Where Did the Road Go? The Straight and Narrow about Curves

Similar documents
Lessons Learned from the Minnesota County Road Safety Plans. Richard Storm CH2M HILL

Summary of Local HSIP Solicitation State Fiscal Years (SFY) 2016, 2017, 2018 & 2019

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

Local Road Safety Plans

Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT) & Crash Data

Local Rural Road Safety

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

Highway Safety Improvement

Systemic Safety. Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation March 2016

Traffic Signs (1 of 3)

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

SUCCESFUL HSIP APPLICATIONS CUUATS & CHAMPAIGN COUNTY

Now Let s Think Systemic

Sponsored by the Office of Traffic and Safety of the Iowa Department of Transportation NOVEMBER 2001 CTRE

Recently Developed Intersection CMFs. Nancy Lefler, VHB ATSIP Traffic Records Forum, 2014

Engineering Countermeasures for Transportation Safety. Adam Larsen Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Olmsted County Highway Safety Plan

ENGINEERING DRIVER SAFETY INTO PAVEMENT PRESERVATION

CE576: Highway Design and Traffic Safety

COUNTY ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN 2018

Vehicle Miles of Travel Trends in Minnesota:

DRIVING ZERO FATALITIES TO A REALITY ILLINOIS LOCAL SAFETY INITIATIVE

Speed Management Action Plan

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Table of Contents Kansas Highway Safety Improvement Program

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

Final Report for the Minnesota County Roadway Safety Plans. Prepared for

Engineering Your Community Safe

MN 5 Corridor Performance. Current Corridor Characteristics Highway: MN AADT: 2,400 73,000

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Local Road Safety Plans

FLORIDA STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

Closing Plenary Session

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

Highway Safety Improvement Program. Metro District Program Criteria

Proven Safety Countermeasures. FHWA Office of Safety January 12, :00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Reducing Crashes at Rural Thru-STOP Controlled Intersections

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Shenango Valley MPO. State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development

CTDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiatives

Township Signing Practices

9:45-10:30 Understanding the Problem Overview of 15 Critical Strategies (from the CHSP, SHSP) Specific Strategies for Engineers

Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017

Street Smart - Regional Pedestrian Safety Campaign. Hopkins Grand Rounds July 16, 2014

Bicyclist Safety Action Plan (BSAP) 2018 Update. Presentation by Michael Sanders February 28, 2018

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths: It's more than just a slogan

APPENDIX G Lane Departure Action Plan

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Colorado Department of Transportation Crash Data Program Alisa Babler, PE

Road Safety Audit Course Participant Guidebook. August 22 & 23, Cleveland Avenue Columbus, Ohio

Department of Transportation

Implementing Strategies from Missouri s Blueprint for Safer Roadways Using System-wide Safety Solutions to Save Lives

Road Safety Audit Review

Rational road safety management Practice and Theory. Bhagwant Persaud Ryerson University Toronto, Canada

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

Highway 12 Safety Coalition

Safety Corridors a Synthesis. Charlie Nemmers / Derek Vap University of Missouri

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

PALM BEACH COUNTY LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN

SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGET SETTING. Transportation Subcommittee September 15, 2017

Title. Authors. Safety Benefits of Highway Infrastructure Investments (May 2017)

I-90 Corridor Performance Corridor Result

Reducing Fatalities and Serious Injuries on County Roads

A Strategic Highway Safety Plan. a coordinated and informed approach to reducing highway fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

Bicycling & Walking in the Twin Cities TPP Bike/Ped Chapter Overview. Land Use Advisory Committee September 21, 2017

Population Trends. MN 73 Corridor Performance

Phase I-II of the Minnesota Highway Safety Manual Calibration. 1. Scope of Calibration

Road Safety Assessments. Lt. Bob McCurdy Williamson County Sheriff s s Office Marion, IL.

Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool

NCHRP Superelevation Criteria for Sharp Horizontal Curves on Steep Grades. Research Team: MRIGlobal Pennsylvania State University

Safety Performance of Two-Way Stop-Controlled Expressway Intersections

Safety and Design Alternatives for Two-Way Stop-Controlled Expressway Intersections

TEXAS TRAFFIC SAFETY TASK FORCE. Jeff Moseley Texas Transportation Commission

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

Integrating Safety into the Transportation Decision Making Process

Roadway Departure Focus State Initiative Roadside Safety Systems Inspection, Maintenance & Designers Mentoring Program

Toward Zero Deaths Maintaining a Safer Roadway Workshop

Toolbox of Countermeasures and Their Potential Effectiveness to Make Intersections Safer

Minnesota Strategic Highway Safety Plan

RSTF Measurements and Status

Roadside Safety Proven Countermeasures. Emmett McDevitt Transportation Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary

Design of Turn Lane Guidelines

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

Fatal Head-On Crashes on. Rural Two-Lane Two-Way Highways in Minnesota

BIKE ON ROAD NETWORKS: URBAN & RURAL. Non-motorized Transportation Networks. Madison County Council of Governments

GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION STREETS TABLE 1A CG-6 CURB AND GUTTER SECTION

CHAPTER 7 CIRCULATION

To Illuminate or Not to Illuminate: Roadway Lighting as It Affects Traffic Safety at Intersections

Strategies for Making Multimodal Environments Safer. Kim Kolody Silverman, CH2M

Geometric Categories as Intersection Safety Evaluation Tools

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Transcription:

Where Did the Road Go? The Straight and Narrow about Curves Renae Kuehl, SRF Consulting Group October 23, 2018 What is a County Roadway Safety Plan or CRSP?" CRSP Identifies priority location-specific safety concerns and suggested priority infrastructure improvements. o County segments, curves, & intersections o Locations that are most at risk o Proven safety strategies In 2014, initial CRSP plan created for all 87 MN counties in partnership with MnDOT and the Federal Highway Administration. The CRSP Update is an effort to continue to advance safety on county roadways. 2 1

Why the need for County Roadway Safety Plans? 60% of severe crashes (fatality or serious injury) occur on local roadways; most severe are on county roads. Local agencies are responsible for more than 90% of the state s roadway miles. The majority of roadway safety investments have been made on the state system. 3 What is the goal of County Road Safety Plans? To support the statewide initiative of moving Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths Program through continued reduction of fatalities and serious injuries on county roadways. CRSP aligns with the Minnesota Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Support TZD Goal of fewer than 300 fatalities and 850 serious injuries by 2020 4 2

CRSP Phase 1 Counties Beltrami Carlton Chisago Crow Wing Freeborn Goodhue Hennepin McLeod Meeker Morrison Olmsted Otter Tail St. Louis Stearns Wright 5 CRSP Phase 1 Curve System Inventory County Curves on System Curves Analyzed Beltrami 596 354 Carlton 438 232 Chisago 401 325 Crow Wing 821 788 Freeborn 339 199 Goodhue 639 483 Hennepin 1,156 473 McLeod 255 193 Meeker 204 179 Morrison 468 388 Olmsted 335 285 Otter Tail 840 782 St. Louis 4,278 1,538 Stearns 921 707 Wright 583 533 Total 12,274 7,459 Did not analyze curves on gravel roads or in urban environments 61% of curves analyzed account for 76% of severe crashes 6 3

Example County Curve Map 7 Horizontal Curves Frequency of Severe Crashes County Curves Exhibiting # of Severe Crashes 0 1 2 3 Beltrami 348 5% 5 0% 1 0% 0 0% Carlton 231 3% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% Chisago 317 4% 6 0% 2 0% 0 0% Crow Wing 777 10% 10 0% 0 0% 1 0% Freeborn 192 3% 7 0% 0 0% 0 0% Goodhue 468 6% 15 0% 0 0% 0 0% Hennepin 455 6% 16 0% 2 0% 0 0% McLeod 188 3% 5 0% 0 0% 0 0% Meeker 173 2% 6 0% 0 0% 0 0% Morrison 380 5% 8 0% 0 0% 0 0% Olmsted 275 4% 10 0% 0 0% 0 0% Otter Tail 769 10% 12 0% 1 0% 0 0% St. Louis 1524 20% 14 0% 0 0% 0 0% Stearns 691 9% 14 0% 1 0% 1 0% Wright 514 7% 18 0% 1 0% 0 0% Total 7302 98% 147 2% 8 0% 2 0% 7,459 curves analyzed 7,302 (98%) had NO severe crashes 147 curves (2%) had ONE severe crash 8 curves (.1%) had TWO severe crashes 2 curves (.03%) had THREE severe crashes 8 4

What is a Systemic Risk Analysis? Analytical approach identifies and prioritizes safety deficiencies on roads based on risk of crash Identifies risk factors based on roadway and traffic characteristics Prioritizes the road system for safety investment by documenting the number of risk factors present at each location. 9 Risk Factor Identification Curves: ADT Range Radius Range Severe Crash on Curve Intersection on Curve Visual Trap on Curve 10 5

Example Risk Factor - Curve Radius The majority of severe crashes occurred on curves with 500-1,500 radii. 11 Example Risk Factor - Curve Radius The majority of severe crashes occurred on curves with 500-1,500 ADT 12 6

Systemic Contributing Factors Horizontal Curves Rural Factor Min Max Radius [ft] 500 1500 Traffic Volume [vpd] 500 1500 Lane Width [ft] 11 Shoulder Type None, Curb, Composite Outside Shoulder Width [ft] None 4 Total Cross Section Width [ft] 28 34 Adjacent Intersection Visual Trap Lighting Intersection, Railroad Present None Outside Edge Risk 2S 3 13 Example Curve Prioritization 14 7

Rural Curve Strategies Chevrons 20% to 30% $3,960 per curve 11/5/2018 16 8

Delineators 18% to 34% non-intersection, head-on, run-off-road, sideswipe, nighttime crash types $500 per curve 11/5/2018 17 High Friction Surface Treatment All crash types - 24% Wet road crash type 52% $25 to $35 per square yard 11/5/2018 18 9

Reconstruct (TT to a Single T Intersection) Not Available $150,000 to $300,000 per curve 11/5/2018 19 Shoulder Paving (2, 4, 6 ) 20% to 30% run-off-the-road crashes (with shoulder rumble) (2 only) $54,000 per mile + $5,850 per mile (for Edge Rumble) 11/5/2018 20 10

Clear Zone Maintenance/ Enhancements Fatal, serious, & minor injury crashes: increase of 28% to decrease of 18% $10,000 to $250,000 per curve 11/5/2018 21 Lighting 25% to 40% of nighttime crashes $6,000 per light 11/5/2018 22 11

Dynamic Curve Signing Not Available $50,000 per curve 11/5/2018 23 Curve Project Decision Tree 24 12

Example Curve Project Map 25 Suggested Curve Projects Summary Total cost: $20,435,550 26 13

What are the initial results of county road safety improvements? Counties Begin HSIP Implementation Based on County Roadway Safety Plans 2006 2017 Trends State Total - Down 19% State System - Down 19% County System - Down 33% 2012 2017 Trends State Total - No Change State System - Down 3% County System - Down 22% 27 Questions? 14