UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Similar documents
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER INSPECTION REPORT DOUBLE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT HAWTHORN ROAD OVER RICE CREEK (PELKEY LAKE) MORRISON COUNTY

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CR 52 over CALDWELL BROOK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/04/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 10 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. 81(ENCHANTED LANE) over CHANNEL. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 09/07/2016

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

INFILTRATION PRACTICE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FORM

Bridge Failures in Alberta

Components of a Barrage

Underwater Inspection of Bridges Overview of a Statewide Program

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 14 over BUTLER CREEK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/21/2016. County Highway Agency

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

PED (OLD TWNS RD) over OTTER TAIL RIVER

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

State DOT - Bridge Inspection Manual Part II Course No. SE0117 PDH: 10

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

Culvert Safety Inspection Report

FLAGLER BEACH PIER POST INCIDENT SAFETY INSPECTION HURRICANE IRMA SEPTEMBER 15-17, 2017

APPENDIX K CULVERT INSPECTION MEMO

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

EPA R6 Dive Team Operations Report. San Jacinto Waste Pits Channelview, TX December 9-10, 2015

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

Illinois State Water Survey

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

PROPOSING A NEW PORTABLE DEVICE FOR BRIDGE SCOUR INSPECTION

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier

2012 Susitna River Water Temperature and Meteorological Field Study

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

Green CCR Surface Impoundment

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

Item 404 Driving Piling

Cranes Roost Park Facility Analysis

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

TAO Safety Policy No. HS-5.1 Page 1 of 15 Revision No. 2 Revision Date: July 19, 2005

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 52/P UNDERWATER INSPECTION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS IN LIEU OF DRYDOCKING

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Bridge Design Preliminary Bridge Design Example 1 / 6 Spring 2012 updated 1/27/2012

General Information for Culvert Design

Beavers are particularly adept at manipulating their

Construction Dewatering

Building Coastal Resiliency at Plymouth Long Beach

SITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE

VWP CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT. Project Name: Berkmar Drive Extension Locality: Albemarle County Inspector: ERM

Shoreline Erosion Control Failures and How To Avoid Them

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

Implications of proposed Whanganui Port and lower Whanganui River dredging

3. Types of foundation

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

TCML operate and control the 146 Km Railway line from Lake Magadi to Konza.

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

Information for File # SEW

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

PUSH PIER SYSTEMS STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY. Push Pier Systems PN #MBPPT

Environmental. Effects of Dredging

The Dalles Dam Powerhouse Trash Rack ROV Inspection Report

Guidelines for Underwater Inspection and Imaging of Railroad Bridges

Outlet Structures T-12

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Annual CCR Landfill Inspection OML Existing Landfill OML Expansion Phase 1

CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

PENNDRAIN.rep. HEC-RAS Version May 2005 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street Davis, California

The Challenge of Wave Scouring Design for the Confederation Bridge

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

Steelhead Society of BC. Thompson River Watershed Restoration and Enhancement Project #4 Nicola River Bank Stabilization and Enhancement Project

Fish Passage Assessment Report Mare Brook Culverts

Initial Annual CCR Landfill Inspection OML Existing Landfill OML Expansion Phase 1

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

We re good at what we do! Anywhere, TX SITE

FORMAT FOR SENDING COMMENTS. Title: CRITERIA FOR DESIGN OF CANAL HEAD REGULATORS (Second revision of IS 6531)

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS)

Hard Hat Services ph: hardhatinc.com 932 N. Wright St., Suite 160 Naperville, IL 60563

Angela Lane, Lowe Environmental Impact / Karen Akuhata (WDC) The Wairoa wastewater treatment system requires a replacement consent by May 2019.

CORPS FACTS. Harbor Dredging U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUILDING STRONG

Transcription:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7635 CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY JUNE 18, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. 7423

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT SUMMARY: The substructure units inspected below water at Structure No. 7635, Box 1 and Box 2 of the culvert, were found to be in good condition with no defects of structural significance. Light scaling was observed in both boxes of the culvert extending from 1 foot below the waterline to the culvert ceiling and along the entire ceiling with a typical penetration of 1/4 inch. The concrete floor of Box 1 was exposed along the length of the culvert with the upstream apron toe exposed vertically 6 inches. No undermining was observed at the upstream apron. The flow of the upstream waterway is directed at approximately a 45 degree angle to the culvert openings resulting in considerable sediment deposition with box 2 of the culvert, consisting of up to 2 feet thick layer of silt and light timber drift on the culvert floor. INSPECTION FINDINGS: (A) The concrete of the culvert was typically sound with no significant defects or loss of section. (B) Light to moderate scaling was observed on the culvert walls extending from 1 foot below the waterline to the culvert ceiling and on the entire ceiling with a typical penetration of 1/4 inch and a maximum penetration of 1/2 inch. (C) The concrete floor was exposed in Box 1 along the entire length of the culvert box. The culvert apron was exposed along Box 1 at the upstream opening of the culvert with up to 6 inches of apron toe vertical exposure. No undermining was observed at the upstream toe. (D) The eastern half of the box 2 culvert floor was typically covered by a approximately 2 feet thick layer of soft silty infill accumulation with typical probe rod penetration of 1 foot. A light timber drift accumulation was scattered throughout the box consisting of 3 inch diameter and smaller branches. (E) The channel bottom material upstream of the structure consisted of a firm mixture of sand and gravel with up to 6 inch diameter cobbles allowing no probe rod penetration.

(F) The channel bottom material downstream of the structure consisted of sandy gravel allowing up to 2 inches of probe rod penetration. RECOMMENDATIONS: (A) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of five sixty (60) months. Inspection Team Leader: Daniel G. Stromberg, P.E.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION 1. BRIDGE DATA Bridge Number: 7635 Feature Crossed: Beaver River Feature Carried: CSAH 4 Location: St. Louis County Bridge Description: The culvert consists of two reinforced concrete culvert boxes designated as Box 1 and Box 2 from west to east. 2. INSPECTION DATA Professional Engineer Diver: Daniel G. Stromberg Dive Team: Clayton Brookins, Breanne Stromberg Date: June 18, 2012 Weather Conditions: Partly Cloudy, 70 F Underwater Visibility: 2.0 feet Waterway Velocity: 1 ft/sec

3. SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA Substructure Inspected: Box 1 and Box 2 General Shape: The culvert consists of two reinforced concrete box barrels measuring 10 feet wide by 5 feet high and 72 feet long. Maximum Water Depth at Substructure Inspected: Approximately 4.5 feet. 4. WATERLINE DATUM Water Level Reference: The top of the upstream headwall. Water Surface: The waterline was approximately 2.5 feet below reference. Assumed Waterline Elevation = 97.5 feet. 5. NBIS CODING INFORMATION (Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113) Item 62: Culvert Condition: Code 7 Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection: Code 6 Item 92B: Underwater Inspection: Code B/06/12 Item 113: Scour Critical Bridges: Code E/12 Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site. Yes X No

6. STRUCTURAL ELEMENT CONDITOIN RATING Item # Element Description Quantity Unit Conditions 1 2 3 4 5 241 Concrete Culvert 144 LF 144 388 Culvert Wingwalls/Headwall 2 EA 2

Photograph 1. View of the Upstream headwall, Looking Northeast. Photograph 2. View of the Downstream Headwall, Looking Southeast.

Photograph 3. View of Typical Scaling at the West Wall of Box 1, Looking West. Photograph 4. View of Upstream Channel, Looking South.

Photograph 5. View of Downstream Channel, Looking North.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES DAILY DIVING REPORT INSPECTORS: Collins Engineers, Inc. DATE: June 18, 2012 ON-SITE TEAM LEADER: Daniel G. Stromberg BRIDGE NO: 7635 WEATHER: Partly Cloudy, 70 F WATERWAY CROSSED: Beaver River DIVING OPERATION: X SCUBA SURFACE SUPPLIED AIR OTHER PERSONNEL: Clayton Brookins, Breanne Stromberg EQUIPMENT: Commercial Scuba, Sounding Pole, Hand Tools, Camera, Underwater Light TIME IN WATER: 12:45 p.m. TIME OUT OF WATER: 1:45 p.m. WATERWAY DATA: VELOCITY 1 ft/sec VISIBILITY 2.0 feet DEPTH 4.6 feet maximum ELEMENTS INSPECTED: Box 1 and Box 2 REMARKS: Overall, the substructure units inspected were found to be in good condition with no defects of structural significance. Light scaling was observed on the walls of both boxes of the culvert extending from 1 foot below the waterline to the culvert ceiling and along the entire ceiling with a typical penetration of 1/4 inch. The concrete floor of Box 1 was exposed along the length of the culvert. The culvert apron was also exposed along the upstream end of Box 1 with up to 6 inches of vertical apron toe exposure. No undermining was observed at the upstream apron. The culvert floor within Box 2 was mostly covered by a layer of silt infill and light timber drift up to 2 feet thick. FURTHER ACTION NEEDED: YES X NO Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of five sixty (60) months.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES UNDERWATER INSPECTION CONDITION RATING FORM BRIDGE NO. 7635 INSPECTION DATE June 18, 2012 INSPECTORS Collins Engineers, Inc. NOTE: USE ALL APPLICABLE CONDITION ON-SITE TEAM LEADER Daniel G. Stromberg DEFINITIONS AS DEFINED IN THE MINNESOTA WATERWAY CROSSED Beaver River RECORDING AND CODING GUIDE INCLUDING GENERAL, SUBSTRUCTURE, CHANNEL AND PROTECTION, AND CULVERTS AND WALL DEFINITIONS TO COMPLETE THIS FORM. CONDITION RATING SUBSTRUCTURE CHANNEL GENERAL UNIT REFERENCE NO. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF WATER PILING REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT FOOTINGS DISPLACEMENT OTHER (HEADWALL/WINGWALL) OVERALL SUBSTRUCTURE CONDITION CODE* SCOUR EMBANKMENT EROSION EMBANKMENT PROTECTION OTHER (DRIFT/DEBRIS) OVERALL CHANNEL & PROTECTION CONDITION CONCRETE STEEL TIMBER LOSS OF SECTION PREVIOUS REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OTHER UNIT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 Concrete Culvert Box 1 4.5 N 7 N 8 7 7 8 6 N N 6 7 N N 8 N N 2 Concrete Culvert Box 2 2.75 N 7 N 8 7 7 8 6 N 6 6 7 N N 8 N N *UNDERWATER PORTION ONLY REMARKS: Overall, the substructure units inspected were found to be in good condition with no defects of structural significance. Light scaling was observed on the walls of both boxes of the culvert extending from 1 foot below the waterline to the culvert ceiling and along the entire ceiling with a typical penetration of 1/4 inch. The concrete floor of Box 1 was exposed along the length of the culvert. The culvert apron was also exposed along the upstream end of Box 1 with up to 6 inches of vertical apron toe exposure. No undermining was observed at the upstream apron. The culvert floor within Box 2 was mostly covered by a layer of silt infill and light timber drift up to 2 feet thick. NOTES: ATTACH SKETCHES AS NEEDED, IDENTIFY REMARK BY REFERRING TO UNIT REFERENCE NO. AND REMARK NO. USE GENERAL SECTION TO IDENTIFY OVERALL PRESENCE OF SPALLS, CRACKS, CORROSION, ETC.