UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Similar documents
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER INSPECTION REPORT DOUBLE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT HAWTHORN ROAD OVER RICE CREEK (PELKEY LAKE) MORRISON COUNTY

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CR 52 over CALDWELL BROOK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/04/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 10 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. 81(ENCHANTED LANE) over CHANNEL. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 09/07/2016

INFILTRATION PRACTICE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FORM

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

Underwater Inspection of Bridges Overview of a Statewide Program

Culvert Safety Inspection Report

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 14 over BUTLER CREEK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/21/2016. County Highway Agency

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

PED (OLD TWNS RD) over OTTER TAIL RIVER

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Bridge Failures in Alberta

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

State DOT - Bridge Inspection Manual Part II Course No. SE0117 PDH: 10

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

Components of a Barrage

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

PROPOSING A NEW PORTABLE DEVICE FOR BRIDGE SCOUR INSPECTION

FLAGLER BEACH PIER POST INCIDENT SAFETY INSPECTION HURRICANE IRMA SEPTEMBER 15-17, 2017

General Information for Culvert Design

APPENDIX K CULVERT INSPECTION MEMO

Cranes Roost Park Facility Analysis

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

DIVER INSPECTION REPORT Canyon South, Raw Water Tank

EPA R6 Dive Team Operations Report. San Jacinto Waste Pits Channelview, TX December 9-10, 2015

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Amador Circle Tank. City of Rio Vista. Report of Findings From the Diving Operations Conducted on. March 28, 2011

Green CCR Surface Impoundment

Access Management Standards

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

CHAPTER 4 SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA 4.0 CULVERT DESIGN

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES. Lake Okeechobee & EAA Vol 3 A-i December 2005 Version 1 Draft 4

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

Angela Lane, Lowe Environmental Impact / Karen Akuhata (WDC) The Wairoa wastewater treatment system requires a replacement consent by May 2019.

Information for File # SEW

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Illinois State Water Survey

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 52/P UNDERWATER INSPECTION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS IN LIEU OF DRYDOCKING

TAO Safety Policy No. HS-5.1 Page 1 of 15 Revision No. 2 Revision Date: July 19, 2005

Beavers are particularly adept at manipulating their

ROAD MAINTENANCE. Back to Basics. Duane A. Blanck, P.E MAT Spring Short Course

The Basics of Culvert and Inlet Design

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

VWP CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT. Project Name: Berkmar Drive Extension Locality: Albemarle County Inspector: ERM

Design & Maintenance of Culverts

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO. 841 HYDROSTATIC TESTING OPERATIONS

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

APPENDIX C DIVING. Section I. General

Guidelines for Underwater Inspection and Imaging of Railroad Bridges

Item 404 Driving Piling

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

Culvert Design Basics

GOM Diving Safety Work Group

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife Section of Fisheries. Stream Survey Report. Luxemburg Creek.

HEC 26 Aquatic Organism Passage Design Manual Evolution & Application

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Dry Hydrants. The installation of a non-pressurized pipe system into local water sources provides a ready means of supplying water to fire engines.

TOP:001.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service TECHNICAL OPERATING PROCEDURE

Dredging Keeping Our Underwater Highways Open

Smoothing Out the Bumpy Road Ahead

TCML operate and control the 146 Km Railway line from Lake Magadi to Konza.

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

Aquatic Facility Evaluation City of Merriam, Kansas. Kyle A. McCawley, P.E. Larkin Aquatics 4/9/2014

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

FAIRWAY PALMS II CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY

Lecture 10 : Sewer Appurtenances

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Initial Annual CCR Landfill Inspection OML Existing Landfill OML Expansion Phase 1

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

The Dalles Dam Powerhouse Trash Rack ROV Inspection Report

APPENDIX B HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA FOR CULVERTS

Technical Report Culvert A Hydraulic Analysis

Transcription:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7780 CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. 7423

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT SUMMARY: The substructure units inspected below water at Structure No. 7780, Box 1 and Box 2 of the culvert, were found to be in satisfactory to fair condition with some defects of only minor structural significance. The concrete of the walls, haunches and ceiling exhibited light to heavy scaling with a maximum penetration of 3/4 inch. A heavy accumulation of timber debris was observed obstructing the upstream opening of Box 1. The culvert had a layer of silty sand throughout the length of both boxes. INSPECTION FINDINGS: (A) The culvert floor was typically covered in a layer of silty sand allowing a maximum probe rod penetration of 4 inches. (B) The channel bottom material upstream and downstream of the culvert apron consisted of silty sand allowing a maximum probe rod penetration of 8 inches. (C) The concrete of the culvert walls and haunches exhibited moderate to heavy scaling with a typical penetration of 1/2 inch and a maximum penetration of 3/4 inch. (D) The concrete of the culvert ceiling exhibited light scaling with a maximum penetration of 1/4 inch and random areas of poor concrete consolidation with a maximum penetration of 1 inch. (E) A heavy timber debris accumulation of 4 inch diameter and smaller branches was observed obstructing the flow at Box 1. (F) The concrete of the center wall extension at the upstream and downstream ends of the culvert exhibited heavy scaling with a maximum penetration of 2 inches.

(G) A 12 foot wide by 8 inch high area of concrete section loss was observed at the upstream headwall with up to 1.5 inches of penetration and exposed reinforcing steel exhibiting approximately 30 percent loss of section. (H) A light timber debris accumulation was observed at the upstream opening of Box 2 extending 5 feet off the east face of the center wall. RECOMMENDATIONS: (A) The timber debris accumulation in Box 1 did not significantly affect the channel flow since the flow was very low, but ideally the debris should be removed before it becomes more detrimental. If the debris accumulation increases in size or density or the flow through the culvert increases, it may become more imperative to remove the debris to reduce excessive lateral loads on the culvert, limit further debris accumulation, and reduce the likelihood of channel bottom degradation resulting from obstructed flow.

RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT.): (B) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months. (C) At the time of inspection of the submerged substructure units of Structure No. 7780, the waterline and water flow were noticeably lower than the mean values. As a result the inspection could be safely carried out by means of wading. During future inspections of the substructure units, a higher waterline elevation and/or increased flow may result in lower overhead clearance with a possibility of a confined space entrance requirements which may require a qualified dive team to safely carry out the inspection. If future inspections determine that the waterline consistently remains at a level which an inspection can be safely performed by the means of wading, consideration may be given to removing the structure from the underwater inspection list. Inspection Team Leader: Daniel G. Stromberg, P.E.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION 1. BRIDGE DATA Bridge Number: 7780 Feature Crossed: A Ditch Feature Carried: CSAH 133 Location: St. Louis County Bridge Description: The culvert consists of two reinforced concrete culvert boxes designated as Box 1 and Box 2 from west to east. 2. INSPECTION DATA Professional Engineer Diver: Daniel G. Stromberg, P.E. Dive Team: Marc B. Parker, Clayton Brookins Date: September 27, 2012 Weather Conditions: Sunny, 60 F Underwater Visibility: feet Waterway Velocity: None/Negligible

3. SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA Substructure Inspected: Box 1 and Box 2 General Shape: The culvert consists of two reinforced concrete box barrels measuring 12 feet wide by 6 feet high and 42 feet long. Maximum Water Depth at Substructure Inspected: Approximately 0.6 feet. 4. WATERLINE DATUM Water Level Reference: The top of the culvert headwall at the upstream end of Box 1. Water Surface: The waterline was approximately 6.9 feet below reference. Assumed Waterline Elevation = 93.1 feet. 5. NBIS CODING INFORMATION (Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113) Item 62: Culvert Condition: Code 5 Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection: Code 4 Item 92B: Underwater Inspection: Code A/09/12 Item 113: Scour Critical Bridges: Code E/12 Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site. Yes X No

6. STRUCTURAL ELEMENT CONDITOIN RATING Item # Element Description Quantity Unit Conditions 1 2 3 4 5 241 Concrete Culvert 84 LF 0 71 13 0 n/a 387 Concrete Wingwalls 4 EA 0 4 0 0 n/a 388 Culvert Headwall 2 EA 0 1 1 0 n/a 985 Slopes and Slope Protection 1 EA 1 0 0 n/a n/a

Photograph 1. Overall View of the Culvert, Looking North. Photograph 2. View of the Typical Concrete Condition of the Culvert Walls, Looking Northwest.

Photograph 3. View of Timber Debris Obstructing Box 1, Looking North.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES DAILY DIVING REPORT INSPECTORS: Collins Engineers, Inc. DATE: September 27, 2012 ON-SITE TEAM LEADER: Daniel G. Stromberg, P.E. BRIDGE NO: 7836 WEATHER: Sunny, 60 F WATERWAY CROSSED: A Ditch DIVING OPERATION: SCUBA SURFACE SUPPLIED AIR X OTHER Inspection by Wading PERSONNEL: Clayton Brookins, Marc B. Parker EQUIPMENT: Dry Suit, Sounding Pole, Hand Tools, Camera, Underwater Light TIME IN WATER: 1:50 P.M. TIME OUT OF WATER: 2:15 P.M. WATERWAY DATA: VELOCITY None/Negligible VISIBILITY 2 feet DEPTH 0.6 feet maximum at the downstream opening ELEMENTS INSPECTED: Box 1 and Box 2 REMARKS: Overall, the substructure units inspected were found to be in satisfactory to fair condition with some defects of only minor structural significance. The concrete of the walls, haunches and ceiling exhibited light to heavy scaling with a maximum penetration of 3/4 inch. A heavy accumulation of timber debris was observed obstructing the upstream opening of Box 1. The culvert had a layer of silty sand throughout the length of both boxes. FURTHER ACTION NEEDED: YES X NO

The timber debris accumulation in Box 1 did not significantly affect the channel flow since the flow was very low, but ideally the debris should be removed before it becomes more detrimental. If the debris accumulation increases in size or density or the flow through the culvert increases, it may become more imperative to remove the debris to reduce excessive lateral loads on the culvert, limit further debris accumulation, and reduce the likelihood of channel bottom degradation resulting from obstructed flow. Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months. At the time of inspection of the submerged substructure units of Structure No. 7780, the waterline and water flow were noticeably lower than the mean values. As a result the inspection could be safely carried out by means of wading. During future inspections of the substructure units, a higher waterline elevation and/or increased flow may result in lower overhead clearance with a possibility of a confined space entrance requirements which may require a qualified dive team to safely carry out the inspection. If future inspections determine that the waterline consistently remains at a level which an inspection can be safely performed by the means of wading, consideration may be given to removing the structure from the underwater inspection list.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES UNDERWATER INSPECTION CONDITION RATING FORM BRIDGE NO. 7780 INSPECTION DATE September 27, 2012 INSPECTORS Collins Engineers, Inc. NOTE: USE ALL APPLICABLE CONDITION ON-SITE TEAM LEADER Daniel G. Stromberg, P.E. DEFINITIONS AS DEFINED IN THE MINNESOTA WATERWAY CROSSED A Ditch RECORDING AND CODING GUIDE INCLUDING GENERAL, SUBSTRUCTURE, CHANNEL AND PROTECTION, AND CULVERTS AND WALL DEFINITIONS TO COMPLETE THIS FORM. CONDITION RATING SUBSTRUCTURE CHANNEL GENERAL UNIT REFERENCE NO. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF WATER PILING REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT FOOTINGS DISPLACEMENT OTHER (HEADWALL/WINGWALL) OVERALL SUBSTRUCTURE CONDITION CODE* SCOUR EMBANKMENT EROSION EMBANKMENT PROTECTION OTHER (SILT & DEBRIS BUILDUP) OVERALL CHANNEL & PROTECTION CONDITION CONCRETE STEEL TIMBER LOSS OF SECTION PREVIOUS REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OTHER UNIT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 Concrete Culvert Box 1 0.6 N 6 N N 5 5 N 7 N 7 7 5 N N 5 N N 2 Concrete Culvert Box 2 1.1 N 6 N N 5 5 N 7 N 4 4 5 N N 5 N N *UNDERWATER PORTION ONLY REMARKS: Overall, the substructure units inspected were found to be in satisfactory to fair condition with some defects of only minor structural significance. The concrete of the walls, haunches and ceiling exhibited light to heavy scaling with a maximum penetration of 3/4 inch. A heavy accumulation of timber debris was observed obstructing the upstream opening of Box 1. The culvert had a layer of silty sand throughout the length of both boxes. NOTES: ATTACH SKETCHES AS NEEDED, IDENTIFY REMARK BY REFERRING TO UNIT REFERENCE NO. AND REMARK NO. USE GENERAL SECTION TO IDENTIFY OVERALL PRESENCE OF SPALLS, CRACKS, CORROSION, ETC.