Transportation Safety Planning Purdue Road School March 29, 2006 What is the problem? 42,636 Fatalities Nearly 3M Injuries Over 4M PDO crashes $230B Cost to the Nation Trends in Motor Vehicle Fatality Rates Rate Per Year 30 Fatality Rate per 100,000 Population 25 Fatality Rate per 100 Million VMT 20 15 10 5 0 1923 1966 1980 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year Highway Crash Characteristics Distracted driving (25%) Impaired driving (41%) Roadway departures (38%) Speeding (31%) Failure to wear safety belts (59% unrestrained) Intersections (21%) Pedestrians (11%) Pedalcyclists (2%) Trucks (11%) Motorcycles (8%) Transit (.7%) Total = 247%
Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Transit Where Fatalities Occur by Roadway Functional Class 2001 Data 4,641 fatalities 68,000 injuries 725 fatalities 41,000 injuries 295 fatalities 56,607 injuries 59,898 incidents Number of Fatalities Local Roads 19% 17% Interstate and Other Freeway Fatality Rates (per 100 Million VMT) 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.6 1.5 2.1 1.0 0.9 Collectors 22% 42% Arterials 0.5 0 Interstate and Other Freeway Arterials Collectors Locals Young Drivers Motor vehicle crashes = leading cause of death for 15-20 year olds Highest crash risk in all types of crashes of any age group Most severe problem 16 year-olds least driving experience, more risk taking, sense of infallibility Older Drivers Older Person Safety and Mobility 2002 9% of population 12% of traffic fatalities Travel mileage has increased by 20% since 1995 Older Person Safety and Mobility 2030 Population 65 will more than double by 2030 (30M => 70M)
659 436 381 4,078 87 264 1,117 328 Number of Highway Fatalities - 2002 270 176 449 119 742 97 657 78 127 216 459 803 1,522 180 1,277 84 404 1,614 307 322 1,418 773 1,411 792 47 439 124 512 914 1,208 915 659 1,175 1,575 734 640 1,053 3,725 875 885 0 to 404 404 to 885 885 to 4,079 1,033 1,523 3,132 2003 833 2004 947 2005 936* 510 Translating Crash Statistics into Local Terms Iowa Crime Crash Clock 1 murder every 8.3 days 1 aggravated assault every 90 minutes 1 violent crime every 70 minutes 1 property crime every 7 minutes 1 crime every 6 minutes 1 fatality every 18 hours 1 injury every 15 minutes 1 property damage crash every 10 minutes 1 crash every 7 minutes TSP Background Transportation Planning Process System Operations Implementation of Strategies Each statewide and metropolitan planning process shall provide for consideration of projects and strategies that will increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. TEA-21 Mobility and Accessibility Economic Development Vision Environmental Quality Goals and Objectives Performance Measures Data Other Sources for Project Ideas Alternative Improvement Strategies Analysis Methods Evaluation Policies Operations strategies Infrastructure projects Studies Regulations Education and awareness Enforcement Financing strategies Partnerships Collaborative undertakings Short- (3-5 year) Range Program Long- Range Plan
Mobility and Accessibility Economic Development Vision Environmental Quality Safety included in vision Transportation Safety Planning Continuous monitoring of safety in operations Safety performance measures Goals and objectives Safety stated in goals Consider education enforcement and emergency response System operations Safety strategies considered Performance measures Data Safety data continuously collected Other sources for project ideas Alternative improvement strategies Analysis methods Safety included in analysis Collaboration with safety stakeholders, and the public Safety projects programmed Safety part of criteria set Evaluation Policies Operations strategies Infrastructure projects Studies Regulations Education and awareness Enforcement Financing strategies Partnerships Collaboration Safety explicitly part of project implementation Implementation of strategies Short (3-5 year) Range Program Long Range Plan Safety integrated within plan Safety strategies considered Transportation Safety Planning Leadership Collaborative Data Driven Comprehensive Implementation Leadership Top Level Officials Champions www.marc.org Collaborative DOTs MPOs Local Governments Transit Agencies Tribal Governments Highway Safety Motor Carrier Safety Law Enforcement Universities www.sjtpa.org www.sjtsa.org www.iowasms.org
Crash Data Enforcement Data Roadway Data Enforcement Experience Public/Elected Officials Road Safety Audits Research Data Driven Problem Identification Hot Spot Analysis Proactive Program/Project Selection Evaluation Goals, Objectives, Performance Measures Course Corrections Data Driven A problem well stated is a problem half solved. Emerson Factor Measure Points Safety Documentation of serious injury pattern... 5 More than 7 accidents per MVM... 4 More than 5 accidents per MVM... 3 More than 3 accidents per MVM... 2 More than 1 accident per MVM... 1 Project Impact High Impact... 5 On Safety Medium Impact... 3 Low Impact... 0 Location of Crashes and Hot Spots Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety: 1998-2000 SL 8 IH 45 IH 10 US 59 IH 610 IH 610 Legend N E W S 0 1 2 3 Miles Street State road Freeway Bicycle hot spot Bicycle crash Pedestrian hot spot Pedestrian crash IH 610 SH 288 Education Enforcement Engineering Emergency Services Multimodal Systemwide Comprehensive Leadership, Ownership and Management Action Plans Performance Measures Local Involvement Partner Responsibilities Feedback Updates Effective Implementation
Success Factors Communication Collaboration Compromise Perseverance Creativity Safety Planning A Collaboration Model The TSP Working Group - National Working Group American Automobile Association American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials American Planning Association American Public Transportation Association American Public Works Association Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Community Transportation Association of America FHWA (Safety, Planning, Federal Lands, Resource Center) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Transit Administration Governors Highway Safety Association Institute of Transportation Engineers National Association of Counties National Association of County Engineers National Association of Development Organizations National Association of Regional Councils National Governors Association National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Transportation Research Board (NCHRP) Progress Report Conferences/Panels/Presentations/Workshops Forums Awards Program Web Sites Research NCHRP 08-44; 17-33, 08-54 Rural & Small Area Scan TMA Peer Exchange Forums Completed AK US/Mexico Interested
Planning It Safe Awards Award jury included ITE, AASHTO, AAA, APTA. NYDOT Route 9 Pedestrian Safety Study SEMCOG 2025 Regional Transportation Plan MARC First Steps: Safety Planning Initiatives Los Angeles MTA Metro Gold Line NCHRP 546 Incorporating Safety into Long-Range Transportation Planning Guidebook Forecasting Tool http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/tpea04/2004pisa.htm www.trb.org http://www.trb.org/safety/tsp/ http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/
The Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program Assisting transportation officials and staff to resolve increasingly complex issues related to transportation needs in their communities Clearinghouse Publications Information Training Technical Assistance Peer Programs www.planning.dot.gov The TPCB Peer Program Forum for sharing ideas & noteworthy practices. Strengthens transportation planning practices. Builds relationships & reinforces cooperation between agencies. Designed to meet specific needs of a region, State, or locality. Peer Program Types Peer Exchange Peer Roundtable Peer Workshop Application and instructions at: www.planning.dot.gov/peer.asp Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program Safety Conscious Planning Peer Exchange Detroit, MI May 3 5, 2005 Host: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Participants: Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) Delaware Valley Regional Planning Council (DVRPC) North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority (NJTPA) Michigan Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Michigan Office of Highway Safety Planning American Automobile Association Traffic Improvement Association SAFETEA-LU: Highway Safety Improvement Program Strategic Highway Safety Plans Identify State s key safety needs Guide investment decisions All public roads Linking the SHSP with the Transportation Planning Process Common goals Identifying and bringing together partners Awareness of safety issues and challenges Consistent plans and programs Communication and consultation
TSP New Working Relationships The objectives of TSP and SHSP are the same: to bring together all of the appropriate partners to ensure a coordinated effort to improve surface transportation safety. Let s Make a Difference. Jim Thorne, P.E. Metropolitan Planning Specialist FHWA Resource Center Jim.thorne@fhwa.dot.gov 708-283 283-35383538