TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PREDATORS CAUGHT BY TUNA PURSE-SEINERS SEINERS IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Similar documents
Pelagic Predators Food Habits Project

2016 : STATUS SUMMARY FOR SPECIES OF TUNA AND TUNA-LIKE SPECIES UNDER THE IOTC MANDATE, AS WELL AS OTHER SPECIES IMPACTED BY IOTC FISHERIES.

WORKING GROUP TO REVIEW STOCK ASSESSMENTS 8 TH MEETING

An ecological risk assessment for the effect of the Korean tuna longline fishery in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean

Use of productivity and susceptibility indices to evaluate vulnerability in the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean

Potential for top-down control on tropical tunas based on size structure of predator prey interactions

PSAT Meta Data Analysis Project

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOURTH REGULAR SESSION August 2008 Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

2009 Project Report Update on Gulf of Mexico Pelagic Longline Bluefin Tuna Mitigation Research

Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem

Identification of by-catch species of tuna purse seiners in Iranian waters of Oman Sea

Ecopath model of the pelagic ecosystem of the WCPO and related projects. ALLAIN V.

Qualitative analysis of food webs in the Pacific Ocean

TUNA trophic structure in the Pacific Ocean. PFRP funded project

Report of Japan s scientific observer program for tuna longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean in the fishing year of 2007

Sharks caught in Mozambican waters. Barbara Palha de Sousa

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRD REGULAR SESSION August 2007 Honolulu, United States of America

Ecosystem Models: Food webs

Indonesian Tuna Protocol Sampling. Case Study on Catch Monitoring in Benoa Port, Bali, Indonesia

Offshore fish identification cards for small-scale fishermen

PIRFO. Purse-seine fish ID cards. for Pacific Islands Regional Fisheries Observers

DOCUMENT SAC-08 INF A(a) 2016 ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC OBSERVER REPORT FOR KOREAN TUNA LONGLINE FISHIERY IN THE IATTC CONVENTION AREA

TUNA DIET IN THE EQUATORIAL PACIFIC OCEAN EAST TO WEST

Food-web Implications for Pelagic Top Predators: from Guts and Isotopes to Models

Tuna [211] 86587_p211_220.indd 86587_p211_220.indd /30/04 12/30/04 4:53:37 4:53:37 PM PM

Official Journal of the European Union L 123/3

Changes in Fishing Gear- Impact on Tropical Tuna Landing

Catch of Experimental Longline, Purse Seine and Handline in the South China Sea, Area III: Western Philippines

HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT. Options for dealing with these four issues are discussed in the following sections of the report.

3. Highly migratory species

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TENTH REGULAR SESSION. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands 6-14 August 2014

DOCUMENT SAC-08-INF A(d)

Isotope Biogeography and Trophic Dynamics of Billfish Collected in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean.

DOCUMENT SAC-06 INF-L

Photographic identification guide for non-target fish species taken in WCPO purse seine fisheries

Fishery-induced changes in the subtropical Pacific pelagic ecosystem size structure: Observations and theory

CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW AUTHOR: SECRETARIAT. LAST UPDATE: Jan. 25, Overview. 1.1 What is ICCAT? Introduction

Bait innovation as a new challenge in pelagic longlining

DOCUMENT SAC-09 INF A(i )

A PRELIMINARY FOOD WEB OF THE PELAGIC ENVIRONMENT OF THE SARGASSO SEA WITH A FOCUS ON THE FISH SPECIES OF INTEREST TO ICCAT. Brian E.

Atlantic Shark Fishery: Gulf of Mexico. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Management Division

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION August 2010 Nuku alofa, Tonga

SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FIFTH MEETING

DATA OBTAINED FROM PURSE-SEINE OBSERVERS CARRY OUT BY THE INSTITUTO ESPAÑOL DE OCEANOGRAFÍA FROM THE NATIONAL DATABASE PLAN BETWEEN 2003 AND

Albacore tuna, Bigeye tuna, Blackfin tuna, Skipjack tuna, Yellowfin tuna. Image Monterey Bay Aquarium. Atlantic. Purse Seine.

JAPAN. Japan Fisheries Agency , Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, , Japan. National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, FRA

PREDATION OF TUNA BY WHALES AND SHARKS IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN

Offshore fish identification cards for small-scale line fisheries

IOTC-2017-SC20-INF08

ECOSYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS

Shark Catches by the Hawaii-based Longline Fishery. William A. Walsh. Keith A. Bigelow

Mozambique National Report to the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 2012 NOVEMBER, prepared by. Barbara Palha de Sousa

Synthesis of New Zealand Gamefish Tagging Data, 1975 to 2014

Predation, Cannibalism, and the Dynamics of Tuna Populations

Thailand National Report

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE EIGHTH REGULAR SESSION August 2012 Busan, Republic of Korea

IOTC 2013 WPB th Working Party on Billfish. La Réunion 18 th -22 nd September 2013

Is Lagonoy Gulf a special breeding ground for Yellowfin Tuna?

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SIXTH REGULAR SESSION

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-05 BET A

Supplementary Tables and Figures. Table S1. List of taxa identified as artisanally fished in Fiji.

SAC-08-10a Staff activities and research plans. 8 a Reunión del Comité Científico Asesor 8 th Meeting of the Scientific Advisory Committee

Feeding ecology and niche segregation in oceanic top predators off eastern Australia

Tropical Scombrid Feeding Habits in the Central Pacific Kevin McLean S-199 June 9, 2005

JIMAR, PFRP ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FOR FY PROJECT #

THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC TUNA FISHERY:

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE EIGHTH REGULAR SESSION. Busan, Republic of Korea 7-15 August 2012

How much sampling coverage affects bycatch estimates in purse seine fisheries?

Thai Tuna Longline Fishing in the Indian Ocean from 2000 to 2006

AZORES AIRLINES TOURNAMENT San Michael - Azores RULES

A SHORT NOTE ON THE CATCH COMPOSITION AND WEIGHT-LENGTH RELATIONSHIP OF TUNAS, BILLFISHES AND SHARKS OF NORTH BRAZIL

PSAT Meta Data Analysis Project

Report on Bycatch of Tuna Longline Fishing Operation Eastern Indian Ocean by SEAFDEC Research Vessels Year

Large Pelagic Fishery Resource Survey using Pelagic Longline in the Bay of Bengal

Hawaii, Western Central and Eastern Central Pacific. Deep-set and Shallow-set longline, Troll/Pole. July 12, 2016 Alexia Morgan, Consul ng Researcher

Impact of Industrial Tuna Fisheries on Fish Stocks and the Ecosystem of the Pacific Ocean

Catches of billfishes by the Malaysian tuna longliners targeting tropical and temperate tuna in the Indian Ocean.

BYCATCH OF FISH IN HMS FISHERIES

Contribution of cephalopod prey to large pelagic fish diet in the central N. Atlantic

FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR U.S. WEST COAST FISHERIES FOR HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES AS AMENDED APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERIES

SCTB16 Working Paper FTWG 5

Shark bycatch observation in the ICCAT waters by. Chineses longline observer in 2007

Fishing activities of the French and associated flags purse seiners targeting tropical tunas in the Indian Ocean ( )

S.MIGUEL PONTA DELGADA

Recent advances, ongoing challenges, and future directions in ecosystem approaches to fisheries management in the central North Pacific

Bycatch landings in Mauritius for 2009/2010

WORKING GROUP ON STOCK ASSESSMENTS 5 TH MEETING DOCUMENT SAR-5-08 TARGET SIZE FOR THE TUNA FLEET IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

Present Status of Off-shore Fishery Resources and Information on Tuna Fishery in MYANMAR.

Monitoring the pelagic ecosystem effects of different levels of fishing effort on the western Pacific Ocean warm pool

Status and improvement of artisanal fisheries in Manabi province, Ecuador: a case study

Biological data on tuna and tuna-like species gathered at the IOTC Secretariat: Status Report

Feleti P Teo Executive Director

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOURTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Busan, Republic of Korea 8-16 August 2018

REVIEW OF TAIWANESE CATCH AND EFFORT LOGSHEETS

Tuna Resource Exploration with Tuna Longline in the South China Sea, Area IV : Vietnamese Waters

Critical The status of the southern bluefin tuna (SBT) stock is at a critical stage resulting in a reduction in the global SBT catch in 2010/2011.

COMMISSION FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF HIGHLY MIGRATORY FISH STOCKS IN THE WESTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC OCEAN

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE THIRTEENTH REGULAR SESSION. Rarotonga, Cook Islands 9 17 August 2017

Southern bluefin tuna >6.4kg Bigeye tuna >3.2kg Yellowfin tuna >3.2kg Swordfish >119cm LJFL / >18kg dressed Marlins >210cm LJFL

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE SECOND REGULAR SESSION August 2006 Manila, Philippines

Transcription:

TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PREDATORS CAUGHT BY TUNA PURSE-SEINERS SEINERS IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN DR. FELIPE GALVAN- MAGAÑA CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS. LA PAZ, BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR, MEXICO DR. ROBERT J. OLSON INTERAMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION LA JOLLA CALIFORNIA

30 25 Area A 20 15 10 Area C LATITUDE (DEG.) 5 0-5 Area B Area D -10 Area F Dolphin Sets -15 School Sets Area E Floating Object Sets -20-140 -130-120 -110-100 -90-80 LONGITUDE (DEG.)

Table. Stomachs sampled from predators in the bycatch of tuna purse-seiners in the Eastern Pacific Ocean during 1992 1994. Predator Samples Number Stenella attenuata Spotted dolphin 311 Stenella longirostris Spinner dolphin 209 Delphinus delphis Common dolphin 51 Stenella coeruleoalba Striped dolphin 5 Thunnus albacares Yellowfin tuna 4831 Katsuwonus pelamis Skipjack 1205 Thunnus obesus Bigeye Tuna 80 Euthynnus lineatus Black skipjack 100 Auxis spp. Bullets 55 Carcharhinus limbatus Black tip shark 262 Carcharhinus falciformis Silky shark 64 Carcharhinus longimanus W hitetip shark 30 Carcharhinus leucas Bull shark 2 Carcharhinus spp. Carcharhinid sharks 82 Sphyrna spp. Hammerhead sharks 48 Isurus oxyrinchus Mako shark 4 Prionace glauca Blue shark 2 Alopias spp. Thresher shark 12 Nasolamia velox W hite nose shark 2 Makaira indica Black marlin 25 Makaira mazara Blue marlin 15 Makaira spp. Marlins unidentified 18 Tetrapturus audax Striped marlin 8 Istiophorus platypterus Sailfish 49 Coryphaena hippurus Mahi-mahi 545 Acanthocybium solandri W ahoo 235 Elagatis bippinulata Rainbow-runner 48 Total 8298

Predator and prey in dolphins sets 50% 40% Weight percentage 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc.Fishes Mesopelagic Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Gempylidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Wahoo Black Skipjack Big Eye Skipjack Yellowfin Auxis spp. Sharks 36 (31) 14,157g Billfishes 9 (2) 1,615g Other species 4 (3) 418g Dolphins 389 (187) 18,133g Tunas 1579 (505) 336,128g

Predators and prey in school sets 70% 60% Weight percentage 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc.Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Gempylidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Wahoo Black skipjack Skipjack Yellowfin tuna Auxis spp. Sharks 124 (26) 99,577 g Billfishes 52 (10) 17,004 g Other species 23 (22) 5,483 g Tunas 1242 (979) 126,327 g

Predators and prey in Log sets 60% 50% Weight percentage 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc.Fishes Mesopelagic Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Gempylidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Wahoo Black skipjack Big eye Skipjack Yellowfin tuna Auxis spp. Sharks 233 (58) 292,660 g Billfishes 27 (15) 23,533 g Other species 389 (388) 49,913 g Tunas 261 (1706) 12,643g

TUNAS

Tunas 100% 90% Weight percentage 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc.Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Black Skipjack Skipjack Yellowfin Tuna Auxis spp. Yellowfin Tuna 2,895 (1,936) 464,891g Skipjack135 (1,070) 7,939g Bullets 2(53) 8g Black Skipjack 12 (88) 577g Big eye 38 (42) 1,638g

DOLPHINS

DOLPHINS 100% 90% 80% Weight percentage 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc. Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Skipjack Auxis spp. Striped dolphin 5 (0) 125g Spotted dolphin 231 (80) 12,080g Spinner Dolphin 139 (70) 5,611g Common dolphin 14 (37) 317g

SHARKS

Sharks 100% 90% 80% Weight percentage 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc. Fishes Myctophidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Wahoo Black Skipjack Big eye Skipjack Yellowfin tuna Auxis spp. Hammerhead sharks 44(4) 31,238g Bull shark 2(0) 410g Blue shark 1(1) 125g White nose shark 2(0) 6,660g Carcharhinids Sharks 57 (25) 44,368g Thresher shark 9(3) 6,653g Silky Shark 51 (13) 61,444g White tip shark 15(15) 18,661g Mako Shark 3(1) 3,621g Black tip shark 209 (53) 233,214g

BILLFISHES

Billfishes 80% 70% Weight percentage 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Unidentified Marlins 16(2) 9,134g Striped marlin 5(3) 7,082g 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc.Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Skipjack Yellowfin tuna Auxis spp. Sailfish 43(6) 5,166g Blue marlin 9(6) 11, 563g Black marlin 15 (10) 9,207g

OTHER PREDATORS

Other predators 50% 40% Weight percentage 30% 20% 10% 0% Epi Cephalopods Meso Cephalopods Crustacea Misc.Fishes Myctophidae Phosichthyidae Carangidae Coryphaenidae Exocoetidae Nomeidae Tetraodontiformes Wahoo Black skipjack Big eye Skipjack Yellowfin tuna Auxis spp. Wahoo 113(122) 21, 325g Rainbow runner 32(16) 2,834g Mahi-Mahi 271(274) 34,805g

30 25 Area A 20 15 10 Area C LATITUDE (DEG.) 5 0-5 Area B Area D -10 Area F Dolphin Sets -15 School Sets Area E Floating Object Sets -20-140 -130-120 -110-100 -90-80 LONGITUDE (DEG.)

Table. Overlapping between predators in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. T=Tuna, D=Dolphin, S=Shark, B=Billfishes, O= Other predators (Mahi-mahi, wahoo, rainbow runner) Numbers in bold indicate values higer than 0.6, which could indicate overlapp between predators Area/set type T-D T-S T-B T-0 D-S D-B D-O S-B S-O B-O Area A/Dolphin set 0.43 0.04 0.2 0.27 0.17 0.18 0.28 0.02 0 0.02 Area B/Dolphin set 0.41 0.26 0.39 Area C/Dolphin set 0.24 0.11 0.77 0.75 0.18 0.16 0.11 0.05 0 0.95 Area D/Dolphin set 0.29 0.52 0.55 Area E/Dolphin set 0.47 Area F/Dolphin set 0.50 0 0.01 Area A/School set 0.67 0.48 0.24 0.44 0.1 0.41 Area B/School set 0 0 0 Area C/School set 0.39 0.23 0.15 Area D/School set 0.16 0.03 0.21 0.42 0.14 0.12 Area E/School set 0 0 0.35 0.28 0 Area F/School set 0.01 0.99 0 Area B/Log set 0.02 0.1 0.33 0.6 0.45 0.51 Area C/Log set 0.69 Area D/Log set 0.11 0.11 0.49 0.55 0.27 0.29 Area E/Log set 0.18 0.12 0.43 0.46 0.3 0.45 Area F/Log set 0.08 0 0.44 0.75 0.56 0.46

Tabla 2. Breadth niche recorded in predators by each area in the EPO. D=Dolphins sets, S= School sets, L= Log sets Area A Area B Area C D S L D S L D S L TUNAS 2.8 7.0 3.4 1.0 2.5 1.8 2.3 1.8 DOLPHINS 6.4 6.2 5.1 OTHER PREDATORS 3.0 2.0 4.9 1.0 3.0 BILLFISHES 1.7 6.4 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.9 SHARKS 1.4 3.9 3.0 1.0 4.1 1.6 3.1 Area D Area E Area F D S L D S L D S L TUNAS 1.7 2.1 8.9 1.1 1.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.2 DOLPHINS 6.1 17.6 4.5 OTHER PREDATORS 2.2 11.9 2.0 6.3 1.4 1.0 4.7 BILLFISHES 2.2 5.3 1.0 2.0 2.0 SHARKS 3.2 3.3 2.6 2.7 5.1 1.6 2.9

100% Dolphin Sets Prey Biomass 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Misc. fishes Crustacea Cephalopoda Myctophidae Carangidae Tetraodontiformes Exocoetidae Phosichthyidae Nomeidae other Scombridae Auxis spp. 0% 300-600 601-800 801-1000 1001-1200 1201-1400 1401-1889 72 227 344 556 254 108 Fork Length (mm) Sample Size

100% Schoolfish Sets Prey Biomass 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 300-600 601-800 801-1000 1001-1200 1201-1400 1401-1889 237 392 258 123 84 22 Fork Length (mm) Sample Size Misc. fishes Crustácea Cephalopoda Myctophidae Carangidae Tetraodontiformes Exocoetidae Phosichthyidae Nomeidae other Scombridae Auxis spp.

100% Log Sets Prey Biomass 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 300-600 601-800 801-1000 1001-1200 1201-1400 135 24 19 9 6 Fork Length (mm) Sample Size Misc. fishes Crustacea Cephalopoda Myctophidae Carangidae Tetraodontiformes Exocoetidae Nomeidae other Scombridae Auxis spp.