Congestion Management Report

Similar documents
Congestion Management Report

Congestion Management Report

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic

US287 Asset Inventory Loveland. Figure 6-1 Loveland Bridges and Traffic Signals

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

INTRODUCTION THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS

What is the Congestion Management Process? What is Congestion? Growth in the Treasure Valley Development and Congestion

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

The Route 29 Corridor Study was initiated at the request of Virginia s Commonwealth

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

STUDY PROCESS & SCHEDULE

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

US287 Asset Inventory Fort Collins. Figure 5-1 Fort Collins Bridges and Traffic Signals

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

Geometric and Trafc Conditions Summary

CITY OF OAKLAND. 27th Street Bikeway Feasibility and Design. Final Report (v3) March 23, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY

ARRENTON RANSPORTATION

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

APPENDIX E: Transportation Technical Report

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Focused Traffic Analysis for the 200 Nellen Avenue Project

INFRASTRUCTURE: Using the Grid to Create a more Self-Sustaining Downtown. Studio Spring 2013

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Bellevue Transportation: Challenges, Opportunities and Priorities Bellevue Downtown Association September 20, 2018

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility

Route 7 Corridor Study

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Description: Widen I-64 to 6 lanes from I-265 to the KY 53 interchange in Shelby County.

Pennsylvania Highway Statistics

In Collaboration with: City of Belton Cass County FHWA Johnson County KDOT MoDOT City of Olathe City of Overland Park

5.0 Roadway System Plan

City of Wayzata Comprehensive Plan 2030 Transportation Chapter: Appendix A

Gateway Transportation Study

Appendix B: Forecasting and Traffic Operations Analysis Framework Document

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Traffic Control Signals Review 4325 McCowan Road

Chapter 2 Current and Future Conditions

I 10 Phoenix to California Border Multimodal Corridor Profile Study

Wesbrook Place Traffic Analysis of Redistributed Dwelling Units

University Hill Transportation Study Technical Memorandum Alternatives Modeling and Analysis May 2007

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

3.1.1 Area Land Uses. Downtown Winston-Salem Area

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Public Involvement Meeting Tuesday, June 13, Albany Shaker Road Corridor Study

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Overview. Existing Conditions. Corridor Description. Assessment

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

New Seward and 36 th Avenue Intersection Conceptual Design

Route 29 Solutions Projects

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

Main-McVay Transit Study: Phase 2 Options Definition and High Level Constraints Evaluation

Durrance Elementary School

Project Description Form 6V

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

Attachment One. Integration of Performance Measures Into the Bryan/College Station MPO FY 2019 FY 2022 Transportation Improvement Program

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Water Street Corridor Streetscape TRAFFIC STUDY

Welcome. The Brooklin Secondary Plan and Transportation Master Plan are collectively referred to as the Brooklin Study.

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

Concurrent Monitoring, Analysis, and Visualization of Freeway and Arterial Performance for Recurring and Non-recurring Congestion

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

Goodlettsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Executive Summary

Chapter 6: Transportation

CHAPTER 3 STUDY AREA OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

100 Most Congested Roadways in Texas

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

National Network Safety Analysis (6/4/2015 Revision) FRA and FRA PID 86661

Transcription:

Congestion Management Report NH 101A (Amherst St and Canal/Bridge St), NASHUA Segment Length: 2.7 miles Daily Traffic Volumes: 9,000-40,000 Analysis Period: August 2015 Number of Traffic Signals: 9 Number of travel lanes: 2 Roadway Class: IV (Urban Principal Arterial Other) As the primary entry point to the Nashua Downtown Central Business District from the east and the west, Amherst St, Canal St and Bridge St (which collectively comprise the portion of NH 101A in Nashua east of the F.E. Everett Turnpike) serve several vital transportation functions. This corridor functions as a major east-west thoroughfare as it is one of the only two Nashua River crossings in the downtown area, thereby providing a connection between the F.E. Everett Turnpike and the Town of Hudson. NH 101A includes a number of commercial, industrial, recreational and civic uses. It is also located at the center of several densely populated adjoining neighborhoods. In addition to the relatively high levels of pedestrian traffic, the corridor also serves public transit riders. Some level of motor vehicle congestion should be expected given the mixed-use nature of this corridor. Recently, the City of Nashua has completed or is in the process of completing significant improvement projects along the corridor and nearby to improve navigability and comfort levels for pedestrians and motorists. Impact of Broad Street Parkway Travel time runs and corridor analyses were conducted before the completion and opening of the Broad Street Parkway in December 2015. The parkway is forecast to reduce vehicular demand on NH 101A by providing an alternative Nashua River crossing between Main Street and the F. E. Everett Turnpike. The Nashua Regional Planning Commission plans to complete an additional congestion analysis of NH 101A after the impacts of the parkway are fully in effect. Report, travel time runs and data analysis conducted by 2017

AM Peak Period Actual & Expected Travel Times Expected Travel Time during the Morning Commute 5 minutes and 15 seconds, traveling in easterly direction based upon posted speeds and free flowing traffic 5 minutes and 21 seconds, traveling in westerly direction based upon posted speeds and free flowing traffic Eastbound 8 minutes and 34 seconds 3 minutes and 19 seconds (63%) longer than expected Actual Travel Time during the Morning Commute:* Westbound 7 minutes and 10 seconds 1 minute and 49 seconds (34%) longer than expected *The actual travel time is based upon a single travel run that was similar in duration and congestion to the average observed travel time.

PM Peak Period Actual & Expected Travel Times Expected Travel Time during the Evening Commute 5 minutes and 15 seconds, traveling in easterly direction based upon posted speeds and free flowing traffic 5 minutes and 21 seconds, traveling in westerly direction based upon posted speeds and free flowing traffic Actual Travel Time during the Evening Commute:* Eastbound Westbound 10 minutes and 26 seconds 8 minutes and 37 seconds 5 minutes and 10 seconds (98%) longer than expected 3 minutes and 15 seconds (61%) longer than expected *The actual travel time is based upon a single travel run that was similar in duration and congestion to the average observed travel time.

AM Travel Time Ratios (7:00am 9:00am) Travel Time Ratio A travel time ratio (TTR) compares the actual (measured) & expected (noncongested) travel times along a corridor. It is assumed that in non-congested conditions, motorists can travel at the posted speed limit. The actual time is the average of several travel time runs. The ratio between the actual time and the expected time would equal 1 for a non-congested segment. Eastbound Congestion occurs during the morning peak period along the first three segments of the corridor beginning at Everett Turnpike and continuing to the intersection of Lowell St/Canal St, as indicated by Travel Time Ratios that are above the threshold of 1.5. On average, travel in the eastbound direction on this corridor takes approximately 3 minutes and 19 seconds (63%) longer as compared to free-flow conditions. Westbound Congestion occurs in the westbound direction during the morning peak period along the first two segments of the corridor beginning at the Hudson Town Line and continuing to the intersection of Canal St/Main St, as indicated by ratios that are above the threshold of 1.5. On average, travel in the westbound direction on this corridor during the morning commute takes approximately 1 minute and 49 seconds (34%) longer as compared to free-flow conditions.

PM Travel Time Ratios (4:00pm 6:00pm) Travel Time Ratio A travel time ratio (TTR) compares the actual (measured) & expected (noncongested) travel times along a corridor. It is assumed that in non-congested conditions, motorists can travel at the posted speed limit. The actual time is the average of several travel time runs. The ratio between the actual time and the expected time would equal 1 for a non-congested segment. Eastbound Congestion occurs during the evening peak period along the entire corridor beginning at Everett Turnpike and continuing to the Hudson Town Line, as indicated by Travel Time Ratios that are above the threshold of 1.5. On average, travel in the eastbound direction on this corridor takes approximately 5 minutes and 10 seconds (98%) longer as compared to free-flow conditions. Westbound Congestion occurs in the westbound direction during the evening peak period along the first two segments of the corridor beginning at the Hudson Town Line and continuing to the intersection of Canal Street/Main Street, as indicated by ratios that are above the threshold of 1.5. On average, travel in westbound direction on this corridor during the evening commute takes approximately 3 minutes and 15 seconds (61%) longer as compared to free-flow conditions.

Northbound Probe Travel Time Data The NPMRDS provides roadway performance data for the National Highway System (NHS). The NPMRDS data are derived from instantaneous vehicle probe speed data supplied by a variety of GPS devices carried by both trucks and cars. The data are supplied on a GIS roadway network, which divides the NHS into directional road segments based on the Traffic Message Channel (TMC) standard. Travel times from the National Performance Measurement Research Data Set (NPMRDS) are available for the entire extent of the NH 101A east of the F.E. Everett Turnpike to the Hudson Line. Weekday travel time data collected in 2015 along TMCs located as shown in the above figure are summarized by travel speeds. The percent of traffic traveling below the speed limit versus at or above the posted speed limit of 30 mph during the peak and off peak hours for each segment is graphed in the figure to the right and on the following page. The data indicate that, in general, that the vast majority of vehicles fall below the posted speed limit of 30 mph. Yet, there are slight differences between the Canal/Bridge Street and the Amherst Street TMCs. The speeds along Amherst Street are slightly higher in the westbound direction compared to the eastbound direction. Along Canal/Bridge Streets, motorists tend to drive at faster speeds in both the westbound and eastbound directions during the AM and Off-peak hours compared to the PM peak hours. (Photo to the right: Vehicles heading in the easterly direction across the Taylor Falls Bridge on the Nashua/Hudson border.)

Probe Travel Time Data A Gateway to Downtown Nashua Nashua s NH 101A Corridor east of the F.E Everett Turnpike is vestige of traditional New England communities that has a blend of nearby housing, retail, civic, recreational, and industrial uses all within walking distance of its downtown. The corridor also exhibits the symptoms of the mid-twentieth century evolution to an automobile-centric society in that 101A is a major east-west travel corridor with large volumes of traffic. The corridor also serves many public transit riders and pedestrians. The 2015 weekday travel time data was also summarized by average travel speed by hour of day for all vehicle types (passenger and freight combined). The graphs below clearly show that average speeds during the majority of the day are below the posted speed limit of 30 mph, with the exception of the westbound traffic between Main St and Exit 7, which moves a little faster at 30 mph or slightly below the speed limit. Like many areas, parking is constrained and motorists on the corridor must contend with a number of potential obstructions, including fellow motorists making parallel parking efforts, crossing pedestrian traffic, cyclists and the loading and unloading of freight. The NH 101A corridor generally operates as it should because it is reasonable to expect traffic along the corridor to be congested given the mix of uses. Attractions along this corridor that may generate traffic include the Amherst Street Elementary School, Holman Stadium, and BAE Systems. The fact that there is pedestrian traffic and some motor vehicle congestion means the corridor is not only the entryway to the downtown, but a desirable location by itself.

Projects There are several recent infrastructure projects in Nashua s urban core that could impact the 101A Corridor east of the F.E. Everett Turnpike. In recent years, the City of Nashua has completed a significant rehabilitation of pedestrian facilities along the corridor that are designed to improve navigability and comfort levels for pedestrians. The Nashua Regional Planning Commission plans to complete an additional congestion analysis of the corridor after the impacts of the improvements are fully in effect.