Goals of the WBA with respect to Judicial and Executive Endorsements

Similar documents
ALA MOOT COURT RULES. Only ABA-accredited law schools may enter the ALA Moot Court Competition.

YACHTING ASSOCIATION OF INDIA

ALA MOOT COURT RULES FOR 2012

Arkansas Tech University Institutional Review Board

2015 Fact Sheet Player Registration, Transfer and Finals Eligibility

Banksia Securities Limited ACN: (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(In Liquidation) ("BSL")

IV NOVICE MOOT COURT COMPETITION ORGANIZED BY: COLLEGE OF LEGAL STUDIES, MOOT COURT ASSOCIATION

HNBA 21 ST Annual Uvaldo Herrera National Moot Court Competition

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD REGISTRATION OF AGENTS REGULATIONS, 2010

GOLF QUEENSLAND - Selection Policy

AFL Coaches Code of Conduct

VOLLEYBALL ALBERTA - WEB PRIVACY POLICY

OVA Privacy Policy. a) Arranges and encourages volleyball matches and competitions within Ontario;

Scottish Swimming Regulations. Swimming Technical Officials National Technical Committee. Issue 7 November 2015

REGULATION 8. ELIGIBILITY TO PLAY FOR NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVE TEAMS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 1:13-cv JEB Document 20 Filed 05/15/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

National Collegiate Water Ski Association Policies and Procedures

2018 THURGOOD MARSHALL MEMORIAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION

AUSTRALIAN SAILING POLICY SPO National Officiating Program. Australian Sailing Judge Accreditation. 1 Executive Summary...

EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL THURGOOD A. MARSHALL MEMORIAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION

PORTSMOUTH & DISTRICT TABLE TENNIS ASSOCIATION

CODE OF CONDUCT. (Version: 1 January 2018)

Scottish Swimming Regulations. Swimming Technical Officials National Technical Committee. Issue 8 November 2016

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

Articles By-Laws Regulations History

POLICY FOR SELECTION TO JUNIOR AND YOUTH ENGLAND BOXING SQUADS AND TEAMS

SOUTH AFRICAN RUGBY UNION - ANTI-DOPING REGULATIONS

U S Olympic Committee Policy

Price Media Law Moot Court Competition Rules

The Thirty-First Annual. Rules. Prepared By: Elizabeth Murad, Chair. Faculty Advisor: Professor Evelyn M. Tenenbaum

PGA TOUR INTEGRITY PROGRAM MANUAL. Effective January 1, 2018

AYSO SECTION 1 RULES & REGULATIONS

BCAC ANTI DOPING POLICY

A2:1 The Facility Standards are focused on ensuring appropriate standards for the benefit of the Game including:

HARVARD FOREST RESEARCH SHOOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

EMORY CIVIL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES MOOT COURT COMPETITION FALL 2018 COMPETITION RULES

DISCIPLINE, PROTEST, GRIEVANCE AND APPEAL PROCEDURES Updated with changes approved at the February 22, 2015 GBM

Scottish Swimming Regulations. Open Water National Discipline Committee

By-Laws June 1, 2017

AUSTRALIAN SAILING POLICY SPO National Officiating Program. Australian Sailing Race Officer Accreditation. 1 Executive Summary...

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Approved by the CONCACAF Executive Committee on April 7, 2016 ELECTORAL PROCESS GUIDELINES

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. [ NMAC - Rp, NMAC, 01/01/2018]

WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY. Whistleblower Policy 1

JUDGES COMMITTEE GUIDELINES revised 3/29/2012 Program Requirements for Singles and Pairs

THE ADVOCACY DEPARTMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER STURM COLLEGE OF LAW PRESENTS THE ADVOCATES CUP. A Trial Advocacy Tournament For 1Ls, 2Ls and 3Ls

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

District 50 Toastmasters Carol DeLatte, DTM - Quality Contest Chair

Review of Considerations and Requirements for Automated Enforcement

Case 2:13-cv LKK-CKD Document 1 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 14

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

USA Rugby Disciplinary Regulations and Procedures. General Information and Requirements

ATHLETICS AUSTRALIA SELECTION POLICY 16 th IAAF WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS LONDON, GREAT BRITAIN 4 th to 13 th AUGUST 2017

USA Water Polo, Inc. Conduct of Championships

The International Cricket Council. Player Eligibility Regulations

IRB Member Handbook. Introduction

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

National Youth Team Selection - Australian Sport Climbing Youth Team

Date: November 1, 2017

ADULT COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS MEN AND WOMENS A CUP, B CUP, U21, AND MASTERS

CANTON LIONS JR. FOOTBALL CLUB BYLAWS Revised/Approved February 2016

Billings, Exum & Frye National Moot Court Competition at Elon University School of Law Spring Official Rules

CANONS OF ETHICAL CONDUCT

Teacher & Coach Licence Application Form - Level 1 Full Licence

Teacher & Coach Licence Application Form - Level 3 Full Licence

TO THE MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS OF FIFA

Classification Rules for ITTF Para Table Tennis

Advancing Through the Canadian Judging System

Bylaws Page 1

ON-FIELD REGULATIONS SECTION THREE: PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CATEGORY 5 GENERAL CHARGES. 2 Nothing in this Section Three shall preclude:

DC CAUSE NO.

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Best Hole in One Club Member ( Rules and Regulations )

PETITION TO THE COURT

Wellington Soccer Association Bylaws

4 th ARGUENDO, LAW FEST 4 th ALL INDIA GURCHARAN SINGH TULSI CRIMINAL LAW ANNUAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018

SUTTON COLDFIELD CRICKET CLUB JUNIOR MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION

Stanwood- Camano Little League All- Star Team Selection Process

POLICY STATEMENT PROVISION OF PERMITS TO VETERINARIANS TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN THE NEW SOUTH WALES THOROUGHBRED RACING INDUSTRY

Junior Policies BOD approved 9/5/17 Updated 10/6/17 page 4

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

City of Oakland Employment Opportunity Part-Time

Club, Team and Player Eligibility Regulations Australian Youth Water Polo Championships

Advancing Through the Canadian Judging System

Chapter 2.7 Bylaw sport governance and management

IRB HANDBOOK April 2010

FIVB TRIBUNAL REGULATIONS

Minutes of the Archery Australia Executive Board Meeting th September, 2012

Chapter Rights and obligations of IPC members

New England Diamond Gems. Indoor Training Facility Field Rental for

USA Swimming National Team Steering Committee Policy Manual

CANON MAC YOUTH TRAVEL BASEBALL C.M.Y.T.B.

WORLD RUGBY MEMBERSHIP PATHWAY

2016 Tennis Regulations League Section

Office of Inspector General The School District of Palm Beach County

TRIAL COURT BAILLIFF S STUDY GUIDE

Transcription:

Guidelines for Judicial and Executive Candidates Seeking Endorsement from the WBA Revised & Approved August 2016 The following Guidelines are designed to provide candidates for judicial and executive positions who are seeking endorsement by the (WBA) information regarding the WBA s process in evaluating candidates, the selection criteria used by the WBA, and the information that the WBA requires from candidates. Any questions regarding the information contained in these Guidelines or the WBA s endorsement process may be directed to WBA s Executive Director: Carol Montoya, carol@wbadc.org, 202-639-8880 The Executive and Judicial Endorsements Committee of the WBA (the Committee) will complete an investigation of each candidate seeking endorsement by the WBA. This investigation may involve interviews with the candidate, interviews with persons listed as references for the candidate, a review of information provided by or on behalf of the candidate, and a review of additional information and interviews with additional persons that the Committee deems appropriate to properly evaluate the candidate. Upon completion of the Committee s investigation, the Committee will make a recommendation to the WBA Board regarding candidates for endorsement. The WBA Board will make the ultimate decision regarding endorsement. There will be no levels of ratings of candidates (e.g., qualified, very qualified, etc.). The WBA will endorse only those executive candidates about whom it is genuinely enthusiastic and only those judicial candidates whom it believes will be excellent judges. Goals of the WBA with respect to Judicial and Executive Endorsements The WBA s principal goal in endorsing candidates for judgeships is to ensure the appointment of qualified judges to both local and federal courts in the District of Columbia. Consistent with that goal, the WBA also seeks to increase the number of people occupying judgeships in the District of Columbia and federal courts who share the mission of the WBA. The WBA endorses candidates who have demonstrated a commitment to equality of all litigants before the courts and who have been responsive to women s needs and concerns.

The WBA s principal goal in endorsing candidates for executive positions in the District of Columbia and federal governments and in bar associations is to increase the number of qualified people in those positions who share the mission of the WBA. The WBA seeks to endorse candidates who have demonstrated a commitment to promoting women s advancement and opportunities and to responding to women s needs and concerns. Criteria for Evaluating Judicial Candidates WBA Membership. WBA membership is not required for endorsement; however, membership is a factor to be considered in deciding whether to endorse men and women who practice in the District of Columbia. Qualifications. The WBA will give priority to courtroom experience as a factor favoring endorsement and will also consider the following factors and any other factors that the WBA deems appropriate in light of the appointment sought: administrative skills; areas of practice; commitment to the advancement of women in the legal profession (e.g. as an advocate, mentor, etc.) commitment to equal justice under the law; common sense; communication skills (oral and written); demonstrated commitment to the community; demonstrated commitment to the concept of equal opportunity; demonstrated freedom from bias; integrity; judicial temperament; practice before the court in question; prior adjudicative experience; professional experience; scholarship; stamina; and ties to the District of Columbia. The order of the above-listed factors is alphabetical and does not indicate their priority. Satisfaction of Statutory Requirements. The Board will only endorse those candidates who demonstrate that they satisfy the statutory requirements for the positions they seek.

Criteria for Evaluating Executive Candidates WBA Membership. WBA membership is not required for endorsement; however, membership is a factor to be considered in deciding whether to endorse men and women who practice in the District of Columbia. Qualifications. The Board will consider the following factors and any other factors that the WBA deems appropriate in light of the appointment sought: areas of practice; commitment to equal justice under the law; commitment to the advancement of women in the legal profession (e.g. as an advocate, mentor, etc.) common sense; communication skills (oral and written); demonstrated commitment to the community; demonstrated commitment to the concept of equal opportunity; demonstrated freedom from bias; integrity; professional experience; scholarship; and stamina. The order of the above-listed factors is alphabetical and does not indicate their priority. Political Affiliation. WBA endorsement will not be based on, or rejected due to, affiliation with any particular political party, unless such affiliation is a specified requirement for a position. Attorneys. Endorsements will be primarily of attorneys, but endorsements will not be limited to attorneys. A non-attorney may be endorsed for a position in which the candidate would have the opportunity to promote the interests of women in the legal profession. Initiating the Process Before the Committee will initiate its investigation process, the candidate seeking endorsement must inform a co-chair of the Committee, with a copy to the Executive Director, of her or his intent to seek endorsement from the WBA. Persons seeking an endorsement for another must provide the Committee with confirmation from the candidate that she or he desires the endorsement and must ensure compliance on behalf of the candidate with the instructions set forth in these Guidelines. The candidate should provide the WBA with at least thirty (30) days notice for completion of the endorsement process.

Once a co-chair of the Committee has been contacted as set forth in the paragraph above, the following information and materials must be sent by or on behalf of the candidate seeking endorsement: Completed WBA Candidate Application Form, which includes: o the name of the position sought with a brief description of the position; o the date by which the endorsement for the appointment must be received in order to be considered; o the name, title, and address of person to whom an endorsement letter should be sent; o the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of three references, two professional and one personal. Note that the Committee will contact the references prior to making any recommendations; o an executed Release Letter Resume of the candidate seeking the endorsement. If not included in the resume, any information pertinent to the criteria set forth above under the sections of these Guidelines entitled Criteria for Evaluating Judicial Candidates and Criteria for Evaluating Executive Candidates, as applicable. A draft letter of endorsement. The letter should highlight the candidate s qualifications for the appointment sought. WBA reserves the right to alter the draft. Judicial Endorsement Candidates only: a list of three recent significant cases in which the candidate participated, including the case name and number, presiding judge and name(s) of opposing counsel. Articles by or about the candidate (optional). Letters in support of the endorsement (optional). Note that, in addition to the materials and information listed above, the Committee may request additional information from the candidate and/or from other sources that it deems useful in determining whether to recommend endorsement of the candidate. The above information and materials should be sent, in electronic format, to the WBA Executive Director at carol@wbadc.org. A hard copy of the notarized Release Letter should be sent to:

Concluding the Process A Committee co-chair or WBA Board member will inform the candidate of the WBA s decision regarding endorsement. All documents assembled during the consideration of a candidate remain the property of the WBA and will be maintained in the custody of the association and co-chairs. The information so assembled and all deliberations and discussions will not be disclosed except to members of the WBA Board and the Executive and Judicial Endorsements Committee, unless such disclosure is warranted by the preparation of an endorsement letter.