AGENDA: November IO, 1998 REPORT BACK ON BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAMS

Similar documents
BICYCLE SAFETY OBSERVATION STUDY 2014

8. Collisions INTRODUCTION

2017 Annual Traffic Safety Report

Chicago Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Initiative Final Report

Napier City road trauma for Napier City. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues.

NYC Pedestrian Safety Study & Action Plan. Research, Implementation & Safety Division of Traffic Operations

The 2002 Pedestrian Safety Awareness Campaign

People killed and injured per million hours spent travelling, Motorcyclist Cyclist Driver Car / van passenger

Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

MEMORANDUM. City Constituents. Leilani Schwarcz, Vision Zero Surveillance Epidemiologist, SFDPH

Bike to the Future c/o Portage Avenue. Winnipeg, MB. R3B 2B2 Fax:

PlaySafe and Live Well!

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Transportation and Public Works Annual Motor Vehicle Collision Report

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( )

Final Report 2012 Chicago Department of Transportation 30 N. LaSalle St., Ste 500 Chicago IL Gabe Klein, Commissioner

City of Coronado Bicycle Map, Schools, Traffic Signals and Crossing Guard Locations

Alberta. Traffic Collision Statistics. Office of Traffic Safety Transportation Services Division May 2017

San Francisco 2009 Collisions Report April 21, 2011

PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1994 through 2000

Bike Collisions on the Pacific Coast Highway (RT-1) 3 County Overview: Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego

Figure 1. Indiana fatal collisions by young driver involvement,

1998 SURVEY OF FRONT SEAT OCCUPANT RESTRAINT USE IN EIGHTEEN TEXAS CITIES. by Katie N. Womack. October 1998

Bicycle Helmet Use Among Winnipeg Cyclists January 2012

Transportation Issues Poll for New York City

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

NYC Pedestrian Safety Study & Action Plan. NYTMC Brown Bag Lunch Presentation December 15, 2010

CASUALTY REVIEW

LINCOLNWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT

2015 Victorian Road Trauma. Analysis of Fatalities and Serious Injuries. Updated 5 May Page 1 of 28. Commercial in Confidence

Pedestrian Accidents in Utah

Rider Satisfaction Survey Total Market 2006

North Carolina. Bicycle Crash Facts Prepared for

SOMERSET ROAD SAFETY PARTNERSHIP CASUALTY REVIEW Working together to reduce casualties

Traffic Safety Barriers to Walking and Bicycling Analysis of CA Add-On Responses to the 2009 NHTS

Focus on Enforcement. 7/21/2017 Presentation to SFMTA Policy & Governance Committee. Joe Lapka Corina Monzón

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

Bicycling Perceptions and Experiences in Oregon and Southwest Washington. Presented to: The Bicycle Transportation Alliance September 8, 2009

Safety and Active Transport. Dr. Maureen Carew, Medical Officer of Health Renfrew County and District Health Unit May 30, 2014

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Among the key specific findings from the survey are the following:

EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2006 ROAD SAFETY IN LONDON PAST SUCCESSES AND FUTURE INNOVATIONS

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2007 June 2011 (All ages) Mode of travel

TRAFFIC CRASHES involving BICYCLISTS

APPENDIX C. Systems Performance Report C-1

Background and Goals of SRTS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUDGET AND LEGISLATIVE ANALYST

COMMUNITY PEDESTRAIN SAFETY TRAINING. Long Beach June 5 th, 2010

2017 Watch for Me NC Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program: Information for Prospective Applicants

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

Citizens Advisory Committee March 26, 2014

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Beaverton Police Department Traffic Safety Team

5.13 Soledad. Demographic Profile. Disadvantaged Communities. Safety Profile

CDRT. Child Death Review Team Dallas County. Brief Report Traffic-related Child Deaths OVERVIEW

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Safer Cycling: How the City of Vancouver is Proactively Improving Cycling Safety

EMPHASIS AREA 2: SCHOOL CHILDREN

2003 road trauma for. Wairoa District. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues WAIROA DISTRICT JULY 2004

A review of 2015 fatal collision statistics as of 31 December 2015

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

Among the key specific findings from the survey are the following:

Developing a Safer Cycling Strategy for the ACT ACRS Conference August 2012

Pedestrian Safety Campaign

Vision Zero Task Force February 28, Collision Landscape Analysis

VISION ZERO: What will it take?

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

TOOLKIT STOP ON RED. National. Week August 6-12, 2017 RED-LIGHT RUNNING FACT. #StopOnRed2017 to spread the message!

Why Zone In on Speed Reduction?

Pedestrian Safety Initiatives National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

Film Guide for Educators. Designing for Safety

I am a CUNY student, bicyclist and resident in New York City. This dialogue is presented

Pedestrian injuries in San Francisco: distribution, causes, and solutions

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Garden Grove, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Bicycle Safety Education. A Parent s Guide to Safe Practices

City of Stamford, Vision Zero Planning Study-Education

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan Bicycle Safety Action Plan

Vision Zero San Jose. Moving toward zero traffic deaths and providing safe streets for all

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Arlington County Police Department Law Enforcement Guide. Enforcing Bicycle Traffic Laws

April 2, 2012 Rachel Vincent Legislative Services April 12, 2012 \\ Jennifer Jennax A ),

EMPHASIS AREA 1: PEDESTRIANS

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice

Traffic Safety Facts 2007 Data

road safety issues 2001 road toll for Gisborne district July 2002 Road user casualties Estimated social cost of crashes*

Dear Mr. Tweed: Sincerely, Min Zhou, P.E. Vice President

Section 2: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

COLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4

BICYCLE SAFETY: A PARENT S GUIDE

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT

Lincolnshire JSNA: Road Traffic Accidents

3 Silverton High School Report

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

What is non-infrastructure?

Childhood Obesity: A Policy Perspective

Transcription:

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ HEALTH SEWiCES AGENCY ADMINISTRATION HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY P.O. BOX 962, 1080 EMELINE AVENUE SANTA CRUZ, CA 95061 (408) 454-4066 FAX: (408) 454-4770 TDD: (408) 454-4123 October 21, 1998 AGENDA: November IO, 1998 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Santa Cruz County 701 Ocean Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 SUBJECT: REPORT BACK ON BICYCLE SAFETY PROGRAMS Dear Board Members: Your Board had previously requested information on the efficacy of County-supported bicycle helmet programs. HSA staff, in conjunction with the Community Traffic Safety Coalition, have recently completed an evaluation of local bicycle injury data and observed bicycle safety behaviors. Bicycle-related injuries in Santa Cruz County, 1990 to 1996: Since 1992, the Community Traffic Safety Coalition and the Santa Cruz County Health Services Agency have been working to reduce bicycle-related injuries in Santa Cruz County. Data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System (SWITRS) compare baseline data from 1990, before the coalition was formed, to data from 1996, the most recent data published (see attached chart). The number of bicyclists injured or killed per year in Santa Cruz County declined 38%, from 272 injuries and 2 fatalities in 1990, to 171 injuries and no fatalities in 1996; The injury rate for bicyclists decreased 41%, from 119 per 100,000 population in 1990, to 70 per 100,000 population in 1996. In California as a whole, the bicyclist injury rate declined 31% in the same period; 43

Injuries to bicyclists, ages 5 to 14 years, dropped 63%, from 71 injuries in 1990, to 26 in 1996; and for ages 15 to 24 years, injuries dropped 57%, from 107 injuries in 1990, to 46 in 1996. The percent of injured bicyclists in this area who were wearing helmets at the time of a collision rose from 12% in 1990 to 39% in 1996. In California, only 18% of injured cyclists were wearing helmets in 1996. Of the 7 bicyclists who died of their injuries from 1990 to 1996, only one was wearing a helmet. Changes in bicycle helmet use in Santa Cruz County from 1993 to 1998: In a 1993 observation study of bicycle helmet use conducted by the Community Traffic Safety Coalition, 31% of cyclists County-wide wore helmets. In a follow-up evaluation in 1998, bicycle helmet use County-wide increased to 41%. (See attached report, Bicycle Safety Observation Study, May, 1998.) The most significant improvement was among children, the focus of low-cost bicycle helmet sales and school-based education programs. Bicycle helmet use by children under age 13 rose from 15% in 1993 to 52% in 1998. The Youth Bicycle Helmet law, which went into effect January 1, 1994, requires all children under age 18 to wear bicycle helmets. However, youth ages 13 to 18 made only a small change in helmet use, from 18% in 1993 to 20% in 1998. Although both regions have improved, bicycle helmet use is still significantly higher in north Santa Cruz County, at 46%, than in the greater Watsonville area, at 15%. Among children under age 13, bicycle helmet use in North County rose from 21% in 1993 to 74% in 1998; bicycle helmet use among children in greater Watsonville area rose from 0% in 1993 to 28% in 1998. (For more information on efforts to improve bicycle helmet use in Watsonville, see attached Evaluation+of Bicycle Safety Outreach to the Latin0 Community. Conclusion: The bicycle injury rate in Santa Cruz County has declined faster than the State average, especially among children, ages 5 to 14. Bicycle helmet use by injury victims is also greater than the State average. Observed bicycle helmet use in the County increased from 31% in 1993 to 41% in 1998. Reduction in bicycle-related injuries is dependent on a combination of safety education, road engineering improvements, parental and family involvement, and traffic law enforcement. The combined efforts of the Health Services Agency (HSA) and the other members of the Santa Cruz County Community Traffic Safety Coalition have contributed to lowering the County bicycle injury rate and increasing bicycle helmet use. However, there is more work to be done to further improve bicycle safety-related behaviors. As described in the Conclusion section of the attached report, local efforts will continue to focus on high risk populations in the County. 43

It is, therefore, RECOMMENDED that your Board: Accept and file this report on bicycle safety programs in Santa Cruz County. Sincerely, RECOMMENDED: HSA Administrator ( Susan A. Mauriello County Administrative Officer CMM/amg attachments cc: CA0 Auditor-Controller County Counsel HSA Administration Pat Ellerby, Health Education, HSA

Exhibit A 2 8 8 Community Traffic Safety Coalition of Santa Cruz County BICYCLESAFET)IOBSERVATIONSTUDY,MAY 1998 The Community Traffic Safety Coalition has been working since 1992 to reduce bicycle-related injuries in Santa Cruz County. In May 1998 the Coalition conducted a large observation study of bicyclists throughout the county to evaluate the impact of education efforts and low-cost bicycle helmet sales on bicyclists behavior. Three bicycle safety behaviors were observed: wearing bicycle helmets, riding with traffic, and stopping at stop signs and red lights. Riding on the sidewalk* was also noted, where applicable. Bicycle helmet use was compared with smaller baseline observation studies conducted in 1993 and 1995. Of the total 1794 cyclists observed in 1998, 41% wore helmets, 80% rode with traffic, and 63% stopped at a stop sign or red light. The vast majority of cyclists observed were male (80%). Of the 1538 cyclists at sites with sidewalks, 89% rode in the street, while 11% rode on the sidewalk. Riding on the sidewalk varied from 0% to 39% depending on site, probably due to the perceived hazards of the street at that location. For the purposes of this report, the data is split into two regions: north county is defined as San Lorenzo Valley through Aptos, and south county refers to the greater Watsonville area. 1464 of the cyclists were observed at 21 sites in north Santa Cruz County, and 330 cyclists were observed at 12 sites in south county. On average, 39 cyclists per hour were observed in north county, compared to only 13.5 cyclists per hour in south county. Helmet use and riding with traffic were substantially higher at the north county sites, as illustrated in Chart I, but there was no difference in stopping at stop signs. There was somewhat less riding on sidewalks in south county. I Chart I: Bicycle Safety Behaviors by Region, 1998 96% Wore helmet Rode on right Stopped at sign/light Not on sidewalk Children under age 13 were more likely to wear a helmet (52%) and stop at signs and lights (76%) than older cyclists. Teens age 13 to 18 years had the lowest rate of helmet use (20%) and stopping (57%). Females practiced each of the three safety behaviors at a higher rate than males. Bicyclists wearing helmets were also more likely to follow other safety behaviors. Bicyclists are safest riding visibly and predictably in the street, like other vehicles. Riding on the sidewalk increases potential conflicts with cars at intcrscctions and driveways, and crates hazards for pedcstrinns. 43 3 1

289 Changes in Bicvcle Helmet Use The 1998 results were compared to resuks from a smaller Bicycle Helmet Use Study which the Coalition conducted in 1993. (Note that since the 1998 study included additional sites, the results are not completely comparable.) For all ages combined, bicycle helmet use increased 10 percentage points from 3 1% in 1993 to 41% in 1998. In both 1993 and 1998, bicycle helmet use varied significantly by age, as illustrated in Chart II. Most of the increase in helmet use from 1993 to 1998 was among children under 13 years, who were required by California law to wear bicycle helmets starting l/1/94. (Enforcement started l/1/95). Helmet use among children rose from 15% in 1993 to 52% in 1998. Helmet use among youth age 13-18 years rose only slightly from 18% in 1993 to 20% in 1998, even though the law applies to all children under 18 years. Children under age 13 continue to wear helmets at the highest rate, and teens age 13 to 18 years continue to have the lowest rate. Chart II: Bicycle Helmet Use by Age, 1993 v. 1998 ALL AGES Children (O-l 2 yrs) Teens (13-l 8 yrs) Approximate Age of Cyclist Adults (over 18 yrs) The trends in helmet use also varied by region (Chart III). While helmet use remains lower in south county at 15%, it made a gain of 14 percentage points, compared to a 12 percentage point gain to reach 46% in north county. Chart III: Bicycle Helmet Use by Region, 1993 v. 1998 North County South County

Similarly, for children under 13 in north county, helmet use rose from 21% in 1993 to 74% in 1998. In south county, helmet use among children rose from 0% to 28%. A special observation study by the Community Traffic Safety Coalition in 1995 in south county reveals that bicycle helmet use was actually higher in 1995 right after the bicycle helmet law started being enforced. (No comparable data for all of north county is available for 1995.) Chart IV shows helmet use by age in south county. Helmet use among children rose from 0% in 1993 to 61% in 1995 then dropped to 28% in 1998. Among teens, age 13 to 18 years, helmet use rose from 0% in 1993 to 22% in 1995, then dropped to only 5% in 1998. Chart IV: Bicycle Helmet Use in South County, 1993 v. 1995 v. 1998 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 01993 Ezl1995 ml998 20% 10% 0% ALL AGES Children (O-l 2 yrs) Teens (13-l 8 yrs) Adults (over 18 yrs) Approximate Age of Cyclists Conclusion A bicycle safety observation study was conducted in May 1998 by the Community Traffic Safety Coalition to assess the impact of education efforts and low-cost bicycle helmet sales on bicyclist s behavior in Santa Cruz County. Of the total 1794 cyclists observed in 1998, 41% wore helmets, 80% rode with traffic, and 63% stopped at stop signs or red lights. For all ages combined, bicycle helmet use increased by 10% from 3 1% in 1993 to 41% to 1998. Helmet use among children rose significantly from 15% in 1993 to 52% in 1998. In reviewing bicycle helmet use data by region, helmet use in south county is low at only 15% compared to north county at 46%. For children under 13 in north county, helmet use rose from 21% in 1993 to 74% in 1998. In the south county area, helmet use among children rose from 0% in 1993 to 28% in 1998. As shown in Chart IV, Bicycle helmet use among children and teens in south county increased substantially from 1993 to 1995 when the helmet law was first enforced, then declined sharply from 1995 to 1998. During 1995-1998, almost 2,000 bicycle helmets were sold at a subsidized cost of $5.00 or given away to children in Watsonville, yet observed use of helmets declined. Apparently, many children have helmets but do not wear them. Staff teaching bicycle safety in Watsonville elementary schools report that most children are aware of the bicycle helmet law but say it is not currently enforced in the greater Watsonville area..- 3

Renewed attention to bicycle helmet use and new education and enforcement strategies are needed to reverse this trend. The Community Traffic Safety Coalition, in cooperation with the Health Services Agency, will continue to direct resources to address the special needs identified in south county and among youth. One strategy being considered locally to increase compliance with bicycle-related trafec laws is a youth traffic school. Youth violators and their parents attend a class on bicycle and pedestrian safety as an alternative to paying fines. This strategy has been implemented in other areas of California including Huntington Beach and Fairfield. traffk safety\bike evaluation\bike98.rpt.doc 8/27/98 43

Community Traffic Safety Coalition of Santa Cruz County Exhibit B r 292 EVALUATIONOFBICYCLESAFETYOUTREACHTOTHELATINOCOMMUNITY The Community Traffic Safety Coalition has been working since 1992 to reduce bicycle-related injuries in Santa Cruz County. In 1995 the Coalition assessed the bicycle safety needs of the Latin0 community in both the Santa Cruz area and the Watsonville area. The needs assessment included a review of injury statistics, interviews and focus groups with community members, and a baseline observation study of bicyclists. Atter three years of education programs and low-cost bicycle helmet sales designed to meet the specific needs of the Latin0 community, the Coalition conducted a second observation study in May 1998 to measure any changes in bicycle safety behavior. This report compares the 1995 results to the equivalent sites in the 1998 study.* Three bicycle safety behaviors were observed: wearing bicycle helmets, riding with traffic, and stopping at stop signs and red lights. Sites in the Santa Cruz and Watsonville areas were chosen in consultation with members of the Latin0 community in areas with a higher concentration of Latin0 residents, or likely to be commute routes for workers. However, all bicyclists who passed the site were counted, and the exact percentage of Latinos is unknown. Most of the sites were the same from 1995 to 1998, but a few sites which had too few cyclists were changed, and more neighborhood sites were added in the hopes of observing more children. A total of 890 cyclists were observed in 1995, and 822 cyclists were observed in 1998. In spite of attempts to include sites where children would be riding, the sample of children and teens observed was low in both years: only 113 children in 1995 and 134 children in 199s. Chart I below compares the results from the two years. For all ages combined, bicycle helmet use and riding with traffic showed no significant improvement, remaining at about 30% and 70%, respectively. Stopping at stop signs and red lights increased 20 percentage points, from 39% in 1995 to 59% in 1998, with improvement in all age groups. Chart I: Bicycle Safety Behaviors, 1995 v. 1998 ; 70% t 60% s 50% { 40% ta 30% H 3 20% ; 10% -0 0% 70% 70% Wore helmet Rode with traffic Stopped at sign/light * The 1998 study included additional sites to assess bicycle safety behavior in the county as a whole. Those rcsults are reported separately in Bicycle Safety Observation Study, May 1998. 1

Children and parents were the primary focus of the bicycle safety outreach to the Latin0 community conducted during 1995 to 1998. Charts II shows the changes for children under age 13, and Chart III shows the changes for teens age 13 to 18. (As noted previously, however, the sample sizes for these subgroups were small, so the results are not conclusive.) In general, children made greater gains in bicycle safety than other ages. However, bicycle helmet use among children actually declined from 62% in 1995 to 39% in 1998, but remains higher than the average for all ages (30%). Children s rate of riding with traffk increased from 42% in 1995 to 57% in 1998; stopping at signs improved from 48% to 76%. Riding with traffic was a special concern for children, because in 1995 only 42% of children rode with traffic, compared to 77% of adults. Although the rate for adults stayed about the same, at 78% in 1998, children made a large improvement to 57%. 293 Chart II: Bicycle Safety Behaviors, 1995 v. 1998, Children under 13 years Wore helmet Rode on right Stopped at sign/light Chart III: Bicycle Safety Behaviors, 1995 v. 1998, Teens age 13-18 years Wore helmet Rode on right Stopped at sign/light

Chart III shows that for teens age 13 to 18, bicycle helmet use declined somewhat from 24% in 1995 to 20% in 1998. Riding on the right also declined, from 67% to 59%. For stopping at stop signs and lights, teens followed the trend of all age groups, increasing from a 39% rate in 1995 to 59% in 1998. Teens continue to wear bicycle helmets and stop at stop signs and lights at a much lower rate than younger children. Additional data is available for the Watsonville area from a 1993 study on bicycl? helmet use. (The north county sites in the 1993 study are not comparable to the 1995 north county sites.) Chart IV shows helmet use by age iri the Watsonville area. Helmet use among children in the Watsonville area rose dramatically from 0% in 1993 to 61% in 1995, right after the bicycle helmet law started being enforced. By 1998 the rate had dropped to 28%. Among Watsonville teens age 13 to 18 years, helmet use rose from 0% in 1993 to 22% in 1995, then dropped to only 5% in 1998. Chart IV: Bicycle Helmet Use in the Watsonville Area, 1993 v. 1995 v. 1998 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% ALL AGES Children (O-l 2 yrs) Teens (13-l 8 yrs) Adults (over 18 yrs) Approximate Age of Cyclists Review of Outreach Efforts During 1995 to 1998 the Coalition conducted many outreach, education, and low-cost helmet programs for the Latin0 community, especially the Watsonville area. When the helmet law fine began January 1, 1995, the Community Traffic Safety Coalition and Watsonville Police Department (WPD) worked very hard to advertise the new law to parents through schools and the Spanish media. WPD gave frequent warnings and tickets when necessary. In a county-wide bicycle safety reward program which started in January 1996, WPD and CHP were very active in the Watsonville area distributing the cheeseburger cite rewards to children wearing helmets and following bicycle safety rules. During 1995 to 1998 Health Services Agency (HSA) staff and Community Trafic Safety Coalition volunteers taught bicycle safety to 425 classes at 39 elementary schools in the county. A total of 11,284 children participated, including 5,286 in the Watsonville area. Most of the presentations in the Watsonville area and many in other areas of the county were bilingual in English and Spanish. Through HSA and Coalition programs, almost 2000 bicycle helmets were sold at a subsidized 43 3

cost of $5 or given away to children in Watsonville during the years between the two studies. Bicycle helmets continue to sell well in Watsonville through a current program with the Watsonville Parks and Recreation Department. In addition, HSA staff have tried to reach parents with bicycle safety information since the 1995 study, but have only found a few opportunities so far. A special bicycle helmet program in 1996-97 worked with youth involved with low-rider bicycles to make bicycle helmets more appealing to youth. Bicycle helmet use reported by middle school students in Watsonville increased from 20% before the program in 1996 to 43% in 1997. Bicycle helmet use observed in 1998 was 39% for children under 13 and only 20% for teens age 13 to 18. Discussion The bicycle safety outreach to the Latin0 community conducted during 1995 to 1998 focused on children and parents. Predictably, improvements in bicycle safety behavior were strongest for children under 13. Education efforts appear to have been most successful in encouraging children to ride with traffic and stop at stop signs and lights. Children made much greater gains than adults in both these behaviors. For children, riding on the right improved from 42% in 1993 to 57% in 1998. Stopping improved from 48% in 1993 to 76% in 1998. Helmet use, however, will require new strategies. Bicycle helmet use among children and teens in Watsonville increased substantially from 1993 to 1995 when the Youth Bicycle Helmet Law was first enforced, then declined sharply from 1995 to 1998, even though helmet use improved at the Santa Cruz sites during the same time period. The high participation in bicycle helmet sales in the Watsonville area suggest that many children have helmets but do not wear them. Possible causes include differences in local norms, and declines in enforcement. Bicycling is much more common in north county, including many adults who wear helmets. With fewer role models, the norm is much slower to change in the Watsonville area. HSA staff teaching bicycle safety in Watsonville elementary schools report that children are all aware of the Bicycle Helmet Law, but know that it is not currently enforced. Watsonville Police Department reports that they have stopped writing tickets for lack of bicycle helmets because most of the citations are dismissed in court since officers cannot prove prior warning. (Capitola Police Department reports the same problem.) Conclusions Education efforts have been successful at improving riding with traffic and stopping at stop signs and lights among children. Helmet use, however, will require new enforcement and education strategies. The Community Traffic Safety Coalition, in cooperation with,the Health Services Agency, will continue to direct resources to address the special needs identified in south county and among youth. One strategy being considered locally to increase compliance with bicyclerelated traffic laws is a youth traffic school. Youth violators and their parents would attend a class on bicycle and pedestrian safety as an alternative to paying fines. This strategy has been implemented in other areas of California including Huntington Beach and Fairfield. Another possibility is to reorganize the Coalition s bicycle safety reward program. Special messages to counter the risk-taking behavior of males and youth continue to be needed. The Health Services Agency will continue education in Watsonville schools, and renew efforts to reach parents. dtrafflc safety\bike evaluatiodbike98.latino.rpt 9/17/98

Santa Cruz County Bicyclist Injuries by Age and Year 120 - - 1, 100.---- - -------- --- ------------------------- v--v- ----- ------ -_-_-_-_----------------------------------- - - - - - - - - -----.--,.-, ----- ------------------ _- ---------------------- ---.., -~~ 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19% Data Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System