HABITAT IMPROVEMENT. Fishery Division PROJECT NUMBER 1 OREGON STATE GAME COMMISSION S. W. Alder Portland 5, Oregon. 01,00I SEArt.

Similar documents
HABITAT IMPROVEMENT. Fishery Division PROJECT NUMBER 6 OREGON STATE GAME COMMISSION. lit S. W. Alder Portland 5, Oregon.

HABITAT IMPROVEMENT. Fishery Division PROJECT PORTLAND, OREGON OREGON STATE GAME COMMISSION P. 0. BOX NUMBER 13 Lower Crooked River

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: with periodic updates. Chapter 22: Guidelines for Sampling Warmwater Rivers with Rotenone

FINAL Caples Lake Fisheries Management Plan. Version 4.0

LAKE DIANE Hillsdale County (T8-9S, R3W, Sections 34, 3, 4) Surveyed May Jeffrey J. Braunscheidel

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT EASTERN REGION

Upper/Lower Owl Creek Reservoir

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Crooked Lake Oakland County (T4N, R9E, Sections 3, 4, 9) Surveyed May James T. Francis

Quemahoning Reservoir

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

MIDDLE FORK RESERVOIR Wayne County 2006 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

DRIPPING SPRINGS LAKE 5 YEAR LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

6TH PELLETIER BROOK LAKE T15 R9, Aroostook Co. U.S.G.S. Gardner Pond, Maine (7 1/2 )

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Crawford Reservoir. FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Eric Gardunio, Fish Biologist Montrose Service Center

Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Biologist Report. Wilmore Dam. Cambria County. May 2011 Trap Net, Electrofishing and Hoop Net Survey

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

What was the historic coaster fishery like?

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

Overview of Recreational Pond Management

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

CARL BLACKWELL LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Invasive Fish in the Cariboo Region. Russell Bobrowski Fisheries Biologist, BC Gov Cariboo Region Dec 19, 2017

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

SKIATOOK LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Executive Summary Chubb Lake 2004

5B. Management of invasive species in the Cosumnes and Mokelumne River Basins

Elk Lake, Antrim and Grand Traverse counties T. 28, 29 N., R. 8, 9 W., Sec. many. Lake surveys. began at 40 feet

Sebec Lake Fisheries Management Plan 2012

NEVADA DIVISION OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F YELLOWSTONE CUTTHROAT TROUT EASTERN REGION

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

SOONER LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN

LITTLE WHITE OAK Knox County 2006 Fish Management Report. Debbie King Assistant Fisheries Biologist

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Big Spring Creek Habitat Enhancement and Fishery Management Plans

Little Kern Golden Trout Status:

MARTINDALE POND Wayne County 2004 Fish Management Report. Christopher C. Long Assistant Fisheries Biologist

INLAND LAKE MANAGEMENT REPORT FY Spring 2008

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Justification for Rainbow Trout stocking reduction in Lake Taneycomo. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation

Assessment of Elizabeth Lake as a Potential Candidate for Stocking

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

Tunica Cutoff 2018 REEL FACTS Keith Meals Fisheries Biologist

Rolling Knolls Pond Population Survey

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORTS F EUREKA COUNTY Small Lakes and Reservoirs

Fisheries Resources in White Pine County

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Summer Steelhead Surveys North Fork Trinity River Trinity County, California

Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in the Upper Truckee River: Restoration of a Threatened Species in a Fluvial Headwater Environment

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

The Results of Four Years of Fish eradication Work with Toxaphene in Nebraska

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Columbia Lake Dam Removal Project

Caro Impoundment, Tuscola County

LAKE TANEYCOMO ANGLER CREEL SURVEY SUMMARY. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

LAKE TANEYCOMO 2011 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT

Pickwick Lake 2018 REEL FACTS Trevor Knight Fisheries Biologist (662)

Beaver Valley Ranch Steamboat Springs, Colorado

Warden Tom Kasnick August 30, 1983

Fish Survey of Goose Lake (ID # ), Ramsey County, Minnesota in 2012

COLUMBIA LAKE DAM REMOVAL PROJECT

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE SPORT FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Striped Bass and White Hybrid (x) Striped Bass Management and Fishing in Pennsylvania

LAKE SURVEY REPORT DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF 08/30/2018) Fisheries Management. DOW Number: Survey ID Date: 08/27/2018

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Claytor Lake View of the Claytor Lake dam from Claytor Lake State Park s boat ramp.

f Agricultural S c i e n c SMALL EARTH DAMS LLOYD N. BROWN ^ CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL CIRCULAR 467 \ Experiment Station Extension Service

HUBBARD LAKE Alcona County (T27N, R7E; T28N, R7E) Surveyed May and September Tim A. Cwalinski

Swift Current Creek Watershed

EcoLogic Memorandum. TO: Ben Brezell; EDR FROM: Mark Arrigo RE: Possible Impacts of Dredging Snooks Pond DATE: 6/4/07

FOR SALE Sprague River Ranch

EXTENT OF OBSERVATION

Little Calumet River Rapid Response Fish Identification and Enumeration Branch Summary Report

Past, Present, and Future Fishery Management in Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids Reservoirs

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

Alcona Dam Pond Alcona County (T25N, R5E, Sections various) Surveyed June 6-12 and September 16, 2003

Regulations. Grabbling season May 1 July 15; only wooden structures allowed.

TABLE ROCK LAKE 2014 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

Comprehensive Fisheries Survey of High Falls Reservoir, Marinette County Wisconsin during 2004 and Waterbody Identification Code

2014 Island Lake Survey June 13 th, 2014 Andrew Plauck District Fisheries Biologist Report Prepared 4 March 2015

NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon February 8, By Greg A.

1.Mill Creek Watershed Summary Description and Land Use

Stony Creek Creel Census

Executive Summary. Map 1. The Santa Clara River watershed with topography.

LAKE TANEYCOMO 2012 ANNUAL LAKE REPORT. Shane Bush Fisheries Management Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Southwest Region

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1

NURSERY POND Fish Management Report. Jason C. Doll Assistant Fisheries Biologist

Climate Change Adaptation and Stream Restoration. Jack Williams;

Transcription:

HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Fishery Division 01,00I SEArt tapoim4 TAME COMMISSION OREGON STATE GAME COMMISSION 1634 S. W. Alder Portland 5, Oregon NUMBER 1

STATE OF OREGON OREGON STATE GAME COMMISSION P. W. Schneider, Director FEIERAL AID TO FISH RESTORATION PROGRESS. REPORT. State-Wide Fishery Rehabilitation Malheur Reservoir and Tributaries Segment F-20-D-l8 BY Lawrence E. Bisbee Aquatic Biologist

State Oregon Project No.: F-20-11.18 Date: December 13, 1962 PROGRESS REPORT State-wide Fishery Rehabilitation Malheur Reservoir and Tributaries Segment Period Covered: June 25, 1962 to December 4, 1962 ABSTRACT Malheur Reservoir in Malheur County, Oregon, was chemically treated on October 11, 1962, to eliminate an abundant population of black crappie and a smaller population of finescale suckers and redsided shiners. A total of 1,100 gallons of liquid synergized rotenone (Pro-Noxfish) was used to establish a toxicity of 1.5 p.p.m. in the reservoir. The visible kill consisted of black crappie (99.4 per cent), rainbow trout (0.5 per cent) and finescale suckers and redsided, shiners (0.1 per cent). Carp which reappeared following the 1950 eradication program appeared to have been completely eliminated from the reservoir and tributaries in the 1955 treatment. Toxicity of the rotenone in the reservoir appeared to be short-lived, possibly because of the high total dissolved solids in the water. Five days after the initial treatment, chemical tests for rotenone in water samples indicated less than 0.5 p.p.m. Chemical treatment of approximately 20 miles of tributary stream was completed September 10, 196/. A total of 200 gallons of liquid synergized rotenone was used in drip stations to maintain a toxicity of 2.3 p.p.m. in the live stream. Potholes in the lower eight miles were treated with a portable 200-gallon high pressure spray tank. The kill of finescale suckers, redsided shiners and dace numbered in the thousands. Several thousand trout

were killed in the stream above Ironside. The stream and the reservoir will be restocked in the spring of 1963. Location and Past History Malheur Reservoir is located on Willow Creek, a tributary of the Malheur River in Malheur County, T. 14 S., R. 41 E., Sec. 14. The reservoir is located 13 miles northwest of Brogan and 17 miles northeast of Ironside. Although the dam was constructed about 1913 or 1914, very little fishery management work was done prior to 1950. During that period, an abundant trash fish population including carp, redsided shiners, finescale suckers and dace thrived in the reservoir. In September 1950, the reservoir and 15 miles of Willow Creek were chemically treated for the first time. A complete drawdown occurred for the first time in many years leaving only 114 acre-feet of water in the reservoir. In 1951, public access to Malheur Reservoir was assured when easements were signed with Mr. and Mrs. Carroll Locey and the Orchard Water Company of Malheur County. Since 1951, the reservoir has been managed as a trout fishery and has developed into one of the best in the southeastern part of Oregon. The fishery is maintained by the annual stocking of 100,000 to 150,000 rainbow fingerlings. which normally attain a growth rate of one inch per month. By October 1955, trash fish had again made a tremendous increase in the reservoir and it was chemically treated for the second time. An estimated 3,000 acre-feet of water remained at that time. Carp, raided shiners, finescale suckers and dace were removed. After the 1955 treatment, angling pressure on Malheur Reservoir reached an all-time peak in 1960 when an estimated 15,000 anglers visited the reservoir. The fishery declined rapidly after 1960 when black crappie,' illegally iftroducedtby'anglers'in. 1958, began to increase - 2 -

in large numbers. By 1962, total angling pressure on Malheur Reservoir had declined to a low of 7,600 fishermen for the season. Additional public access to Malheur Reservoir was acquired in 1961 when an agreement between the Malheur County Court and Mr. Francis Domby was signed opening up a 40-acre tract of land or public use. This additional area provides for camping, parking, bank angling and boat launching. Preparation Since 1962 was an extremely poor water year as far as runoff into Malheur Reservoir was concerned, it was predicted by the Orchard Water Company that the reservoir would be drawn down to dead storage by the end of the summer. A decision to chemically treat the reservoir and tributaries was reached in view of this possibility and because of the tremendous increase in numbers of illegally introduced crappie. Treatment of the stream system was necessary because of an increasing population of finescale suckers and shiners. A complete kill of these species was not accomplished in 1955 or 1950. Chemical treatment of the reservoir and tributaries was scheduled for October in order to take advantage of maximum draw-down of the reservoir after the irrigation season. Many irrigation ditches above the reservoir were dry and much of the grain and hay along the creek was harvested which simplified access to the streams. Coordination was necessary with local ranchers along Willow Creek above the reservoir and with the Orchard Water Company. All ranchers were contacted prior to the time when preliminary investigations were to be conducted on the creek. All ranchers were very cooperative. Contact with these people was made again just prior to chemical treatment of the streams. Survey of the tributaries was completed in August and September by a 3

two-man crew. The stream system from the head of the reservoir to the headwaters was investigated for isolated potholes, springs, upper limits of trash fish and general survey information. The majority of the Willow Creek watershed lies just out6ide the timbered boundary of the Malheur and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests. The watershed lies generally in open rolling sagebrush-juniper type country. The main stem of Willow Creek flows through flat, open cultivated valleys connected by a short stretch of narrow canyon. Willow Creek from the mouth of Grouse Creek down to the reservoir contained many potholes in the main channel and very little flowing water. The flow increased from an estimated 50-60 gallons per minute just above the mouth of Grouse Creek to an estimated 1 cubic foot per second at Ironside. A large marshy area at the mouth of Grouse Creek was created by beaver dams. The main flow of water was coming from the South Fork which has live water all year. The Middle Fork was dry in the lower three miles but had live water above the Farley ranch. The majority of the other tributaries were completely dry or had only a small flow of water in the headwaters. Alder Creek contained live water which originated from two springs (Miller spring) located approximately one mile above the mouth of the creek. The springs had an estimated flow of 60-100 gallons per minute. Much of the stream system is choked with thick streamside cover which made it impossible to make a thorough investigation or check results of the treatment. Many of the irrigation ditches were completely dry at the time of investigation. Those containing water were being fed from wells. September 16 an aerial photo of Malheur Reservoir was taken by a private engineering company to aid in determining water volume in the reservoir. September 25 soundings were taken with an electric depth recorder. Water

volume computed by staff engineers indicated the reservoir contained 1,321 acre-feet of water on September 25, The water level was 421/2 feet below the high water line. This was the lowest the reservoir has been since 1950. Sampling of the fish populations was done throughout the tributary streams in order to locate upstream limits of trash fish. Willow Creek below Ironside' contained an abundant population of finescale suckers, shiners and dace. An occasional trout was seen. Only trout and dace were observed in the Middle Fork. In the South Fork, a good population of small rainbow was found throughout the stream. Finescale suckers were located up to 51/2 miles above Ironside. No suckers were observed above that point. The flows from Miller spring contained shiners and dace. Fish populations in the reservoir were composed of rainbow (0.6 per cent), black crappie (87.1 per cent), redsided shiners (0.1 per cent) and finescale suckers (12.3 per cent) as determined by trop_ net sets. In preparation for the project the general pattern of activities for chemical treatment was followed. Equipment and rotenone were assembled at a specified location, markers and live boxes were placed in the reservoir and various water analysis and temperature studies were accomplished. The reservoir was divided into three main sections for equal distribution of the chemical. Eleven live boxes containing crappie and finescale suckers were anchored at various points in the reservoir and at depths ranging from 5 to 28 feet. The live boxes were set out three days in advance of the treatment to check the reaction of the fish to the various depths. Crappie appeared to be a poor test fish while suckers were satisfactory. A water sample from the reservoir was sent to a commercial laboratory for analysis. The results of the analysis follow in Table 1. 5-

TABLE 1 Water Analysis, Malheur Reservoir Date taken - September 26, 1962 Depth taken - 8 feet Ph value - 8.8 Specific conductance, Micromhos/cm - 610 Parts per million Total solids (residue on evaporation) 475 Volatile solids (loss on ignition) 75 Alkalinity has Ca CO3) Carbonate Bicarbonate 50 173 Temperatures and dissolved oxygen samples taken on October 8, 19625 are enumerated in Table 2, TABLE 2 Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Readings Malheur Reservoir Depth Temperatures Dissolved Oxygen Air 53 Surface 520 FOUrteen feet 52 Twenty-seven feet 51 o 8.0 ppm 7.7 ppm 7.7 ppm Chemical Treatment - Tributaries 1. Equipment used a. Three 50-gallon drums with constant flow drippers b. Eight 30-gallon drums with constant flow drippers c. Four back pack cans d. Two 5-gallon rotenone cans e. Three 1-gallon rotenone cans f. One funnel g. One graduate - 25 ml h. One pickup truck, 3/4-ton i. One pickup truck, 1/2-ton j. One portable 200-gallon John Bean spray rig with 200 feet of high pressure hose and gun 2. Personnel needed - Four men

3. Man days required - Twenty -six 4. Chemical - Pro-Noxfish synergized rotenone Drippers 100 gallons Spray rig 100 gallons 5. Streams treated Stream Miles Treated Water Volume Willow Creek 15 1 c.f.s. to potholes Willow Creek, South Fork 6 3/4 1 c.f.s. Alder Creek (Miller spring) 1 50-60 g.p.m. 6. Drip station data (See Table 3) Chemical treatment of the tributaries above Malheur Reservoir began on September 3 and was completed September 10, 1962. Since the South Fork of Willow Creek above the community of Ironside and the upper end of Willow Creek below Ironside had a suitable flow, drip stations were established 3/4 to 2 1/4 miles apart. Table 3 presents data on individual drip stations. In the South Fork, the drip stations operated for a period of 48 hours. At Stations 2 through 7 dead fish were observed above each drip barrel after 18 hours of operation indicating chemical from the drip above had reached that point. At Stations 8 through 10 it took the chemical up to 36 hours to reach the station below. For that reason, these drips were operated for a period of 72 hours. Since much of the South Fork and most of the section of Willow Creek from Ironside down to Station 9 was covered by dense brush, no attempt was made to check the stream for isolated pockets of fish while the drips were in operation. In those sections of stream where cover was not too thick, checks were made for isolated pockets of fish. Several were found. Immediately below Station 11 a series of beaver dams had impounded the water and had created a large marshy area several acres in size. From this - 7

Stream TABLE 3 Data on Drip Stations for Various Streams Treated in the Willow Creek Drainage Se tember 3 to Se tember 10, 1962 Drip Gallons Drip Duration Stream liquid No. Location (Hours) flow used Concentration Distance to next drip Willow Creek, 1 6k miles above Ironside 24 1 c.f.s. 5 2.3 ppm 1 mile South Fork 2 1 mile below Station 1 48 1 c.f.s. 10 2.3 ppm 1 3/4 miles 51/2 miles above Ironside next to road 3. 1 3/4 miles below Station 2 48 1 c.f.s. 10 2.3 ppm 1 3/4 miles at a field road crossing 4 1 3/4 miles below Station 3 48 across meadow 1 c.f.s. 10 2.3 ppm 214 miles Willow Creek 5 21/4 miles below Station 4 48 1 c.f.s. 10 2.3 ppm 1 mile _mile below Ironside 6 First bridge crossing 11/2 miles 60 below Ironside 0.5 c.f.s. 12 2.3 ppm 1 mile 7 Crossing at Locey ranch 72.25 c.f.s 12 2.3 ppm 1 mile 8 Bridge crossing 1 mile below 72 60 g.p.m. 13 2.3 ppm 1 mile Locey ranch 9 Crossing at abandoned ranch 60 building 1 mile below Station 8 10 1 mile below Station 9 crossing 18 below old lone barn 11 At lower end of drop-off of new 18 by-pass ditch and just above marsh 60 g.p.m. 10 2.3 ppm 1 mile 60 g.p.m. 2 2.3 ppm 3/4 mile 60 g.p.m. 5 2.3 ppm

point the portable 200-gallon spray rig with 200 feet of hose played an important part in the treatment of the remainder of Willow Creek. The marsh was flooded with water up to three feet deep in places and was overgrown with cattails up to ten feet in height. In order to insure a complete coverage of all the marsh, parallel trails 15 feet apart were forced through the cattails from one side to the other the full length of the marsh. A man with the high pressure hose followed and covered the area along each trail. The large beaver dam near the marsh was opened up to create a flow through a section of thick brush. A heavy concentration of rotenone was mixed into the flow as the water drained out of the dam. From the marsh down to the reservoir, Willow Creek contained only potholes and an occasional small flow. ideal for treating such sections. The high pressure spray equipment was From the mouth of the canyon lust below the Bronson ranch for a distance of approximately 21/2 miles Willow Creek had cut a channel eight to ten feet deep. The banks were lined with thick brush and trees. In order to treat this stretch of stream it was necessary for one man to walk along in the stream bed. At points approximately 400 feet apart the 200-foot hose was pulled into the brush and the stream was sprayed 200 feet above and below each point, making sure each section overlapped the previous one. Many of the potholes in this section were 10 to 40 feet long and up to 5 feet deep. A number of checks were made along the stream to determine the completeness of the kill. Spot treatment failed to produce live fish. Chemical Treatment - Malheur Reservoir 1. Equipment used a. Fifty'gallons regular gas b. Five gallons solvent 9

c. Gas hand pump d. Rotenone hand pump and 50 feet of hose e. Three aluminum 14-foot flat bottom scows f. One 16-foot aluminum boat with 18 h.p. outboard motor g. One 14-foot aluminum boat with 10 h.p. motor h. Five 25 h.p. outboard motors with gas cans i. Funnel j. Portable 200-gallon John Bean spray pump with 200 feet of high pressure hose and gun k. Three 16-foot poles for "A" frame construction 1. Quarter-ton chain hoist m. Ten live boxes n. Outboard motor lift o. Six venturi attachments with hose and barrel fittings p. Barrel bung opener q. Tarp (large) r. One case outboard motor oil s. One tent 2. Personnel - Seven men 3. Chemical - Pro-Noxfish synergized liquid rotenone Deep water application - 55 gallons Shoreline application - 55 gallons Surface application - 990 gallons Malheur Reservoir was treated on October 11, 1962. hours were required to put out 1,100 gallons of chemical. Approximately nine The majority of the rotenone was put out by three boats equipped with venturi devices attached to the outboard motors. One boat distributed chemical in each of three sections. One flat-bottomed scow outfitted with the 200-gallon portable spray equipment covered the entire shore line and shallow water areas. The equipment was also used to apply rotenone to the deep water areas of the reservoir. Chemical tests for rotenone concentrations were made periodically while the reservoir was being treated and for several days afterward. were collected at various points in each section and at various Water samples depths. Results are presented in Table 4. The treatment of Malheur Reservoir appeared to be quite effective. Approximately 20 minutes after the chemical was first introduced crappie and 10 -

rainbow began to show signs of distress in shallow water areas. By midafternoon, very few distressed fish were observed. The kill consisted of black crappie, rainbow, finescale suckers and shiners. It is estimated that sportsmen picked up less than 700 trout, most of which were around 12 inches in length. A check of the entire shoreline the day after the treatment revealed no live fish. Very few suckers and shiners were observed. Crappie composed the largest percentage of the kill. From strip counts made along various sections of the shoreline, it is estimated that the crappie kill was 175,000 to 200,000 fish. Better than 95 per cent of the crappie were four inches or less in length. The day after the treatment the live boxes were checked. Fish in live boxes at all depths were dead. On October 15, six overnight gill net sets were made at depths ranging from 5.feet to 30 feet throughout the reservoir to check completeness of kill. No fish were taken or observed. Additional gill net, sets will be made in the future. Tests for toxicity were made on November 29, 1962. Six live boxes containing 21/2-ito 6-inch rainbow were placed at various depths in the lower end of the reservoir. The live boxes were checked December 4, 1962. Results are given in Table 5.

TABLE 4 Date Results of chemical tests for rotenone concentrations in water samples taken at various depths in Malheur Reservoir during and following chemical treatment Sample Section A Section B Section C No. Death..m Death..m Death m 10/11/62 1* 5' 0,0 2* 25' 0.5 3 5' 1+ 4 20' 1+ 5 3' 0,5 6 25 0.5 7 5 1.0 9' 0.5 10-12-62 1 3' 1+ 2 19 1+ 3 5 1+ 4 15 1+ 5 2.5' 1+ 6 7' 1+ 7 5' 1+ 8 28' 1+ 10-15-62 1 5' -0,5 2 30' -0.5 3. 5-0.5 4 18-0.5 5 4-0.5 6 8' -0.5 10-16-62 1 5-0.5 2 28-0.5 * Taken 10:20 A.M. TABLE 5 5-0.5 190-0.5 3' -0.5 9-0.5 Tests for toxicity in Malheur Reservoir using lite:boxes containing rainbow fingerlings Live box Time and Time and.condition-of]fish No. Depth Date set Date checked No;_dead No'alive 1 9' 4:00 PM, 11-29-62 2:00 PM, 12-4-62 9 5 111 2/ 31' " It tt 7 7 of II! MI 3 6 ft 4 6 ft It fr. 4 30' " 5 9 5 90 U u u It 7 2 6 26' It Ill II " 6 3 Approved by Submitted byf obert L. Borov cka Coordinating Biologist - 12 Larry Bisbee Project Biologist

LAS sisi '.1 ass.. ; 3.e r*".* 7 -T rn lti si Y. C tow a. &TVs 7.", 7. 16. 47%. ts.".14: 7. >zi 1. 'e jai s.. C..10. 3. Serk 2 1 oda Awe/ - =111=1=0 gm./ 1.1.11A 0.4. siva... si...3. - m %. Zlift., Of Ts**11 IP4-1.1 - IMM 11I t. t. Co..,, 1414 rour n Tins wielso Cr.., 11.06 Ps.* - - -. es. ss;ss s.. was.. _ egat it - - - ^ilea 112 7,),,,riv,' MY.._. C o 4/7

5 Sc 215 2 0 \O \O \ a O aco. ELEV. WHEN TREATED A y 2 SCALE IN FEET ELEV 215 145 SURFACE ACRES G3 87.1 1 425 ACRE FEET 532157 S 9 OREGON STATE GAME COMMISSION PORTLAND OREGON CONTOUR MAP MALHEUR. RESERVOIR