Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

Similar documents
Review of the Changes to the Fisheries Act

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act

Fisheries Protection Program: An overview DFO Pacific Region

Implementation of the Amended Fisheries Act and the Fisheries Protection Program

Review of the Changes to the Fisheries Act Process Overview

Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fisheries Protection Program

Technical Overview: Fisheries Act Amendments

Does DFO Need to Review My Project?

CMM Conservation and Management Measure for the Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area.

Meeting in Support of Species at Risk Act Listing Process for Lower Fraser River and Upper Fraser River White Sturgeon

CMM on Management of New and Exploratory Fisheries in the SPRFMO Convention Area

Risk Assessments in the Pacific Fisheries for BC & Yukon

Marine Environment Plans

The Role of Marine Science in Supporting the Implementation of the Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Regulations Thomas W.

A PETITION TO THE AUDITOR GENERAL OF CANADA pursuant to s. 22 of the Auditor General Act

Strait of Georgia and Howe Sound Glass Sponge Reef Conservation Initiative

Activities Responsibility Timing. Province - Department of Environment and Conservation. Canada. and/or

Public Consultation Document

Council CNL(16)31. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year EU - Finland

AmericAn PlAice. consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

SUBMISSION GUIDE NATIVE PLANTS AND ANIMALS. May

ATLANTIC STURGEON. Consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

The Decision Making and Western Knowledge Systems in Canadian Fisheries Management

CNL(08)29. Council. Report On Canada s Implementation Plan June 2008

PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING AND ADDRESSING EMERGENCY SITUATIONS AS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 8 AND OF THE 1996 LONDON PROTOCOL

Federal AIS Regulations in Canada: Finally! Kate Wilson Aquatic Invasive Species Specialist Alberta Environment & Parks PNWER July 13, 2015

Summary of Preliminary Results of Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis, 2018

Press Release New Bilateral Agreement May 22, 2008

Council CNL(14)29. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans for the Calendar Year Russian Federation

all Participants are entitled to the baseline limit of 2,500 tonnes;

Essential Fish Habitat OCNMS Advisory Council July 13, 2013

Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

Consent and consultation: Case study of the Cree Nation s stand against uranium

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

U.N. Gen. Ass. Doc. A/CONF.164/37 (8 September 1995) < pdf?openelement>.

Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America on the Conservation of the Porcupine Caribou Herd

APPENDIX 2.1 Lake Sturgeon - Mitigation and Enhancement

Revisions to the National Standard 1 Guidelines:

Loughs Agency Gníomhaireacht na Lochanna Factrie fur Loughs

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA AND TRANSPORT CANADA REGARDING

FISHERIES, WILDLIFE, MIGRATORY BIRDS AND RENEWABLE RESOURCES ACT

1+1. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Peches et Oceans Canada A NEW DIRECTION FOR CANADA'S PACIFIC SALMON FISHERIES OCTOBER 1998.

Grizzly Bear Management Plan for the Gwich in Settlement Area

Eastern New Brunswick Coastal and Inland Recreational Fisheries Advisory Committee

Final Draft Integrated Fishery Management Plan. Summary

October 5, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Byelaws: Questions and answers

Pacific Pilotage Authority. submission to the. Canada Transportation Act Review Panel. January 2015

Endangered Species Act and FERC Hydroelectric Projects. Jeff Murphy & Julie Crocker NHA New England Meeting November 16, 2010

GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN SUBMISSION TO THE RAILWAY SAFETY ACT REVIEW PANEL

NZ s Fishery Management Framework The Fisheries Act 1996 & Spatial Management Tools

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

Renseignements supplémentaires. Supplementary Information. Présentation du Ministère des Richesses naturelles de l Ontario

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION. Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

WHALE WATCHING AND SWIMMING REGULATIONS 2013

Comparison of EU and US Fishery management Systems Ernesto Penas Principal Adviser DG Mare

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

Fishing and Port Access Requirements for U.S. North Pacific Albacore Tuna Vessels in the Canadian EEZ. May 29, 2018

Update on Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force

Fisheries Unit Welsh Government Rhodfa Padarn Llanbadarn Fawr Aberystwyth SY23 3UR 15 November 2013

Re: Consultation on the addition of narwhal and two bowhead whale populations to the SARA List

The Commercial Fishing Production Incentive Regulations

Fisheries, Wildlife, Migratory Birds and Renewable Resources Act

Emergency Action on Regulations

endangered species act A Reference Guide August 2013 United States marine corps

Invasive Species Act, Jeremy Downe Invasive Species Program/Policy Advisor Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry February 8, 2017

MOVING TO RIGHTS BASED MANAGEMENT: GREEN-LIPPED MUSSEL CASE STUDY. Martin Workman, Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand,

A New Ecological Framework for Recreational Fisheries Management in Ontario

Mapping Tools: Drains Maps Species at Risk Maps. A.D. Latornell Conservation Symposium November 2013 Jenn Thomas Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Legislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013

Chinook Salmon. The Yukon River Panel

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

2016 Fraser River Chinook Key Information for Management. FN Forum March 8-10 Nanaimo, BC

Permitting under the Endangered Species Act, 2007

THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT ACT. (No. 47 of 2013)

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

Species at Risk Act (SARA) Consultation Workbook

WHALE SHARK (Rhincodon typus) RECOVERY PLAN

SCHEDULE A NORTHLAND FISH AND GAME COUNCIL JOB DESCRIPTION

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

Loughs Agency Freshwater Fisheries Monitoring Programme

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

WILDLIFE AND MIGRATORY BIRDS REGULATION

Health & Safety Policy & Plan. Rightway Roofing.

1 VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Ver VicRoads Access Management Policies May 2006 Version 1.02

2017 CONSERVATION HARVESTING PLAN Atlantic Halibut (4RST) Prince Edward Island fixed gear fleet Less than meters

Auditor General. of British Columbia. Salmon Forever: An Assessment of the Provincial Role in Sustaining Wild Salmon

The news release published by Public Safety Canada provided the following information:

INTERIM MEASURES ADOPTED BY PARTICIPANTS IN NEGOTIATIONS TO ESTABLISH SOUTH PACIFIC REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION

Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Update on North Atlantic Right Whale Recovery Planning and Management Activities

Protecting the Deep Sea Under International Law. Legal Options for Addressing High Seas Bottom Trawling

Eastern Brook Trout. Roadmap to

Appendix 7: Fisheries Management

Presented by: Barbara A. Brenner Stoel Rives LLP. Bakersfield Association of Professional Landmen May 10, 2011

BC Taekwondo Canadian Sport for Life Implementation Plan

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia

Presentation by Dr. Wintorph Marsden Dr. Mishka Stennett Ms. Nadia McNeish Ministry of Industry, Commerce, Agriculture & Fisheries KINGSTON, JAMAICA

Regional Plan of Action (RPOA) to Promote Responsible Fishing Practices including Combating IUU Fishing in the Region 1. Contents

Transcription:

Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act Part 1 Legislation and Policy * The information in this presentation represents concepts as they have been developed to this point in time. They are still under development and this information should not be taken to represent a final position on concepts. Fisheries and Oceans Canada Sept 17, 2013 Fisheries Protection: A New Approach Amendments to the Fisheries Act passed through Parliament and received Royal Assent on June 29, 2012 and December 14, 2012. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) is transforming its approach to fisheries protection in order to: Focus the Act s regulatory regime on managing threats to the sustainability and ongoing productivity of Canada s commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries; Provide enhanced compliance and protection tools for these fisheries Provide clarity, certainty and consistency of regulatory requirements through the use of tools such as standards and regulations; and Enable enhanced partnerships with agencies and organizations that are best placed to provide fisheries protection services to Canadians. 2 1

The new Fisheries Protection Provisions Two new fisheries protection provisions are of particular importance under the amended Fisheries Act: sections 6 and 6.1, which provide a new framework and purpose for decision making related to the fisheries protection provisions, section 35, the prohibition against causing serious harm to fish that are part of or that support a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery. 3 Purpose of the new Fisheries Protection Provisions The purpose for decision-making (section 6.1): to provide for the sustainability and ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational and Aboriginal fisheries In this context: Sustainability: the use of the environment and resources to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs; Productivity: the sustained yield of all component populations and species and habitats that support and contribute to a fishery in a specified area. 4 2

Prohibition against serious harm to fish Current regime includes two prohibitions: section 32 (killing of fish) and section 35 (harm to fish habitat). A new prohibition merges these two sections (sections 32 and 35) into a single prohibition (section 35 (1)): No person shall carry on any work, undertaking or activity that results in serious harm to fish that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support such a fishery. The prohibition applies to fish (and their habitat) that are part of commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries, and to fish (and their habitat) that support commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries. 5 Serious harm to fish Serious harm to fish is defined in the Fisheries Act: the death of fish or any permanent alteration to, or destruction of, fish habitat (section 2) Proposed policy interpretation: the death of fish the permanent alteration to fish habitat as an alteration of such duration that limits or diminishes the ability of fish to carry out one or more of their life processes the destruction of fish habitat as an elimination of habitat such that fish can no longer rely on this habitat to carry out one or more of their life processes 6 3

Protected fish and their habitats Aboriginal, in relation to a fishery: means that fish is harvested by an Aboriginal organization or any of its members for the purpose of using the fish as food, for social or ceremonial purposes or for purposes set out in a land claims agreement entered into with the Aboriginal organization; commercial, in relation to a fishery: means that fish is harvested under the authority of a licence for the purpose of sale, trade or barter; recreational, in relation to a fishery: means that fish is harvested under the authority of a licence for personal use of the fish or for sport; fish or fish habitat that support: those that provide functions for sustaining the production of commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery species. 7 Factors to be considered A new section 6 guides decision-making related to the Fisheries Protection Provisions. Four factors must be considered before making decisions: a) the contribution of the relevant fish to the ongoing productivity of commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fisheries; b) fisheries management objectives; c) measures and standards to avoid, mitigate or offset serious harm to fish that are part of or support a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery; and d) the public interest. 8 4

6(a): Contribution of relevant fish relevant fish: all fish and their habitat that are involved (either as part of the fishery or in a supporting role) in a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, and that could be affected by a project; contribution: the role of the relevant fish or fish habitat in the overall productivity of the commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery. In summary, the contribution of relevant fish is the role of the fish affected by a project in the productivity of the commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery. The precision required in determining the contribution will depend on the project: Relatively medium to small scale project impacts will likely use indirect surrogates of productivity (e.g., habitat quantity or quality) Large scale project impacts that cause ecosystem transformation may require more detailed estimates (e.g., fish population models) 9 6(b): Fisheries Management Objectives Fisheries management objectives are the stated socioeconomic, biological and ecological goals for a fishery The objectives typically are established by federal or provincial/territorial fishery managers, or in some cases, other authorities such as co-management boards Where objectives do not exist, consultation with fishery management authorities may be required and will be guided by the purpose statement of section 6.1 of the Fisheries Act 10 5

6(c): Avoid, mitigate and offset Based on the mitigation hierarchy, attempts to minimize overall impacts to fish and fish habitat should follow, in sequence: Avoidance: measures to completely prevent adverse effects to fish and fish habitat Mitigation: measures to reduce the duration, intensity or extent of adverse effects to fish and fish habitat that cannot be completely avoided the best-available measures or standards should be implemented as much as is practically, technically and economically feasible Offsetting: measures to offset serious harm to fish by maintaining or improving the productivity in the area of the affected fishery options may include habitat modification (restoration, removal of obstructions, etc.), enhancement of fish production, and use of habitat banks 11 6(d): The public interest The public interest is a consideration that is integral to the entire Fisheries Act In most instances where Section 6 applies, the public interest will be served through consideration of factors (a) through (c) which consider the public s interest in the fishery Factor (d) allows the Minister to consider other factors deemed relevant to the well-being of society at a given place and time 12 6

Generalized project review process 1. Are impacts likely? no Prohibition does not apply yes 2. Will impacts be avoided? yes Prohibition does not apply proponent no 3. Will project occur in water that contain fish or fish habitat that are part of or support CRA fisheries? yes 4. Will project result in serious harm to fish? no no Prohibition does not apply Prohibition does not apply yes Prohibition applies Authorization request DFO 5. Consideration of section 6 factors: a) contribution of the relevant fish b) fisheries management objectives c) measures and standards to avoid, mitigate or offset serious harm to fish d) the public interest Authorization issued Authorization refused Enhancing Compliance and Protection The new provisions also enhance compliance: Enforceable Conditions In contravention if, in carrying out a work, undertaking or activity, proponent fails to comply with a prescribed condition of an authorization or as set out in regulations. Contraventions Changes to the penalty section in order to bring it in line with other changes in the Fisheries Act and with the Environmental Enforcement Act providing more predictability and consistency with other major federal environmental legislation as well as increased penalties and fines. Duty to Notify Every person shall report an occurrence that results in serious harm to fish that are part of a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery, or to fish that support such a fishery. 14 7

Information requirements / Time limits The proposed regulations were pre-published in Part 1 of the Canada Gazette, on April 13, 2013, for a 30 day public comment period. The regulations identify the information required for proponents to submit requests for Fisheries Act authorizations. proponent contact information; details of project (works, undertakings and activities, schedule, etc.); identification of the serious harm; offsetting plans; monitoring; etc. The regulations also include time limits to determine the completeness of the information and for the issuance of authorizations Once the information is received and other legal/statutory requirements (such as federal EA process and Aboriginal consultation) are complete, the Department will be bound by a set time limit (i.e., 90 days) for the issuance (or denial) of the authorization. 15 Implementing the New Fisheries Protection Provisions under the Fisheries Act Part 2 Organization and Operations 8

Outline 1. FPP organization al overview 2. DFO regulatory review process 3. DFO Partnerships Guidelines Standards Unit 17 Key changes with FPP 1. Legislative changes - serious harm to fish that are part of or contribute to CRA fishery and new information and timeline regulations. 2. Shift from area-based delivery (local habitat biologists) to centralized regional referral management 3. FPP Organized into Regulatory and Non Regulatory units. 4. The FPP has reduced footprint (5 offices) and resources (compared to previous HMP) 5. Nationally consistent and structured regulatory review process (triage): Reliance on best placed delivery/partnerships (lower risk projects) Refocus of effort on higher risk projects requiring a FA authorization. 18 9

New FPP Organization 19 FPP Regulatory Framework Centralized regulatory processing and decision making (triage in Vancouver ) Project Referrals Website / triage / FPU staff Habitat occurrences Environmental assessment ORR Line / Triage CEAA / triage Compliance Monitoring 20 FPU staff 10

FPP Regulatory review process 1. Website: Working Near Water in BC and Yukon Information to help proponents comply with Fisheries Act without a DFO review Application process - request for authorization, request review, or notify Proponent driven (currently limited coordination with BC at FCBC) 2. Triage process: Is regulatory review required? Triage review If low risk letter of advice (no authorization required) If higher risk assign for regulatory review by FPU 3. FPU Review proces: Is a Fisheries Act authorization required? No authorization required letter of advice Authorization required (detailed review, decision and approval) 21 DFO Regulatory Process Existing processes and standards continue to apply: Self-Assessment Standards Guidelines Regulations Triage Letters of Advice Authorization Monitoring More information is available on the Working Near Water in BC and Yukon website. 22 11

CEAA 2012 Changes DFO Role in EA DFO is not responsible for conduct of federal EAs CEA Agency, NEB, and CNSC are responsible authorities under CEAA 2012 DFO is no longer a decision-maker but provides expert advice on fish, fish habitat and aquatic Species at Risk to the responsible authority DFO provides expert advice to BC EAO for substituted or equivalent EAs managed by BC (same as for standard federal EA) 23 Partnership Guidelines and Standards Key Functions: Liaising with clients to negotiate, develop, manage and audit partnership agreements in support of FPP objectives (e.g. RFCPP) Support and coordinate First Nations consultations Leading the development of standards and guidelines for the protection of CRA fisheries Interaction with BC Partnerships and agreement with BC Standards and guidelines Development of coordinated regulatory processes / tools 24 12

FPP Contacts in Pacific Region For general questions or help contact the Pacific Region Helpline: Phone: Toll free 1-866-845-6776 Email: EnquiriesPacific@dfo-mpo.gc.ca To report damage to fish or fish habitat: Phone: toll free 1-800-465-4336 Website: Observe, Record, Report Regulatory Reviews: Brad Fanos (Vancouver): Phone: (604) 666-3909 Email: Brad.Fanos@dfo-mpo.gc.ca Partnerships: Alain Magnan (Nanaimo): Phone: (250) 756-7021 Email: Alain.Magnan@dfo-mpo.gc.ca 25 Discussion Key issues and gaps Priorities and opportunities 26 13