Ecosystem-based Management of Fisheries Resources in Marine Ranching Areas

Similar documents
Abundance and trophic interactions in North Sea fishes

(Draft) Trophic levels of multi-species in the Gulf of Thailand 01. Ratanawalee Poonsawat 1 Mala Supongpan 2 Villy Christensen 3

Evaluating how food webs and the fisheries they support are affected by fishing closures in temperate Western Australia

GUIDE TO ESTIMATING TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH USING SIZE FREQUENCY IN CATCH, EFFORT DATA, AND MPAS

Towards Ecosystem-Based Management Modelling Techniques 2. Whole Ecosystem Models

Minute on Bangkok Meeting 3 April 2006,

Ecological interactions between forage fish, rorquals, and fisheries in Haida Gwaii

Top down modeling and bottom up dynamics: Linking fisheries-based multispecies models with climate hypotheses in the Northern California Current

Glossary. Action point or trigger point or level

A REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF NATURAL MORTALITY FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF YELLOWFIN TUNA IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN

HOW BENTHIC HABITATS AND BOTTOM TRAWLING AFFECT TRAIT COMPOSITION IN THE DIET OF EUROPEAN PLAICE (PLEURONECTES PLATESSA) IN THE NORTH SEA

9.4.5 Advice September Widely distributed and migratory stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Scoping Presentation for Amendment 43 to the Snapper Grouper Fishery Management Plan of the South Atlantic Region

OPTIMAL FISHERIES YIELD AN ECOSYSTEM PERSPECTIVE

Ecosystem-based Science for Management of Alaskan Fisheries. Patricia A. Livingston NOAA-Fisheries Alaska Fisheries Science Center Seattle, WA, USA

ICES Advisory Approach

Preliminary results of SEPODYM application to albacore. in the Pacific Ocean. Patrick Lehodey

North Carolina. Striped Mullet FMP. Update

Fei CHAI ( 柴扉 ) and Francisco Chavez

Introduction to population dynamics and stock assessments

Chris Harvey NWFSC, Sea1le.

ICES advises that when the MSY approach is applied, catches in 2019 should be no more than tonnes.

MEFEPO. North Sea fisheries case studies: Herring Beam Trawl. MEFEPO Final symposium 3-4 October 2011, Brussels

Towards Sustainable Multispecies Fisheries in the Florida Coral Reef Ecosystem

Linkages between coastal and open ocean habitats of Pacific salmon and small pelagics in the Northwestern and central Pacific

Report of the Working Group on Widely Distributed

Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) in divisions 7.b c and 7.e k (southern Celtic Seas and western English Channel)

WP4 Ecosystem modelling workshop Ecopath with Ecosim

Food Chain. Marine Food Webs and Fisheries

Investigating coastal ecosystem structure and dynamics using Ecopath/Ecosim ecosystem models and stable isotope data

Bycatch accounting and management in the Ross Sea toothfish fishery

Common Resource Problem-Fishing

Proposal for biomass and fishing mortality limit reference points based on reductions in recruitment. Mark N. Maunder and Richard B.

Northeast Atlantic Mackerel, Handlines

National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Japan 2. Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, USA

System Formulation Part 2: Running the model ExtendSim Model with input and ouput

Fisheries Management Glossary

Figure 1. Total western central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) tuna catch by species (SKJ; skipjack, YFT; yellowfin, BET; bigeye tuna, ALB; albacore)

3.4.3 Advice June Barents Sea and Norwegian Sea Cod in Subareas I and II (Norwegian coastal waters cod)

Policy Instruments for Fisheries Management and the Concept of Fisheries Refugia

STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN SMALL PELAGIC FISHERY - AUGUST 2013

Implications of reducing Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) minimum size (MLS/MCRS) in the Skagerrak and Kattegat area (IIIa).

Striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 7.d and 3.a (North Sea, eastern English Channel, Skagerrak and Kattegat)

Below you will find 4 different student projects that combine fisheries science and marine ecology in various ways

Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in Division 7.e (western English Channel)

Interactions in a multispecies age-structured assessment model for the Gulf of Alaska

Why has the cod stock recovered in the North Sea?

Advice May Herring in Subdivisions and 32 (excluding Gulf of Riga herring)

Fast Tracking the Development of Environmental- Friendly Fishing Methods

MEFISTO PREPARED APPLICATIONS MODELLING FISHERIES MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN

Are the Coral Reef Finfish Fisheries of South Florida Sustainable?

Research Priorities of the SPC Oceanic Fisheries Programme. John Hampton Oceanic Fisheries Programme Secretariat of the Pacific Community

Herring (Clupea harengus) in subdivisions and 32 (central Baltic Sea, excluding Gulf of Riga)

Advice June Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

Stock Assessment Form of Metapenaeus stebbingi (Demersal sp.) in GSA 26.

Forage indicators and consumption profiles for Chesapeake Bay fishes

Observed pattern of diel vertical migration of Pacific mackerel larvae and its implication for spatial distribution off the Korean Peninsula

Paper prepared by the Secretariat

The State of the Ocean and the impact of subsidies. Daniel Pauly Sea Around Us project Fisheries Centre, UBC

Red tide mortality on red grouper (Epinephelus morio) between 1980 and 2009 on the West Florida Shelf SEDAR42- AW- 01

Stock Assessment Form of Saurida undosquamis (Demersal sp.) in GSA 26.

I. What is a Fishery? II. What is Fisheries Management? III. What is Fisheries Science? I. Brief history of the evolution of fisheries science.

Red Snapper distribution on natural habitats and artificial structures in the northern Gulf of Mexico

EU request to ICES on in-year advice on haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in Division 7.a (Irish Sea)

Blue crab ecology and exploitation in a changing climate.

Life Beyond the Spawning Grounds: Distribution & Food Web Relations of Herring & Forage Fishes in Puget Sound

Managing Lower Trophic Level Species in the Mid-Atlantic Region

Fishery Report 2017: Champsocephalus gunnari South Georgia (Subarea 48.3)

TRIANGLE SHELL (SAE) SAE1 SAE9 SAE8 SAE3

STOCK ASSESSMENT OF ALBACORE TUNA IN THE NORTH PACIFIC OCEAN IN 2011

STATUS OF EXPLOITED MARINE FISHERY RESOURCES OF INDIA

Risk Assessments in the Pacific Fisheries for BC & Yukon

Marine Food Webs and Fisheries

ISC Pacific Bluefin tuna Stock Assessment 2016

2017 North Pacific Albacore Stock Assessment

Advice June 2013 Version 2,

The Stock Assessment Workshop for North Pacific Armorhead Shimizu, Shizuoka, Japan March Meeting Report

Harvest Control Rules in a multispecies world: The Barents Sea and beyond. Daniel Howell IMR Bergen

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SILVERBELLY LEIOGNATHUS BINDUS (VALENCIENNES) ALONG WEST BENGAL COAST V. SRIRAMACHANDRA MURTY*

Flatfish fishery off Cochin and some aspects of the biology and stock of Malabar sole Cynoglossus macrostomus (Norman)

IOTC 2013 WPNT03 18 ABSTRACT

Golden redfish (Sebastes norvegicus) in subareas 5, 6, 12, and 14 (Iceland and Faroes grounds, West of Scotland, North of Azores, East of Greenland)

Black-bellied anglerfish (Lophius budegassa) in divisions 7.b k, 8.a b, and 8.d (west and southwest of Ireland, Bay of Biscay)

Recent stock recovery and potential future developments in. Sebastes mentella in the Barents- and Norwegian Seas.

Advice June Sole in Division IIIa and Subdivisions (Skagerrak, Kattegat, and the Belts)

Status of Yellowtail Rockfish (Sebastes flavidus) Along the U.S. Pacific Coast in 2017

PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA STOCK ASSESSMENT

Advice June 2014

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) in divisions 7.b k (southern Celtic Seas and English Channel)

The Common Wild Capture Fishery Methodology 1

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

6.3.8 Advice May 2014 Version 2, ECOREGION North Sea STOCK Herring in Division IIIa and Subdivisions (western Baltic spring spawners)

Albacore Tuna, South Pacific, Troll, Pole and Line

Population Dynamics and Management of Goldlined Seabream Rhabdosargus sarba (Sparidae) from the Oman Coast of Arabian Sea

SILVER WAREHOU (SWA) (Seriolella punctata)

Beaked redfish (Sebastes mentella) in subareas 1 and 2 (Northeast Arctic)

LARGE TROUGH SHELL (MMI)

Evaluating the impact of fishing forage fish on predators. Ray Hilborn School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington

2.3.1 Advice May Capelin in Subareas V and XIV and Division IIa west of 5 W (Iceland East Greenland Jan Mayen area).

9.4.5 Advice October Widely Distributed and Migratory Stocks Herring in the Northeast Atlantic (Norwegian spring-spawning herring)

Transcription:

Ecosystem-based Management of Fisheries Resources in Marine Ranching Areas Chang Ik Zhang, Sung Il Lee, and Jong-Man Kim * Pukyong National University * Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute

Introduction Contents - Introducing an ecosystem-based approaches in fisheries management for marine ranching area - Analysis of ecosystem changes before and after marine ranching activities - Comparison of the results from the ecosystem model and the population model In marine ranching project - for providing a stable habitat -> construction of seaweed bed and artificial reefs - for stock enhancement -> artificial releasing activity

A map showing the marine ranching area of Tongyeong, Korea Area -Total -Main : 9000 ha : 2000 ha - Protection waters : 540 ha

Bird-eye view of the marine ranching area Marine ranching area projects - 1998 year Tongyeong (1998-2004 : 9 yrs) - 2001 year Yeosu (2001-2008 : 8 yrs) - 2003 year Jeju (2003-2010 : 8 yrs)

The status of Tongyeong marine ranching Construction of seaweed 6 months after construction - Species : two brown algae Ecklonia stolonifera, Ecklonia cava -Below 6 m - Area : 1,117,118 m 2 2 years after construction

The status of the Tongyeong marine ranching Construction of artificial reefs - Area : 752 ha - Numbers of artificial : 7,852 Ship reef

Rocky bottom and location of artificial reefs in marine ranching area

Location of releasing and released target species in the Tongyeong marine ranching area Jacopever rockfish Black rockfish Abalone Black seabream Red seabream

Data and Methods Ecosystem model - Ecosystem structure model : Ecopath model -> Analyzing the ecosystem structure (Christensen and Pauly, 1992) - Ecosystem dynamic model : Ecosim model (Walters et al., 1997) -> Estimating changes in quality of organisms and carrying capacity of ecosystem Population model - Stock enhancement model -> Estimating a carrying capacity, potential production, and the optimum number for the stock enhancement - Stock management model -> Estimation a acceptable biological catch (ABC)

Schematic diagram of ecosystem models

Methods of input parameter estimation Biomass (B) - Being obtained from oceanographic and fisheries resources surveys, or estimated from cohort analysis Production/Biomass (P/B) ratio - Being estimated by three methods 1) the instantaneous coefficient of total mortality (Z) : 2) growth rate (G) : 3) von Bertalanffy growth equation : Z B P = / G B P = / ] 3 1 2 3 3 1 [ ] 3 1 2 2 1 [ 3 K Z K Z K Z Z K Z K Z K Z K B P + + + + + + + + =

Methods of input parameter estimation Consumption/Biomass (Q/B) ratio - Being calculated from survey data and references - For a group which consisted of multi-species is estimated to be the weighted mean by the biomasss of the associated species Diet composition (DC) Q k ij - DC ij = = 1 Q DC ij i j= 1 Catch (C) - Catch per unit area by species and by gear, obtained from a field survey

Flow chart for stock enhancement system Age-specific length (weight) Catch by ages Age composition longevity von Bertalanffy growth parameters Survival rate Age at recruitment Instantaneous coefficient of natural mortality Instantaneous coefficient of fishing mortality Recruitment Carrying capacity by species from ecosystem model Yield per recruit per unit area Beverton and Holt model Virgin biomass per recruit per unit area (F=0) Current bimass " (F=Fc) The number of current recruitment The number of recruitment, when F=0 Optimum number of recruitment for stock enhancement Area Age at being juvenile Optimum individual number for stock enhancement Age-specific maturity ratio Spawning biomass per recruit per unit area Expected yield increasing Expected biomass increasing Expected spawning biomass

Flow chart for the TAC estimation Longevity Age-specific length (weight) von Bertalanffy growth parameters Catch by ages Length composition Catch and fishing effort Survival rate Age at recruitment Instantaneous coefficient of natural mortality Instantaneous coefficient of fishing mortality Biomass(individual) and fishing mortality by ages Pelagic stocks Environmental factors (temperature, plankton, etc.) MSY and F MSY : Zhang model MSY and f MSY : G-S, Fox, P-T, Schnute, and Deriso models Age-specific maturity ratio F max, F 0.1 and Opt t c : B-H model F 40%, F 35% : B-H model Future biomass Simulation : Zhang, and Deriso models Considering the structure and function of ecosystem A B C Social and economical factors T A C

ABC estimation model ABC estimation for a single species ABC = F 0.1 M B + F 0.1 (1 e ( M + F 0.1 ) ) ABC estimation for multi-species by a single gear ABC j = ABC B i i B j ABC i and B i : the acceptable biological catch and biomass of target species (i) by single gear, respectively ABC j and B j : the acceptable biological catch and biomass of stock (j), although they are included in same group, the are target of other fishing gear and the population parameters are unknown, respectively

Input parameters in the Tongyeong ecosystem before marine ranching activities Group name Habitat area (fraction) Biomass in hab. Area (t/km 2 ) Production /Biomass (/year) Consumption /Biomass (t/km 2 ) Catch (t/km 2 ) Finless porpoise 0.003 0.020 13.108 0.000 Otter Pisc. Birds Skates Flatfishes Adult jacopever rockfish Juv. Jacopever rockfish Other rockfishes Sparidae Anguilliformes Moronidae Grey mullet Hairtail Other demersal fish 0.400 0.400 0.001 0.001 0.258 0.396 0.032 0.972 0.108 0.230 2.514 0.164 0.184 0.457 0.239 0.060 0.800 1.565 1.365 1.368 2.772 1.368 1.409 1.368 1.455 1.300 1.460 1.155 91.250 60.000 2.560 2.490 10.790 37.176 12.061 2.500 2.600 26.160 2.500 2.600 18.293 0.000 0.000 0.387 0.414 0.011 0.034 0.078 0.149 3.301 0.019 0.001 0.545 0.018

Input Parameters in the Tongyeong Ecosystem before Marine Ranching Activities Group name Habitat area (fraction) Biomass in hab. Area (t/km 2 ) Production /Biomass (/year) Consumption /Biomass (t/km 2 ) Catch (t/km 2 ) Large pelagics 0.480 2.214 3.000 0.311 Small pelagics 12.380 2.800 3.500 31.579 Cephalopoda 1.640 3.300 0.278 Benthic feeders 3.850 2.534 7.100 0.293 Infauna 25.585 1.722 11.226 0.017 Epifauna 11.464 1.217 5.777 10.314 Gastropoda 1.786 2.303 5.777 0.147 Zooplankton 12.796 9.000 22.000 - Benthc algae 9.200 534.068-2.760 Phytoplankton 0.400 91.276 170.000 - - Detritus - - - -

Diet composition by group in the Tongyeoung ecosystem before marine ranching activities Prey \ Predator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Finless porpoise 2 Otter 3 Pisc. Birds 0.070 4 Skates 0.023 5 Flatfishes 0.023 0.050 0.176 6 Adult Jacopever rockfish 0.035 0.050 0.029 0.004 7 Juv. Jacopever rockfish 0.035 0.050 0.457 0.054 0.115 0.194 8 Other rockfishes 0.035 0.050 0.023 0.004 9 Sparidae 0.035 0.050 0.023 0.029 0.037 10 Anguilliformes 0.035 0.050 0.023 0.029 0.037 0.004 11 Moronidae 0.035 0.050 0.176 0.023 0.024 0.037 0.004 12 Grey mullet 0.035 0.050 0.176 0.023 0.029 0.037 0.004 13 Hairtail 0.039 0.050 0.023 0.029 0.037 0.004 14 Other demersal fishes 0.035 0.050 0.176 0.023 0.044 0.062 0.004 15 Large pelagics 0.006 0.050 0.029 0.029 0.159 0.020 0.011 16 Small pelagics 0.018 0.026 0.057 0.031 0.044 0.054 0.027 0.056 0.033 0.080 17 Cephalopoda 0.045 0.229 0.088 0.009 0.019 0.059 0.194 18 Benthic feeders 0.433 0.217 0.088 0.266 0.120 0.067 0.244 0.059 0.194 0.307 19 Infauna 0.384 0.264 20 Epifauna 0.121 0.102 0.197 21 Gastropoda 0.013 22 Zooplankton 0.003 0.229 0.088 0.020 0.363 0.933 0.196 0.474 0.386 0.613 23 Benthic algae 0.102 24 Phytoplankton 0.025 25 Detritus SUM

Diet composition by group in the Tongyeoung ecosystem before marine ranching activities Prey \ Predator 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 Finless porpoise 2 Otter 3 Pisc. Birds 4 Skates 5 Flatfishes 6 Adult Jacopever rockfish 7 Juv. Jacopever rockfish 0.214 0.029 0.129 8 Other rockfishes 0.011 9 Sparidae 0.011 10 Anguilliformes 0.011 11 Moronidae 0.011 12 Grey mullet 0.011 0.014 13 Hairtail 0.005 14 Other demersal fishes 0.011 15 Large pelagics 0.003 0.012 16 Small pelagics 0.036 0.010 0.052 0.390 0.030 17 Cephalopoda 0.179 0.014 0.184 18 Benthic feeders 0.355 0.107 0.026 0.020 19 Infauna 0.107 0.147 0.141 0.429 0.327 20 Epifauna 0.107 0.300 0.053 0.009 21 Gastropoda 0.107 0.065 0.019 0.046 22 Zooplankton 0.214 0.355 0.200 0.581 0.678 0.774 0.070 0.054 23 Benthic algae 0.107 0.134 24 Phytoplankton 0.020 0.800 25 Detritus 0.107 0.429 0.544 0.200 SUM

Input parameters in the Tongyeong ecosystem after marine ranching activities Group name Habitat area Biomass in hab. Area Production /Biomass Consumption /Biomass (fraction) (t/km 2 ) (/year) (t/km 2 ) Finless porpoise 0.004 0.020 13.108 Otter Pisc. Birds Skates Flatfishes Adult jacopever rockfish Juv. Jacopever rockfish Other rockfishes Sparidae Anguilliformes Moronidae Grey mullet Hairtail Other demersal fish 0.400 0.400 0.001 0.010 0.101 0.479 1.779 2.279 0.136 0.549 0.522 0.596 1.922 0.528 1.850 0.060 0.800 1.365 1.365 1.386 2.772 1.368 1.309 1.386 1.055 1.200 1.360 1.055 91.250 60.000 2.560 2.490 10.790 37.176 12.061 2.500 2.600 26.160 2.500 2.600 18.293

Input Parameters in the Tongyeong Ecosystem after Marine Ranching Activities Group name Habitat area Biomass in hab. Area Production /Biomass Consumption /Biomass (fraction) (t/km 2 ) (/year) (t/km 2 ) Large pelagics 1.606 2.214 3.000 Small pelagics 2.536 2.700 3.500 Cephalopoda 0.953 3.300 Benthic feeders 8.740 2.534 7.100 Infauna 30.695 1.722 11.226 Epifauna 26.421 0.717 5.777 Gastropoda 7.930 1.703 5.777 Zooplankton 15.955 9.000 22.000 Benthc algae 27.000 534.068 - Phytoplankton 0.400 71.001 170.000 - Detritus - - -

Diet composition by group in the Tongyeoung ecosystem after marine ranching activities Prey \ Predator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 True porpoise 2 Otter 3 Pisc. Birds 0.070 4 Skates 0.023 5 Flatfishes 0.023 0.050 0.176 6 Adult Jacopever rockfish 0.035 0.050 0.029 0.004 7 Juv. Jacopever rockfish 0.035 0.050 0.457 0.054 0.115 0.194 8 Other rockfishes 0.035 0.050 0.023 0.004 9 Sparidae 0.035 0.050 0.023 0.029 0.037 10 Anguilliformes 0.035 0.050 0.023 0.029 0.037 0.004 11 Moronidae 0.035 0.050 0.176 0.023 0.024 0.037 0.004 12 Grey mullet 0.035 0.050 0.176 0.023 0.029 0.037 0.004 13 Hairtail 0.039 0.050 0.023 0.029 0.037 0.004 14 Other demersal fishes 0.035 0.050 0.176 0.023 0.044 0.062 0.004 15 Large pelagics 0.006 0.050 0.029 0.029 0.159 0.020 0.011 16 Small pelagics 0.018 0.026 0.057 0.031 0.044 0.054 0.027 0.056 0.033 0.080 17 Cephalopoda 0.045 0.229 0.088 0.009 0.019 0.059 0.194 18 Benthic feeders 0.433 0.217 0.088 0.266 0.120 0.067 0.244 0.059 0.194 0.307 19 Infauna 0.384 0.264 20 Epifauna 0.121 0.102 0.197 21 Gastropoda 0.013 22 Zooplankton 0.003 0.229 0.088 0.020 0.363 0.933 0.196 0.474 0.386 0.613 23 Benthic algae 0.102 24 Phytoplankton 0.025 25 Detritus SUM

Diet composition by group in the Tongyeoung ecosystem after marine ranching activities Prey \ Predator 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 Finless porpoise 2 Otter 3 Pisc. Birds 4 Skates 5 Flatfishes 6 Adult Jacopever rockfish 7 Juv. Jacopever rockfish 0.214 0.029 0.129 8 Other rockfishes 0.011 9 Sparidae 0.011 10 Anguilliformes 0.011 11 Moronidae 0.011 12 Grey mullet 0.011 0.014 13 Hairtail 0.005 14 Other demersal fishes 0.011 15 Large pelagics 0.003 0.012 16 Small pelagics 0.036 0.010 0.052 0.390 0.030 17 Cephalopoda 0.179 0.014 0.184 18 Benthic feeders 0.355 0.107 0.026 0.020 19 Infauna 0.107 0.147 0.141 0.429 0.327 20 Epifauna 0.107 0.300 0.053 0.009 21 Gastropoda 0.107 0.065 0.019 0.046 22 Zooplankton 0.214 0.355 0.200 0.581 0.678 0.774 0.070 0.054 23 Benthic algae 0.107 0.134 24 Phytoplankton 0.020 0.800 25 Detritus 0.107 0.429 0.544 0.200 SUM

A flow chart showing the structure and trophic interactions in the Tongyeong ecosystem Before marine ranching ecosystem After marine ranching ecosystem

A dynamic simulation showing the effect on the Tongyeong ecosystem by the annual increase in the benthic algae and recruitment of jacopever rockfish 200 Change in biomass (%) 150 100 50 0 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013-50 Year Adult Jacopever rockfish2+ Juv. Jacopever rockfish0-1 Sparidae Moronidae Large pelagics Small pelagics Cephalopoda Epifauna Gastropoda Benthic algae

The carrying capacity estimates for major fisheries resources in the Tongyeong ecosystem Carrying capacity (mt/year) Group name Ecosystem modeling Population modeling Skates 34.43825 Flatfishes 2.63 Adult Jacopever rockfish 2.12 Juv. Jacopever rockfish 3.05 7.12 Other rockfishes 1.53 Sparidae 0.89 Anguilliformes 15.17 Moronidae 1.62 Grey mullet 5.30 Hairtail 3.93 Other demersal fishes 5.99 Large pelagics 3.97 Small pelagics 5.68 Cephalopoda 2.72 Benthic feeders 32.05 Infauna 976.32 Epifauna 133.48 Gastropoda 20.30 Benthic algae 20.25 Total

Comparison of the results from ecosystem model and population model Carrying capacity estimates of rockfish - Population modeling : 4.5 mt - Ecosystem modeling : 3.5 mt ABC estimates - Rockfish : 2.076 mt (before marine ranching : 0.056 mt)