WILDLIFE WATCHING U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS*

Similar documents
2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation National Overview

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

The 2001 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in MISSOURI. Prepared by:

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in TEXAS. Prepared by:

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

The 2006 Economic Benefits of Hunting, Fishing and Wildlife Watching in NORTH CAROLINA. Prepared by:

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Wyoming. Bait

Table of contents. Florida ranks as the second highest state (after California) in the number of people participating in wildlife-viewing recreation.

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

Hunter and Angler Expenditures, Characteristics, and Economic Effects, North Dakota,

Angler Spending on Fishing-related Durable Goods: Results from the 2014 Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey

Participation Topline Report 2012

Recreation. Participation. Topline Report

OFFERING MEMORANDUM DUTRA S ISLAND RARE ISLAND WITH DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL PRICE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Washington

The University of Georgia

TRENDS IN PARTICIPATION RATES FOR WILDLIFE-ASSOCIATED RECREATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND GENDER:

Angling in Manitoba (2000)

Participation and Expenditure Patterns of African-American, Hispanic, and Female Hunters and Anglers

HUNTING IN AMERICA. An Economic Force for Conservation 2018 EDITION

OUTDOOR RECREATION PARTICIPATION REPORT TOPLINE 2013

San Patricio County Guided Fishing Market Research

Economic Analysis of Marine Recreational Fishing at NOAA Fisheries

Hi, we are Hook & Barrel Magazine.

Nueces County Guided Fishing Market Research

Final Report, October 19, Socioeconomic characteristics of reef users

Economic Contribution of Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in Colorado. Executive Summary Season. A joint cooperation report

Sport Fishing Expenditures and Economic Impacts on Public Lands in Oregon

Teton County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, For the Wyoming Wildlife Federation. David T. Taylor & Thomas Foulke

Summer Flounder. Wednesday, April 26, Powered by

Fremont County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Appendix A (Survey Results) Scroll Down

Carbon County Related Hunting and Fishing Spending, 2015

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

Deer and Deer Management in Central New York: Local Residents Interests and Concerns

PATHS TO PARTICIPATION. How to help hunters and target shooters try new shooting sports activities.

SPORTING HERITAGE. Fueling the American Economy 2018 EDITION

2005 Arkansas Nongame Wildlife Conservation Survey

Natural Resource Enterprises: Enhancing Conservation and Income on Private Lands in Mississippi

Economic Analysis of Recreational Fishing in the Proposed GRNMS Research Area Updated April,

SPECIAL REPORT ON FISHING AND BOATING. A partnership. project of:

Outdoor Enthusiasts Classification of Animal Species and Estimation of Animal Life Expectancy

The Power of Outdoor Recreation Spending in Pennsylvania:

New Sportfishing Data and Industry Trends

Fishing and Hunting Recruitment and Retention in the U.S. from 1990 to 2005

GREAT RECREATION AREA!

Paddlesports Kayaking Canoeing. A Partnership Project of:

Endangered Species in the Big Woods of Arkansas Public Opinion Survey March 2008

Economic Impact of Hunting Expenditures on Southern U.S

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH HUNTING ALONG THE TEXAS GULF COAST. Joni S. Charles, PhD. Contracted through the. River Systems Institute

Economic Impact of Mountain Biking in the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests

Angling in Manitoba Survey of Recreational Angling

Maine Office of Tourism Visitor Tracking Research 2012 Calendar Year Annual Report Regional Insights: Kennebec & Moose River Valley

SPECIAL REPORT ON FISHING AND BOATING 2012

It s Hockey Time OCTOBER 2009

PATHS TO PARTICIPATION. How to help hunters and target shooters try new shooting sports activities.

The Value of Springs to The Petersen Ranch

Paddlesports. Kayaking Canoeing Rafting Stand up paddling. A Partnership Project of:


THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL SALTWATER FISHING ON THE LOUISIANA ECONOMY

Montauk Beach Restoration Project. Town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, Long Island, New York January 2013

Fast Facts: Recreational Scuba Diving and Snorkeling

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Bringing the University to You

Wildlife Viewing in Utah: Participation &

PATHS TO PARTICIPATION. How to help hunters and target shooters try new shooting sports activities.

New Jersey Trapper Harvest, Recreational and Economic Survey

DRBC RFAC Meeting Lake Wallenpaupack Environmental Learning Center - Hawley, PA. December 3, 2015

Bryan, Texas. The Good Life, Texas Style. Joey Dunn BR FRANK CLARK. Incorporated 1871

PATHS TO PARTICIPATION. How to help hunters and target shooters try new shooting sports activities.

PATHS TO PARTICIPATION. How to help hunters and target shooters try new shooting sports activities.

Welcome to Scotland's Marine Tourism and Recreation Survey

Brook Trout Angling in Maine2009 Survey Results

PATHS TO PARTICIPATION. How to help hunters and target shooters try new shooting sports activities.

User Characteristics and Use Trends Since the 1990s on Paved State Bicycle Trails

ESRM 350 Consumptive and Non- Consumptive Exploitation of Wildlife

SERIES 2019 MEDIA GUIDE

The 35th Annual Marine Corps Marathon. Economic Contribution and. Characteristics of Visitors and Local Spectators. Final Report.

ESRM 350 Consumptive and Non- Consumptive Exploitation of Wildlife

The Economic Significance of Florida Bay. Dr. Andrew Stainback GEER April Coral Springs, Florida

Basic Information Everyone Should Know

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hunting, Shooting, and Fishing Recruitment and Retention Programs

Henning's Oregon Fishing, Hunting & Vacation Guide

FOR SALE Sprague River Ranch

National Association of REALTORS National Smart Growth Frequencies

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

YOUNG FARM & SPORTING CLUB A Premium Recreational Investment Property & Hunting Paradise

Hunter use of public-access lands in the Rainwater Basin and beyond

INTRODUCING GOLF TOURISM TRENDS IN GOLF TOURISM. How much do international golf tourists spend on their trip in New Zealand?

RED RIVER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE

Alaska Recreation Survey 2013

ECONOMIC RESULTS OF THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL RECREATIONAL FISHING SURVEY 1. DAVID CAMPBELL, DCafe

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

Golfers in Colorado: The Role of Golf in Recreational and Tourism Lifestyles and Expenditures

2016 ANNUAL REPORT A CONSTITUTIONAL AGENCY FUNDED BY SPORTSMEN AND WOMEN THROUGH THEIR PURCHASE OF HUNTING AND FISHING LICENSES.

SPECIAL REPORT ON FISHING AND BOATING 2011

INDUSTRY STATISTICS & RESEARCH RECREATIONAL BOATING. Statistical Abstract $950

Bicycle Travel in Oregon

Transcription:

WILDLIFE WATCHING U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE 2006 NATIONAL SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS* During 2006, 71 million U.S. residents, 31 percent of the U.S. population sixteen years old and older, participated in wildlife-watching activities. People who took an interest in wildlife around their homes (within one mile) numbered 68 million, while those who took trips away from their homes to watch wildlife (more than one mile) numbered 23 million people. Wildlife watching is defined as closely observing, feeding, and photographing wildlife, visiting public parks around the home because of wildlife, and maintaining plantings and natural areas around the home for the benefit of wildlife. Of all the wildlife watching in the United States, bird-watching attracted the largest following. Approximately 47.7 million people observed birds around the home and on trips in 2006. A large majority, 88 percent (41.8 million) observed wild birds around the home, while 42 percent (19.9 million) took trips (an annul average of 14 days) away from home to observe wild birds. WILDLIFE-WATCHING EXPENDITURES Wildlife watching generated heavy spending for wildlife-related recreation. In 2006, 79 percent of all wildlife watchers 16 years old and older spent $45.7 billion, an average of $816 per spender. Trip-Related Expenditures Food and lodging: $7.5 billion Transportation: $4.5 billion Other trip costs: $0.9 billion Equipment Expenditures Wildlife-watching equipment (e.g., binoculars, cameras, bird food, special clothing): $9.9 billion Auxiliary equipment (e.g., tents, backpacking equipment): $1.0 billion Special equipment (e.g., off-road vehicles, campers, boats): $12.3 billion *U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 2006 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife- Associated Recreation. A PDF file of this 168-page document can be downloaded at http://library.fws.gov/nat_survey2006_final.pdf.

Other Expenditures Land leasing and owning: $6.6 billion Plantings (to benefit wildlife): $1.6 billion Membership dues and contributions: $1.1 billion Magazines, books: $.4 billion AROUND-THE-HOME WILDLIFE OBSERVERS The 2006 national survey gives data about the activities of wildlife observers around the home and about some of the demographics of those observers. Of the 67.8 million around-the-home participants in the survey, 78% lived in metropolitan areas with populations of 1 million or more (44%), 250,000 to 999,999 (22%), and 249,999 or less (12%). In 2006, 17% of the total U.S. population lived outside metropolitan areas. Twenty-two percent of the around-the-home participants in the survey lived outside metropolitan areas. Wildlife Watching Activities 53.4 million fed wild birds. 19.2 million fed other wildlife. 41.8 million observed wild birds. 44.5 million observed wildlife. 18.8 million photographed wildlife. 13.3 visited public areas 10.2 maintained natural areas 9.6 maintained plantings In 2006, 229 million people 16 years old and older lived in the U.S. Of that number, 30 percent watched wildlife around their homes. The participation rates of around-the-home participants in the survey varied by region: 24%, Pacific 29%, Mountain 42%, West North Central 25%, West South Central 33%, East North Central 34%, East South Central 38%, New England -2-

27%, Middle Atlantic 28%, South Atlantic Male and Female Data 36.3 million females observed wildlife. 31.5 million males observed wildlife. Age Data 1.3 million, 16 to 17 years old 3.0 million, 18 to 24 years old 7.1 million, 25 to 34 years old 13.8 million, 35 to 44 years old 16.1 million, 45 to 54 years old 13.0 million, 55 to 64 years old 13.5 million, 65 and older years old Participation Rate based on National Percent of Household Income Levels 17%, $100,000 or more 12%, $75,000 to $99,999 19%, $50,000 to $74,999 9%, $40,000 to $49,999 5%, $35,000 to $39,999 4%, $30,000 to $34,999 5%, $25,000 to $29,999 4%, $20,000 to $24,999 5%, $10,000 to $19,999 3%, less than $10,000 Number of Years of Education Completed 6.6 million, 11 years or less 20.9 million, 12 years 17.0 million, 1 to 3 years of college 13.2 million, 4 years of college 10.0 million, 5 years or more of college -3-

AWAY-FROM-HOME WILDLIFE-WATCHING In 2006, 23 million people 16 years old and older took trips away from home to feed, observe, or photograph wildlife. They comprised 32 percent of all wildlife watchers and about 10 percent of the U.S. population. About 21.5 million participants, 9 percent of the U.S. population, observed wildlife an average of 14 days in 2006. Photographing wildlife was enjoyed by 11.7 million people, 5 percent of the U.S. population. They averaged 9 days per photographer. Approximately 7.1 million people fed wildlife an average of 11 days and comprised 3 percent of the U.S. population. Seventy-eight percent of away-from-home wildlife-watching participants lived in metropolitan areas with populations of 1 million or more (45%), 250,000 to 999,999 (21%), and 249,999 or less (12%). In 2006, 17% of the total U.S. population lived outside metropolitan areas. Twenty-two percent of the away-from-home participants in the survey lived outside metropolitan areas. Of the 23 million away-from-home wildlife watching participants, 67% (15.4 million) travelled within their resident states, 16% (3.68 million) travelled within and outside their resident states, and 17% (3.91 million) only travelled outside their resident states. Wild birds attracted the most interest from wildlife watchers on their trips (20 million people or 87 percent of the all away-from-home participants). Most Watched Birds Waterfowl: 15.4 million Birds of prey: 14.0 million Songbirds: 13.7 million Herons, Shorebirds, and other Water birds: 11.5 million Other birds (e.g., roadrunners, turkeys): 8.8 million Most Visited Areas Public land only: 12.2 million Private land only: 2.5 million Public and private land: 6.2 million -4-

In 2006, 229 million people 16 years old and older lived in the U.S. 10 percent of whom took trips to wildlife watch. The participation rates of away-from-home participants in the survey varied by region: 11%, Pacific 13%, Mountain 14%, West North Central 8%, West South Central 11%, East North Central 13%, East South Central 12%, New England 9%, Middle Atlantic 7%, South Atlantic Male and Female Data 11.8 million males 11.2 million females Age Data 0.6 million 16 to 17 years old 1.1 million 18 to 24 years old 3.1 million 25 to 34 years old 6.0 million 35 to 44 years old 5.2 million 45 to 54 years old 4.4 million 55 to 64 years old 2.6 million 65 and older years old Participation Rate based on National Percent of Household Income Levels 16%, $100,000 or more 16%, $75,000 to $99,999 14%, $50,000 to $74,999 12%, $40,000 to $49,999 10%, $35,000 to $39,999 10%, $30,000 to $34,999 8%, $25,000 to $29,999 7%, $20,000 to $24,999 6%, $10,000 to $19,999 6%, less than $10,000-5-

Number of Years of Education Completed 1.4 million, 11 years or less 6.1 million, 12 years 6.2 million, 1 to 3 years of college 4.9 million, 4 years of college 4.4 million, 5 years or more of college -6-