKLD Annual Meeting July 30, 2016

CORPS FACTS. Harbor Dredging U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG

Summary of Water Access for Marinas and Public Boat Ramps

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC. Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP)

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Condition of Improvements 30 December 2014 Wrangell Harbors, Alaska (CWIS No , )

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps In Reply to Application Number CENAB-OP-RMS (NATIONAL HARBOR (FORMERLY PORT Baltimore District AMERICA])

SWANSEA CHANNEL DREDGING TO IMPROVE NAVIGATION

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Port Sanilac Harbor, Michigan

Grays Harbor O&M and Deepening Dredging

Grays Harbor Federal Project

Comparison of Predicted and Measured Shoaling at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

Ninilchik Harbor Page 2 of 11

Navarre Beach & Dune Restoration Project Status Report to be regularly updated June 17, 2016 Report

Follets Island Nearshore Beach Nourishment Project

Juneau Douglas Harbor

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

R. Randall Center for Dredging Studies Texas A&M University

1-44. SITKA HARBOR, ALASKA (Western Channel, Crescent Bay Basin, Channel Rock Breakwaters) (CWIS NOS , 16840, 10322, 55030, 13787)

Tanya M. Beck. Kelly Legault. Research Physical Scientist Coastal & Hydraulics Lab, ERDC Vicksburg, MS

Project Incorporation of Sea Level Rise City of Newport Beach Approach for Balboa Islands, City of Newport Beach, California

TOWN OF DENNIS 10 YR COMPREHENSIVE DREDGE PERMIT SEPTEMBER 10, 2013

V. HARBOR DEPTHS, CHANNEL DESIGN AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND DREDGING

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Lorain Harbor, Ohio

Dredging Keeping Our Underwater Highways Open

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Marquette Harbor, Michigan

City of Pittsfield HARBORMASTER RULES AND REGULATIONS on docks

A Single-Point Mooring System for Direct Pumpout of Hopper Dredges

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

APPENDIX M DREDGED MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMMP) FINAL INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Port Sections Guide Section 01

PNWA Conference Update

Cordova Harbor Page 2 of 9

Attachment A. Pertinent Correspondence

Amended Written Closure Plan

BEACH NOURISHMENT BY RAINBOWING FOR THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST BY DCI. Capt. MVR MURTHY ABSTRACT

Regular Workshop October 20, 2014 Agenda Item: Dr. Albert E. Browder, PE; Olsen Associates, Inc.

2018 Beach Preservation Project Information

Shellfish Division Annual Shellfish Resource Management Regulations

NAUTICAL TERMINOLOGY

La Quinta Channel Extension Port of Corpus Christi Ingleside, Texas. Mark Coyle

Protectingpipelinesfor

La Rance tidal power plant in La Rance, France. Tidal and Wave Energy

SHOALING PREVENTION: AN ALTERNATIVE TO DREDGING

3.3 OCEANOGRAPHY/COASTAL PROCESSES

Aliso Canyon Gas-Electric Coordination Phase 3 Draft Final Proposal

APPENDIX D REAL ESTATE PLAN

Sediment Management Plan Rehoboth Bay

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Fairport Harbor, OH

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

CLAM PASS ANNUAL RESTORATION & MANAGEMENT PLAN TIDAL ANALYSIS ELEMENT REPORT NO. 13

1-22. KETCHIKAN, ALASKA (Thomas and Bar Point Basins) (CWIS NOS & 87071) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2007

Recreational Boating Feasibility and Capacity Study

MIDNIGHT PASS POSITION PAPER

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Kenosha Harbor, Wisconsin

Feasibility Study for Restoration of Titlow Lagoon Fish Passage. South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group

Part 9 Specific Land Uses - Foreshore & Waterway Development

UNITED NEW YORK SANDY HOOK PILOTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION AND UNITED NEW JERSEY SANDY HOOK PILOTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION

Unit 11 Lesson 2 How Does Ocean Water Move? Copyright Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company

CHAPTER 134 INTRODUCTION

The 2017 Panama City Beaches Beach Interim Renourishment Project. Answers to Common Questions

SAMPLE COASTAL SKIPPER CHARTWORK QUESTIONS Updated 17 October 2008

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Lexington Harbor, Michigan

Wexford Harbour. Yachting Guide. Navigation

Developing a. Guidance for operators who need to develop a. specified limits plan

Written Closure Plan. Cherokee Station - Active CCR Impoundments Public Service Company of Colorado Denver, Colorado.

ROYAL VANCOUVER YACHT CLUB

Chapter 11 Tides. A tidal bore is formed when a tide arrives to an enclosed river mouth. This is a forced wave that breaks.

SECTION II NM 11/13 NAVIGATION PUBLICATIONS COAST PILOT CORRECTIONS. Chapter 4 Paragraphs 85 to 86; read: (85)

BALD HEAD ISLAND, NC SAND SHARING SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND ASSESSMENT. Erik J. Olsen, P.E. olsen associates, inc.

الاسكندريه مصر Tel Fax: (+2) Mob: (+2)

APPENDIX A. F107 & 380 Lines OYSTER RIVER DURHAM, NH

Cat Island Chain Restoration

TABLE OF CONTENTS LEGAL NOTICE

Blair/Williamson Intersection Expressed Needs

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE 8-FOOT CHANNEL OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN KENNEBUNK RIVER KENNEBUNK & KENNEBUNKPORT, ME

Preventing Damage to Harbour Facilities and. Ship Handling in Harbours PART 2 INDEX

DRAFT. October 17, 2014 File No Mr. Brendhan Zubricki Town Administrator Essex Town Hall 30 Martin Street Essex, MA.

Earth s oceans covers 71 % _ of the planet s surface. In reality, Earth s ocean waters are all. interconnected as part of a single large global ocean.

Planning Considerations for Nearshore Placement of Mixed Dredged Sediments

Norwalk Harbor: The Jewel of Long Island Sound. A Presentation by the Norwalk Harbor Management Commission

UMass Boston Waterfront at a glance

Figure 1 - Photo of Surveyed Area. Figure 2 - Void Survey Results

EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF MORRO BAY - HARBOR DEPARTMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR VESSELS USING CITY PIERS, DOCKS AND OFFSHORE MOORINGS

ST. LOUIS SECTION PROJECT OF THE YEAR AWARD

APPENDIX D W-19 FLUVIAL AND TIDAL HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENTATION, WATER QUALITY AND SEA LEVEL RISE MODELING STUDIES

Shoalwater Bay Shorline Erosion Dredging

City of Pittsfield Harbormaster APPLICATION FOR AN INDIVIDUAL MOORING PERMIT

Ocean Waves. Capillary. Gravity. Wind generated. Tides Tsunamis Seiches

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

Final Waterways Assets and Resources Survey Master Plan for Dredging and Beach Nourishment

5 Year Recreation Plan Proposed Amendment Marina/Harbor/Boat Launch

CABRILLO BEACH YACHT CLUB DANA POINT YACHT CLUB

Cornish Crabbers Shrimper 19 Curlew

PEASE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DIVISION OF PORTS & HARBORS ANNUAL DREDGE REPORT

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Caseville Harbor, Michigan

Coastal Harbors and Waterways, NC (Shallow Draft Navigation) (O&M)

BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS OF HARBOR DREDGING ON THE GREAT LAKES

Transcription:

Maltester Channel Dredging Shoreline Marina Committee November 18, 2008

Shoaling Study Summary Report Completed in October 2008 Analyzed siltation rates at Marina Rate of siltation is dynamic ranging from 0 to 14 inches per year Long range projection is that without dredging the marina and channel would reach an equilibrium point similar to the mudflat areas north of El Torito Time to equilibrium difficult to estimate due to the number of factors

Short Term Shoaling Rates

Mid Term Shoaling Rates

San Leandro Tides At San Leandro Marina the extreme tide variation is approximately 11 from + 9.0 to 2.0 (mean lower low water) Tides are predominantly generated by the effects of the moon and the sun The highest and lowest tides (Spring Tides) occur consecutively and usually twice each month at full and new moon phases At other moon phases (Neap Tides) occur having lesser height variation

Boat Draft Draft - a measure of the boat s depth below the water surface For boats using the San Leandro launch ramp o Power boat hulls typically do not exceed 3.3 o Sail boats keels typically do not exceed 5 o Harbor berthed boats have drafts up to 7 feet Some boats have removable dagger boards or props etc. to temporarily reduce their overall draft

Dredging Alternatives No Dredging Closure of the Marina Closure of the boat launch ramp COE dredge project abandoned Harbor and channel will continue to silt No future cost to remove dredge material from DMMS Future cost to remove improvements from harbor Future costs to return DMMS to wetlands

Dredging Alternatives Full Dredging Federal Channel dredged to past depths All facilities capable of remaining open COE does not have sufficient funds for full dredge and does not permit supplemental funding by City City cost for full dredge including berthing area 310K CY $ 3.5M Material removal to Oyster Bay Park $7M Next dredge cycle costs range from $4.9M to $7.3M depending on disposal location

Dredging Alternative Modified Dredging Boat launch ramp to remain open Harbor converted to small boat marina 2009 dredging funded by COE Future material removal (85K CY) by City $2M disposed at Oyster Bay Park Future maintenance dredging on a 4 year cycle to maintain approximately 69% yearly access to launch ramp by trailerable boats (50,000 CY) Future year maintenance dredging costs including removal $2.2M - $3.7M

Dredge Depth - 5 feet Theoretical Navigation Limits A boat with a draft of 3.3 will be able to navigate the channel dredged to a depth of 5 feet at tides of -0.5 and higher (3.3 draft + 1.2 clearance) 97% of the calendar year Each year approximately 12 of silting is deposited In the second year the same boat can only navigate portions of the channel at tides of + 0.5 or higher. 90% of the time Similarly, in Year 3 navigation is restricted to 80% of the time And in Year 4 navigation is restricted to 69% of the time And in Year 5 navigation is restricted to 53% of the time

Dredge Depth - 5 feet Theoretical Navigation Limits

Typical Dredge Process USACOE hydraulically dredges channel and pumps 15%-20% slurry to the DMMS High water content slurry decants in the DMMS for a year or more until the material dries sufficiently to be transported At City s expense the dried material is removed, and trucked to a disposal area. In 2004, the material was disposed at the Oyster Bay Regional Park Cost for disposal depending on disposal location range from $24 to $53/cubic yard

Oyster Bay Park Disposal Alternative USACOE willing to pump slurry to other similar location where it becomes property of City Piping is possible to the near water area of Oyster Bay Park City would be responsible to transport slurry to disposal area and decant material to remove water to consolidate material

Disposal to Oyster Bay Park Alt Piping Channel Typical Piping to DMMS

Oyster Bay Park Disposal Alternative EBRPD open to receiving dredge material directly to park but significant issues exist with method City must pump slurry about ½ mile uphill to disposal area requiring additional pumping and pipeline Dewatering process must accept slurry at the rate the COE pumps and coordination will be extremely difficult Trails & public areas will be disrupted by temporary piping Additional permitting will be required that could impact 2009 dredging schedule City costs of disposal incurred at time of dredging Mechanical dewatering process expensive $15-$30/cy City of Santa Cruz incurred a cost of $35/cy with a similar process

Questions?