Monday July 17th, 2017 Rep. Rob Bishop, Chairman House Committee on Natural Resources 123 Cannon Building Washington, DC 20515

Similar documents
The Greater Sage-Grouse:

The Endangered Species Act Works

[Docket No. FWS R6 ES ; FXES C6-178-FF09E42000]

Political Interference in Endangered Species Science A Systemic Problem at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

PROTECTING SAGE GROUSE AND THEIR HABITAT IN THE WEST. John Harja Senior Counsel on Detail to the Public Lands Office

Via Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested

Natural Resource Statutes and Policies. Who Owns the Wildlife? Treaties. Federal Laws. State Laws. Policies. Administrative Laws.

AOGA EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR. Endangered Species Act

Natural Resource Statutes and Policies

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

Case 1:15-cv EGS Document 52-7 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 7. Exhibit 7

The Gray Wolf and the Endangered Species Act (ESA): A Brief Legal History

Questions and Answers: Proposed Rule to List Lesser Prairie-Chicken As Threatened

Transition: Wild Horse & Burro Management

Re: Comments on 90-Day Finding on Petitions to Delist the Gray Wolf in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, and the Western Great Lakes

SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE ATTACKS ON THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT IN THE 115 TH CONGRESS

Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the Draft Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) Conservation Strategy

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

August 2, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Bull trout ESA litigation update

Proposed Terrestrial Critical Habitat for the Northwest Atlantic Loggerhead Sea Turtle Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

3608, H.R. 6344, H.R. 6345, H.R. 6346, H.R. 6354, H.R. 6355, H.R. 6356, H.R.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

[FWS R1 ES 2015 N076; FXES FF01E00000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Draft Recovery Plan for

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Recovery Plan for the. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

CENTRAL PROJECT: PLANNING EVERGLADES CENTRAL EVERGLADES RESTORING THE HEART OF THE EVERGLADES

Western Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies. White Paper: Wildlife Management Subsidiarity

Bill Hanson US Fish & Wildlife Service

Native Species Restoration and its Impact on Local Populations

Living Beaches: Integrating The Ecological Function Of Beaches Into Coastal Engineering Projects and Beach Management

II. Comments Regarding the Mitigation Goals of Net Conservation Benefit and No Net Loss

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

Submitted to: House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies

Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Tulsa, Oklahoma. Jonna Polk, Field Supervisor

Hot Topics: Endangered Species Act. Presented by Kirk Maag, Stoel Rives LLP October 2016

IMPACTS OF A REDUCTION IN FISH PRODUCTION FROM SERVICE TROUT MITIGATION HATCHERIES IN THE SOUTHEAST

AOGA Educational Seminar

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON RESIDENT CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT Questions and Answers

Candidate Species Conservation:

May 7, Ryan Zinke, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1840 C Street, N.W. Washington, D.C

Endangered Species Act: Information On Species Protection On Nonfederal Lands

Endangered Species Act and FERC Hydroelectric Projects. Jeff Murphy & Julie Crocker NHA New England Meeting November 16, 2010

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Native American Crosscut Funding

MT Fish, Wildlife and Parks Wildlife Division, Attn: Public Comment WOLF SEASON POB Helena, MT

Section 3: The Future of Biodiversity

After 40 years of protection, Yellowstone grizzly bears are off the list

Matching respondents over time and assessing non-response bias. Respondents sometimes left age or sex blank (n=52 from 2001 or 2004 and n=39 from

FEATURED NEWS. Greater Sage Grouse Habitat. View Web Version Like Tweet Forward

Easements for Endangered Species: A Collaborative Approach to Saving the Lesser Prairie Chicken

Exotic Wildlife Association Membership Alert

AN INCIDENTAL TAKE PLAN FOR CANADA LYNX AND MINNESOTA S TRAPPING PROGRAM

Introduction Plants and animals are a natural component of the environment humans inhabit. In addition to the aesthetic, spiritual, and utilitarian

Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Community Conservation Plan

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Endangered Species on Ranches. Nebraska Grazing Conference August 14 15, 2012

Save the Cowboy, Stop the APR! What does this mean?

INDEX. House Interior Appropriations Bill of

15 May Dear U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:

Challenges of Florida Panther Conservation. Presented by: Darrell Land, Florida Panther Team Leader

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Status of Endangered Species At Act Determinations ti and. the Southeast. Southeast Region

Pre-Visit Lesson Endangered Species On the Brink of Recovery

SIERRA LEGAL DEFENCE FUND

Dear Chairman Bishop, Chairman Hoeven, Ranking Member Fortenberry, and Ranking Member Merkley:

TRCP National Sportsmen s Survey Online/phone survey of 1,000 hunters and anglers throughout the United States

IC Chapter 34. Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation

Salmon Recovery Planning in Washington

Large Carnivore Conflict Management in Kenya Implementing National Carnivore Conservation Strategies. Charles Musyoki, PhD. Kenya Wildlife Service

Lone Wolf Racking up Miles

Environmental Law and Policy Salzman & Thompson

Summary After near eradication of the gray wolf from the lower 48 states in the first half of the 20 th century, the wolf was on the Endangered Specie

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Reporting and Recovery Planning and Implementation for Endangered Species

Montana Natural Heritage Program 1515 East Sixth Ave., Helena, Montana (406)

Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Exhibit K: Declaration of Kassia Siegel, Member and Center for Biological Diversity Staff (Nov. 28, 2011)

February 14, Via Electronic Mail & Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested

BUILDING DEPARTMENT VALUATION AND FEES MONTHLY REPORT

[FWS R6 ES 2017 N031; FF06E FXES111606C0000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Enhancement of Survival Permit

Advancing the Gulf of Mexico Shellfish Initiative (GoMexSI)

Stakeholder Activity

ECONOMIC VALUE OF OUTFITTED TRIPS TO CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS

ESCA. Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times

[Docket No. FWS R2 ES ; FXES FF02ENEH00] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Mexican Wolf Draft Recovery

Overview of Federal and State Wildlife Regulations

Silencing The Uproar

Healthy Planet. legacy circle

The wolf hunt is on in Wyoming after endangered protections are lifted

Preliminary submission of information relevant to the status review of the thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) (NOAA-NMFS )

Legislation. Lisa T. Ballance Marine Mammal Biology SIO 133 Spring 2013

Environmental Law Under Trump: Public Lands, Wildlife, and Federalism

[Docket No. FWS R6 ES ; FXES FF09E42000] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Greater Yellowstone

The Road to Recovery: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future for the Endangered Mexican Gray Wolf

PRESENTATION TO THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISALTIVE STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE September 26, 2013

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No (Consolidated with , , , , )

Yellowstone grizzly bears have been taken off the endangered species list

Northern Long-eared Bats A Federally Threatened Species. Wende Mahaney USFWS Ecological Services Maine Field Office March 14, 2016

AmericAn PlAice. consultations on listing under the Species at Risk Act

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION. Hunting, Trapping, and Fishing

Gray Wolves Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA): Distinct Population Segments and Experimental Populations

Transcription:

Monday July 17th, 2017 Rep. Rob Bishop, Chairman House Committee on Natural Resources 123 Cannon Building Washington, DC 20515 Rep. Raul Grijalva, Ranking Member House Committee on Natural Resources 1511 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 Chairman Bishop and Ranking Member Grijalva, On behalf of the membership of the Minnesota Farmers Union (MFU) we wish to thank-you from taking time to hear H.R. 424 authored by Rep. Collin Peterson. MFU is a strong supporter of this legislation that requires the Department of the Interior to reissue the final rule published on December 28, 2011, that removed the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes Distinct Population Segment from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and that removed the designation of critical habitat for that wolf in Minnesota and Michigan. De-listing the gray wolf has been a top issue for our livestock farmers in the northern part of the state, as we have seen continued conflict between wolves and livestock farmers. MFU strongly believes that gray wolf numbers have adequately recovered in Minnesota. MFU also strongly believes that the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) is ready and able to administer the gray wolf population through its current management plans. Minnesota has consistently topped the federal delisting goal of 1,250-1,400 with numbers exceeding 2,000 wolves in recent years surveys. Again, MFU appreciates Rep. Peterson carrying this important legislation forward, and appreciates the committees time in hearing this legislation, and MFU urges its passage. Regards, Gary Wertish, President

07/18/2017 The Honorable Rob Bishop The Honorable Raul Grijalva Chairman Ranking Member House Committee on Natural Resources House Committee on Natural Resources 1324 Longworth HOB 1329 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 RE: Gray Wolf State Management Act (H.R. 424) Chairman Bishop & Ranking Member Grijalva, On behalf of the American Farm Bureau Federation, we would like to thank you for scheduling a hearing to consider the Gray Wolf State Management Act (H.R. 424). This commonsense, bipartisan legislation would reinstate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service s (FWS) order to remove the gray wolf in the Western Great Lakes and Wyoming from the federal Endangered Species List. It would also provide legal clarity for the gray wolf s status on the Endangered Species list. Farm Bureau has been an active participant in the wolf issue for decades. That participation encompasses legal efforts in the federal district court in Minnesota seeking damages on behalf of Minnesota ranchers resulting from wolf predation; a lawsuit challenging the introduction of wolves into Montana, Wyoming and Idaho; comments on proposed federal regulations; comments delivered in public and congressional hearings; and regular interaction with the FWS on the impact of gray wolf populations on the membership. The purpose of the ESA is to recover species that are threatened with extinction: the Act clearly lays out the appropriate path to take after a species has recovered. In the case of the gray wolf, affected states have taken a positive, constructive approach in assuring continued recovery of the wolf, a step which supports the species de-listing. Farm Bureau supports Federal efforts to de-list the gray wolf. Such an effort is clearly justified in light of the goals of the Endangered Species Act; the best available scientific and commercial data that is available; the goals outlined in various recovery plans; and the aggressive leadership in affected states. Viewed in this context, the current status of the wolf clearly justifies its removal from the list of threatened and endangered species. We commend you for your leadership on this important issue, and look forward to continuing to work with you and the House Natural Resources Committee in securing enactment of this critically important legislation. Sincerely,

Dale Moore Executive Director, Public Policy American Farm Bureau Federation

July 18, 2017 The Honorable Rob Bishop The Honorable Raul Grijalva Chairman Ranking Member Committee on Natural Resources Committee on Natural Resources U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives 1324 Longworth House Office Building 1329 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 RE: Livestock Industry Support for H.R. 424, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2017 Dear Chairman Bishop and Ranking Member Grijalva: The Public Lands Council (PLC) and the National Cattlemen s Beef Association (NCBA)support H.R. 424, the Gray Wolf State Management Act of 2017. PLC is the only national organization dedicated solely to representing the roughly 22,000 ranchers operating on federal lands. NCBA is the nation s oldest and largest national trade association for cattlemen and women, representing more than 170,000 cattle producers through direct membership and their state affiliates. PLC and NCBA are producer directed and in partnership with our state affiliates work to preserve the heritage and strength of the industry by providing a stable business environment for our members. The livestock industry has numerous concerns with the gray wolf being listed as an endangered species. Unlike most species listed under the ESA, wolves pose a serious threat to wildlife, humans, private property namely, livestock even in cases where wolf populations are sparse. The result is economic hardship and the possibility of a need to list other species. Secondly, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has already determined the wolf is no longer warranted for listing under the ESA. H.R. 424, introduced by Representative Collin Peterson calls for the Secretary of the Interior to reinstate two U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decisions that delisted the gray wolf from the endangered species list in the Great Lakes Region and Wyoming, allowing the states to continue to manage the wolf populations, as they have successfully done for several years. Relisting the species undermined the good work that has taken place on the ground, and unnecessarily takes away the states right to manage wildlife populations within their borders. It also takes away the ability for livestock producers to protect their herds, putting their livelihood and economic stability in jeopardy. H.R. 424, is a bipartisan, common sense approach to management of species, which promotes cooperation between the USFWS, state wildlife agencies, and local stakeholders.

PLC and NCBA have been continually involved in ESA related activities. Our associations have submitted comments in partnership with our state affiliate organizations on the Gray and Mexican Wolves, Sage Grouse, Lesser Prairie Chicken, and the Black Footed Ferret to name a few. For the last two years, we have been fully engaged with the Western Governors Association and the ESA Initiative led by Governor Matt Mead of Wyoming. It is crucial for the livestock industry to be engaged to the fullest extent possible, in order to ensure that the nation s livestock producers, who provide food and fiber for the nation and world, are protected from harmful and unwarranted listings under the ESA. PLC and NCBA applaud the efforts of Representative Peterson and appreciate the opportunity to provide our input on behalf of our members the nation s food and fiber producers. We encourage members of the Committee to support this positive and proactive piece of legislation. Sincerely, Dave Eliason President Public Lands Council Craig Uden President National Cattlemen s Beef Association