The Burrishoole Catchment

Similar documents
VARIABILITY IN GROWTH RATE IN EUROPEAN EEL ANGUILLA ANGUILLA (L.) IN A WESTERN IRISH CATCHMENT

River Severn and Estuary

Know Your River Conwy Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Know Your River Conwy Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Stillwater Status Report: Lough Muck, County Donegal

ELECTRO-FISHING REPORT 2016 UPPER TWEED

Know Your River - Clwyd Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

GUIDE TO ESTIMATING TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH USING SIZE FREQUENCY IN CATCH, EFFORT DATA, AND MPAS

Management of eel species: a modelling problem

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

Stillwater Status Report: Lough Muck, County Tyrone

We would also like to thank Dr. Martin O Grady (CFB) and No. 3 Operational Wing, Irish Air Corps (Aer Chór na héireann) for the aerial photographs.

EU request to provide advice on fisheries-related anthropogenic impacts on eels in EU marine waters

Salmon age and size at maturity: Patterns and processes

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel)

Conservation Limits and Management Targets

Fish Survey Report and Stocking Advice for Loch Milton. (Loch a Mhuilinn), May 2011

We would also like to thank Dr. Martin O Grady (CFB) and No. 3 Operational Wing, Irish Air Corps (Aer Chór na héireann) for the aerial photographs.

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION. establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European Eel.

Eel management in Sweden Håkan Westerberg. Fiskeriverket

HADDOCK ON THE SOUTHERN SCOTIAN SHELF AND IN THE BAY OF FUNDY (DIV. 4X/5Y)

Know Your River River Afan Salmon and Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Implications of reducing Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) minimum size (MLS/MCRS) in the Skagerrak and Kattegat area (IIIa).

Fish Conservation and Management

Stillwater Status Report: Lough Mourne, County Donegal

Know Your River Dee Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Official Journal of the European Union L 248/17

Preliminary results of SEPODYM application to albacore. in the Pacific Ocean. Patrick Lehodey

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

Application of a New Method for Monitoring Lake Trout Abundance in Yukon: Summer Profundal Index Netting (SPIN)

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area

Kenai River Sockeye Escapement Goals. United Cook Inlet Drift Association

Monitoring of sea trout post-smolts, 2012

Goldfish control in the Vasse River: summary of the 2008 programme

Appendix A Recommended EPA Temperature Thresholds for use in Establishing Thermal Potential and Species Life Stage Numeric Criteria

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013

D. Clifton-Dey M. Walsingham January 1995.

Advice October 2013

Lamprey populations in the UK & the development of a new sampling tool for deep water habitats. Nicola Teague

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE TWELFTH REGULAR SESSION. Bali, Indonesia 3-11 August 2016

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Advice June 2014

Refined Designated Uses for the Chesapeake Bay and Tidal Tributaries

Know Your River - Clwyd Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

IFM SCOTLAND S CODE of GOOD PRACTICE for FRESHWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT part 1: Salmon & Trout

10.3 Advice May 2014

Characterising the status of the Western Port recreational fishery in relation to biodiversity values: Phase 1 Greg Jenkins and Simon Conron

Assessment Summary Report Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper SEDAR 7

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Know Your River - Ogwen Salmon & Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Know Your River - River Ogmore Salmon and Sea Trout Catchment Summary

Loughs Agency. Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission. Pre-Fishery Stock Assessment Lough Foyle Native Oyster Fishery.

Species Profile: Red Drum Benchmark Assessment Finds Resource Relatively Stable with Overfishing Not Occurring

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Overview 10/8/2015. October Pelagic Advice Pelagic AC 7 October 2015

Water Framework Directive Fish Stock Survey of Lough Meelagh, August 2014

Inland Fisheries Ireland. National Research Survey Programme. Fish Stock Survey of Lough Nasnahida, July 2015

Preliminary analysis of yellowfin tuna catch, effort, size and tagging data using an integrated age-structured model

An Roinn Turasoireachta, lascaigh. agus Foraoiseachta THE IMPACT OF EEL FYKE NETTING ON OTHER FISHERIES

Abstract. The aim of this study was to determine the size and age compositions, growth

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

The Fishery. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-05

2013 Electrofishing Program Summary. Miramichi Salmon Association In collaboration with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans

DARK GHOST SHARK (GSH)

ATLANTIC SALMON NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, SALMON FISHING AREAS 1-14B. The Fisheries. Newfoundland Region Stock Status Report D2-01

Lecture 2: Sampling gear. Ichthyology 3

Fish population survey report

Council CNL(11)35. Annual Report on Actions Taken Under Implementation Plans. EU - France

Red Sea bream in Subareas VI, VII and VIII

Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in Division 4.b, Functional Unit 6 (central North Sea, Farn Deeps)

Spurdog (Squalus acanthias) in the Northeast Atlantic

Factors influencing production

Council CNL(17)33. Annual Progress Report on Actions Taken Under the Implementation Plan for the Calendar Year EU - Denmark

IMPROVING POPULATION MANAGEMENT AND HARVEST QUOTAS OF MOOSE IN RUSSIA

NORTH ISLAND EELS (SFE 20-23, LFE 20-23)

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

Benchmark Statement Respecting the Fish, Fish Habitat and Fisheries of Fish and Little Fish Lake, within the Taseko River Watershed.

Salmon Five Point Approach restoring salmon in England

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Chemical and Biological Recovery from Acidic Deposition in the Honnedaga Lake Watershed

TAY DISTRICT SALMON FISHERIES BOARD POLICY ON SALMON STOCKING

Guidance Note. Hydropower Guidance Note: HGN 8 Fish Passage. When do you need to install a fish pass?

ISC Pacific Bluefin tuna Stock Assessment 2016

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

Inland Fisheries Ireland. National Research Survey Programme. Fish Stock Survey of Dunglow Lough, July 2015

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Water Framework Directive Fish Stock Survey of Glencar Lough, August 2013

Growth: Humans & Surf Clams

Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND. Public Involvement ISSUE ANALYSIS. Attachment 1

Fish population survey report

What does science tell us about Tuna? Tuna biology.101. Erica Williams, Jacques Boubée & Wakaiti Dalton

A Combined Recruitment Index for Demersal Juvenile Cod in NAFO Divisions 3K and 3L

Salmon spawning report 2010

RIVER CONONISH INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Dr Kjersti Birkeland

Transcription:

Case Study Description The Burrishoole Catchment This document is part of the Report of FP6-project FP6-022488 Restoration of the European eel population; pilot studies for a scientific framework in support of sustainable management. lime - Study Leading to Informed Management of Eels Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 8.1, Policy-oriented research, Scientific Support to Policies.

Case Study Description The Burrishoole Catchment Russell Poole, Elvira de Eyto Aquaculture & Catchment Management Services Marine Institute Furnace, Newport, Co. Mayo, Ireland Tel. 00-353-98-42300; FAX. 00-353-98-42340 russell.poole@marine.ie NB: The data provided for the case study should only be used in the context of testing models and should not be quoted otherwise without the permission of the Marine Institute. 1 Abstract The Burrishoole catchment, in the west of Ireland, consists of rivers and lakes with relatively acid waters. The catchment has never been commercially fished and there are no barriers or turbines. The eels have been intensively studied since the mid-1950s with a count of the total silver eel escapement from freshwater since 1970. An intensive baseline survey was undertaken in 1987-88 which, along with the silver eel data and the absence of fishing mortality, makes it the ideal case study for calibrating various models of yellow eel stock and silver eel output from an unexploited catchment. 2 Introduction For EU SLIME, the Burrishoole represents many smaller catchments that are lightly fished or unexploited. While the growth rates are relatively slow, the data set should be able to facilitate modelling of the stock. This is a relatively data rich situation. The catchment can be broadly separated into a tidal portion and a freshwater portion. No recruitment or silver eel data exist for the tidal portion. Complete silver data is available from the entire freshwater catchment, although there is no quantitative estimate of recruitment. The data supplied to SLIME is described in Appendix 1. 3 Burrishoole Catchment The Burrishoole valley, Co. Mayo, Ireland, (Fig. 1) lies in a north - south direction; the principal features were described by Parker (1977). The Burrishoole catchment is an oligotrophic and poorly buffered system (53 0 55'.22 N 009 0 34'.185 W), with an area of 8,949ha and consists of three main lakes, the brackish L. Furnace (141 ha), the freshwater lakes Feeagh (410 ha) and Bunaveela (46 ha) and a number of smaller lakes such as L. Avoher, and L. Namaroon. The catchment area is drained by at least 70 km of small shallow streams, particularly to the west; the Altahoney, Marmarata and Glenamong and to the east; the Goulaun, Rough (Srahrevagh) R., Lodge and Cottage rivers. These rivers make up 28ha of shallow stream area (not including 1 st ord), of which 22ha is accessible to migrating salmonids (Poole et al. 1990; Poole 1994; McGinnity et al., 2003). p.288 lime FP6-project 022488

Upstream and downstream Wolf-type fish traps, employing horizontal grids with 12 mm gaps, are situated on two short outflow rivers joining L. Feeagh to L. Furnace. Trapping commenced on the Mill Race in 1958 and full trapping of all migrating silver eels commenced at these both traps in 1970 (Poole et al. 1990). This gave a complete census of the number and size of migrating silver eel leaving the freshwater portion of the catchment. L. Namaroon Bunaveela L. N Altahoney L. Avoher Marmarata Black R. Fiddaunveela Lena R. Goulaun Rough R. Fiddaunahoillaun. Glenamong L. Feeagh Cottage R. Stream B Stream A Yellow R. Salmon Leap Trap BOH Lakes Rivers Clew Bay Mill Race Trap L. Furnace Estuary 2 km Figure 1. Map of the Burrishoole catchment showing the position of the main lakes and rivers and the fish census traps at the Salmon Leap and the Mill Race in red, fyke net locations in blue and river names in black. 3.1 Estuary A relatively short tidal estuary (~4 km) which dries extensively at low water. This leads upstream into the tidal lower L. Furnace (BOH). A low stock of yellow eel present. FP6-project 022488 lime p. 289

3.2 Back of the House (BOH) A fully tidal shallow (<3m) area (16ha) between the upper estuary and the weirs leading into L. Furnace. A good stock of yellow eel of all sizes. In particular in the 1980s many large female eel. Diet predominantly crustacean and fish. 3.3 L. Furnace The general structure of the lough can be described in terms of a cryptodepression bounded by moraine and drumlin countryside. The lough has a total surface area north of Nixon's Island of 125 ha. L. Furnace may be considered an oligotrophic lake, typical in many respects to other bog lakes in the nature of its surface waters, but radically different in the deeper areas as a consequence of meromictic stable stratification occurring between 3m and 4m due to salinity levels (halocline), a thermocline and an oxycline (Parker, 1977). This results in the development of permanently anoxic conditions in the deeper areas. The maximum depth recorded in Lough Furnace is 21.5 m. Eel diet largely crustacean, molluscan and fish. 3.4 L. Feeagh Lough Feeagh is an oligotrophic, freshwater lake of glacial origin. The lough has an area of 410 ha, a maximum depth of 43 m and lies about 200 m upstream of L. Furnace at an altitude of 14 m. Lough Feeagh joins L. Furnace by two narrow turbulent channels; the Mill Race (man-made) and the Salmon Leap (natural). The waters of L. Feeagh are neutral to acidic and distinctly coloured, but transparency is only moderate. Values for ph range from approximately 6.3 to 7.0 and conductivity values are around 80-90 µs/cm. The surface temperature is monitored continuously at the Mill Race. Temperature values are generally within the range 3 o C to 20 o C. Thermal stratification may occur in L. Feeagh although the lake is too exposed for this to be a common occurrence. Eel diet largely insect larvae, some molluscs and fish. 3.5 Bunaveela L Bunaveela L. lies at an altitude of approximately 150 m above sea level, at the head of the Goulaun sub-catchment on the north eastern side of the catchment, about 14 km from the tidal interface. The lake is "pear" shaped and has an area of 42 ha and a maximum depth of 23 m. There is one main inflowing stream, the Fiddaunveela, and one main outflow, the Goulaun. The geology of the area around Bunaveela L. is mixed; to the west of the lough is sandstone, to the south is an area of sand and gravel moraine with some outcrops of limestone and to the east is an area of mica schists. The sandstone and limestone tends to buffer the lake, boosting productivity and allowing some molluscs and considerable numbers of Gammarus duebeni to inhabit the lake. Bunaveela L. is accessible to migrating salmonids, salmon and sea trout, and has healthy stocks of resident brown trout and charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Eel diet largely insect larvae and Gammarus. 3.6 L. Avoher L. Avoher lies at an altitude of approximately 100 m above sea level at the head of the Maumaratta R. and lies nestled in the coniferous forestry and peat bogland. The lake is very acidic and oligotrophic; the geology is of quartzite and is extremely base poor. The shores are of peat and the bottom is also peat mud with luxuriant growths of Potamogeton sp., Isoetes, Myriophyllum. and waterlilies (Nuphar & Nymphaea). The lake has an area of 1.8 ha and is p.290 lime FP6-project 022488

rather shallow with a maximum depth of about 5 m. L. Avoher is inaccessible to migrating salmonids, but it does have a stock of resident brown trout and freshwater eel. Eel diet largely insect larvae. 3.7 L. Namaroon The smallest lake on the system (area = 0.6 ha) and also the highest at an altitude of approximately 250 m above sea level, L. Namaroon lies at the head of the Altahoney river, about 16 km from the tidal interface, in a bowl shaped corrie; it has a maximum depth of about 10 m. The lake lies on the south east slopes of Nephin Beg mountain on a bed rock of mica schist and gneiss. The shores are rocky with some peat banks and the bottom is of peaty mud. There is little apparent aquatic vegetation. There is only one outflow, less than half a metre wide and only some 10 cm deep. Freshwater eel appear to be the only fish species present in the lake. Eel diet largely Hemiptera and Coleoptera. 3.8 The Rivers The Burrishoole catchment is drained by at least 70km of rivers and streams, or 30ha of shallow stream area (not including 1 st ord), of which about 20ha is accessible to migrating salmonids, principally the Glenamong R., the Black R., Maumaratta R., Altahoney R., Goulaun R., Rough and Lodge Rivers, Cottage R. and the Yellow R. These rivers are all very spatelike in nature, rapidly rising and falling in response to precipitation. There is evidence to suggest that a number of streams in the catchment (Altahoney, Maumaratta and Glenamong) may have been environmentally compromised by the forestry activity. Eel diet largely insect larvae and some Gammarus. 4 The Burrishoole Eel Fishery The eel stock in the Burrishoole catchment has not been commercially exploited during the last 50 years and historically may only have been fished at the southern end of L. Feeagh at a silver eel weir, no longer present. There is no eel enhancement and no data on the level of recruitment. Upstream and downstream Wolf-type fish traps, employing horizontal grids with 12 mm gaps, are situated on two short outflow rivers joining L. Feeagh to L. Furnace. Full trapping of migrating silver eels commenced at these traps in 1970 (Poole et al. 1990). 4.1 Fishing capacity There is no commercial or recreational fishing capacity on Burrishoole. 4.2 Fishing effort There is no commercial or recreational fishing effort on Burrishoole FP6-project 022488 lime p. 291

4.3 Catches and Landings There are no commercial or recreational catches on Burrishoole. 4.4 Catch per Unit of Effort Survey CPUEs using fyke net are reported below. 5 Summary Description of Eel Population 5.1 Recruitment to Burrishoole No historical quantitative data on elver migrations were collected in the Burrishoole. However, the Annual Reports of the Salmon Research Trust state that in 1980, 34.5 kg of elvers were trapped from the Mill Race right bank permanent trap and a further 28.4 kg were collected using hand nets from the Salmon Leap during a drought in late May 1980. It was estimated that these weights were only a fraction of the total run (Ann. Rep., 1980). This comment from the 1981 report is worth quoting; "The year was characterised by an unexplained cohort failure of elvers. There was no evidence of glass eels in Lough Furnace during January and February, and no signs of early-pigmented elvers on the lake shore thereafter. The elver traps on the Mill race were set working in mid-april but virtually no elvers were caught and the trapping was terminated in early July". The catches in 1982 were also extremely poor, although the run of elvers was considered to be "normal" (Ann. Rep., 1982). The number of elvers captured in 1987 and 1988 contrast sharply with the weights captured in 1980. The equivalent weights captured in the Mill Race traps were 1.2 kg in 1987, 2.0 kg in 1988 and 12.6 kg in the portable trap on the lake shore in 1988. These figures show a reduction in catch of between 70 and 95% between 1980 and 1987/88. The glass eels were intercepted on arrival in the estuary from November 1987 to April 1988 and their migration was followed through brackish water into L. Furnace. The transition to the migrating elver was examined. There was a decrease in both length and weight of the eels sampled. There was evidence to suggest earlier upstream migration by the larger individuals. Along with the decrease in size, the eels became progressively more pigmented over time. Otolith development (otoliths prepared by burning and cracking) occurred over three phases with the appearance in the second phase of the first dark band outside the nucleus coinciding both with the winter and the estuarine transition. In the third phase the next growth zone developed in relation to pigment level and date of sampling, but apparently not to the length of the eel. This is the first indication of growth uncoupling between the juvenile eels and its otolith (Poole et al. 2004). Upstream migrating juvenile pigmented eels (bootlace) also occurred in the upstream migration into freshwater and when these were compared to similar sized eels remaining in the estuary, the migrating eels were found to be relatively older for length with a slower annual growth rate and a greater length at age variation. 5.2 Yellow Eel The fyke net CPUE for yellow eels in the estuary and six lakes varied significantly with location in both 1987 and 1988. With the exception of the outer estuary, unit catch fell dramatically with distance from the sea. There was a marked seasonal fluctuation in catch with low catches during the winter months and higher catches in the spring and summer. The lengths of the eels varied significantly between locations and between sites within locations. With the exception of the estuary, larger eels occurred in the brackish water locations. The p.292 lime FP6-project 022488

normal length range of the data extended to about 60 cm, but large eels over 80 cm were recorded from Bunaveela L., L. Feeagh (Fig. 2), L. Furnace and the Back of the House. Mean length of the eels increased with increasing distance from the sea for the river eels, but not for the lake populations. There were large variations in both length at terminal age and growth rate, with significant differences between annual growth increments in individual years, between individuals, between males and females, between 'normal' size and large female eels and between eels in different locations (Poole et al., 1992; Poole & Reynolds, 1998). Markrecaptured eels verified the slow growth patterns calculated from the otolith material (Poole & Reynolds, 1996). There were also significant differences in the proportions of broad headed eels and in the composition of the diet at each location (Poole, 1994). Yellow eels showed a marked tendency towards homing to specific or general areas of each lake examined. 30 25 1987 20 Number 15 10 5 0 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 Length (cm) Figure 2. An example of yellow eel length frequency for the 1987 L. Feeagh fyke net survey. 5.3 Silver Eel The silver eel migrations in Burrishoole have been studied since 1959 (Piggins, 1985; Poole et al., 1990) (Figure 3). Numbers of eels in the migrations have decreased (Figure 4.). The mean length of male eels has increased by 16.5% and females by 27.6%. Total weight of catch has not been affected by the drop in numbers. A change in sex ratio from 94% males in 1962 to 37.5% in 1988 has also occurred. A decrease in elver recruitment into freshwater and a change in the environmental status of the system are discussed as contributory factors. Differential migration times of males and females, an increase in female length and decrease in male length were observed over time during the 1988 eel run. The changes in the silver eel migration may have implications for the setting of "pristine spawner escapement" (Table 1). The current female output is higher than observed in the 1970s and the female eels are also larger in the latter years. This may be a natural biological mechanism for increasing the production of ova in periods of population dearth. FP6-project 022488 lime p. 293

450 400 350 Female Male 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 Number 78 82 86 90 94 98 Length (cm) Figure 3. Length frequency for the 1988 silver eel migration, showing male and female eels separately. Number Burrishoole Silver Eel Number Weight 8000 300 7000 250 6000 200 5000 4000 150 3000 100 2000 50 1000 0 0 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 Year Weight (gm) Burrishoole Silver Data Burrishoole Silver Data 100 90 y = -1.2203x + 80.648 65 60 % Male 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Female Length 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year Year Figure 4. The annual numbers and size of downstream migrating silver eel along with the % males and size of females in the run. p.294 lime FP6-project 022488

Table 1. Comparison between the silver eel migration in 1971-1980 and 1995-2005, showing numbers, biomass, number and size of female and estimate of potential ova yield. Silver Eel 1971-1980 1995-2005 Average count 4409 3149 Biomass (kg) 436 677 Silver Output (kg/ha) 0.9 1.5 Number of females 1626 2103 Biomass of Females 329 570 Potential No. Ova (1.5m/kg) 494,127,893 855,468,322 6 Application of the Models For the purposes of testing models in SLIME, it was decided to focus on the freshwater portion of the Burrishoole catchment and use the silver eel census (escapement) at the lower end of the freshwater catchment as the ultimate verification of the model outputs. Three models were applied to the Burrishoole dataset; SMEP, GlobAng and the Demographic Model. 6.1 SMEP 6.1.1 Description The primary requirement of SMEP is that reach length and width data are available so that the productive area of catchment can be calculated, and eel production modelled based on eel population parameters. Where available, eel population data for the catchment are used to make the eel population parameters more appropriate to the specific population. The Burrishoole was appropriate for SMEP because catchment data were readily available, along with eel population data sufficient to inform the parameters file. The Burrishoole is a non-exploited system so there was no complication for fishing mortality. Also, the Burrishoole fish traps have given 35 years of silver eel output data with which it should be possible to validate the model. However, a core assumption of SMEP is that the parameters describing the eel population dynamic processes are constant throughout the catchment, albeit influenced by reach length (migration rate), and density-dependence (migratory tendency, growth, mortality, differentiation/maturation rates). It is possible that some eel population dynamic processes differ between riverine and lacustrine habitats, e.g. the influence of density dependent processes. Therefore, the presence of several lakes in the Burrishoole catchment, and especially the large L. Feeagh at the bottom of the freshwater system, posed a particular challenge for the parameterisation of SMEP. 6.1.2 Parameter Setting Growth: using von Bertalanffy growth parameters was not the most appropriate when applied to the smaller, younger age classes of eel, especially the upstream migrating bootlace recruits; age at length may be a better approach. FP6-project 022488 lime p. 295

Recruitment: No recruitment figures were available for Burrishoole, although relative changes in abundance were implied. SMEP was calibrated against observed silver eel escapement in order to derive estimated recruitment levels of 1.2 million and 600,000 glass eels for the pre-1980 s and present-day, respectively. Carrying Capacity: maximum densities observed for streams were used, although these may still be well below maximum possible density. No density data were available for the lakes. The concept of carrying capacity for eel requires further exploration. 6.1.3 Population Data Total length frequencies were available for stream sites, but not for lakes these length distributions were based on fyke net survey lengths. It may be possible to refine these using gear selectivity values. 6.1.4 Model Outputs Based on the 50% decline in recruitment from 1970 to 2000, SMEP produced a silver eel escapement over the period 1980 to 2005 that was similar in both number and trend to that observed from the traps at the exit from L. Feeagh. The model underestimated the production of silver eels in reach 1, probably because it overestimated the migratory tendency of eels in this reach, and therefore distributed yellow eels upstream rather than silver eels downstream. A further consequence of this is that the model probably overestimates the silver eel production from reaches 2 and 3. Reach 1 is a large lake which contains over 80% of the water surface area in the catchment. The model did predict male domination of the silver eels at high recruitment, the switch to parity of the sexes about 25 years after recruitment decline began, and a female dominated (79%) silver eel run at the equilibrium state due to the lower recruitment level. This time frame would seem to be reasonable given the slow growth rates in the catchment. The model was under-estimating the residence time in each reach and also over-estimating growth rate, so that the predicted length frequencies presented in Table 1.4 were biased against the longer individuals for both yellow and silver eel. This was particularly obvious in the disparity between yellow eels greater than 650-750mm and silver eels reaching 950mm. It seems likely that SMEP was under-estimating residence time, growth and length frequencies in the lake habitats and overestimating for the riverine habitats, especially Reaches 2 & 3. 6.1.5 Conclusion SMEP has definite potential for modelling eel populations and silver eel output, but will require considerable further parameter testing and development to cope with missing data (i.e. carrying capacities) and the presence of lakes in the "Reach structure" of the model. Describing the catchment in reaches, setting an appropriate level of recruitment where no actual data exist and matching biological parameters (i.e. growth, eel density & size related to habitat) to actual data, appeared be the key constraints to useful model outcome. 6.2 GlobAng 6.2.1 Description GLOBANG is designed to perform simulations of eel population dynamics within a hydrographical network. After calibration with real field data, the model is able to evaluate silver eel escapement in response to a variety of management scenarios, especially when spatial dimension is important. The model integrates ageing, recruitment, sexual differentiation, silvering, natural mortality and for the first time migration within a watershed. Fishing mortality and impacts of migration barriers can also be simulated. p.296 lime FP6-project 022488

6.2.2 Model Outputs Similar data were applied to the GLOBANG model as were applied to SMEP and the same recruitment and carrying capacity comments made under SMEP apply here. It was difficult to represent the timing of the later recruitment in Burrishoole in GLOBANG as the model ends in May while recruitment to freshwater in Burrishoole commences in May. GLOBANG appeared to capture the age distributions of the silver eel fairly well although in 1988 the model over-estimated male and under-estimated female production. In 2005, the model under-estimated silver escapement for both sexes. As with SMEP, GLOBANG appeared to have difficulty in estimating the level of silver eel escapement and the relative proportions of males and females. This was probably due to the presence of lakes, particularly low down the system, with large carrying capacities. This made simulation of upstream colonisation and maturation difficult under the current versions of GLOBANG and SMEP. 6.2.3 Conclusion GLOBANG certainly warrants further development to include a wider range of parameter value possibilities, such as timing of recruitment and the presence of lakes, which should improve the accuracy of the outputs. GLOBANG represented the age structure of the silver eel output reasonably well and also predicted the production of silver eel from L. Feeagh. However, the proportion and trends of the sex ratios in the silver eel output was opposite to that observed, in particular for the number of female silvers being produced. 6.3 Demographic Model (DemCam) 6.3.1 Description The objective of the Demographic Model is to have a realistic description of the status of the stock in an homogeneous water body considering the main aspects (both natural and anthropogenic) that affect the population dynamics of eel. The model evaluates the impact of fisheries (separately for glass, yellow and silver eels), restocking, maturation, eel growth and natural mortality on the population and consequently on the silver eel output. The model is deterministic and age-structured and the time step is annual. The processes involved are a juvenile mortality density dependent, a growth process distinguished for undifferentiated, males and females, a fishing mortality and a maturation pattern length dependent. 6.3.2 Model Output Application to the Burrishoole data was only carried out at a generalised level within SLIME. The model was run from 1931 until 2030 with estimates of recruitment of 2,000,000 in 1980 and 250,000 in 1988. Outputs from SMEP & GLOBANG would tend to indicate that these estimates may have been high. The model was calibrated using a linear relationship between sex ratio at differentiation time and recruitment supposing that minimum recruitment is associated to the most skewed (in favour of females) sex ratio. Figure 5 presents the model output for silver eel escapement from the Burrishoole catchment and compares it with the observed escapement as counted through the fish traps at the outflow from freshwater. FP6-project 022488 lime p. 297

Figure 5. Observed (blue) and predicted (red) annual spawning stock. Burrishoole case. The model is clearly underestimating the spawning stock output from about 2000 onwards, compared to the observed output. This may be due to making an inaccurate assumption regarding the levels of recruitment, in fact the estimated spawning stock starts to decline in 1996, 16 years later than the drop in the recruitment, consequent with the fact that eels need about 16 years to attain maturation size. However, the 16 years to maturation may be too low for the Burrishoole population where the mean age for males is about 20 years and the females is about 30 years. The model has been heavily influenced by the two estimates of recruitment and these will need to be revised or confirmed for future modelling. 6.3.3 Conclusion The main problem of modelling the Burrishoole system in DemCam is the lack of data regarding recruitment (although this is a problem common to the majority of catchments), moreover the recruitment data of 1980 (2.000.000 individuals) seems to be very high when compared to the annual silver productivity of the system (about 600 kg). Maybe 1980 was a year of high recruitment which lead to overestimation of all the past recruitment. Overestimation of recruitment can consequently cause overestimation of juvenile mortality (juvenile estimated survival rate is about 0.0004) and adult natural mortality rate of 0.36, much higher than the 0.14 usually used for adult eels (Dekker, 2000). More accurate studies on the dependence of sex ratio on density could help in estimating past recruitments. 6.4 Final Comments Applying the models to the Burrishoole dataset proved to be a worthwhile exercise and certainly yielded interesting results. The lack of a recruitment data series for the catchment, as with many catchments, created an obstacle that required considerable "hind-casting", in the case of SMEP, to achieve a silver eel output simulation that matched the observed data. There will be further development required in relating eel data to physical habitat, in order to allow for the application of the model to data poor situations. There will also be further refinement required to allow for modelling of eel stocks in larger water bodies and lakes. The influence of eel density and habitat productivity on sexual differentiation, growth and silver eel production from rivers and lakes is still not clearly understood. It was, therefore, informative to run the models in a scenario where the final output was already known and this p.298 lime FP6-project 022488

allowed for considerable "tweaking" of the parameters. This may not be as easy where silver eel output is not already evaluated. 7 Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the staff of the Marine Institute, particularly the field staff, for dedicated monitoring of the eel census and surveys over the years. 8 References McGinnity P., Gargan P., Roche W., Mills P., & McGarrigle M. (2003). Quantification of the freshwater salmon habitat asset in Ireland using data interpreted in a GIS platform. Irish Freshwater Fisheries Ecology and Management Series: No. 3, Central Fisheries Board, Dublin, Ireland, 132pp. Parker, M. M. (1977). Lough Furnace, County Mayo; physical and chemical studies of an Irish saline lake, with reference to the biology of Neomysis integer. PhD Thesis, Dublin University, 1977. Piggins, D. J. (1985). The silver eel runs of the Burrishoole River System: 1959-84; numbers, weights, timing and sex ratios. ICES/C.M.1985/M:5. Poole, W.R. (1994). A population study of the European Eel (Anguilla anguilla (L.)) in the Burrishoole System, Ireland, with special reference to growth and movement. PhD Thesis, Dublin University; 416pp. Poole, W.R. & Reynolds, J.D. (1996). Age and growth of yellow eel, Anguilla anguilla (L), determined by two different methods. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 5 (2); 86-95. Poole, W.R. & Reynolds, J.D. (1998). Variability in growth rate in European Eel Anguilla anguilla (L.) in a western Irish catchment. Biology and the Environment: Proc. RIA; 98B (2); 141-145. Poole, W.R., Reynolds, J.D.R. & Moriarty, C. (1990). Observations on the silver eel migrations of the Burrishoole river system, Ireland. 1959 to 1988. Int. Revue Ges Hydrobiol. 75 (6); 807-815. Poole, W.R., Reynolds, J.D. & Moriarty, C. (1992). Age and growth of eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) in oligotrophic streams. Irish Fisheries Investigations, Series A (Freshwater). No. 36; 74-79. Poole, W.R., Reynolds, J.D. & Moriarty, C. (2004). Early post larval growth and otolith patterns in the eel Anguilla anguilla. Fisheries Research 66 (1); 107-114. Appendix 1: CASE STUDY DATA. Recruitment Data on glass eel size and development from the estuary and the top end of L. Furnace, elver data migrating upstream into freshwater and bootlace recruitment into freshwater. Freshwater Yellow Eel Yellow eel data available from all the lakes for 1987 and 1988. And for Feeagh and Bunaveela 2001 and 2005. Small amount of information for Feeagh 1973, included in the growth file. FP6-project 022488 lime p. 299

Electrofishing data, including catch, 3 fishing population estimates, minimum estimates, and lengths are available for many sites throughout the catchment between 1991 and 2005, but not all sites in all years. Data - Length, weight, sex, age, growth rate, head shape, catch & CPUE Silver Eel Data Counts for Mill Race Trap since 1959, and total counts since 1970, eel size, sex ratio and growth rate. Tidal water Yellow Eel Yellow eel data available from L. Furnace, BOH and the estuary for 1987 and 1988. And for L. Furnace & BOH 2001 and 2005. Data - Length, weight, sex, age, growth rate, head shape, catch & CPUE Eel Growth Summary historical data for L. Feeagh from 1973, including length, age and growth rate. Growth data and growth parameters are given for all yellow eel locations sampled in 1987 and 1988. p.300 lime FP6-project 022488