Spillover Effects of Marine Environmental Regulation for Sea Turtle Protection Hing Ling Chan & Minling Pan NOAA Fisheries, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center U.S.A. 2015.10.23 PICES 2015, Qingdao, China
Study Background Hawaii swordfish longline fishery was the major domestic producer for the U.S. swordfish market Incidental catch with endangered species - Sea turtles bycatch U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 2
Study Background The fishery was closed between 2001-2004, due to a lawsuit Re-open in 2004 with a series of new regulations Circle hooks (not J hooks) Fish as bait (not squid) Annual effort limits (< 50% historical level) Annual turtle limits (17 loggerhead or 16 leatherback turtles) Impacts of the new regulations Interaction rate with sea turtle declined 90% (+) Fishing landings declined (-) U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 3
U.S. vs. Foreign Production in North Pacific Ocean Non-U.S. Production U.S. Production Non-U.S. Production in North and Central Pacific (Metric Tons) 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 U.S. Production in North & Central Pacific (Metric Tons) U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 4
Study Objective While these regulations reduced sea turtle interactions by the Hawaii fleet, what happen to the sea turtle stocks ocean-wide? While Hawaii fish production declined but other countries fish production increased, did the sea turtle conservation goal achieve? This study examines whether, and to what extent, U.S. fishing regulations could cause spillover effects and changed foreign fleet activity that ultimately had adverse effects on the very species intended for protection. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 5
Spillover Effects Between Fisheries Price Hawaii Price Foreign Fisheries S H2 S F1 Story on the fish side S H1 S F2 Sea turtle bycatch (number) Caught Sea turtle bycatch (number) Caught Story on the turtle side T H1 T H2 B H T F2 T F1 B F Q H2 Q H1 Caught Q F1 Q F2 Caught U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 6
Conditions for Spillover Effects Shared resources in high seas: both turtles and swordfish are globalized resources on the high seas and caught by Hawaii and foreign fisheries; Production displacement: the fishing activities of foreign fleets respond to the changes of Hawaii swordfish production (production displacement); and Lower sea turtle bycatch rate of Hawaii longline swordfish fleet, compared to most of foreign fleets U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 7
Shared Resources in High Seas: Turtle Leatherback turtle Loggerhead turtle U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 8
Shared Resources in High Seas: Hawaii swordfish production represented 6% of total swordfish in North Pacific in 2009 and 81% of U.S. production Red: Hawaii Green: Other countries U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 9
Sea Turtle Bycatch Rate Across Countries Top Producers in North and Central Pacific Production Weight in North and central Pacific 2012 Turtle Bycatch per Unit of Effort (# turtle/mt) Annual Turtle Bycatch Taiwan 24% 0.073 550 Japan 18% 0.025 140 Indonesia 16% 0.100 500 Philippines 14% 0.100 440 China 8% 0.100 270 Republic of Korea 4% 0.100 130 Hawaii/U.S. 4% 0.013 19 Australia 3% 0.006 6 Mexico 1% 0.174 80 Total 100% 2270 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 10
Spillover Estimation Step 1: To test the correlation between non-u.s. and U.S. production from 1991 to 2012 (22 years) 1991-2000 before policy (the fishery was closed or restricted) 2001-2012 after the policy Pearson Correlation (r) U.S. production Non-U.S. production (X t ) (Y t ) U.S. Production (X t ) Before Policy (1991-2000) After Policy (2001-2012) 1 0.455 1-0.527* *significant at the 10% level. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 11
Spillover Estimation Step 2. To estimate the normal trend (before policy 1991-2000) for non-u.s. production (Y) Y t = a + bt + ε t ε t = Y t - Ŷ t (for 22 years) t = 1991-2000 t = 1991-2012 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 12
Spillover Estimation (to quantify) Step 3. To estimate how did non-u.s. swordfish production respond to the changes of U.S. production from 2001 to 2012 Y t - Ŷ t = c + d X t + u t Independent Variable Coefficient T-value c 5,770.09*** (4.42) d -1.01*** (-2.82) R 2 0.28 ***significant at the 1% level. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 13
Results The coefficient d = -1.01 is significant at the 95% level. This implies that, a decrease of one unit of U.S. production is associated with an increase of 1.01 units of non-u.s. production, and vice versa. Production displacement exists between U.S. and non- U.S. swordfish production. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 14
How Production Displacement related to Sea Turtle Catch/Interactions? Hawaii Production (mt) Total Production in N&C. Pacific (mt) # Total Turtle Catch Reduction in Turtle Catch (#) % Reduction in turtle catch Status quo (2012) 1,080 31,330 2,270 - - Scenario 1: Hawaii product at Historical level peak 4,985 31,330 2,270 260 11% Scenario 2: Everyone fishes like Hawaii 31,330 392 1,878 83% U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 15
How Production Displacement related to Sea Turtle Catch/Interactions? Hawaii Production (mt) Total Production in N&C. Pacific (mt) # Total Turtle Catch Reduction in Turtle Catch (#) % Reduction in turtle catch Status quo (2012) 1,080 31,330 2,270 - - Scenario 1: Hawaii product at Historical level peak 4,985 31,330 2,010 260 11% Scenario 2: Everyone fishes like Hawaii 31,330 392 1,878 83% U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 16
How Production Displacement related to Sea Turtle Catch/Interactions? Hawaii Production (mt) Total Production in N&C. Pacific (mt) # Total Turtle Catch Reduction in Turtle Catch (#) % Reduction in turtle catch Status quo (2012) 1,080 31,330 2,270 - - Scenario 1: Hawaii product at Historical level peak 4,985 31,330 2,010 260 11% Scenario 2: Everyone fishes like Hawaii 31,330 31,330 392 1,878 83% U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 17
Conclusions Strong spillover (market transfer effects) from regulation of the Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery for swordfish. Reduced swordfish production by Hawaii longline fishery did not contribute stock-wide conservation of sea turtles. Conversation acts for marine resource can not be isolated at the local level. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 18
Thank you and Question? U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 19