Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations

Similar documents
Maintaining biodiversity in mixed-stock salmon fisheries in the Skeena watershed

Salmon age and size at maturity: Patterns and processes

Population Structure

For next Thurs: Jackson et al Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:

Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe

Applied population biology: pacific Salmon

Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook Salmon Captive Broodstock Program: F 1 Generation

RAFTS STOCKING POLICY

Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery

Reproductive success of hatchery chinook salmon in the Deschutes River, Washington

Appendix A Recommended EPA Temperature Thresholds for use in Establishing Thermal Potential and Species Life Stage Numeric Criteria

The Salmonid Species. The Salmonid Species. Definitions of Salmonid Clans. The Salmonid Species

NATIVE FISH CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE SPRING CHINOOK SALMON ROGUE SPECIES MANAGEMENT UNIT

SALMON FACTS. Chinook Salmon. Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs

Recent Environmental Conditions and BC Salmon Outlook to 2020

UNIT 4E. SALMON SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Chinook salmon (photo by Roger Tabor)

Faster, better, cheaper: Transgenic Salmon. How the Endangered Species Act applies to genetically

Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction

Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

Staff, Organizations Directly Affected (including but not limited to):

Rivers Inlet Salmon Initiative

Oregon Hatchery Research Center January 2014 David L. G. Noakes, Professor & Director

Kootenay Lake Kokanee and other Fish 2017 Status

Brian Missildine Natural Resource Scientist Hatchery Evaluation and Assessment Team Lead Washington-British Columbia Annual General Meeting Kelowna,

Todd N. Pearsons, Ph.D. Grant County PUD. Presented at the University of Washington

Ecology of stream-rearing salmon and trout Part II

Yakima River Basin Coho Reintroduction Feasibility Study

Seaward Migration. To go or not to go? Timing Locomotion Life history patterns Environmental changes. Chinook salmon smolt

ESTIMATED RETURNS AND HARVEST OF COLUMBIA RIVER FALL CHINOOK 2000 TO BY JOHN McKERN FISH PASSAGE SOLUTIONS

WFC 50 California s Wild Vertebrates Jan. 11, Inland Waters (Lakes and Streams) Lisa Thompson

FISHERIES BLUE MOUNTAINS ADAPTATION PARTNERSHIP

LAKE STOCKING POLICY FOR SPORT FISH DIVISION. Original Policy Authorized in February of 1998 Revised 04/07/2008

"Recommended Improvements for the Next Pacific Salmon Treaty"

Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning and Reproductive Success Studies in the Columbia River Basin

Development of All-Female Sterile Kokanee. for recreational fisheries in British Columbia

TAY DISTRICT SALMON FISHERIES BOARD POLICY ON SALMON STOCKING

Wild Steelhead Coalition Richard Burge Conservation VP September 11, 2006

Coded Wire Tag Elimination from Management Questions

New England Atlantic Salmon Programs DPS Delineations

Summary of HSRG Findings for Chum Populations in the Lower Columbia River and Gorge

The Columbia River Estuary half of estuary-ocean coupling: more going on than we thought

WF4313/6413-Fisheries Management. Class 22

Managing for Diversity

Aquaculture in the Pacific Northwest: Benefits and Drawbacks OCTOBER 11, 2018 DOUGLAS J. STEDING

11426 Moorage Way P.O. Box 368 LaConner, WA Phone: Fax:

Lesson 3-2: Nechako White Sturgeon Life Cycle

CHAPTER 2 - THE COQUILLE FISHERY

Propagated Fishes other than direct food/fiber production. Several Options. Pacific Northwest

We recommend that whenever possible you use the following guidelines for choosing the most sustainable options in 2010.

Of the Salmon and For the Salmon

Early Marine Migrations. General geography Four general patterns Influence of genetics

Review of Hatchery and Wild Salmonid Literature

Attachment 1. Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND

LEAVENWORTH COMPLEX HATCHERY PROGRAMS. Presentation to the Independent Science Advisory Board

Salmon Biology Station

Salmon and Steelhead in the American River Tim Horner, PhD Geology Department California State University, Sacramento

MEMORANDUM. Joan Dukes, NPCC. Michele DeHart. DATE: August 5, Data Request

CHAPTER 4 DESIRED OUTCOMES: VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

Life history patterns: many solutions to the same problem

Life history characteristics of Snake River Fall Chinook salmon collected off the Oregon/Washington Coast

Fish Conservation and Management

July 9, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture 1

Lect 19 - Populations - Chapter 23. Different Levels of Ecological Organization. Populations

Volume II, Chapter 10 Kalama Subbasin

Hatchery Reform and our Pacific Region National Fish Hatcheries. Presented by Doug Olson

Sharing The Fish Whose Fish? Bernie Walrut Barrister & Solicitor 43 Wright Street, Adelaide, South Australia

Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

Employer Name: NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center

Cushman Hydro Project Public Meeting. Cushman Fire Hall Dec. 6, 2018

Ad Hoc Review Group IP(06)12 FINAL. Implementation Plan. European Union (Denmark)

Hood Canal Steelhead Project A conservation hatchery experiment. Joy Lee Waltermire

***Please Note*** April 3, Dear advisory committee members:

Fish Tech Weekly Outline January 14-18

Ocean Conditions, Salmon, and Climate Change

2016 Conservation Stamp, Esther Semple. Dr. Brian Riddell, Pacific Salmon Foundation, Vancouver, B.C. Contacts:

Salmon responses to Climate change

Wetland Recovery and Salmon Population Resilience: A Case Study in Estuary Ecosystem Restoration

Addressing Critical Uncertainties in the Reintroduction of Chum Salmon to Oregon Tributaries of the Columbia River. Kris Homel

Press Release New Bilateral Agreement May 22, 2008

Acclimation Strategies Improve Post-release Performance of Hatchery Salmon and Steelhead in Northeast Oregon By

2013 Annual Report on Aquaculture in Japan (Draft)

MEMORANDUM. Ron Boyce, ODFW Bob Heinith, CRITFC. Michele DeHart. DATE: November 30, Operations

Lakelse Sockeye Recovery Program

Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions

Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary

LIFE HISTORY DIVERSITY AND RESILIENCE

LOWER SNAKE RIVER COMPENSATION PLAN: Oregon Spring Chinook Salmon Evaluation Studies 2006 Annual Progress Report

Burbot Conservation Aquaculture at The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho s Hatchery 2 - Twin Rivers Hatchery

SALMON WORD SEARCH Find the hidden words (up/down, across, diagonal).

Hatchery Scientific Review Group Review and Recommendations

Declining patterns of Pacific Northwest steelhead trout spawner abundance and marine survival

Faith in Nature: The Missing Element in Salmon Management and Mitigation Programs

An Overview of Lobster and Crab Enhancement Throughout the World

Southern Oregon Coastal Cutthroat Trout

Presentation: Summary of ISRP Reviews of Steelhead and Spring and Fall Chinook Salmon Programs of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan

Transcription:

Hatcheries: Role in Restoration and Enhancement of Salmon Populations Hatcheries play a large role in the management, ecology, and evolution of Pacific salmon. Why were/are they built? What are the assumptions behind their operation, and what are the concerns?

Hatcheries I. Extent of hatchery production II. Why build a hatchery? i. High survival rates at early life history stages improve net productivity over a wild population. Nature is inefficient we can do better. II. III. IV. Objectives, and underlying assumptions Reasons to question the assumptions Concerns: i. Short-term: fishery management: how to handle success ii. Intermediate-term: behavioral and ecological interactions iii. Long-term: genetic consequences

Millions of Fish 0 50 100 150 200 Hatchery production Pacific Northwest British Columbia Alaska coho salmon 1900 1930 1960 Mahnken et al. NPAFC Bull. 1998. Release Year 1990

Hatchery production Millions of fish released 0 100 200 300 400 500 Pacific Northwest British Columbia Alaska chinook salmon 1900 1930 1960 1990 Mahnken et al. NPAFC Bull. 1998. Release Year

Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Hatcheries

Estimated % of adult wild steelhead 100 80 Percent Wild 60 40 20 0 Light 1987 AK B.C WA Col. R. OR CA

Columbia River salmon: approximate abundance, early 2000s Species Total % wild Spring chinook 200,000 16 Summer chinook 65,000 82 Fall chinook 800,000 50 Coho 700,000 10 Steelhead 300,000 25 Sockeye 125,000 100 chum 9000 100 www.fpc.org ~ 2.2 million

Hatcheries: solution or problem? Why build a hatchery? 1. Compensate for overfishing 2. Mitigate for lost habitat (Columbia River) 3. Create or enhance a fishery (SE Alaska) 4. Supplement a weak or unstable run 5. Preserve and restore endangered run Issaquah Salmon Hatchery, King County, Washington ca. 1935; UW library archives

Hatcheries: solution or problem? Key assumptions: 1. The hatchery by-passes the limiting life-history stage; other habitats are under-utilized or are not limiting 2. There are no other biological interaction between hatcheryproduced and wild fish (e.g. diseases, genetic interaction, predation, etc.) 3. The survival rate of hatchery-produced fish is similar to wild fish. 4. The hatchery does not affect habitat needed by wild fish. 5. The fisheries can accommodate the more productive hatchery population without over fishing the wild one. 6. The hatchery s productivity will be stable over time.

Why do hatcheries work so well? They short-circuit the limiting life history stage For most fishes, the embryonic and early larval stages are characterized by very high mortality. Many species are difficult to breed in captivity or their young are difficult to feed. However, salmon are easy to breed, the large, robust embryos are easy to incubate, and the juveniles feed readily. Most wild salmon die between fertilization and emergence from the gravel (often 80-90%). It is easy to improve on the survival rates of wild salmon. Nature is inefficient we can do better. Number of years 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Chilko River sockeye salmon: Average = 8.3% 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 % survival to emergence

Hypothetical coho salmon life tables Wild Hatchery Stage Abundance Mortality Abundance Mortality Egg 2500 80% 2500 10% Fry 500 90% 2250 20% Parr 50 50% 1800 20% Smolt 25 80% 1440 95% Adult 5 72

Hypothetical coho salmon life tables Wild Hatchery Stage Abundance Mortality Abundance Mortality Egg 2500 80% 2500 10% Fry 500 90% 2250 20% Parr 50 50% 1800 20% Smolt 25 80% 1440 95% Adult 5 72

Hypothetical coho salmon life tables Wild Hatchery Stage Abundance Mortality Abundance Mortality Egg 2500 80% 2500 10% Fry 500 90% 2250 20% Parr 50 50% 1800 20% Smolt 25 80% 1440 95% Adult 5 72

Hypothetical coho salmon life tables Wild Hatchery Stage Abundance Mortality Abundance Mortality Egg 2500 80% 2500 10% Fry 500 90% 2250 20% Parr 50 50% 1800 20% Smolt 25 80% 1440 95% Adult 5 72

Hypothetical coho salmon life tables Wild Hatchery Stage Abundance Mortality Abundance Mortality Egg 2500 80% 2500 10% Fry 500 90% 2250 20% Parr 50 50% 1800 20% Smolt 25 80% 1440 95% Adult 5 72

Hypothetical coho salmon life tables Wild Hatchery Stage Abundance Mortality Abundance Mortality Egg 2500 80% 2500 10% Fry 500 90% 2250 20% Parr 50 50% 1800 20% Smolt 25 80% 1440 95% Adult 5 80% 72 80% Spawner 1 14 If we impose an 80% fishing rate on both groups

If hatcheries are so efficient, how do we catch their surplus without overfishing healthy but less productive wild populations?

Hatcheries: solution or problem? Simulated effects of stocking and fishing on lake trout Stocking of non-native lake trout at moderate to high exploitation rates caused loss of the recipient population. Even when the stocked fish reproduce, their progeny mask the loss of the wild stock. At exploitation and stocking rates typical of lake trout populations in Ontario, the wild stock was replaced by the hatchery stock in a few generations. Native stocks having weak recruitment are least resistant to displacement by hatchery stocks and are also the most likely to be subjected to stocking. Evans and Willox. 1991. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48 (Suppl. 1): 134-147

Behavioral and ecological interactions between wild and hatchery produced salmon Implicit assumptions in most hatchery programs: 1. The hatchery by-passes the limiting life history stage or habitat, and so increased production of juveniles leads to increased production of adults 2. There are no important biological interactions between wild and hatchery fish that would limit overall production (i.e., hatchery fish are simply added to the wild ones)

Behavioral and ecological interactions between wild and hatchery produced salmon can be complex Competition: Hatchery fish are usually larger and may be more aggressive, giving them advantages over wild fish But, wild fish may already have territories when hatchery fish are released, giving them an advantage Large size may give hatchery fish a survival advantage but life in the hatchery might make them more vulnerable to predation Atsushi Sakurai If the stream is at carrying capacity, more smolts will not be produced and the wild population may be reduced. J. Rhodes

Behavioral and ecological interactions between wild and hatchery-produced salmon can be complex Predation: Smolts may prey on wild salmon of other species, or smaller conspecifics. Hatchery produced fish might help swamp predators or might concentrate them. Thus, overall responses of predators, and population consequences may be difficult to predict. Belted Kingfisher

Smolt to adult survival of Snake River chinook % smolt to adult return 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 hatchery wild 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 Raymond (1988) NAJFM

The survival of hatchery-released fish is usually lower than that of wild fish, even though the hatchery fish are larger. Why? Predator avoidance (learned) Feeding behavior (learned) Genetics (reduced selection for adaptive behavior) Physiology (photoperiod, temperature, growth rate) Diet (essential micronutrients, fat content) Release date Inherently unfit individuals remain in the hatchery population but are culled from the wild population already????

The numbers of smolt released may not determine the number of adults returning (ocean effects can be strong) smolts (millions) Smolts Adults returns (millions) 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 Year of smolt migration Numbers of coho salmon smolts entering the Oregon coastal environment and adult returns for the same year class (Brodeur 1990)

Hatcheries: Genetic effects Domestication Selection: Genetic divergence of wild and hatchery populations Lower fitness of hatcheryproduced fish in the wild Do we seek to isolate wild and hatchery populations or combine them? Hybridization with other species (trout)

Natural and sexual selection Wild females must select, prepare and defend nest sites and choose mates; males must choose and compete for access to females.

The hatchery staff cannot know which salmon would have chosen the best nest sites or otherwise been successful in reproducing, so there is a relaxation of selection on these traits. There may also be deliberate or inadvertent selection on other traits such as date of maturation, size, etc. In addition to these processes affecting adults, there is also selection for juveniles that adapt to confined conditions. Together, these processes are referred to as domestication selection.

Hatcheries: reproductive success Reproductive success of native, wild and non-native, hatchery produced steelhead in the Kalama River, WA Life history stage Survival hatch v. wild Egg to fry 85-87% Sub-yearling 76-79% Smolt 58-64% Adult 42% Leider et al. 1990

Hatcheries: reproductive success These effects are cumulative, and the authors concluded that the naturally spawning wild summer steelhead we examined produced from 7.8 to 9.3 times more adult offspring than did their naturally spawning hatchery counterparts. However, more than 40%...of the naturally produced adult summer steelhead were the direct offspring of hatchery spawners due to the preponderance in the spawning escapement. Leider et al. 1990. Aquaculture 88: 239-252

Hatchery and wild salmon: two options 1. Integrated hatchery: make wild and hatchery fish as similar as possible, by breeding some wild fish in the hatchery and having some hatchery fish spawn in the river in each generation, and manage them as a single population. 2. Segregated hatchery: make the hatchery fish as different from the wild fish as possible (e.g., breeding date), limit interbreeding as much as possible, and have different fishing rates on the two components.