West Midlands Cycle Design Guidance Cycling and the Midland Metro

Similar documents
Design and Installation of Low Level Cycle Signals

RAILWAY LEVEL CROSSING CHECKLIST Road Safety Review of Railway Crossings

Chapter 4 - Links Within the Highway. Suitability of Routes

Devonport City Cycling Network Strategy

Perne Rd / Radegund Rd Roundabout Cambridge

4. Guided Bus Explained

Appendix 12 Parking on footways and verges

Review of Guidelines for Cycleway Safety Fencing

Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Highway Infrastructure Manager

DESIGN CODE. Enterprise West Harlow London Road North Design Code 21

Road Safety Factsheet

Issues at T junctions:

Rhebogue Neighbourhood Greenway. Road Safety Audit Stage 2

CAR PARKING [15] General provision

The integration of Cycling & Light Rapid Transit /

Entry Treatments. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/94 August Introduction. Design. Vertical Deflections. Locations

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

Strategy for Walking & Cycling Action Plan

Raised Rib Markings. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/95 March Introduction

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

Marcus Jones, TRL. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

Space for Cycling. A guide for decision makers

1 This technical note considers the issues associated with the use of tidal flow bus lanes on key public transport corridors in Cambridge.

The existing site constraints which may be encountered for the A428 scheme proposals are divided into sections as follows.

E4 Cycle Route Exeter University to Redhayes Bridge. - Recommendations from Exeter Cycling Campaign

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Footpath design. A guide to creating footpaths that are safe, comfortable, and easy to use

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL NOTE 22 (VICARAGE ROAD JUNCTION)

PART 5 TD 51/03 SEGREGATED LEFT TURN LANES AND SUBSIDIARY DEFLECTION ISLANDS AT ROUNDABOUTS SUMMARY

DMURS - Practical Implications

Frome Street Bicycle Route

PART 5 TD 51/17 SUMMARY

Highway Code for Cyclists Operation Close-Pass

TRANSPORT AND MOVEMENT

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 93/07 DRIVER LOCATION SIGNS INTERIM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) A: Class 2 Pedestrian / Cycle Ways. Pedestrian and Cycle Ways:

The Cabinet Member for Highways & Streetscene. Aurang Zeb - Head of Highways & Transport

CAMBRIDGE SOUTH WEST PARK & RIDE

How do we design for pedestrians? Case study: transforming the Walworth Road

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Report from Embassy Visit to Copenhagen May David Arditti

guide to a phased approach TRIPP

TS 109 DURHAM ROAD QTC PHASE 4 PROJECT PROPOSAL. Page 1

BEST PRACTICES FOR ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORT. C G B (Kit) Mitchell

CHECKLIST 2: PRELIMINARY DESIGN STAGE AUDIT

Side Roads and Other Non-Signalised Junctions

Cycle Traffic and The Strategic Road Network. John Parkin and Phil Jones Presenting on behalf of Highways England

TGSI Tactile Ground Surface Indicators

Cycle network linking Wolverhampton city centre and Bilston town centre with employment sites and residential areas:

Milton Road Bus Stop and Crossings Workshop WSP. 19th September 2017

Cyclists at road narrowings

Frascati Road and Temple Hill Route Improvements. Outline Design Report to Accompany Public consultation

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

IMPLEMENTATION. PEDESTRIAN USERS (Continued /) Building Frontages: A: Stair Applications. Geometry (Accessed from the Sidewalk) Refer to A:

157 Chapter 6: Bicycles

Local Highway Panels Members Guide. 5 Crossing Facilities

TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET

Parking. Signing. Appendix C Typical detail drawings. London Cycling Design Standards

Sharing the Road Together. Drivers and Cyclists

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Callan Park accommodates travel from a wide range of transport modes, including walking, cycling, bus and light rail.

Appendix A Guiding Principles for Cycling Safety in Work Zones

Derby Cycling Group, c/o 126, Station road, Mickleover, Derby, DE3 9FN. Date: 20 th November, 2018.

CHECKLIST 6: EXISTING ROADS: ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

Regulatory traffic signs

Roads and public rights of way

Traffic calming regulations (Scotland)

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

Traffic Calming Regulations

SCHEME DESIGN AND ENGINEERING

The Safe System Approach

Economic and Social Council

IAN WHITE ASSOCIATES. Crawley Station Gateway Public Realm

Have your say on the transformation of Oxford Street West

Minta Farm Berwick S96A Transport Impact Assessment

Accommodating Cyclists at Signalised Intersections

Appendix 1 Greenway Standards

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Bedfordshire County Council Cycle Parking Guidance Annex 1 Development standards Annex 2 Parking dimensions and layouts

Sharing the Road Together: Drivers and Cyclists

Principles. 4biii. Good Urban Design

Understanding the highway and traffic system to drive safely. Gopinath Menon Vice-Chairman, Singapore Road Safety Council

Public Consultation on Braintree Integrated Transport Package (ITP) HAVE YOUR. Consultation open from 24 September to 5 November 2018 SAY

Streets for All : 9 Use of white lines

OLDER PEOPLE INDEPENDENT MOBILITY FOR LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES. Christopher G B (Kit) Mitchell

CURRENT ORIGINAL REFERENCE SECTIONS. (Typical Section) (Typical Section) The Parade Island Bay : Concept Option Summary Sheets.

(HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN -1)

Bramshaw traffic calming proposal

APPENDIX D. PERS Assessment

Nottingham Cycle City Frequently Asked Questions

Comments on the Hailsham to Eastbourne Sustainable Transport Corridor

CYCLING CHARTER ACTION PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Cycle Routes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 3/95 March Introduction. Implementation. Project aims. Design

Green Streets and Urban Greenways

Mapping Cycle-friendliness towards a national standard

RAA Submission. to Adelaide City Council Speed Limits and Cycling Routes May Charles Mountain. Senior Manager Road Safety

1. TRANSFORM CITY ROAD WEST INTO A GREAT CENTRAL city street

Space for Cycling. Delivering healthy streets. Roger Geffen Policy Director, Cycling UK

Chapter 7 - Rural Roads

Citizens Cycling Jury. Sharing the Roads Safely Final Recommendations. November RAA Response to Recommendations

Introduction Methodology Study area and data collection Results and recommendation Conclusion References

Transcription:

Transport for the West Midlands Cycling and the Midland Metro September 2017 Project Code: 02821 Phil Jones Associates Ltd Seven House High Street Longbridge Birmingham B31 2UQ philjonesassociates.co.uk

Version Control and Approval Version Date Main Contributor Issued by Approved by A 08 September 2017 Adrian Lord Adrian Lord Adrian Lord Prepared for Hannah Dayan Cycling Charter Co-ordinator Transport for the West Midlands Transport for West Midlands 16 Summer Lane Birmingham B19 3SD Transport for the West Midlands Cycling Design Guidance

Contents Section Page 1 Cycling and Midland Metro 4 1.1 Why provide for cycling 4 1.2 How to provide for cycling 4 1.3 Crossing the Line 5 1.4 Cycling along the tram corridor 7 1.5 Tram Stops 8 1.6 Signing 8 Transport for the West Midlands Draft Cycling Design Guidance

1 Cycling and Midland Metro 1.1 Why provide for cycling 1.1.1 Tram corridors are often attractive as potential cycle routes, offering direct links that serve several communities along their length, and built to accommodate a known demand for travel. There is potential for bike and ride interchange for longer trips. Cycling can increase the catchment of Metro stops because a 10-minute cycling isochrone covers approximately four times the area of the equivalent walking isochrone. Because Metro stops are often directly accessible from quieter residential streets they can attract people that are unwilling or unable to cycle on busier roads. 1.1.2 When introducing a new tram route, permeability of existing pedestrian and cycle routes should be preserved where possible. Tram corridors can potentially sever links between adjacent quiet streets when it proves necessary to restrict and formalise crossing points. Good quality infrastructure at the intended crossing points and routes leading to them can help instil the desired behaviour and avoid conflicts with the tram system. In West Bromwich a cycle track has been provided alongside the Metro line with access to stops (Sandwell Council) 1.2 How to provide for cycling 1.2.1 Installing a Metro line requires long term planning and major works, with opportunities therefore to add cycle facilities for marginal additional cost. There is general guidance from the Office of Rail Regulation which includes some advice on catering for pedestrians Cycling Design Guidance 4 Transport for the West Midlands

and cyclists. What type of facilities can be achieved will depend on local circumstance and are typically: Fully separate greenway cycle track alongside a dedicated tram line corridor (e.g. parts of West Bromwich). Off-carriageway cycle track alongside on-carriageway tram lines. Dedicated cycle lane within the carriageway but outside the Dynamic Kinematic Envelope (DKE) of the tram. Fully shared all-purpose carriageway. Safe crossing facilities where cycle routes cross a tram line. Secure and sheltered long-stay cycle parking stands at stops. 1.2.2 Incidents involving pedestrians and cyclists being struck by a tramcar happen very rarely. The more common hazards are slips, trips and falls associated with crossing the line. Cyclists are at risk in two ways: Bicycle wheels may drop into the groove of the rail and cause a fall (the wheel rarely gets fully stuck but the groove causes the rider to lose their balance); Tyres slip on the metal surface of the rail, especially in wet conditions. 1.3 Crossing the Line The general arrangement should be that on-street crossings between the cycle route and tram tracks are at 90 degrees to the line (or as close as possible, and not less than 60 degrees). This includes arrangements for turning in and out of any side streets along the line. There is a risk at places where the cycle track/carriageway and the tram tracks merge/diverge as this is where it may be most difficult for cyclists to cross the line at right angles, especially if other traffic is present. Transport for the West Midlands 5 Cycling Design Guidance

Cycle track guides cyclists to cross perpendicular to lines where road and tramline diverge, Nottingham (Adrian Lord) Cycle track crossing, Manchester city centre (Adrian Lord) 1.3.1 Signalised pedestrian/cycle crossings can be used on tram lines as set out in TSRGD 2016. Where crossing points are not signalised (usually where there are low flows of people crossing and good visibility), a sign can be placed along the tram line to remind drivers to give an audible warning. 1.3.2 Where a cycle track joins or crosses the alignment of the tram line, the cycle-track arm of the junction may be treated in the same way that an all-purpose carriageway junction Cycling Design Guidance 6 Transport for the West Midlands

would be treated (either signalised or unsignalised). The stop or give-way line must be at least 500mm from the edge of the DKE and a supplementary Tram plate may be used in conjunction with the stop or give way sign. At more complex signalled junctions where the cycle route might be partially on and off-carriageway, elephant s footprint markings and/or coloured surfacing can be used to indicate the intended route. 1.3.3 The Velostrail type rail groove filling products may have a role to play in some circumstances such as level crossings where the tram line is off-highway. These are only for a standard railway line profile and not for the flange groove used for street running tram lines. Other infill products designed for use along the length of the line in a street prevent the required regular visual inspections for rail wear and cracking, and are not therefore practicable within a UK operating environment. 1.4 Cycling along the tram corridor 1.4.1 Streets where cyclists share the same direction of travel as the trams should offer a separate cycle track or sufficient carriageway width between the track and the nearside kerb. The ORR guidance suggests a minimum of 1.0m mandatory cycle lane between the kerb and the DKE of the tram, but this is inadequate for comfortable cycling and does not offer safe clearance for cycles with more than two wheels. The ORR guidance is very clear that the 1.0m minimum clear strip does not provide space for a tram to pass cyclists, and is just meant to provide a clear area to enable cyclists on a standard two-wheel bike to pass along a narrow street in the absence of trams without having to cross the tracks. Designers should normally aim for 1.5m cycle lane width as in other circumstances so that a tram can pass with a comfortable clearance between the cyclist and the vehicle. The cycle lane must be mandatory with parking restrictions and not wide enough to permit unlawful parking by vehicles. Parking/waiting by vehicles partially on the adjacent footway may be deterred by bollards along the kerb edge if necessary. The outer edge of the mandatory cycle lane marking should be at least 0.2m from the DKE. 1.4.2 Roadside parking, delivery bays and bus stops should be arranged in laybys so that cyclists do not need to cross the tramline when passing. Kerb-face drainage can help cyclists to avoid having to bump over gulley grates where width is restricted. 1.4.3 If the road is not wide enough for a cycle lane but there are long sections of road where it is reasonable to assume that a tram would need to overtake a cyclist during normal operations (for example long uphill sections) there should be some kerbside refuge provision for the cyclist to be able to pull into the side at regular intervals. 1.4.4 Where suitable conditions for cycling cannot be met, an alternative cycle route may be indicated along adjacent streets. Transport for the West Midlands 7 Cycling Design Guidance

1.5 Tram Stops 1.5.1 Tram stops on the nearside of the carriageway do not allow for any clearance for a separate cycle track and therefore a bypass arrangement of a cycle track to the rear of the stop is the preferred treatment (see bus stops). 1.6 Signing 1.6.1 The standard blue Tram Only signs can be used to mark the streets where other vehicles (including cycles) are prohibited (see TSRGD 2016). A supplementary plate describing the alternative route may be added e.g. Cycle access to station follow signs via XXX Street. 1.6.2 Where a hazard associated with tram rails is identified, TSRGD 2016 permits the use of the general Hazard (exclamation mark) sign. A supplementary Tram tracks plate to alert users to the presence of tram rails can be used as a non-prescribed sign with appropriate DfT site approval. Cycling Design Guidance 8 Transport for the West Midlands