Life history patterns: many solutions to the same problem

Similar documents
2016 Diadromous Migration Season on the Presumpscot A R E P O RT F R OM THE GMR I FIS HE R IE S E C O L OGY LAB ON CB AS S

The Life History and Management of Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus)

Population Structure

Finding the Way Home

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

Schooling & Migration

Potential Impacts of Global Warming on Diadromous Fishes of Connecticut

Family Clupeidae. River Herring of the James

(breed) Anadromous. wholly seawater

Lesson 3-2: Nechako White Sturgeon Life Cycle

New England Atlantic Salmon Programs DPS Delineations

ELECTRO-FISHING REPORT 2016 UPPER TWEED

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION

Fish Reproduction Anything Goes! Chap 20 Fish Reproduction Breeding Opportunities

Salmon age and size at maturity: Patterns and processes

Salmon and Steelhead in the American River Tim Horner, PhD Geology Department California State University, Sacramento

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

ECRR and ARRN Technical Exchange Meeting / ARRN forum 2014 (29 Oct in Vienna, Austria)

Adaptations of Flora and Fauna in Rhode Island s s Estuaries

SALMON FACTS. Chinook Salmon. Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

As a college student majoring in wildlife management,

Hello, my name is Speck. I am a Spotted Sea Trout and live in estuaries and in waters along the coast of the Atlantic Ocean.

Seaward Migration. To go or not to go? Timing Locomotion Life history patterns Environmental changes. Chinook salmon smolt

Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species on the Lake Superior Fishery. by Jeff Gunderson Minnesota Sea Grant Program

Fish Conservation and Management

Pacific Lamprey in the Pacific Northwest. Conserving a Poorly- Understood Northwest Fish. Jeffrey C. Jolley U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

NINA Aquatic Research Station, Ims

RESTORING AND MONITORING MIGRATORY FISH POPULATIONS IN THE PIE WATERSHEDS

The Salmonid Species. The Salmonid Species. Definitions of Salmonid Clans. The Salmonid Species

S7 Supporing Information. Species Narratives. Blue Crab... 2

Fish Conservation and Management

Development of All-Female Sterile Kokanee. for recreational fisheries in British Columbia

[FWS R5 FR 2018 N053; FF05F FXFR ; OMB Control. Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (Linnaeus, 1766)

Variation of Chinook salmon fecundity between the main stem of the Naknek River and a. tributary stream, Big Creek in southwestern Alaska

10.3 Advice May 2014

Appendix A Recommended EPA Temperature Thresholds for use in Establishing Thermal Potential and Species Life Stage Numeric Criteria

Populations and Life Cycles. Hawaii s Freshwater Ecosystems

Chinook salmon (photo by Roger Tabor)

Fish Conservation and Management

What does science tell us about Tuna? Tuna biology.101. Erica Williams, Jacques Boubée & Wakaiti Dalton

INTRODUCTION.

Lect 19 - Populations - Chapter 23. Different Levels of Ecological Organization. Populations

Big Canyon 67 miles upstream. 38 miles upstream

Applied policy in the Mediterranean lagoons

Species Profile: Red Drum Benchmark Assessment Finds Resource Relatively Stable with Overfishing Not Occurring

Fish Tech Weekly Outline January 14-18

Life Cycles. Fry: begin feeding (fry can undergo several more developmental stages, which vary by species, as they mature into juveniles.

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

Fecundity & Spawning. LO: extrapolate effects of physical conditions on fecundity and spawning of fish

Alton Perrie, Environmental Science Department. Jo Beaglehole, Environmental Policy Department Juliet Milne, Environmental Science Department

2014 Winnebago System Walleye Report

Fifty years ago, a single cod was large enough to feed a family of four or five. Today it is barely enough for one

SEA GRANT PROGRESS REPORT

Trout Production at the Bobby N. Setzer Fish Hatchery

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

Management of eel species: a modelling problem

BENSON PARK POND FISH SPECIES

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Ecology and control of invasive Northern Pike in the Columbia River, Canada

U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Connecticut River Coordinator s Office. Ken Sprankle Connecticut River Coordinator

Lesson 3: Which fish should I eat?

Coded Wire Tag Elimination from Management Questions

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

A field energy budget for northern pike, an aquatic piscivore. James S. Diana School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Michigan

Diadromous Fish Assemblage Assessment in the Saco River Estuary, ME

Freshwater Fish Spawning and Migration Periods. Prepared for Ministry for Primary Industries

ATLANTIC SALMON NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, SALMON FISHING AREAS 1-14B. The Fisheries. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-01

Salmon Biology Station

Which fish is for which state?

History and Ecology of Alewives in the St Croix Watershed

Todd N. Pearsons, Ph.D. Grant County PUD. Presented at the University of Washington

How Marine-Derived Nutrients Benefit Both Natural and Model Stream Systems

2005 REVIEW OF THE ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AMERICAN EEL (Anguilla rostrata) Prepared by:

Rahway River Fish Passage Feasibility Evaluation. Weston Solutions, Inc. February 5, 2009

Level 3 Biology, 2018

A.23 RIVER LAMPREY (LAMPETRA

Kokanee Captive Broodstock at Spokane Hatchery

Return. of the. Restored access leads to record runs up the Lamprey River. Michael Dionne

Prepared by Judy Hillaby, R.P. Bio., DFO Williams Lake, for the Horsefly Watershed Round Table 28/01/2011

Last Fall I was fishing for striped bass using green crabs and sand fleas for bait but without any luck. In this presentation I will look into the

In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991

Hagfishes, Class Myxini, Order Myxiniformes. Hagfishes, Class Myxini, Order Myxiniformes. Hagfishes, Class Myxini, Order Myxiniformes

FI F SH A ND F I F SHES E SUBPHYLUM VERTEBRATA

Essential Fish Habitat Description Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua)

Paulding Soil & Water Conservation District Fish Sale Guide

Geology. Key Factors. Overfishing. Great Lakes Fishes. Historical Fishing. About 10,000 years since last glacial retreat very young ecologically

RAFTS STOCKING POLICY

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

JOB VI. POPULATION ASSESSMENT OF AMERICAN SHAD IN THE UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY

JOB VI. POPULATION ASSESSMENT OF AMERICAN SHAD IN THE UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY

FISH COMMUNITIES AND FISHERIES OF THE THOUSAND ISLANDS AND MIDDLE CORRIDOR

COHO SALMON AND STEELHEAD TROUT OF JDSF. Peter Cafferata, Karen Walton and Weldon Jones 1

Nechako White Sturgeon: Conservation Fish Culture; Recruitment Restoration and Harm Reduction

Anadromous Forage Fisheries in Blue Hill Bay: Rainbow Smelt (Recreational) Alewife and Blueback Herring (Commercial and Recreational)

Salmon responses to Climate change

I. Lifetime spawning frequency. Reproduction in Fishes. III. Modes of reproduction. II. Spawning cycles. I. Lifetime spawning frequency

Ad Hoc Review Group IP(06)12 FINAL. Implementation Plan. European Union (Denmark)

Transcription:

Life history patterns: many solutions to the same problem The problem: how to maximize reproductive success, given the uncertainties of mortality for adults and offspring At what age and size should I start to reproduce (males = females?) Large or small offspring? Many or few? Parental care or not? (parent-offspring conflict) When in the year to reproduce? Every year or not? How long to I plan on living?

Periodic: Large body, late maturation, high fecundity, low juvenile survival, high adult survival Mims et al. 2010. Ecology of Freshwater Fishes. 19: 390-400. Based on Winemiller Fecundity Opportunistic: small body, early maturation, low juvenile survival Equilibrium: -medium size, low fecundity, high juvenile survival

Life history patterns: How do salmonids compare with other fishes? 1. Length at maturity 2. Life span 3. Egg size and fecundity (number of eggs) 4. Spawning season 5. Hatching or emergence date Wootton (1984) assembled data on the life history patterns of 162 freshwater fish species in Canada, and this is the basis for comparison (with some updates on salmonids)

Length (mm) 1500 1000 500 non-salmonids salmonids 0 0 10 20 30 Age at maturity Conclusion: salmonids are average or below average in age, and above average in length.

1000000 100000 Fecundity 10000 1000 non-salmonids 100 salmonids 10 10 100 1000 10000 Adult length (mm) Conclusion: salmonids have very few eggs, for their length, compared to other fishes.

Number of species 45 30 15 0 non-salmonids salmonids 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 6.0 Egg diameter (mm) Conclusion: salmonids have exceptionally large eggs

Early comment on spawning seasons Izaak Walton, The Compleat Angler, 1653 P. 68: the [brown] Trout usually spawns about October or November, but in some rivers a little sooner or later: which is the more observable, because most other fish spawn in the spring or summer, when the sun hath warmed both the earth and water, and made it fit for generation.

Number of species 50 40 30 20 10 salmonids non-salmonids 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month of spawning Conclusion: salmonids are among the very few fall spawning species (almost all the others are their relatives, the whitefishes, family Coregonidae).

Number of species 40 30 20 10 0 non-salmonids salmonids 10 20 30 40 50 100 200 > 200 Days to hatch Conclusion: salmonids have a very prolonged incubation period, and emerge in spring at about the same time as the progeny of spring-spawning fishes.

How do we explain such life history patterns as anadromy, semelparity, and age at maturity? Fitness can be defined as the sum, over the entire lifespan, of the probability of surviving to a given age (lx) times the reproductive potential at that age (bx). W = Σ (lx * bx) Consider the relative fitness of anadromous sockeye salmon and non-anadromous kokanee as a case in point.

Comparative hypothetical fitness of sockeye (3000 eggs) and kokanee (500 eggs) Age form length survival number fecundity fitness 1st spring kokanee 28 0.1 50 sockeye 28 0.1 300 1st fall kokanee 60 0.4 20 3 0.12 sockeye 60 0.4 120 3 0.12 2nd spring kokanee 80 0.5 10 sockeye 80 0.5 60 2nd fall kokanee 120 0.8 8 24 0.38 sockeye 180 0.3 18 85 0.51 3rd fall kokanee 180 0.6 4.8 85 0.82 sockeye 360 0.4 7.2 700 1.68 4th fall kokanee 300 0.8 3.84 500 3.84 sockeye 560 0.8 5.76 3000 5.76

Comparative hypothetical fitness of sockeye (3000 eggs) and kokanee (500 eggs) Age form length survival number fecundity fitness 1st spring kokanee 28 0.1 50 sockeye 28 0.1 300 1st fall kokanee 60 0.4 20 3 0.12 sockeye 60 0.4 120 3 0.12 2nd spring kokanee 80 0.5 10 sockeye 80 0.5 60 2nd fall kokanee 120 0.8 8 24 0.38 sockeye 180 0.3 18 85 0.51 3rd fall kokanee 180 0.6 4.8 85 0.82 sockeye 360 0.4 7.2 700 1.68 4th fall kokanee 300 0.8 3.84 500 3.84 sockeye 560 0.8 5.76 3000 5.76

Comparative hypothetical fitness of sockeye (3000 eggs) and kokanee (500 eggs) Age form length survival number fecundity fitness 1st spring kokanee 28 0.1 50 sockeye 28 0.1 300 1st fall kokanee 60 0.4 20 3 0.12 sockeye 60 0.4 120 3 0.12 2nd spring kokanee 80 0.5 10 sockeye 80 0.5 60 2nd fall kokanee 120 0.8 8 24 0.38 sockeye 180 0.3 18 85 0.51 3rd fall kokanee 180 0.6 4.8 85 0.82 sockeye 360 0.4 7.2 700 1.68 4th fall kokanee 300 0.8 3.84 500 3.84 sockeye 560 0.8 5.76 3000 5.76

Comparative hypothetical fitness of sockeye (3000 eggs) and kokanee (500 eggs) Age form length survival number fecundity fitness 1st spring kokanee 28 0.1 50 sockeye 28 0.1 300 1st fall kokanee 60 0.4 20 3 0.12 sockeye 60 0.4 120 3 0.12 2nd spring kokanee 80 0.5 10 sockeye 80 0.5 60 2nd fall kokanee 120 0.8 8 24 0.38 sockeye 180 0.3 18 85 0.51 3rd fall kokanee 180 0.6 4.8 85 0.82 sockeye 360 0.4 7.2 700 1.68 4th fall kokanee 300 0.8 3.84 500 3.84 sockeye 560 0.8 5.76 3000 5.76

Comparative hypothetical fitness of sockeye (3000 eggs) and kokanee (500 eggs) Age form length survival number fecundity fitness 1st spring kokanee 28 0.1 50 sockeye 28 0.1 300 1st fall kokanee 60 0.4 20 3 0.12 sockeye 60 0.4 120 3 0.12 2nd spring kokanee 80 0.5 10 sockeye 80 0.5 60 2nd fall kokanee 120 0.8 8 24 0.38 sockeye 180 0.3 18 85 0.51 3rd fall kokanee 180 0.6 4.8 85 0.82 sockeye 360 0.4 7.2 700 1.68 4th fall kokanee 300 0.8 3.84 500 3.84 sockeye 560 0.8 5.76 3000 5.76

Comparative hypothetical fitness of sockeye (3000 eggs) and kokanee (500 eggs) Age form length survival number fecundity fitness 1st spring kokanee 28 0.1 50 sockeye 28 0.1 300 1st fall kokanee 60 0.4 20 3 0.12 sockeye 60 0.4 120 3 0.12 2nd spring kokanee 80 0.5 10 sockeye 80 0.5 60 2nd fall kokanee 120 0.8 8 24 0.38 sockeye 180 0.3 18 85 0.51 3rd fall kokanee 180 0.6 4.8 85 0.82 sockeye 360 0.4 7.2 700 1.68 4th fall kokanee 300 0.8 3.84 500 3.84 sockeye 560 0.8 5.76 3000 5.76

Life history patterns The differences between salmonids and other fishes stem primarily from: 1. anadromy (resulting in fast growth), 2. semelparity (resulting in early age at maturity and high reproductive output), and 3. parental care (increasing survival of progeny in an otherwise harsh world). These are relatively unusual patterns, thus salmonids are not typical fishes.

Parental Care What are the benefits and costs? (If it is such a great idea, why doesn t everyone do it?) How prevalent is parental care in fishes? Is the salmonid pattern typical?

Parental Care Benefits: Increased survival of offspring Costs: Reduced breeding opportunities Reduced probability of surviving to breed again (predation, energy depletion)

Parental Care Parental care is practiced in 21% of the families of teleost (bony) fishes, and is more common in freshwater than marine fishes. In species with parental care, both parents provide care in 22% of the cases and one parent in 78%. Among the species with uni-parental care, males provide care in 61% of the cases vs. 39% for females. Why do salmon provide parental care, and why is the care provided by the female?

Diadromy Diadromy is the scheduled migration between freshwater and marine environments, and is distinguished from simple tolerance of intermediate salinities (i.e., euryhalinity). Anadromous fishes spawn in freshwater, offspring migrate to sea to rear, and return as adults to breed in freshwater. Catadromous fishes spawn at sea, offspring migrate to freshwater to rear, and return as adults to breed at sea. Amphidromous fishes spawn in freshwater, offspring migrate to sea to rear, then migrate back to freshwater for further rearing before breeding in freshwater.

Diadromous fishes Of all fishes, about 160 (0.8%) are diadromous. Anadromous fishes: about 87 species (54%), including salmonids, shad, striped bass, lamprey, smelt, sticklebacks, sturgeon, retropinnids, etc. Catadromous fishes: about 41 species (25%), including anguillid eels, galaxiids, etc. Amphidromous fishes: about 34 species (21%), including ayu, galaxiids, etc.

Striped bass, Morone saxatilis, is an anadromous species native to the east coast of North America. Adults spawn in rivers, larvae drift into and rear in estuaries, then migrate to coastal waters to grow until they breed.

American shad (Alosa sapidissima ) The Connecticut state fish

Atlantic eels (Anguilla anguilla and A. rostrata) are assumed to breed in deep waters of the Sargasso Sea. Eggs drift upward, and larvae travel in the Gulf Stream. Young glass eels ascend rivers and rear there for years before they mature, migrate to sea, breed and die. The classic example of a catadromous species

Galaxias fasciatus, the banded kokopu, is an amphidromous species from New Zealand. They spawn in streams in fall-winter, and the larvae are swept downstream. The juveniles rear at sea for about 4-5 months, then return to freshwater in spring. They feed and grow in streams for 2-3 years before breeding.

Geographic variation in diadromy Anadromy Percentage frequency Catadromy Amphidromy 90 60 30 0 30 60 90 Latitude

Aquatic productivity and the presence of anadromy in fishes Anadromous fish species (%) Ocean productivity greater than FW productivity FW productivity greater than Ocean productivity Gross et al. 1988. Science. -1.2-0.6-0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 Log (ocean : freshwater) productivity