Predator Prey Lab Exercise L3

Similar documents
Predator Prey Lab Exercise L2

Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Biology B / Sanderson!

Prior Knowledge: Students should have an understanding that plants and animals compete for resources such as food, space, water, air and shelter.

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

The Lesson of the Kaibab

Lab: Predator-Prey Simulation

Science Skills Station

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

Wolves in Yellowstone Park. A Story about Ecosystem Balance

MiSP Photosynthesis Lab L3

STUDENT PACKET # 6 Student Exploration: Rabbit Population by Season

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up. 1. Find the x- and y-intercepts of 2x 5y = 20. Describe the correlation shown by the scatter plot. 2.

Carrying Capacity Activity. 5 th Grade PSI. Teacher s Notes Procedure: Simulation 1 Regular herds

Deer Population Student Guide

Building System Dynamics Models

Native Species Restoration and its Impact on Local Populations

Ecology Quiz Which example shows a relationship between a living thing and a nonliving thing?

Stakeholder Activity

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up Lesson Presentation. Lesson Quiz

The Ups and Downs of Populations Based on Oh Deer by Project WILD By Heather Miller

Zooplankton Migration Patterns at Scotton Landing: Behavioral Adaptations written by Lauren Zodl, University of Delaware

Summary of discussion

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Chapter 20: Page 250

This article is provided courtesy of the American Museum of Natural History.

A Hare-Lynx Simulation Model

Lab Activity: Evolution by Natural Selection

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

This game has been adapted from SECONDARY PROJECT WILD 1983, 1985

Oh Deer! Objectives. Background. Method. Materials

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

Lesson 18: There Is Only One Line Passing Through a Given Point with a Given Slope

Matching respondents over time and assessing non-response bias. Respondents sometimes left age or sex blank (n=52 from 2001 or 2004 and n=39 from

Surf Clams: Latitude & Growth

Living World Review #2

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

1. What function relating the variables best describes this situation? 3. How high was the balloon 5 minutes before it was sighted?

Toothpick Birds. Modeling Predator Behavior in an Outdoor Lab

c. Escape from Unsuitable Conditions i. A long term escape of a period of reduced activity 1. Ex. ii. Moving to a more favorable habitat 1. Ex.

In Chernobyl's post-apocalyptic exclusion zone, animals are thriving

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Workshop on Predation Thomas Herbert, Ph.D. (revised by Dana Krempels in 2013)

Grade: 8. Author(s): Hope Phillips

States of Matter. The Behavior of Gases

Search for the missing sea otters

Managing Wildlife Populations

Deer Management Unit 127

Wildlife CSI - Panhandle elk mortality study

Saiga: Spirit of the Steppe. You can do things every day to be a hero for saiga! by San Diego Zoo Global. Created for the Saiga Conservation Alliance

Population Fluctuations in an Ecosystem Grade 6

Chapter 17: Page 218

Boyle s Law: Pressure-Volume Relationship in Gases

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

1. Determining Solution Concentration

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Big Canyon 67 miles upstream. 38 miles upstream

Lab 4: Transpiration

Early History, Prehistory

F I N D I N G K A T A H D I N :

Endangered Animals at a Glance

Cub Scout and Webelos Nova Award Wild! (Wildlife and Nature)

Welcome! Sea Otters. AP Biology Warm Up; Monday September 17, 2012

2017 LATE WINTER CLASSIFICATION OF NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE ELK

SCIENCE EXTENDED LEARNING MODULES STUDENT PACKET GRADE 8 6: INTERDEPENDENCE

A SURVEY ON MOOSE MANAGEMENT IN CENTRAL ONTARIO

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

The New Coyote and Deer Predation

Beaver Fever. Adapted From: Oh Deer, Project Wild K-12 Activity Guide, Project WILD, p

Guiding Question. Activity 4.5. Has the quagga mussel had a positive or negative effect on the Lake Michigan ecosystem? Activity 4.

CHAPTER 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES -- PART B

Wildlife Management. By C. Kohn, Agricultural Sciences Waterford, WI

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Cub Scout and Webelos Nova Award Nova Wild!

Hudson River Food Webs

Algebra I: A Fresh Approach. By Christy Walters

Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Project on the evaluation of the human dimensions of the target audiences regarding Eastern wolves conservation in La Mauricie National Park of

2011 Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. All rights reserved.

Sharks: We re not just talking great whites. There are around 500 known species of shark. Dive for Sharks

Classroom Activity: Population Study Game (Oh, Deer!)

Dangerously bold Featured scientist: Melissa Kjelvik from Michigan State University

Dispersal of wolves and lynx and their perceived effects on roe deer in the hunting grounds of Lower Saxony, Northern Germany

Graphing Stories Writing Equations

Lesson 14: Modeling Relationships with a Line

Gator Hole Graphics. There is usually a six-month period

Questionnaire for Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Interviews on Boreal Caribou LONG VERSION

A position graph will give the location of an object at a certain time.

Have you ever thought that it would be cool to have parrots

Name Student Activity

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

Algebra I: A Fresh Approach. By Christy Walters

Describe what is happening in figures 1-3. Is the population of mice different in figure 3 than in figure 1? Explain why.

Transcription:

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L3 Name Date Objective: To compare predator and prey populations over time in a small ecosystem. Introduction: In 1970 the deer population of a small island forest preserve was about 2000 animals. Although the island had excellent vegetation for feeding, the food supply obviously had limits. Therefore the wildlife service rangers feared that overgrazing might lead to mass starvation. Since the area was too remote for hunters, the wildlife service decided to bring in natural predators to control the deer population. It was hoped that natural predation would keep the deer population from becoming too large and also increase the deer quality (or health) since predators often pick the weaker members of the herd. In 1971, ten wolves were flown into the island. Procedures: 1. The results of this program are shown in the following table. The Population Change is the number of deer born minus the number of deer that died during that year. Fill out the last column for each year (the first has been calculated for you). Year Wolf Population Population Born Predation Starvation Population Change 1971 0 10 2,000 800 400 100 +300 1972 1 12 2,300 920 480 240 1973 2 16 2,500 1,000 639 498 1974 3 22 2.363 944 891 191 1975 4 28 2,225 996 1,114 20 1976 5 24 2,087 836 953 2 1977 6 21 1,968 788 840 0 1978 7 18 1,916 766 720 0 1979 8 19 1,962 780 760 0 1980 9 19 1,982 790 760 0 1

2. Graph the deer and wolf populations on the graph below. This information is in grey in the data table. Use different scales for the wolf population and the deer population on the y axis. For the deer population, use one box/200 deer; use one box/2 wolves for the wolf population. Use one color to show deer populations and another color to show wolf populations. 3. Connect the data points. 4. Add a title and key to your graph. Title: Population Wolf Population Key: Years 2

Questions: 1. Look at your graph. Describe the changes to the deer and wolf populations between 1971 and 1980 (years 0 and 9). population: Wolf population: 2. Between what years did the deer population have the greatest increase? the deer population have the greatest decrease? the wolf population have the greatest increase? the wolf population have the greatest decrease? 3. What do you think would have happened to the deer population on the island between 1971 and 1980 (years 0 and 9) if wolves had NOT been introduced? 4. Predict what happened to the size of the deer population after 1980 (year 9). Explain your prediction. 3

5. Predict what your graph would look like when the ecosystem reached carrying capacity. Recall that carrying capacity is the maximum population of a given species that can survive indefinitely in a given environment. 6. Use the information from the graph to calculate the unit rates of change for the deer and wolf populations. Use the formula to complete the chart below. Unit Rate of Change = Number of deer (or wolves) = y = (y 2 - y 1 ) Years x ( x 2 - x 1 ) Graph segment Ordered Pairs Number of deer y Years x Unit Rate of Change y/ x population from 1971-1972 (years 0-1) population from 1973-1976 (years 2-5) Graph segment Number of wolves y Years x Unit Rate of Change y/ x Wolf population from 1973-1975 (years 2-4) Wolf population from 1976-1978 (years 5-7) 4

7. What does a positive (+) unit rate of change tell you about a population? What does a negative (-) unit rate of change tell you about a population? 8. We are going to focus on two lines on the wolf graph: 1973-1975 AND 1976-1978. Using the unit rate of change that you already calculated in #6, and one of the ordered pairs, determine the y-intercept for both lines. The equation for a line is y = mx + b where m is the unit rate of change (slope) and b is the y-intercept Y Intercept Wolf graph line from 1973-1975 (years 2-4) m = Ordered pair (x, y) = (, ) y = mx +b Solve for b: Y Intercept Wolf graph line from 1976-1978 (years 5-7) m = Ordered pair (x, y) = (, ) y = mx +b Solve for b: 5

9. Based on the unit rates of change you calculated above and the y intercepts, write an equations for the lines on the wolf curve from 1973-1975 and 1976-1978. Equation - Wolf graph line from 1973-1975 (years 2-4) Equation - Wolf graph line from 1976-1978 (years 5-7) 10. Using the equations above, calculate: a) what the wolf population would be in 1985 (year 14) if the population in 1975 continued to grow. b) which year the wolf population would be zero if the population continued to decline after 1978 (year 7). 11. Why would a scientist be incorrect to use Equation #1 or Equation #2 to predict a future wolf population? Final thoughts: 6

Most biology textbooks describe that predators and prey exist in a balance. This "balance of nature" hypothesis has been criticized by some scientists because it suggests a relationship between predators and prey that is good and necessary. Opponents of this hypothesis propose the following questions: Why is death by predators more natural or "right" then death by starvation? How does one determine when an ecosystem is in "balance"? Do predators really kill only the old and sick prey? What evidence is there for this statement? What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? Would the deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves? Defend your position. 7