Overview. Project No Ryan Cutler Ada County Highway District Christy Foltz-Ahlrichs Ada County Highway District. Heidi Carter, P.E.

Similar documents
AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

Orange Center Elementary School

3/20/2015 VIA . Teresa Haenggi, Associate Planner Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95811

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

Access Management Regulations and Standards

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

San Rafael School District. Task Force Meeting Notes. November 5, 2012

Dec 2, Dear Tri Ong, Sam Woods, and Scott Kubly,

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

11/28/2016 VIA

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

WORKSHOP 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW GENERAL COMMENTS. Walking and Biking. Greening & Stormwater. Transportation & Parking. Lighting, Art and Identity

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Committed to Service

Fairview and Main Local Streets Improvement Plan

UPC Design / CN Locally Administered PE Phase VDOT Administered CN Phase

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Chicago Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to High School (SRTS/SRTHS)

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

Raymond Avenue: Rightsizing Improved Safety and Pedestrian Experience

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

4/14/2017 VIA . Miriam Lim, Junior Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

July 5, Arthur R. Ware, Jr. Elementary School 2017 Safe Routes to School Walkabout Report

See Figure 38, Existing Nonmotorized Connections.

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Public Meeting #1 Comment Summary

Memo. Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Project Public Workshop #2 Summary

RE: Park Plaza Walgreens (P12-016)

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

DRAFT BUENA VISTA 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Municipal and School PROUD TO SERVE. Transportation Assistance

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

9/22/2014 VIA . RE: Butano Apartments Pre App (PAMP )

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

Swamp Road Residents Study

Meadow Woods Elementary School

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

8/1/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Capital Projects Update: N. Lynn Street Esplanade and Custis Trail Improvements 100% Engineering Design - Progress Report

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Frequently Asked Questions

Hidden Oaks Elementary School

Brian McHugh, Buckhead Community Improvement District. SUBJECT: Wieuca Road at Phipps Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX. For the residents of the City of Decatur, Georgia

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM NO. _1A_

Memorandum. Sunday, July 13, Saturday, July 19, 2014

Traffic Control Inspection Checklist Segment:

Capital Projects Update: N. Lynn Street Esplanade and Custis Trail Improvements Advertisement for Construction - Progress Report

State Street and Pierce Park Lane Intersection Concept Report

AGENDA ITEM 6 D THOMASVILLE ROAD (HERMITAGE BOULEVARD TO LIVE OAK PLANTATION ROAD) ROADWAY SAFETY AUDIT

CAPITOL DRIVE & FOND DU LAC AVENUE INTERSECTION ANALYSIS. Urban Planning 772 SARAH BREGANT, RYAN PETERSON, & MATT WERDERITCH

Windy Ridge Elementary School

Route 29 Solutions Projects

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

10/30/2012 VIA

Driveway Design Criteria

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Commercial-Vista Corridor Plan Project Management Team. Judith Johnduff, AICP, Associate Transportation Planner Public Works Department

RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

This page intentionally left blank.

FELL STREET AND MASONIC AVENUE INTERSECTION SURVEY REPORT

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Access Management Regulations and Standards

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT WIDE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN

I 10 Phoenix to California Border Multimodal Corridor Profile Study

Traffic Impact Memorandum. May 22, 2018

Street for approximately 50 feet east of Mississippi Street.

Drag and drop pic and stretch/crop to the limits of the blue rectangle (delete this text box) Maxey Elementary School

Chapter 5: Crossing the Street

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

Military Road Safety Improvements

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

20 th Avenue Neighborway Project August 2, Second Open House

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland

Pedestrian Survey Report

Station 1: Street & Sidewalk Upgrades

RECOMMENDATION: Approve traffic calming projects as recommended by the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Committee (NTCC) on the following streets:

Road Alterations - Wellington Street East, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection

5.0 Roadway System Plan

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Transcription:

Project No. 511031.001 To: From: Ryan Cutler Ada County Highway District Christy Foltz-Ahlrichs Ada County Highway District Heidi Carter, P.E. Date: June 22, 2015 Subject: May 13, 2015 Public Involvement Meeting Summary Report Overview This project entails widening Cole Road from three lanes to five lanes north of the I-84 westbound ramp terminal to Bethel Street. The Cole Road/McMullen Street intersection will be improved with this project and the Cole Road/Franklin Road intersection will be widened to seven lanes on all approaches. The existing traffic signals at Cole Road/McMullen Street, Cole Road/Gratz Drive (future signal) and Cole Road/Franklin Road will be modified. Access management will be incorporated into the Cole Road widening. Driveway approaches will be added along the west side of Beechwood Drive and the north side of Colonial Street to improve site circulation for the private property. The design for the roadway and intersection improvements began in May of 2014 and the project is currently at 75% complete. This project is currently programmed for rightof-way in FY 2016 and construction in FY 2018. The public involvement meeting was held on May 13, 2015. There were 83 people that signed in at this open house with 36 comment sheets received during the meeting. Comments were accepted until May 27 th and 44 comments were received in total. Of the comments received: 35 comments were received via comment form, 1 comment was received via e-mail, 3 comments were received via mail, and 5 comments were posted on-line. A complete list of the comments and survey summaries can be found in the Appendix. May 13, 2015 Public Involvement Meeting Summary Report Page 1

Project No. 511031.001 Survey Summary The comment form presented to the public consisted of one question. Following is a summary of the responses: Question 1 - A number of the public responded to the question: Construction is scheduled for 2018. Are there any special circumstances we need to be aware of during construction? These comments are summarized below: Wondering about replacement of old fence Access by residents living in the Y area who must access neighborhood from either McMullen or Camas. No other access to the neighborhood from the west. Driveway directly on Cole Road and it is the only way to drive in and out of our house. Safety! When is it scheduled to finish? Sound barrier. Please abandon plans to widen Cole Road. What dust mitigation will be used during construction? General Comments The comment form presented to the public also included an opportunity for them to provide general comments regarding the project. Below is a summary of the comments received: Glad you are doing this/good design Several requests for noise mitigation - sound wall /berm Extremely impressed with the plans Cole isn t a problem /Don t widen Cole figure out how to improve Cole/Franklin and Cole/McMullen within existing footprint Many expressed desire for traffic signal at Brentwood Make it happen soon/can t wait until it is done Desire for medians to be concrete and brick pavers Love the design/ Will increase safety by decreasing accidents Strongly oppose project does not improve safety Liked being able to provide comments in the beginning (2011 and 2013) and seeing the plan in various stages Concerns about median in front of Ashland increasing traffic on Brentwood Put median in front of Brentwood instead of Ashland. Brentwood too close to busy intersection for full access/ Medians will increase traffic within neighborhood Concerns about increased traffic on McMullen Plans look good we approve/ Impressed with plan/ Equitable design Like the extra turn lane at Cole & Franklin/Like the sidewalks on McMullen May 13, 2015 Public Involvement Meeting Summary Report Page 2

Project No. 511031.001 Medians are nice way to reduce chance of accidents/ U-Turns will cause greater congestion Many residents asked to be kept updated during construction Concerns about LDS church parking lot having full access to Cole. It will create same problem currently have with McMullen (intersection that is off center) Looks great Cole Road has needed to be widened for a long time. A complete set of the comment forms can be found in the Appendix. May 13, 2015 Public Involvement Meeting Summary Report Page 3

Cole Road and Franklin Road Project No. 511031.001 Appendix Public Information Meeting Comment Forms Online Survey Comments E-mail Comments Survey Monkey Summary May 13, 2015 Public Involvement Meeting Summary Report Page 4

Construction is scheduled for 2018. Are there any special circumstances we need to be aware of during construction? None none DON'T TURN COLE ROAD INTO ANOTHER EAGLE ROAD! None that I can think of. Timing isn't the problem. You just chip sealed the area an it has not been five years. Why are you wasting money? General Comments Dear Mr. Cutler, My name is Patrick Rose. I live on Hummel Drive, teach at Borah High School and am an active member of the neighborhood. I could not make the meeting because I was having my first child. Anyway, I have looked at the proposal and have a question that I hope you can clarify. There is a median being proposed at the intersection of Cole and Hummel Dr. This forces neighborhood traffic to turn north on Cole thus congesting further the intersection at Cole and Franklin. Would it not make more sense to allow residents to turn south towards the freeway thus elevating traffic on Cole? In addition, Hummel is a main artery into the neighborhood. Not allowing emergency vehicles onto Hummel from the north would slow response times for emergency vehicles. With that said, can you please explain why there is no proposed turn lane on the intersection of Cole and Hummel? I will pass on your answer to my concerned neighbors. Thank you in advance for your quick responce and clear reasoning, Patrick Rose I am very happy to have a safer route to I-84. It is always an adventure to get to the westbound on ramp in the neighborhood's present configuration. Thank you so much for straightening out the McMullen/Cole mess. I like the medians on Cole and bike routes are a very welcome addition to the street. I am concerned with easier access to McMullen/Randolph cut through that we will have more traffic on our neighborhood streets. What (if anything) will be done to discourage excess neighborhood traffic during construction? I don't know who's ding-a-ling idea it is to turn part of Cole road into a right turn only. I live on Ashland and making it a right turn is really stupid! I work in Nampa and I would have to go all the way to Overland then try and shoot across 4 lanes of traffic to get to the freeway. U-turns cause congestion and confusion. I will have to go way out of my way to get where I need to go from my subdivision. It will cause people to use our subdivision as cut through's to avoid the right turn only streets causing congestions and excessive noise. Put in a median for left turns. Scrap the sidewalks and bike lanes. The bike lanes now are used as turn lanes. I see very few pedestrians or bikes now. Eagle road is a nightmare and making Cole road right turns only will not help anything! Widen the road, put in medians for left or right turns, realign McMullen and call it good. Seems that would cost less and take less time. It seems like this is being over-thought. Right turn only streets, one-way streets, bike lanes and U-turns cause drivers to become stupid, inattentive, rushed, and rude. A perfect example...eagle road. Drive that someday and see what I am talking about. Contact Information Name: Company: Address: City/Town: State: ZIP: Email Address: Comment # Patrick Rose Boise School 7050 Hummel Boise ID 83709 patrick.rose@boiseschools.org 40 district Dr. Mary Schmidt Lesli May I would like to suggest that you rethink where lights need to be, as well as how ingress Heather Rodman and egress from the Randolph Robertson neighborhood could most effectively be set up. On the east side of the neighborhood, it would serve everyone better if a stoplight were to be installed at the Hummel/Cole intersection, not the McMullen and Cole intersection. The reasons for this are pretty apparent: Hummel is the largest and straightest road through the neighborhood, whereas McMullen is decidedly NOT. Hummel is the main arterial, through our neighborhood. Hummel is also wider, and can accomodate more than one vehicle at a time- it actually has two lanes!- and McMullen does not. Emergency access to the homes in this part of the neighborhood would be SEVERELY restricted, should the only left-and-right turn be at McMullen, and there is no direct way through to many of the homes here for fire trucks, ambulances, etc. It also will drive a much larger volume of traffic through McMullen, which has blind corners, dead ends, etc.- it's not the easiest road to navigate to get around in the neighborhood, and you have to go through a lot of little side streets and weird turns to get to the main roads inside of the neighborhood, to get anywhere. And finally, McMullen doesn't even have sidewalks or streetlights. Making it the main street to access Cole Road is dangerous, and even foolhardy. At the open house yesterday, one of your people stated that we can't add any new lights, due to the proximity of the other lights. I would like to say, though, that you're already installing a new one at the bottom of the hill, to accomodate traffic from the car dealerships and the big church down there. Moving the light from McMullen, to Hummel or the other outlet onto Cole would actually space the lights out BETTER, and would be far more useful, both from a pedestrian and driver's point of view! Another suggestion that I would like to make is that, should you do the wise thing, and move the traffic light to Hummel, would be to include a crosswalk at that spot. Currently, children, churchgoers, etc., have to walk either all the way down the freeway entrance areas, or all the way down to the gas company, in order to cross Cole. I can tell you from (terrifying!) experience, the crosswalk at the top of Cole hill, by the gasworks, is extremely SO I can no longer leave my neighborhood using Cole now. By implementing RIRO, I Mike smith have to go to McMillan and U turn? Way to be retards!!! Why not put an off ramp in at 5- Mile. It would reduce the need to expand Cole road and mimc traffic/highway design of every major city! Paying your salary! 6110 Randolph Dr 6950 Ashland Dr 910 Palmwood Dr. 7114 Rosewood Dr Boise ID 83709 mary@4schmidts.com 41 Boise ID 83709 leslikmay@aol.com 42 Boise ID 83709 leopardstripes@yahoo.com 43 Boise ID 83709 dppllc@hotmail.com 44