UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY

Similar documents
UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT METRO DISTRICT - ANOKA COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO B WABASHA STREET SOUTH BOUND (MASA 235 SB)

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 101 OVER THE MINNESOTA RIVER DISTRICT 8 - REDWOOD COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 9 OVER THE BLUE EARTH RIVER DISTRICT 7 - BLUE EARTH COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO OVER THE STRAIGHT RIVER DISTRICT 6 - RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 8 - LAC QUI PARLE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 7 OVER THE SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT 1 - PINE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 4 OVER THE BEAVER RIVER ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO MSAS 123 (2 ND AVE. SW) OVER THE CANNON RIVER CITY OF FARIBAULT, RICE COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 133 OVER A DITCH ST. LOUIS COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT DISTRICT 4 - OTTER TAIL COUNTY

UNDERWATER INSPECTION REPORT DOUBLE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT HAWTHORN ROAD OVER RICE CREEK (PELKEY LAKE) MORRISON COUNTY

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 10 over POMME DE TERRE RIVER. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/18/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CR 52 over CALDWELL BROOK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/04/2016. County Highway Agency

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. 81(ENCHANTED LANE) over CHANNEL. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 09/07/2016

Underwater Inspection of Bridges Overview of a Statewide Program

2016 UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT. CSAH 14 over BUTLER CREEK. Date of Inspection: Equipment Used: 06/21/2016. County Highway Agency

Annex E Bridge Pier Protection Plan

PED (OLD TWNS RD) over OTTER TAIL RIVER

State DOT - Bridge Inspection Manual Part II Course No. SE0117 PDH: 10

High Definition Laser Scanning (HDS) Underwater Acoustic Imaging and Profiling

Summary of HEC 18, Evaluating Scour at Bridges FHWA NHI Should really follow HEC 18, but this summary will get you the main points.

As temporary grade control facilities along waterways until final stabilization is established.

FLAGLER BEACH PIER POST INCIDENT SAFETY INSPECTION HURRICANE IRMA SEPTEMBER 15-17, 2017

Information for File # SEW

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

INFILTRATION PRACTICE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION FORM

(Revised February,2005) CULVERTS, BRIDGES, AND FORDS

Culvert Safety Inspection Report

Bridge Failures in Alberta

Storm Damage Floating Culverts & Other Inlet Issues

ANNUAL INSPECTION BY A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ALL CCR IMPOUNDMENTS CCR Rule Section (b)

PROPOSING A NEW PORTABLE DEVICE FOR BRIDGE SCOUR INSPECTION

The Challenge of Wave Scouring Design for the Confederation Bridge

We re good at what we do! Anywhere, TX SITE

Components of a Barrage

The Dalles Dam Powerhouse Trash Rack ROV Inspection Report

Earthen Embankments. turning into larger, more costly repairs. The following. The State Dam Safety Program has inspection

COASTAL HAZARDS. What are Coastal Hazards?

Chadbourne Dam Repair and Fish Barrier

Gerald P. Oliveto, P.E. George Franz NJDOT

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

JAP Additional Information Sheet

CHAPTER 5 CULVERT DESIGN

Cranes Roost Park Facility Analysis

Bridge Design for Marine Vessel Collision

Whitewater Valley Station Surface Impoundment Coal Combustion Residual Annual Report

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 002 EMORANNO. 001

Green CCR Surface Impoundment

Specifications for Synchronized Sensor Pipe Condition Assessment (AS PROVIDED BY REDZONE ROBOTICS)

Nome Harbor Page 2 of 12

CONDITION ASSESSMENT REPORT

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

Culvert Design for Low and High Gradient Streams in the Midwest. Dale Higgins, Hydrologist Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Lecture 10 : Sewer Appurtenances

Item 404 Driving Piling

Great Lakes Stream Crossing Inventory Instructions

CLEANING, INSPECTION, AND TESTING OF SEWERS

Suitable Applications Check dams may be appropriate in the following situations: To promote sedimentation behind the dam.

WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (S.O.P.)

Outlet Structures T-12

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

CHAPTER 8 STAKING SIGNALS AND LIGHTING FIELD GUIDE. 8.1 Staking Traffic Control Signal Systems

Illinois State Water Survey

Guidelines for Underwater Inspection and Imaging of Railroad Bridges

APPENDIX C ESTIMATING SCOUR IN BOTTOMLESS ARCH CULVERTS

Indiana LTAP Road Scholar Core Course #10 Culvert Drainage. Presented by Thomas T. Burke, Jr., PhD, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.

SITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE

RISK RATING SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT 1 HIGH 2 MEDIUM 3LOW. I approve the use of this Safe Work Method Statement: NAME: POSITION: Department Manager

Beavers are particularly adept at manipulating their

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL BRIDGE INSPECTION STANDARDS (NBIS)

APPENDIX K CULVERT INSPECTION MEMO

MIRABAY PILOT PROJECT REPORT

STREAM SURVEY File form No..

1-32 NOME HARBOR, ALASKA (CWIS NOS , 87755, 12270, & 10422) Condition of Improvement 30 September 2012

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

REPORT OF INITIAL SURVEY OF AN UNKNOWN BARGE OFF OF CEDAR POINT, SANDUSKY, OHIO. July 26-27, Submitted to Cleveland Underwater Explorers, Inc.

TDLP INC. The Dam & Levee Professionals. Kevin Chancey Sarah Edens. Monica Murie Jason Unruh

FISH PASSAGE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ON PENNYPACK CREEK AT VERREE ROAD DAM AND ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD DAM PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

Lateral Load Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction. ANDREW DAUMUELLER, PE, Ph.D.

CE 535, Spring 2002 Preliminary Design Example 1 / 6

3. Types of foundation

EPA R6 Dive Team Operations Report. San Jacinto Waste Pits Channelview, TX December 9-10, 2015

HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date January 17, Federal Highway Administration.

Existing conditions of each bridge and repair plan are presented in Table

Structure Failure Modes

Amador Circle Tank. City of Rio Vista. Report of Findings From the Diving Operations Conducted on. March 28, 2011

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

OFFICE OF STRUCTURES MANUAL FOR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHAPTER 13 CULVERTS APRIL 2011

Rock Ramp Design Guidelines. David Mooney MS Chris Holmquist-Johnson MS Drew Baird Ph.D. P.E. Kent Collins P.E.

TCML operate and control the 146 Km Railway line from Lake Magadi to Konza.

Ketchikan Harbors Thomas Basin and Bar Point Harbor

Bids DECEMBER 21, 2018 AT 2:00 P.M. (EASTERN) (Estimated Cost: $4,700,000.00)

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION

Packwood Lake Intake Screen Velocity Test Report for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

Chapter 11. Culverts and Bridges Design Checklist for Culvert Design

Transcription:

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 58551 CSAH NO. 41 OVER THE KETTLE RIVER DISTRICT 1 PINE COUNTY JULY 28, 2012 PREPARED FOR THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY COLLINS ENGINEERS, INC. AND WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB NO. 2107

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT SUMMARY: The substructure units inspected at Bridge No. 58551, Piers 1 and 2, were found to be in very good condition with no significant structural defects observed. Minor localized scour has caused partial footing exposure at the upstream nose and along the downstream west edge of Pier 2; however, the channel bottom appeared stable and armored by riprap in the vicinity of Pier 2. INSPECTION FINDINGS: (A) There was partial top of footing exposure encountered at Pier 2 due to localized scour depressions. The footing was exposed at the upstream end and along the downstream west side of the pier. No vertical exposure was encountered. (B) A moderate amount of timber debris, was located at the upstream end of Pier 2. The timber debris consisted of logs and branches measuring 12 inch diameter or less and extending from the channel bottom to 2 feet above the waterline.

RECOMMENDATIONS: (A) Monitor footing exposure during future underwater inspections. (B) Monitor the timber debris accumulation at both piers, in particular at Pier 2, during future inspections, and if found to be increasing to a more detrimental extent, removal operations may become warranted at that time. (C) Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION 1. BRIDGE DATA Bridge Number: 58551 Feature Crossed: Kettle River Feature Carried: CSAH No. 41 Location: District 3 - Pine County Bridge Description: The bridge superstructure consists of three spans of multiple prestressed concrete beams. The superstructure is supported by two reinforced concrete abutments and two reinforced concrete wall piers. The piers are numbered 1 and 2 starting from the westerly end of the bridge. 2. INSPECTION DATA Professional Engineer/Team Leader: Barritt Lovelace, P.E (WSB) Dive Team: George Bender (WSB), John Loftus (Collins) Date: July 28, 2012 Weather Conditions: Sunny, 75 F Underwater Visibility: 3 feet Waterway Velocity: < 0.5 ft/sec

3. SUBSTRUCTURE INSPECTION DATA Substructure Inspected: Piers 1 and 2. General Shape: The piers consist of reinforced concrete wall shafts supporting a pier cap and are supported by rectangular footings founded on piles. Maximum Water Depth at Substructure Inspected: Approximately 8.8 feet. 4. WATERLINE DATUM Water Level Reference: The top of the pier cap at the downstream end of Pier 1. Water Surface: The waterline was approximately 14.5 feet below reference. Waterline Elevation = 1017.76 5. NBIS CODING INFORMATION (Minnesota specific codes are used for 92B and 113) Item 60: Substructure: Code 7 Item 61: Channel and Channel Protection: Code 6 Item 92B: Underwater Inspection: Code B/07/12 Item 113: Scour Critical Bridges: F Bridge is scour critical because abutment or pier foundation is rated as unstable due to observed scour at bridge site. Yes X No 6. STRUCTURAL ELEMENT CONDITION RATING

Item # Element Description Quantity Unit Conditions 1 2 3 4 5 210 Concrete Pier Wall 75 LF 75 361 Scour 1 EA 1 985 Slopes and Slope Protection 1 EA 1

Photograph 1. Overall View of the Structure, Looking East. Photograph 2. View of Pier 1, Looking East.

Photograph 3. View of Pier 2, Looking East.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES DAILY DIVING REPORT INSPECTORS: WSB & Associates and Collins DATE: July 28, 2012 ON-SITE TEAM LEADER: Barritt Lovelace, P.E. BRIDGE NO: 58551 WEATHER: Sunny, 75 F WATERWAY CROSSED: Kettle River DIVING OPERATION: X SCUBA SURFACE SUPPLIED AIR OTHER PERSONNEL: George Bender (WSB), John Loftus (Collins) EQUIPMENT: Commercial Scuba, Scraper, Lead Line, Sounding Pole, Camera, U/W Light, Probe Rod, Tending Line TIME IN WATER: 11:00 a.m. TIME OUT OF WATER: 11:30 a.m. WATERWAY DATA: VELOCITY < 0.5 ft/sec VISIBILITY 3.0 Feet DEPTH 8.8 feet maximum at Pier 2 ELEMENTS INSPECTED: Piers 1 and 2 REMARKS: Overall, the submerged concrete was in very good condition with no structurally significant defects observed. Localized scour pockets, around parts of Pier 2 resulted in partial footing exposure. The top of footing at the south western corner of Pier 2 was exposed with no vertical face exposure, and the top of footing at the upstream nose of Pier 2 was exposed, also with no vertical face exposure. A moderate amount of timber debris accumulation was observed at the upstream end of Pier 2. FURTHER ACTION NEEDED: YES X NO Monitor the timber debris accumulation at Pier 2, during future inspections, and if found to be increasing to a more detrimental extent, removal operations may become warranted at that time. Monitor footing exposure during future underwater inspections. Reinspect the submerged substructure units at the normal maximum recommended (NBIS) interval of sixty (60) months.

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES UNDERWATER INSPECTION CONDITION RATING FORM BRIDGE NO. 58551 INSPECTION DATE July 29,2012 INSPECTORS WSB & Associates, Inc. and Collins Engineers, Inc. NOTE: USE ALL APPLICABLE CONDITION ON-SITE TEAM LEADER Barritt Lovelace, P.E. DEFINITIONS AS DEFINED IN THE MINNESOTA WATERWAY CROSSED Kettle River RECORDING AND CODING GUIDE INCLUDING GENERAL, SUBSTRUCTURE, CHANNEL AND PROTECTION, AND CULVERTS AND WALL DEFINITIONS TO COMPLETE THIS FORM. CONDITION RATING SUBSTRUCTURE CHANNEL GENERAL UNIT REFERENCE NO. MAXIMUM DEPTH OF WATER PILING COLUMNS, SHAFTS, OR FACES* FOOTINGS DISPLACEMENT OTHER OVERALL SUBSTRUCTURE CONDITION CODE* SCOUR EMBANKMENT EROSION EMBANKMENT PROTECTION OTHER (DRIFT/DEBRIS) OVERALL CHANNEL & PROTECTION CONDITION CONCRETE STEEL TIMBER LOSS OF SECTION PREVIOUS REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE OTHER UNIT DESCRIPTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Pier 1 6.3 N 9 N 9 N 8 6 9 9 N 7 9 N N 9 N N Pier 2 8.8 N 9 7 9 N 8 6 9 9 7 7 9 N N 9 N N *UNDERWATER PORTION ONLY REMARKS: Overall, the submerged concrete was in very good condition with no structurally significant defects observed. Localized scour pockets, around parts of Pier 2 resulted in partial footing exposure. The top of footing at the south western corner of Pier 2 was exposed with no vertical face exposure, and the top of footing at the upstream nose of Pier 2 was exposed, also with no vertical face exposure. A moderate amount of timber debris accumulation was observed at the upstream end of Pier 2. NOTES: ATTACH SKETCHES AS NEEDED, IDENTIFY REMARK BY REFERRING TO UNIT REFERENCE NO. AND REMARK NO. USE GENERAL SECTION TO IDENTIFY OVERALL PRESENCE OF SPALLS, CRACKS, CORROSION, ETC.