PART TWO Reviewed by Operations Team and H&S Manager February 2018 TO BE REVIEWED: January 2019

Similar documents
RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GO APE CONTINUOUS BELAY

RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GO APE CONTINUOUS BELAY

RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GO APE TREE TOP JUNIOR COURSE

Grizedale Zip Trekking Adventure Risk Assessment

Grizedale Zip Trekking Adventure Risk Assessment

RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GO APE, ADVENTURE FOREST LIMITED

Grizedale Zip Trekking Adventure Risk Assessment

General Risk Assessment for Climbing, Bouldering and Abseiling

What we are already doing Working at Height comes within the framework of St. Matthew s Health and Safety and Fire arrangements policy

Low Ropes and Adventure Course Risk Assessment

Safety Checklist for Events Held at Hillbrook

Risk Assessment Ground Belay

High Ropes Management Plan

Activity Risk Assessments. Level of risk assessment. Contents

HEALTH & SAFETY ARRANGEMENTS FOR MANAGEMENT OF WORK AT HEIGHT

Risk Assessment Ground Belay

Work At Height Health & Safety Management Standard Issue 3 (April 2011)

Risk Control Measures in Place Remaining Risk Falling from a height Participants 5 The instructor is trained and assessed by a competent person.

Activity Risk Assessments. Level of risk assessment. Contents

University of Lincoln Students Union Annual Risk Assessment for Activities

Lifting Operation & Lifting Equipment Procedure

Specific Risk Assessment Partyrocksbounce

RISK Assessment & Management Plan

Summer Scrambling / Mountaineering

Safe Work Method Statement LRB TREE SERVICES 6 Behland St, Kearneys Spring QLD, 4350 ABN

Health & Safety Policy HSP 13 Working at Height Version Status Date Title of Reviewer Purpose/Outcome

Abseiling Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Safety Management Plan

Rock Climbing Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations (LOLER) Policy. Version No. 2. Review: May 2019

Contractor / Exhibitor Handbook

Exercise IARD. Risk Assessment & Management Plan

Risk Assessment for Low Ropes

GENERIC AALA ACTIVITIES RISK ASSESSMENT

Risk Assessment for Team Builders

(Health, Safety, and Welfare)

LEVEL 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCE IN CHAINSAW AND RELATED OPERATIONS ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 A brief guide

Torridon Giants Trek

POSITION OF PERSON COMPLETING REPORT: IN CONSULTATION WITH: David Radolovic POSITION: HSR/ Program Coordinator

Instructions for the Use of the Excel Spreadsheet. There are Three tabs at the bottom of this worksheet. Instructions tab is the one you are reading

RAMS information for HangDog Indoor Climbing Centre

Keeping People Safe CHURCH HEALTH & SAFETY TOOLKIT LADDERS

TASK DAY RISK ASSESSMENT FORM

Mountain Bike Risk Management Plan

Abseiling Risk Management Plan

WORK METHOD STATEMENT STRUCTURAL STEEL

Risk Assessment for Night Olympics

Type: Policy. Working at Heights Policy. Register No: Status: Public. Developed in response to: Work at Height Regs 2007

FLYING OBJECTS MANUAL HANDLING EXCESSIVE NOISE

RISK ASSESSMENT FOR Philips Smart Touch Installation 03/04/2012

The Work at Height Regulations 2005 A brief guide

Climbing & Abseiling Activity Plan

3. PURPOSE: To establish the minimum safety content of swimming pool Operations Manuals.

Pre-control risk estimate. Likelihood Risk

You must NOT touch any equipment unless you are authorised to work on or with that equipment and you have followed correct safety procedures.

Curriculum Activity Risk Planner for Mid Ropes & Flying Fox

Chinthurst Preparatory School

RISK ASSESSMENT: Education Directorate - basic guidance

JOB SAFETY ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS (JSEA) Working With In Situ Testing Rigs

Risk Assessment for Radio Rogaine

Risk Score (with EC) Who May be Harmed? Risk Score (without EC) Hazard. Existing Controls (EC)

Very unlikely (VU) Unlikely (U) Likely (L) Very likely (VL) Typically experienced once during the working lifetime of an individual

Deans, Directors, Heads of Schools and Departments and Research Institute Directors and Managers

Risk Assessment for Rock Climbing

1 AIM 2 4 REASONS FOR INCLUSION 3 6 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS 4 7 SYSTEM AND PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS 4 8 PEOPLE REQUIREMENTS 6

Working at Height Policy Edition 1 27 th October Authorized by. ... Managing Director

Working at Height. Policy and Procedures. Author: Beth Webster Assistant Safety Advisor. On behalf of School Safety Committee.

APPENDIX A: Risk Assessment for all activities at Farm

Potential risk of injury to staff

Risk Assessment Mobile Climbing Wall

GENERIC AALA ACTIVITIES RISK ASSESSMENT

Pembrokeshire Coast Path (North) Risk Assessment

Archery Risk Management Plan Lutanda Yarramundi

SOAS LONE WORKING GUIDANCE

Activities Risk Management Guide 2018

LIFT MAINTENANCE POLICY

Curriculum Activity Risk Planner for Movie Night and Popcorn

TUDOR PARK EDUCATION TRUST. Working at Heights and Risk Assessment

S31 Opening Statement Working at Height

HEALTH AND SAFETY METHOD STATEMENT AIR CONDITIONING/REFRIGERATION MAINTENANCE/SERVICE. 2. Clean filters and screens when necessary

LONE WORKING HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDANCE

Risk Assessment Examples

EVENT SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT - (SMALL TO MEDIUM SIZED COMMUNITY EVENTS) 1

ASPEC Engineering HSE Management System. Work Instruction. 1 Objective. 2 Working in confined spaces. 2.1 What is a confined space?

Health & Safety Policy & Plan. Rightway Roofing.

PLANNED LIGHTING MAINTENANCE LTD METHOD STATEMENT & RISK ASSESSMENT REPLACEMENT OF LAMPS OR REPAIRS TO HIGH LEVEL LIGHT UNITS

RISK ASSESSMENT Indoor Abseiling

Bogo Operations Pollution Incident Response Management Plan

in conjunction with The UK Ropes Course Guide

IMMANUEL CHURCH, CHICHESTER HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY

PLANNED LIGHTING MAINTENANCE LTD METHOD STATEMENT & RISK ASSESSMENT REPLACEMENT OF LAMPS OR REPAIRS TO LOW LEVEL LIGHT UNITS

The Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 ('LOLER') How they apply to rope-based access systems for work at height

Guidance on Using Temporary Suspended Access Equipment

SAFE WORK METHOD STATEMENT WORKING IN CONFINED SPACE HSE NET NAT SWMS APAND00030

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET 17. Revision 1 : 2016 MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE MANUAL HANDLING OF GAS CYLINDERS

Suitability of Work Equipment

GROUP VISIT RISK ASSESSMENT

The method of Risk Assessment and Mitigation is based on the following Risk Rating Matrix and its general response guidelines.

HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY APPENDIX B WORKING AT HEIGHT GUIDE AND RISK ASSESMENT

Transcription:

GENERAL STRATEGIC (see note 1) RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GO APE, ADVENTURE FOREST LIMITED RISK ASSESSMENT NUMBER TTA P2/01/18 PART TWO Reviewed by Operations Team and H&S Manager February 2018 TO BE REVIEWED: January 2019 Introduction: The European Standard Sports and recreational facilities Ropes courses comes in two parts: EN 15567-1:2015 (Construction and safety requirements) and EN 15567-2:2015 (Operation requirements). AAIAC in conjunction with the European Ropes Course Association (ERCA) produced an update to the UK Ropes Course Guide (Edition 4.1) in July 2015. The European Standard forms the basis for and is a key reference document for the Go Ape risk assessment. Assessing risks is simple in principle. It involves identifying hazards or examining what in a particular situation could cause harm or damage and then assessing the likelihood that harm will actually be experienced by a specified population and what the consequences would be (i.e. the risk). The overall objective is to obtain a view on how to manage the risk or to compare the risk with other risks. At a conceptual level, it has proved useful to make a distinction between an assessment of the risks (the evaluation of the likelihood of harm and its consequences for populations or individuals as described above) and risk control (the prioritisation of risks and the introduction of measures that might be put in place to reduce, if not prevent, the harm from occurring). This stems from the belief that an assessment of risks by and large can be scientific and objective but risk control less so because it integrates the results of an assessment of risks with other critical inputs. (www.hse.gov.uk/risk) Step 1. Identify the Hazards. Step 2. Identify Who may be harmed? Course User Step 3. Evaluate the Risk. People who are taking part in the High Wire Activity Course All Adventure Forest Ltd Staff The general public who are not actually taking part in the course (spectators or forest users). People working for a company or individual contracted by Go Ape to work on or around the course, etc. LIKELIHOOD CONSEQUENCE Very low Definitely will not happen Very low Injury very insignificant i.e. splinters Unlikely to happen Injury fairly minor i.e. minor cut, grazes, bruising Medium Moderate chance of accident happening Medium Injury would stop casualty continuing with task. High Quite likely to happen High Serious injury requiring medical assistance i.e., fractures, Very high Likelihood will happen Very high Very serious injury or possible fatality Step 4. Existing Control Measures ². These are the measure we have put in place to keep the risk to an acceptable level. The Residual Risk (RR) is the level of risk that remains after putting all the control measures into practice. RESIDUAL RISK Very low Minimal risk, control measure more then necessary Control measures satisfactory Medium Control measures adequate High Control measure requires constant supervision. Re-assess situation Very high Control measures inadequate. Stop activity Step 5. The Review Process. Go Ape risk assessments will be reviewed when it is suspected that the assessment is no longer valid or there has been a significant change. In addition they will be thoroughly reviewed annually. Go Ape risk assessments are written in compliance with the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations and in accordance with HSE s 5 Steps to Risk Assessment. The assessments are reviewed when it is suspected that the assessments are no longer valid or there has been a significant change. They are also reviewed annually. Go Ape recognises that risk assessments are fundamental in ensuring a safely run Adventure Course. By continuous and dynamic assessment of risk by all Go Ape staff, adhering to the Feb 2018 1

Go Ape operational and training systems¹, risks are reduced to a reasonable level. To carry out daily risk management all staff must be able to fully understand the Risk Assessment procedure as detailed above. This Risk Assessment is produced in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health Risk Assessment Principles and Practice programme. This risk assessment looks at the risks associated with the Go Ape ropes courses. The assessment refers to the Go Ape operational and training systems¹. Note: Where hazards and existing control measures have been included in Part 1, they will not be repeated in Part 2. SER HAZARD LHD CON WHO MIGHT BE HARMED 2001 Falling objects Medium Medium Course users from the course onto the course EXISTING CONTROL MEASURES Retainers and Lanyards Course users must attach all loose items to themselves (such as cameras) or have them secured within pockets. Information must be supplied to course users during the Safety Brief. GAD Safety Brief. When instructors are carrying out maintenance tasks at height, tools must be retained by using a retaining cord or lanyard. All individual PPE, including pulleys, must be attached to the course user. Pulleys must be attached to the harness by using a pulley retaining lanyard. (Introduced in 2003). Trees/Poles All course trees, wooden poles, metal poles should be visually checked daily, by the instructor opening the course, for loose and broken branches, or loose course hardwear that may become dislodged and fall. Deadwood likely to fall onto the course should be removed so it does not fall onto course users. FURTHERCONTROL MEASURES RR 2002 Impact including: Course users swinging into something solid On the course At the landing (e.g. resulting in lower leg injury) Being struck by parts of the course (for example the Tarzan return system) High Course users Feb 2018 2 Course design Design of the course must take into consideration the possibility of impact problems. This is checked by the external inspection body during the inaugural inspection. Materials are finished to provide smooth, surfaces. Zip wires and landing areas are designed at an angle and sag to arrive at an optimum landing speed or appropriate braking mechanisms are installed. WRGs and swages are covered in protective material where they may cause harm.

Collision On Zip wires At Zip landing Landing sites are constructed to provide a soft and moveable surface of woodchip or wood peel. Protective padding is provided where there is the possibility of collision. The zip braking spring is covered in rubber or foam protection. Where required zip landing sites are fenced off to stop members of the public and children wandering into them. Warning signs are in place to warn members of the public of the risk of collision. Tarzan exit frames are used to ensure course users cannot collide with other course users on nearby elements and to control the Tarzan return system. The speed of the Tarzan return system is monitored and further controlled by changing the mass of the weight, ensuring the return mechanism cannot hit course participants. Feb 2018 3 Operating Procedures Landing areas are to be prepared (raked or dug) on a regular basis to ensure they comply with guidelines (GAD landing sites). Only 1 course participant is allowed on a crossing or on the zip wire at any one time. Safety Brief & Written Safety Rules and Advice. Provision of Information Provision of suitable and sufficient information and training to course participants to ensure they are safe when crossing obstacles and descending zip wires. Written Safety Rules and Advice which must be read by all course participants, Instructors Safety Brief given to all course participants. e.g. Course participants informed on landing technique to minimise risk of injury when completing a zip wire. Safety signage at the start of each zip wire. Course participants recommended to wear appropriate footwear, with soles with good grip, closed toe and heel. Sandals not allowed. Customer advice.

2003 Entanglement in ropes nets, cables or chains and body parts trapped in moving parts of the course Zip wire Tarzan 2004 Unsuitable PPE: Incorrect assessment of loadings including premature failing or malfunctioning of PPE 2005 Slips and trips and uneven ground High Course users V High Course users V High Course users Zip speeds are taken and recorded periodically to identify any changes in speed of landing. Course Design Course designed to minimise the risk of entanglement or entrapment Operating Procedures Hair tied back, suitable clothing Reduce risk through not wearing helmets. GAD Helmet Policy. Effective supervision Regular patrolling Information and Training Tarzan signage Specific Tarzan training in safety brief See Part 1, 1006 Damage to PPE No smoking whilst wearing harnesses No use of chemicals near PPE (insect repellent, sun cream) Use of experienced and competent course designers Records of materials Pathways Sturdy footwear recommended Path surfaces reviewed and levelled Design of course Flat level platforms kept clear Pre-opening inspection Work area management Cabins / offices kept clean and tidy Tool storage areas 2006 Foot/Step Ladders Medium V High Training Consider using cherry pickers Consider back-up safety system 2007 Inclement Weather Lightning High Wind Ice and snow Extreme Cold Heat stroke V High Medium Course users Course closure for lightning, high winds, heavy ice and snow. Duty Manager guidelines on cold weather. GAD Evacuation Plans Suitable clothing Communications and use of radios Rest periods Feb 2018 4

2008 Darkness and inadequate lighting Disorientation Inability to read safety signs Unable to see landing Impaired supervision RISK ASSESSMENT FOR GO APE, ADVENTURE FOREST LIMITED High Course Users 2009 Fire Medium Course Users 2010 Electrocution V High Course Users 2011 Workstation Posture injury Eye strain 2012 Psychological effects Stress Trauma 2013 Other Forest Users Cyclists collision Traffic collision Horses bolting 2014 Clothing & Jewellery Footwear Covered waists 2015 Medical conditions Pregnancy Fatigue Feb 2018 5 Training Staff breaks Consultation with weather experts Consultation with tree expert Inspection policy following inclement weather Patrolling instructors observations (Beaufort land scale) Provision of water Closure of course Careful planning of session availabilty Provision of sufficient, well sited and effective lighting Adequate supervision Staff assistance Medium Medium Provision of furniture/seating Staff breaks Adequate welfare arrangements Employee Assistance Programme Medium Course Users Medium Medium Course Users Medium V High Course Users Evacuation Plan Fire extinguishers (water and powder) Heaters kept clear Heaters must be maintained in accordance with manufacturers instruction Fire Extinguisher Serviced annually Appropriate electrical checks in the cabin Signage Awareness training Instructors aware when leading groups Prohibit sandals, waist must be covered, no hoop earrings, necklaces tucked away. Instructor check Written Safety Rules and Advice Medical and Disability Policies and Pregnancy Policy Disclaimers self certification

Other Pregnancy self certification Terms and Conditions Staff training Written Safety Rules and Advice Systematic assessment of risk Dynamic assessment of risk Patrolling SupervisionInstructor assistance with Tarzan rescue Users advised to seek medical advice 2016 Inadequate Supervision Poor eyesight Incompetence Children rushing ahead Distracted attention of adult Distance between supervisor and children Inadequate patrolling High V High Course Users Ratios see Part 1, 1003 Visual checks RAD Booking Terms and Conditions Instructor check Written Safety Rules and Advice Included in training (pre brief) Supervisor descends zip line last Training Group management advice provided to the supervisor. Supervision Supervision control that under 16 s no more than 1 tree away from supervisor. Activity Specific supervision ratios to be followed Instructors patrol course as per site-specific patrolling method statement. 2017 Rowdy Groups Medium High Course users Exclusion from course Written Safety Rules and Advice Terms and Conditions Patrolling Verbal red/yellow warning 2018 Unauthorised Users V. High Access to course Course open: Ladders protected by stockades, self-closing doors, coded locks changed regularly. Course closed: Ladders taken up and locked to platforms. nets raised. Tarzan Swing padlocked. Signage on gates Feb 2018 6

2019 Missing persons Medium Course Users 2020 Construction and Course Work including: SEE GAD CDM Working at Height Fatigue Entrapment and crushing Vertigo, motion sickness Strains, sprains and other manual handling injuries Weather: Cold, hypothermia and heat stress 2021 Access and egress to the work area Including zip wires 2022 Inappropriate use of equipment Chainsaws, generators, electrical equipment, tools, vehicles, ladders. Medium V High V High V High 2023 Electrocution Medium V High Operating procedures Patrols Observing for signs of attempts to access course out of hours Radios Liaise with other agencies: Rangers, Police etc. No lone working Method statements Effective supervision Selection and use of suitable PPE Use of work restraint and fall arrest equipment Helmets worn Back up safety system Suitable clothing Rest periods Trained person on site Emergency plan Training Manual handling, correct use of ladders and cherry pickers Use of ladders and cherry pickers Work area management including provision of danger and exclusion zones and signage Consultation with landowner Appropriate signage Training Correct use of appropriate equipment, including PPE Safe fuel management Supervision Directives to contractors Electrical equipment appropriate for all weather use Battery power tools (and 240V versus 110V consult further guidance) Note 1: Where a control measure has been identified, it is only included once and not repeated under every serial number. Therefore for a specific hazard identified, a control measure in a serial above may apply to that hazard. Feb 2018 7

References: HSW Act 1974, MHSW Regs amended 1999, WAH regs 2005, PUWER 1992, LOLER 1998, PPE regs 1992, Workplace HSW regs 1992, H&S (Safety Signs) regs 1996, First Aid regs 1981, Occupiers Liability Act 1984, HSE 5 Steps to Risk assessment INDG 163(rev3), HSE A Guide to Risk Assessment requirements INDG 218 (discontinued), European Standard for ropes courses EN 15567 Part 1 and Part 2, HSL Guide to good practice in safety management of aerial ropes courses March 2010. AAIAC UK Ropes Course Guide (3 rd edition) March 2011. HSE Information Sheet Entertainment Sheet No 14 & 15 (withdrawn 2009), Go Ape GAD, OD, TM. ¹ Go Ape operational and training systems. These include the following: Go Ape Operations Manual (OD) and Appendices on how to run a Go Ape course, Go Ape Online Training / Manual (TM), including training and assessment policy and training objectives, generic powerpoint presentations and training videos, Go Ape Duty Manager Training (DMT), Go Ape Rescue Package (RP), Go Ape Company Handbook and further library documents listed on the Document Library (OD) ² Control Measures. Where a control measure has been identified, it is only included once and not repeated under every serial number. Therefore for a specific hazard identified, a control measure in a serial above may apply to that hazard. (HSE RA guidance.) ³ Instructors Training. Go Ape instructors must pass through a full training and assessment programme before they can instruct on Go Ape. They undergo training in accordance with the Go Ape Online Training / Manual, training and assessment policy and training objectives which includes the delivery of safety instruction, operational limits on the use of the course, course inspections during daily course opening and closing, supervision and patrolling techniques, personal protective equipment, harness fitting and inspection, emergency operations, health and safety and customer care. Instructors are First Aid trained. Only instructors with the correct aptitude are selected for additional training in rope rescue techniques. Go Ape s rescue procedures have been developed in conjunction with an external specialist technical advisor who holds the Mountaineering Instructors Certificate and the European Mountain Leader Award (rescue procedures updated in 2005 by Berwyn Evans MIC). Training and assessment of rescue trained instructors is only carried out by our trained and qualified persons, who have been formally assessed as competent to do so by the Operations Manager responsible for training. Duty Managers complete an additional Duty Manager Training package. Site Managers attend annual Managers Training and quarterly Managers Meetings where they are updated on any operational changes including training requirements. Abbreviations: AM = Go Ape Area Manager BTC = Go Ape Booking Terms and Conditions DMT = Duty Manager Training EN(1), EN(2) = European Standard Part 1 (Construction and safety requirements), Part 2 (Operation requirements) GAD = Go Ape Company Handbook and further library documents listed on the Document Library OD = Go Ape operational Documents (including Operations Manual; exact titles of documents may change from time to time) RAD = Risk Acknowledgement and Disclaimer RP = Go Ape Rescue Package SB = Safety Brief SR = Safety Rules TM = Go Ape Online Training Manual including generic powerpoint presentations and training videos The EN Standard / EN (1) / EN (2) = The European Standard Sports and recreational facilities Ropes courses comes in two parts: EN 15567 Part 1 (Construction and safety requirements) and EN 15567 Part 2 (Operation requirements) Further advice has been sought from: Chief Adventure Play Inspector RoSPA, EHO SLDC, AALA guidelines (industry consultation), Consultation with Petzl, Altus, Lyon Equipment and HSE Specialist Inspector, Lightening Report by Ben Fuest, Tree Surveys by John Harraway, Insurers risk control survey reports, Chester West and Cheshire Local Authority Lead EHO, industry best practise consulted, compliance with manufacturers guidelines. Feb 2018 8