UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY

Similar documents
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER INSPECTION REPORT DOUBLE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT HAWTHORN ROAD OVER RICE CREEK (PELKEY LAKE) MORRISON COUNTY

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CR 52 over CALDWELL BROOK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/04/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 10 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

Underwater Inspection of Bridges Overview of a Statewide Program

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. 81(ENCHANTED LANE) over CHANNEL. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 09/07/2016

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

PED (OLD TWNS RD) over OTTER TAIL RIVER

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

Information for File # SEW

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

Culvert Safety Inspection Report

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

State DOT - Bridge Inspection Manual Part II Course No. SE0117 PDH: 10

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 14 over BUTLER CREEK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/21/2016. County Highway Agency

FLAGLER BEACH PIER POST INCIDENT SAFETY INSPECTION HURRICANE IRMA SEPTEMBER 15-17, 2017

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

INFILTRATION PRACTICE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FORM

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

Bridge Failures in Alberta

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

The Challenge of Wave Scouring Design for the Confederation Bridge

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

PROPOSING A NEW PORTABLE DEVICE FOR BRIDGE SCOUR INSPECTION

We re good at what we do! Anywhere, TX SITE

3. Types of foundation

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

Gerald P. Oliveto, P.E. George Franz NJDOT

Components of a Barrage

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier

The Dalles Dam Powerhouse Trash Rack ROV Inspection Report

DIVER INSPECTION REPORT Canyon South, Raw Water Tank

Amador Circle Tank. City of Rio Vista. Report of Findings From the Diving Operations Conducted on. March 28, 2011

Green CCR Surface Impoundment

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

APPENDIX J HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2009

CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT

Guidelines for Underwater Inspection and Imaging of Railroad Bridges

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 52/P UNDERWATER INSPECTION OF MOBILE OFFSHORE DRILLING UNITS IN LIEU OF DRYDOCKING

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 11 APPENDIX B TIDEROUT 2 USERS MANUAL

Cranes Roost Park Facility Analysis

ABC D BC ecision Ma ion trix

REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL BRIDGE INSPECTION STANDARDS (NBIS)

Illinois State Water Survey

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

Culvert Design An Overview of the NYS Highway Design Manual Chapter 8

Washington State Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects. Casey Kramer, PE WSDOT State Hydraulics Engineer

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

Underwater repair for bridge

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (S.O.P.)

RLRC COMMUNITIES EAST GRAND FORKS AREA CHARACTER THE RED LAKE RIVER & THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH CONFLUENCE EAGLE POINT BOAT LAUNCH DESIGN

APPENDIX C DIVING. Section I. General

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

Whitewater Valley Station Surface Impoundment Coal Combustion Residual Annual Report

MIRABAY PILOT PROJECT REPORT

Bridge Design for Marine Vessel Collision

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

FISH PASSAGE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ON PENNYPACK CREEK AT VERREE ROAD DAM AND ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD DAM PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

APPENDIX K CULVERT INSPECTION MEMO

Outlet Structures T-12

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

Kennedy Bridge - Summary of Pier 6 Movement Records

Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

ONTARIO REGULATION 239/02 MUNICIPAL ACT MINIMUM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAYS

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D.

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Identification on Unknown Bridge Foundations Using Geophysical Inspecting Methods

Beavers are particularly adept at manipulating their

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

Fish Passage Culvert Assessment for Cahilty Creek Watershed FIA Project #

JAP Additional Information Sheet

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

Little Traverse Bay Watershed Road/Stream Crossing Inventory

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

Sediment Basin 7E-12. Design Manual Chapter 7 - Erosion and Sediment Control 7E - Design Information for ESC Measures BENEFITS.

Bridge Inspection Access to Minimize Operational Impacts

APPENDIX A STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS AND RATING CURVES

Structural Assessment. USS Yorktown CV-10

Existing conditions of each bridge and repair plan are presented in Table

Transcription:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 7149 CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO. 3512 (CEI 99)

REPORT SUMMARY: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION The substructure units inspected at Bridge No. 7149, Piers 1 and 2, were found to be generally in good condition. Random areas of poorly consolidated concrete were observed on both piers. Since the previous inspection, the footing exposure has increased significantly with up to 6 feet of vertical undermining detected at Pier 1 with the steel H-piles exhibiting minor surface corrosion. The footing at Pier 2 was also exposed with up to 2.9 feet of vertical face exposure, but no undermining was observed. The footing exposures are related to both general and local scour at the bridge site. INSPECTION FINDINGS: (A) Random areas of poor consolidation were observed along the pier and footing between the channel bottom and the waterline. (B) The footing at Pier 1 was completely exposed with undermining ranging from 2.8 feet at the upstream end to 5.9 feet at the downstream nose. The steel piles that were exposed exhibited rust nodules over 10 percent of the surface area. (C) The top of the footing at Pier 2 was completely exposed with up to 2.9 feet of vertical face exposure at the upstream end. No undermining was detected. (D) A moderate accumulation of timber debris was observed under the footing at Pier 1. RECOMMENDATIONS: (A) Scour rating indicates that the bridge has the potential to be at greater risk for scour with further scour analysis required. At a minimum, it is recommended that riprap be properly designed and placed around the piers and in the scour/undermining areas to armor against further scour, unless further scour analysis indicates differently.

(B) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of five (5) years. In the interim, and certainly until the scour conditions are further addressed, the footing exposures and undermining should be closely monitored with water depth soundings, and in the occurrence of a high water event, underwater inspections should be considered immediately after.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION 1. BRIDGE DATA Bridge Number: 7149 Feature Crossed: The Minnesota River Feature Carried: CSAH No. 101 Location: District 8 - Redwood County Bridge Description: The superstructure consists of a three span, multiple steel beam bridge. The superstructure is supported by two reinforced concrete abutments and two reinforced concrete piers. The South Abutment and Pier 1 are supported on piles, and the North Abutment and Pier 2 are supported on spread footings keyed into underlying bedrock. The piers are numbered 1 and 2, starting from the north end of the bridge. 2. INSPECTION DATA Professional Engineer/Team Leader: Shirley M. Walker, P.E. Dive Team: Michelle D. Koerbel, Clayton G. Brookins Date: November 1, 2002 Weather Conditions: Sunny, "15EF Underwater Visibility: "1 foot Waterway Velocity: "1 f.p.s.

3. SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA Substructure Inspected: Piers 1 and 2 General Shape: The pier shafts are oblong and rectangular with rounded downstream noses and beveled upstream noses. The piers are supported by rectangular footings. Although the design plans do not indicate piles under either footing, Pier 1 was determined to be founded on steel H-piles (Based on field observation). Maximum Water Depth at Substructure Inspected: Approximately 12.5 feet. 4. WATERLINE DATUM Water Level Reference: The top of the pier cap on the downstream end of Pier 1. Water Surface: The waterline was approximately 17.1 feet below reference. Waterline Elevation = 77.0 5. NBIS CODING INFORMATION (Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113) Item 60: Substructure: Code 7 Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection: Code 3 Item 92B: Underwater Inspection: Code B/11/02 Item 113: Scour Critical Bridges: Code J/91 Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site. Yes X No

Photograph 1. Overall View of Structure, Looking West. Photograph 2. View of Pier 1, Looking Northwest.

Photograph 3. View of Pier 2, Looking West. Photograph 4. View of South Abutment, Looking Southeast.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES DAILY DIVING REPORT INSPECTORS: Collins Engineers, Inc. DATE: November 1, 2002 ON-SITE TEAM LEADER: Shirley M. Walker, P.E. BRIDGE NO: 7149 WEATHER: Sunny, "15EF WATERWAY CROSSED: The Minnesota River DIVING OPERATION: X SCUBA SURFACE SUPPLIED AIR OTHER PERSONNEL: Michelle D. Koerbel, Clayton G. Brookins EQUIPMENT: Scuba, U/W Light, Scraper, Lead Line, Sounding Pole, Probe Rod, Camera TIME IN WATER: 8:25 a.m. TIME OUT OF WATER: 8:55 a.m. WATERWAY DATA: VELOCITY "1 f.p.s. VISIBILITY "1 foot DEPTH 12.5 feet maximum at Pier 1 ELEMENTS INSPECTED: Piers 1 and 2 REMARKS: Overall, the concrete of Piers 1 and 2 was in good condition with only random minor areas of poor consolidation observed on the shafts and footings. Since the previous inspection, the footing exposure has increased significantly with up to 6 feet of vertical undermining detected at Pier 1 with the exposed steel H-piles exhibiting minor surface corrosion. The footing at Pier 2 was also exposed with up to 2.9 feet of vertical face exposure, but no undermining was observed. A moderate accumulation of timber debris was observed under Pier 1. FURTHER ACTION NEEDED: X YES NO Scour rating indicates that the bridge has the potential to be at greater risk for scour with further scour analysis required. At a minimum, it is recommended that riprap be properly designed and placed around the piers and in the scour/undermining areas to armor against further scour, unless further scour analysis indicates differently.

FURTHER ACTION NEEDED (CONTINUED) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of five (5) years. In the interim, and certainly until the scour conditions are further addressed, the footing exposures and undermining should be closely monitored with water depth soundings, and in the event of high water flows underwater inspections should be considered immediately after.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES UNDERWATER INSPECTION CONDITION RATING FORM BRIDGE NO. 7149 INSPECTION DATE November 1, 2002 INSPECTORS Collins Engineers, Inc. NOTE: USE ALL APPLICABLE CONDITION ON-SITE TEAM LEADER Shirley M. Walker, P.E. DEFINITIONS AS DEFINED IN THE MINNESOTA WATERWAY CROSSED The Minnesota River RECORDING AND CODING GUIDE INCLUDING GENERAL, SUBSTRUCTURE, CHANNEL AND PROTECTION, AND CULVERTS AND WALL DEFINITIONS TO COMPLETE THIS FORM. CONDITION RATING SUBSTRUCTURE CHANNEL GENERAL UNIT REFERENCE NO. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF WATER PILING COLUMNS, SHAFTS, OR FACES* FOOTINGS DISPLACEMENT OTHER OVERALL SUBSTRUCTURE CONDITION CODE* SCOUR EMBANKMENT EROSION EMBANKMENT PROTECTION OTHER (DRIFT/DEBRIS) OVERALL CHANNEL & PROTECTION CONDITION CONCRETE STEEL TIMBER LOSS OF SECTION PREVIOUS REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OTHER UNIT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Pier 1 12.5 7 7 7 9 N 7 3 N N 7 3 7 7 N 8 N N Pier 2 3.5 N 7 7 9 N 7 5 N N 8 5 7 N N 8 N N *UNDERWATER PORTION ONLY REMARKS: Overall, the concrete of Piers 1 and 2 was in good condition with only random minor areas of poor consolidation observed on the shafts and footings. Since the previous inspection, the footing exposure has increased significantly with up to 6 feet of vertical undermining detected at Pier 1 with the steel H-piles exposed exhibiting minor surface corrosion. The footing at Pier 2 was also exposed with up to 2.9 feet of vertical face exposure, but no undermining was observed. A moderate accumulation of timber debris was observed under Pier 1. NOTES: ATTACH SKETCHES AS NEEDED, IDENTIFY REMARK BY REFERRING TO UNIT REFERENCE NO. AND REMARK NO. USE GENERAL SECTION TO IDENTIFY OVERALL PRESENCE OF SPALLS, CRACKS, CORROSION, ETC.