WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT NUMBER WL

Similar documents
CHISANA CARIBOU HERD

INVENTORY STUDIES KLAZA CARIBOU HERD 2012 ACTIVITIES

Agriculture Zone Winter Replicate Count 2007/08

2009 WMU 328 Moose and Elk

2008 WMU 359 moose, mule deer, and white tailed deer

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 501 moose and deer

2008 WMU 360 moose, white tailed deer and mule deer. Section Authors: Robb Stavne, Dave Stepnisky and Mark Heckbert

LITTLE SALMON AND MAGUNDY RIVERS

I'd like to thank the Board for the opportunity to present here today.

MOOSE SURVEY RACKLA AREA LATE-WINTER Prepared by: Mark O'Donoghue, Joe Bellmore, Sophie Czetwertynski and Susan Westover

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT APPLICATION MACKENZIE BISON POPULATION MONITORING

Big Game Survey Results

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 510 moose

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, August 2016 Chris Geremia 1, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White August 17, 2016

Technical Rationale to Increase the Number of Satellite Collars on the Bathurst Caribou Herd

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Performance Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July June IS 0 N

2009 WMU 527 Moose, Mule Deer, and White tailed Deer

Population survey of Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, July 2010

Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) on northwest Victoria Island, Northwest Territories

2008 WMU 106 mule deer

Northern Mountain Caribou Population Dynamics Peace River Region

Northern Yellowstone Cooperative Wildlife Working Group 2012 Annual Report (October 1, 2012-September 30, 2012) Member Agencies

Winter 2016 Hunting District 313 Elk survey (Gardiner to 6-Mile Creek) Date: Flight Duration: Weather/Survey Conditions: Survey Methods

Aishihik and Kluane Northern Mountain Caribou Herds Census, 2009

MACKENZIE MOUNTAIN NON-RESIDENT AND NON-

POPULATION INVENTORY OF THE AISHIHIK WOOD BISON (BISON BISON ATHABASCAE) HERD IN SOUTHWESTERN YUKON 2014

The Qamanirjuaq Caribou Herd An Arctic Enigma by Leslie Wakelyn

Mountain Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) Survey in the Northern Mackenzie Mountains, Gwich in Settlement Area, September 2000

Do upstream mining activities alter fish communities beyond a reference condition defined for the South Nahanni River and Nahanni National Park?

2009 Update. Introduction

Survey Techniques For White-tailed Deer. Mickey Hellickson, PhD Orion Wildlife Management

CARIBOU TRACKING SURVEY IN THE PAULATUK AREA ASSOCIATED WITH THE DARNLEY BAY RESOURCES AEROMAGNETIC SURVEY, SEPTEMBER 1997 NICHOLAS C.

Population Dynamics and Adaptive Management of Yellowstone Bison

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Red Wine Mountains Herd (RWMH) Caribou

ANNUAL REPORT

North Baffin Caribou Fall Composition/Demographic Survey, Interim and Final Report to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board

2010 Wildlife Management Unit 536 moose

MAYO MOOSE MANAGEMENT UNIT

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. February 2, 2016

2007 Nordquist Wood Bison Inventory

IN PROGRESS BIG GAME HARVEST REPORTS FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH Energy and Resource Development

Wildlife CSI - Panhandle elk mortality study

Population Parameters and Their Estimation. Uses of Survey Results. Population Terms. Why Estimate Population Parameters? Population Estimation Terms

Consideration for Moose Management in Ontario Northern Ontario First Nations Environmental Conference

Movements and distribution of the Bathurst and Ahiak. barren-ground caribou herds Annual Report

MACKENZIE MOUNTAIN NON-RESIDENT AND NON-

2009 Stone s Sheep / Caribou Inventory - MU 7-52

Calgary and Canmore Areas Aerial Winter Elk Survey 2008

Management Unit 7-45 Moose Inventory: December 2006

Population Survey of the Nahanni Wood Bison Population, March 2011

Wek èezhìi Renewable Resource Board Management Proposal

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Technical Report on the Cape Bathurst, Bluenose-West, and Bluenose-East Barren-ground Caribou Herds

Bison Hazing and Capture Operations Winter

FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Life history Food Distribution Management... 98

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Full summaries of all proposed rule changes, including DMU boundary descriptions, are included in the additional background material.

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

YELLOWSTONE BISON POPULATION MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

Nalcor Energy Lower Churchill Project, Environmental Effects Monitoring Program 2017 Mealy Mountains Herd (MMH) Caribou

DEER AND ELK POPULATION STATUS AND HARVEST STRUCTURE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: A SUMMARY OF STATE AND PROVINCIAL STATUS SURVEYS.

SPOTLIGHT DEER SURVEY YO RANCHLANDS LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ±10,400 ACRES KERR COUNTY

Mule Deer and Elk Status Report for the San Juan/Chama Basin: Update

Algonquins of Ontario

Mackenzie Mountain Non-resident and Non-resident Alien Hunter Harvest Summary 2016

Biologist s Answer: What are your goals? Deer Management. Define goals, objectives. Manager s Question: Should I cull or shoot spikes?

Annual Report Ecology and management of feral hogs on Fort Benning, Georgia.

2009 Aerial Moose Survey

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Findings and Guidelines Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Page 1

BLACK GAP WMA/ECLCC MULE DEER RESTORATION PROJECT UPDATE. October 1, 2017

Moose Management in the Peace Region

An Educator s Guide to Wild Caribou of North America. Case Study: Bathurst Herd

Mule deer in the Boundary Region: Proposed research and discussion

Summary of discussion

Status Report on the Yellowstone Bison Population, September 2017 Chris Geremia, Rick Wallen, and P.J. White 1

POPULATION SURVEY OF THE NAHANNI WOOD BISON POPULATION MARCH 2004

Monitoring Asian Elephants and Mitigating Human-Elephant Conflict in the Core Landscape of the Southern/Eastern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia

MACKENZIE MOUNTAIN NON-RESIDENT AND NON-

contents 2004 Big Game Statistics

COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report for Grizzly Bear Western population (Ursus arctos) in Canada SUMMARY

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Moose Harvest Management Guidelines June 2009

North Thompson Moose Distribution And Classification Surveys Winter 2005

Monday, November 21, 2011

HARVEST MANAGEMENT PLAN for the Porcupine Caribou Herd in Canada

White-Tailed Deer Management FAQ

CAMERA SURVEYS: HELPING MANAGERS AVOID THE PITFALLS

2012 Wildlife Studies

Deer-Elk Ecology Research Project

2014 BANCROFT/NORTH HASTINGS ELK RESEARCH AND MONITORING UPDATE

contents 2009 Big Game Statistics

Distribution and Abundance of Barren-ground Caribou on Baffin Island, Nunavut

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Northwest Territories, Inuvik, NT X0E 0T0, Canada. Northwest Territories, Fort Smith, NT X0E 0T0, Canada

Transcription:

WILDLIFE RESEARCH PERMIT NUMBER WL005611- PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT TITLE: GREATER NAHANNI CARIBOU POPULATION MONITORING PERIOD: SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 2008 MAIN INVESTIGATOR: TROY HEGEL LOCATION From 26 28 September, 2008, the South Nahanni mountain caribou herd was surveyed during a fall composition count. This survey took place in the South Nahanni river watershed in the trans-boundary area north of the Cantung mine and in and adjacent to Nahanni National Park Reserve, east of the Flat River. From 3 4 October, 2008, the Coal River mountain caribou herd was surveyed in an area west of the Flat River to the Hyland River (YT). Locations of observed animal groups from both herds are identified on Figure 1. From 30 September to 4 October, 30 adult female caribou were captured (net-gun) and fitted with satellite radio-collars. Only animals within the South Nahanni herd were fitted with collars and capture locations are identified in Figure 2. RATIONALE The South Nahanni and Coal River mountain caribou herds are both readily accessible, with all-season roads located within their ranges. Previous surveys and counts of the South Nahanni herd suggest that the herd may be heavily harvested, based on lower bull:cow sex ratios. The harvest rate in 2001 was estimated to be between 4-5%, substantially higher than the 2-3% recommended by the Yukon Woodland Caribou Management Guidelines. This potentially high harvest level is coupled with recruitment rates that are lower than average for other mountain caribou herds throughout the Yukon Territory. Given the concern over the population dynamics of the herd, additional yearly monitoring of population parameters is warranted to gain a more complete assessment of the herd s health, compared to what can be inferred from a single year s estimate. Furthermore, information on the space use of the South Nahanni herd is relatively sparse. The South Nahanni herd is bordered by three other herds: Coal River (south), Finlayson (west), and Redstone (north). Obtaining a better understanding of how the South Nahanni herd uses the landscape will aid management as more detailed seasonal range delineation will reduce the likelihood that animals from other herds are included in monitoring and/or population estimation activities. Additionally, given the high amount of industrial activity occurring along the YT-NWT border, a more comprehensive understanding of landscape use by this herd may provide information to better mitigate impacts of development.

The Coal River herd has been surveyed only once before in 1997 and given the accessibility of this herd to hunters, obtaining more information on its demographic health is also warranted. OBJECTIVES To estimate the composition of the South Nahanni and Coal River mountain caribou herds, specifically recruitment (calf:cow) and sex (bull:cow) ratios. To capture and fit with satellite radio-collars, 30 adult females from the South Nahanni mountain caribou herd. METHODS Composition Counts For both the South Nahanni and Coal River herds a helicopter was used to fly at or above treeline, focussing on high plateaus, which are areas known to be used by mountain caribou during the rut. Routes were flown and areas chosen so as to avoid double-counting of animals. When a group was observed, its composition was assessed and animals were classified into one of five categories: calf, adult female, immature male, mature male, or unclassified. Adult females were distinguished from immature males based on the presence of a dark vulva patch. All attempts were made to classify each animal in a group. The locations (lat/long) of groups were recorded using a GPS. The estimated composition is reported in ratio form (e.g., # calves:100 cows). Animal Capture Captures were undertaken on the South Nahanni herd, following the fall composition count. Captures were carried out from a helicopter using a net-gun approach, a commonly used method for caribou captures, with a highly experience net-gunner and pilot. Upon sighting a group of animals, an adult female was selected from the group and using the helicopter, was eased away from the rest of the group for net-gun deployment. Once restrained, she was fitted with a satellite radio-collar (Telonics model TAW4610), and other samples and measurements were collected including blood, fecal material, body measurements, body condition scores, lactational status, estimated age category (young, mid, old) and external signs of injury or disease. Capture locations (lat/long) were recorded with a GPS. RESULTS Composition Counts Results from the South Nahanni survey are provided in Table 1 and locations of classified groups are shown in Figure 1. A Bell 206 helicopter was used during the survey. During the survey we observed 24 groups of animals, with an average group size of 10.2 animals (Range: 1 60). We classified a total of 245 animals. The

recruitment rate for the herd was low, 9.5 calves:100 cows. This was similar to the low recruitment of10 calves:100 cows observed in 2001. This year s sex ratio, 35.5 bulls:100 cows was slightly higher than the 2007 estimate of 33 bulls:100 cows, although not different statistically. Very few animals were observed in the southern portion of the South Nahanni fall range (i.e., the Ragged Range group of animals), and the total number of animals observed in the 2008 survey was much less than in 2007. This may have been due to our survey being initiated too early; however it occurred during the same dates as the 2001 census of the herd in which many more animals were observed. Furthermore, we did observe some large clusters of animals indicating that animals were grouping for the rut. Another possibility for our reduced number of sighted animals may have been due to poor weather conditions. While air conditions were generally good (i.e., clear skies), there was a patchy snow cover on the ground which created a difficult surface to observe animals (i.e., provided camouflage). Due to weather conditions on our final day (low cloud) and lack of fuel in the far north portion of the South Nahanni herd s fall range, we were unable to survey this far north area. However, based on previous surveys we feel we did cover the primary breeding areas for the herd in the mountain plateaus of the Selwyn Range north of the Cantung Road along the YT-NWT border where we expected to find the highest density of animals. Table 1. Composition of the South Nahanni (2007 and 2008) and Coal River (2008) mountain caribou herds estimated during fall aerial surveys. South Nahanni - South Nahanni - Coal River - 2008 2007 2008 Calves:100 Cows 17.4 (SE=2.9) 9.5 (SE=1.7) 12.0 (SE=2.9) Total Bulls:100 Cows 33.7 (SE=5.1) 35.5 (SE=6.3) 34.3 (SE=6.3) Immature Bulls:100 Cows 17.8 (SE=3.5) 17.8 (SE=3.8) 14.6 (SE=3.9) Mature Bulls:100 Cows 15.9 (SE=2.4) 17.8 (SE=3.8) 19.7 (SE=3.6) Number of Groups Seen 31 24 42 Average Group Size 12.6 10.2 8.12 Group Size Range 1 44 1 60 1 37 Total Animals Counted 390 245 341 Estimated Surveying Time (hours) 5.1 13.0 11.3 Results from the 2008 Coal River herd survey are provided in Table 1 and locations of classified groups are shown in Figure 1. An A-Star (AS350) helicopter was used during this survey. This year s survey was the first since 1997, the only other previous survey. As with the South Nahanni herd, recruitment was low at 12 calves:100 cows. The sex ratio of the herd was also similar to that of the South Nahanni. This bull:cow ratio is near

the minimum level of 30 bulls:100 cows recommended in the Yukon Woodland Caribou Management Guidelines, and may indicate a high harvest level. As with the South Nahanni survey, weather conditions allowed for good visibility. There was no snow on the ground in the Coal River range. The low recruitment rates observed in the 2008 survey for both the Coal River and South Nahanni herd may largely be due to poor climatic conditions at and shortly after calving this year. Data and reports from other herds across the Yukon this year also indicate poor recruitment indicating the results presented here may be representative of a regional phenomena rather than a herd-specific characteristic. For example, preliminary results from other composition surveys indicate recruitment in the Ethel Lake herd, in the central Yukon, was 15 calves:100 cows, and in the nearby Finlayson herd was 18 calves:100 cows. South Nahanni Animal Capture From 30 September to 4 October 2008, 30 adult females were captured, via net-gun, and fitted with satellite radio-collars in the South Nahanni herd. A Bell 407 helicopter was used for capture operations. Locations of captures are indicated in Figure 2. We attempted to place collars on animals representatively according to the distribution of animals across the landscape. One capture related mortality occurred in the Yukon Territory in which an animal tripped on the netting and subsequently fell, breaking its neck. The animal was dressed in the field and the meat was distributed to the Liard First Nation (Watson Lake) via the District Conservation Officer (Mark Brodhagen). Summaries of measurements obtained during the collaring are presented in Table 2. In some cases not all measurements were collected if the animal was observed to be stressed and the primary consideration was to deploy the collar and release the animal as soon as possible. Similar to the recruitment rate estimated during the composition count, only 3 of 30 (10%) cows had a calf at heel, while 6 of 30 (20%) were lactating at the time of capture. Four of 28 animals (14%) were positive for besnoitia based on a visual assessment. Table 2. Summary values of measurements obtained during capture operations on the South Nahanni mountain caribou herd, Fall 2008. Variable Mean Standard Error Total Length (cm) 209.6 3.76 Shoulder Height (cm) 127.5 3.39 Chest Height (cm) 66.6 0.88 Hindfoot Length (cm) 60.0 0.38 Chest Girth (cm) 130.9 1.48 Neck Circumference (cm) 49.8 0.83 Total Body Condition Score 8.66 0.16

LONG-TERM PLANS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Satellite collars will be monitored during the next four years to provide more precise estimates of seasonal distribution and movement patterns. Next year (2009) we will use the collars deployed on the South Nahanni herd as marks for a mark-resight estimate of the size of the herd. During the next 2-3 years, composition counts will be carried out on both the South Nahanni and Coal River herds to provide a more accurate assessment of the condition of the herd than can be obtained with only one year s estimate. This South Nahanni herd size estimate in conjunction with parameters collected during composition counts will be used to assess the sustainability of the harvest at current levels. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS North American Tungsten Corporation Ltd. graciously hosted our crews at the Cantung mine. Their assistance was invaluable and greatly appreciated. Bill Karman (Kluane Helicopters) and Mike Reed (Heli-Dynamics) provided safe and skilled piloting during the survey and capture work respectively. PARTNERS Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, NWT Chapter Department of Environment and Natural Resources, GNWT Nahanni National Park Reserve, Parks Canada Park Establishment Branch, Parks Canada Yukon Environment COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT During both composition counts, observers from local communities participated in survey operations. During the South Nahanni survey, Darrell Betsaka (Nahanni Butte Dene Band), assisted the survey crew, and during the Coal River survey, Kevin Charlie (Liard First Nation), participated on behalf of the community. When feasible, community members will be invited to participate in future years surveys. Results from this year s work will be presented at the upcoming DehCho wildlife workshop in Fort Simpson (October 2008) and this report distributed to communities in both the Yukon and Northwest Territories. CONTACTS Jan Adamczewski - Department of Environment and Natural Resources (GNWT) Jan_Adamczewski@gov.nt.ca; (867) 873-7763 Doug Tate, Dana Haggarty - Nahanni National Park Reserve, Parks Canada Doug.Tate@pc.gc.ca; (867) 695-3151 (ext 225) Dana.Haggarty@pc.gc.ca; (867) 695-3151 (ext 237) Troy Hegel, Yukon Environment Troy.Hegel@gov.yk.ca; (867) 667-5465

Figure 1. Locations of animal groups during the fall composition surveys of the South Nahanni and Coal River mountain caribou herds, September/October 2008.

Figure 2. Capture locations of animals fitted with satellite radio-collars (n=30) in the South Nahanni mountain caribou herd, September/October 2008.