Lancaster County Dune Inventory

Similar documents
City of Virginia Beach Dune Inventory

Accomack County Dune Inventory

Northumberland County DuneInventory

Dune Monitoring Data Update Summary: 2013

The Value of Created Dunes to address Coastal Hazards in Chesapeake Bay: Hurricane Isabel Impacts

Design and Construction of Living

Volume and Shoreline Changes along Pinellas County Beaches during Tropical Storm Debby

Salt Ponds Shore Zone Modeling for Breakwater Placement: Summary Report

VIMS CCRM Coastal Management Decision Tools. Decision Tree for Undefended Shorelines and Those with Failed Structures

Shore Zone Management Planning for Middle Peninsula Chesapeake Bay Public Access Authority Properties

Long Beach Island Holgate Spit Little Egg Inlet Historical Evolution Introduction Longshore Transport Map, Survey and Photo Historic Sequence

For more information or permission to reprint slides, please contact Donna Milligan at 1

Beach profile surveys and morphological change, Otago Harbour entrance to Karitane May 2014 to June 2015

Reading Material. Inshore oceanography, Anikouchine and Sternberg The World Ocean, Prentice-Hall

Yorktown Beach with Hurricane Isabel Impacts

New Jersey Coastal Zone Overview. The New Jersey Beach Profile Network (NJBPN) 3 Dimensional Assessments. Quantifying Shoreline Migration

BEACH PROCESSES AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS

Australian Coastal Councils Conference

Shorelines Earth - Chapter 20 Stan Hatfield Southwestern Illinois College

Chapter - Oceans and Coasts

LAB: WHERE S THE BEACH

Overview. Beach Features. Coastal Regions. Other Beach Profile Features. CHAPTER 10 The Coast: Beaches and Shoreline Processes.

Shoreline Studies Program, Department of Physical Sciences, VIMS

Oceans and Coasts. Chapter 18

Figure 4, Photo mosaic taken on February 14 about an hour before sunset near low tide.

DUNE STABILIZATION AND BEACH EROSION

Chesil Beach, Dorset UK High energy, shingle coastline. Brighton Beach, Sussex UK Pebble beach

Figure 106. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Coastal management has lagged behind the growth in population leading to problems with pollution

Fairfax County Shoreline Management Plan

OECS Regional Engineering Workshop September 29 October 3, 2014

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the major environments on Mustang Island.

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION

Combating Erosion at Mosquito Point

Chapter 20 Lecture. Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology. Eleventh Edition. Shorelines. Tarbuck and Lutgens Pearson Education, Inc.

Affects of Tides on Lateral Coastal Access at. Las Varas Ranch. Gaviota, California. Photos Courtesy of California Coastal Records Project

Chapter. The Dynamic Ocean

Estuarine Shoreline Stabilization

Brief History of Headland Breakwaters Usage in Chesapeake Bay, USA. 25 Years of Rock, Sand and Plants for Shore Protection

UPPER BEACH REPLENISHMENT PROJECT RELATED

Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering - Volume 14 COASTAL STABILIZATION. Richard Silvester John R C Hsu. \v? World Scientific

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

ATLANTIC COUNTY 2006 to 2008

Coastal Engineering 57 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Coastal Engineering

DUXBURY WAVE MODELING STUDY

Figure79. Location map for the 10 NJBPN profile sites in Atlantic County, NJ 155

City of Suffolk Shoreline Management Plan

Basic Dune Physical Characteristics

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

Inlet Management Study for Pass-A-Grille and Bunces Pass, Pinellas County, Florida

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Earth Science Chapter 16 Section 3 Review

RE: Hurricane Matthew Beach Damage Assessment and Recommendations [CSE 2416]

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Design Considerations for Living Shorelines in Connecticut. Jennifer E.D. O Donnell Department of Marine Sciences University of Connecticut

Prince George County Shoreline Management Plan

An Update of Coastal Erosion in Puerto Rico

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

MAR 110 LECTURE #15 Wave Hazards

Lecture Outlines PowerPoint. Chapter 15 Earth Science, 12e Tarbuck/Lutgens

EVALUATION OF BEACH EROSION UP-DRIFT OF TIDAL INLETS IN SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, USA. Mohamed A. Dabees 1 and Brett D.

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition

Encroachment of Sills onto State-Owned Bottom: Design Guidelines for Chesapeake Bay

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL OCEANFRONT BEACHES THE BOROUGH OF AVALON, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

Julebæk Strand. Effect full beach nourishment

Performance of Upham Beach T-Groin Project and Its Impact to the Downdrift Beach

Westmoreland County Shoreline Management Plan

Chapter 12: Coasts (after a brief review of Tides)

SHORE PROTECTION AND HABITAT CREATION AT SHAMROCK ISLAND, TEXAS ABSTRACT

2014 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

CROSS-SHORE SEDIMENT PROCESSES

York County Shoreline Management Plan

Blakely Island, N Thatcher Bay. Restoration Recommendation: Rank Score (total score)

Beach, dune and development in the Borough of Mantoloking as of January Prepared for The Borough of Mantoloking: April 2, 2008

New Jersey Beach Profile Network Atlantic County Profile Site Locations

FINAL REPORT FOR 2013 ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UPPER, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

COASTAL SYSTEMS WAVE ENERGY

IMPACTS OF COASTAL PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON THE COASTS OF CRETE: NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS

USE OF SEGMENTED OFFSHORE BREAKWATERS FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL

Marginal Marine Environments

HARBOUR SEDIMENTATION - COMPARISON WITH MODEL

CHAPTER 4 - SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDY AND PLAN

Wind Blow-out Hollow Generated in Fukiage Dune Field, Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan

ALTERNATIVES FOR COASTAL STORM DAMAGE MITIGATION AND FUNCTIONAL DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES

Nearshore Dredged Material Placement Pilot Study at Noyo Harbor, CA

To: William Woods, Jenni Austin Job No: CentrePort Harbour Deepening Project - Comments on community queries

Figure 38. Locations of the 28 NJBPN profile stations in Ocean County, NJ.

Shore - place where ocean meets land Coast - refers to the larger zone affected by the processes that occur at this boundary.

Q1. What are the primary causes/contributors to coastal erosion at Westshore and the concept of longshore / littoral drift.

SPECIAL SPRING 2018 STORM REPORT ON THE CONDITION OF THE MUNICIPAL BEACHES FOR THE BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR, CAPE MAY COUNTY, NEW JERSEY

TITLE: COASTAL EROSION AND LANDFORMS.

2013 ANNUAL REPORT - TO THE CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD ON THE CONDITION OF THE CITY BEACHES

Comparison of Predicted and Measured Shoaling at Morro Bay Harbor Entrance, California

Low-crested offshore breakwaters: a functional tool for beach management

Species Conclusions Table

The Continuing Evolution of the New Inlet

MONITORING SEDIMENT TRANSPORT PROCESSES AT MANAVGAT RIVER MOUTH, ANTALYA TURKEY

STATUS REPORT FOR THE SUBMERGED REEF BALL TM ARTIFICIAL REEF SUBMERGED BREAKWATER BEACH STABILIZATION PROJECT FOR THE GRAND CAYMAN MARRIOTT HOTEL

Tangier Island, Virginia. Shoreline Management Plan for the West Coast of the Uppards

Transcription:

Lancaster County Dune Inventory Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William & Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia June

Lancaster County Dune Inventory C. Scott Hardaway, Jr. Donna A. Milligan Lyle M. Varnell George R. Thomas Walter I. Priest Linda M. Meneghini Thomas A. Barnard Christine Wilcox Shoreline Studies Program Department of Physical Sciences and Wetlands Program Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William & Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia This project was funded by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality s Coastal Resources Management Program through Grant #NA7OZ- of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 97, as amended. June

Table of Contents Table of Contents... i List of Figures... i List of Tables... i INTRODUCTION.... Purpose.... Dune Act... BACKGROUND.... Dune System Classification.... Site Characteristics... List of Figures Figure. Location of Lancaster County within the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system... Figure. Geographic extent of dunes in Lancaster County... Figure. Dune classification system developed by Hardaway et al. ()... Figure. Typical profile of a Chesapeake Bay dune... List of Tables Table. Identified dune sites in Lancaster County as of...5 Table. Dune site measurements in Lancaster County as of...6 Table. Dune site parameters in Lancaster County as of...6 DUNE DATA SUMMARY...5 INVENTORY...7 5 REFERENCES...7 Acknowledgments Appendix A. Location of Dune Sites Appendix B. Individual Dune Inventory Sheets Cover Photo Mosquito Point, Lancaster County, Virginia on 5 August taken by VIMS, Shoreline Studies Program. i

INTRODUCTION. Purpose Lancaster County, Virginia is located at the confluence of the Rappahannock River and Chesapeake Bay (Figure ). Most of the dunes are located along the Rappahannock River with the remainder along Chesapeake Bay. There are a total of 5 dune sites identified along the Lancaster County shoreline (Figure ). It is the intent of this publication to provide the user with information on the status of dunes in Lancaster County. This information comes from research performed in 999 and which was presented in a report entitled Chesapeake Bay Dune Systems: Evolution and Status (Hardaway et al., ). Although somewhat dated, the information provides a short historical perspective of the state of each site at the time of the site visit. Since much of the data was collected several years ago and the beach and dune systems may have changed, this report is intended only as a resource for coastal zone managers and homeowners; it is not intended for use in determining legal jurisdictional limits.. Dune Act N Washington DC Baltimore Coastal dune systems of the Commonwealth of Virginia are a unique and valuable natural resource. Dunes are important to both the littoral marine system (as habitat for flora and fauna) and the adjacent landward environment (as erosion control and protection from storms). These functions form the basis for the Coastal Primary Sand Dune Protection Act of 98 (Act) and the related resource management effort under which the primary dune and beach components of existing dune systems are protected. Secondary dunes are not protected under the Act; however, as they are an important part of the overall dune system, they were included in the original report (Hardway et al., ) and analyzed as part of a risk assessment performed by Varnell and Hardaway (). In this inventory, both primary and secondary dunes are included. P c otoma R. Rappahannock R. Primary dunes must meet three criteria in order to fall under the Act s jurisdiction:. Substance: a mound of unconsolidated sandy soil contiguous to mean high water. Morphology: landward and lateral limits are marked by a change in grade from >% to <%.. Character: primary dunes must support specific plant species or communities which are named in the Act and include: American beach grass (Ammophila breviligulata); beach heather (Hudsonia tometosa); dune bean (Strophostylis spp.); dusty miller (Artemisia stelleriana): saltmeadow hay (Spartina patens); seabeach sandwort (Arenaria peploides); sea oats (Uniola paniculata); sea rocket (Cakile edentula); seaside goldenrod (Solidago sempervirens); and short dune grass (Panicum ararum). The General Assembly enacted the Coastal Primary Sand Dune Protection Act (the Dune Act) in 98. The Dune Act was originally codified in Code 6.-. to -.8. The Dune Act is now recodified as Coastal Primary Sand Dunes and Beaches in Code 8.- to -. York R. James R. Norfolk/ Virginia Beach Figure. Location of Lancaster County within the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system.

the intensity, direction, and duration of winds and waves constantly change through the seasons, so too, do coastal dunes. They exist in a state of flux. Dunes act as a reservoir of sand which can buffer inland areas from the effects of storm waves and, in the process, act as natural levees against coastal flooding. During high energy conditions, such as the northeast storms which frequent the Eastern Seaboard, primary dunes may be subject to attack by wind-driven waves aided by storm surges. The dune may be eroded, and the sand deposited in an offshore bar. Then, under low-energy conditions, the sand may move back to the beach. All dunes in the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system are mobile features especially with regards to coastal zone management. Unlike ocean dune fields that are relatively continuous features exposed to the open ocean, the dunes of the Chesapeake form across a temporal and spatial geomorphic matrix driven by sand volume, varying wave climate, and shoreline geology. The coastal geology, in large part, determines whether shoreline erosion acts upon the upland (high bank) or marsh (low bank). Sand supply and the long-term local wave climate are significant factors in the location of dunes. The stability or ability of a dune/beach system to accrete over time is necessary for the formation of secondary dunes. Figure. Geographic extent of dunes in Lancaster County. BACKGROUND Coastal primary sand dunes form by the accumulation of sand due to the interaction of wind and wave action along the shore. Sand deposited on the beach during periods of relatively low wave energy is moved landward by onshore winds. The deposition of material above the intertidal zone allows vegetation to take root along the wrack line which then acts as a baffle, slowing wind speed and causing wind-borne sand to settle and be trapped in the vegetation, thereby resulting in further accretion of the dune. Therefore, the size and location of a primary dune is determined by the amount of sand available and the ability of wind and waves to move it as well as the degree to which any existing vegetation can act to trap it. Just as Natural dunes in the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system vary in size and nature, but all require an accreted feature, such as a beach washover or a spit to become vegetated above the intertidal zone. Vegetation and a continuous beach/dune profile are required to create the jurisdictional primary dune. If the dune/beach forms across a low marsh shoreline, the system will move landward in response to storms, and only a low primary dune will exist. If sand can accrete bayward due to shoals, spits, or man-made features such as jetties and groins, then a secondary dune may develop from the original primary dune. Hardaway et al. () found that the occurrence of dunes around Chesapeake Bay is due, in part, to three factors: ) morphologic opportunity (i.e., relatively stable setting), ) abundant sand supply in the littoral transport system, and ) conducive onshore wind/wave climate. Deposited sand must remain above a stable backshore to allow dune vegetation to become established. Each dune documented by Hardaway et al. () has its own history of change -- growth and decay; natural and anthropogenic. Many miles of natural dunes have been altered by development, and many have been formed in response to processes altered by man s influence. Dunes around the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system in the localities within the Act encompass only about miles of shoreline (Hardaway et al., ). This is about.% of the total Bay shore - making it an important, but rare, shore type.

. Dune System Classification The Chesapeake Bay dune classification was developed in Hardaway et al. () and is portrayed in Figure. This classification is based on factors that are unique to certain dune systems and has a basis in the dune field evolution, vegetative zones, lateral and vertical extent of primary and secondary dune features, and anthropogenic impacts. Dunes are categorized as Natural (), Man Influenced (), or Man Made (). These three types reflect how the state of the dune is most impacted. The parameters (A through G) are most influential in defining the status of a given dune system. Parameter values within each category assign a range of limits or characteristics. Categories A, B, and C relate to the nature of the impinging wave climate at a given site while categories D, E, and F relate to geologic parameters. Dune parameter G relates to the type of anthropogenic influence. Fetch Exposure (A) is a qualitative assessment of the wave exposure and wave climate across open water. Wave impact is the dominant natural process driving shoreline erosion and sediment transport along the Bay coasts. Riverine, Bay Influenced (A.) is somewhere between the Open Bay exposure (A.) and Riverine Exposure (A.). Generally, A. sites have fetches of 5- nautical miles (nm); A. have fetches of > nm; and A. have fetches <5 nm. Shore Orientation (B) is the direction the main dune shore faces according to eight points on the compass. Shoreline exposure to dominant directions of wind and waves is a component of fetch exposure (A) and wave climate as well as aeolian processes that assist in dune growth and decay. Nearshore Gradient (C) controls wave refraction and shoaling that, in turn, affect the nature of wave approach and longshore sand transport as well as onshore/offshore transport. The presence or absence of bars indicates the relative amount of nearshore sediment available for transport. The Morphologic Setting (D) is significant in the genesis of a particular dune site. Aerial imagery from VIMS SAV Archive and field observations were used to determine and classify the Morphologic Setting. Four basic categories were developed including: ) Isolated dunes, ) Creek mouth barrier dune/spit, ) Spit and ) Dune fields. Morphological Settings and are distinguished only by shore length (i.e. Morphologic Setting < 5 ft and Morphologic Setting > 5 ft) as an arbitrary boundary. These categories were subdivided to reflect the nature of the setting into four subcategories which are ) Pocket, ) Linear, ) Shallow Bay and ) Salient. The Relative Stability (E) of a dune is very subjective. It is meant as a value judgement as to the overall current and future integrity at the time of the site visit. If the site had wave cut scarps along the primary dune face and/or was actively moving landward (overwash), it was termed Land Transgressive/Erosional (E.). If the backshore/dune face had a slight gradient with stabilizing vegetation, it was stable (E.) or, possibly, accretionary (E.). Dune Classification System. Natural. Man Influenced. Manmade Dune Parameters A. Exposure: fetch. Riverine, Bay Influenced. Open Bay. Riverine B. Shore Orientation (direction of face). North 5. South. Northeast 6. Southwest. East 7. West. Southeast 8. Northwest C. Nearshore Gradient. to, ft., to, ft. Greater than, ft (Distance to the 6 ft contour) D. Morphologic Setting. Isolated (less than 5 ft alongshore). Pocket. Linear. Shallow Bay (curvilinear). Salient (point). Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit. Spit. Dune Field. Pocket. Linear. Shallow Bay (curvilinear). Salient (point) Dune Type. Extensive Bars. No Bars (greater than 5 ft alongshore) E. Relative Stability. Stable. Accretionary. Land Transgressive/Erosional F. Underlying Substrate. Marsh/Creek Bottom. Upland G. Structure/Fill. Groin. Revetment/Bulkhead. Breakwater. Jetty 5. Beach Fill Figure. Classification system for Chesapeake Bay identified dune systems (from Hardaway et al., ).

The underlying substrate (F) is a general category for the type of substrate or sediment the dune resides on and against. Two broad categories were chosen - marsh and upland. The marsh category includes creek bottoms which should be a separate category because beach/dune development can occur across the mouth of a creek bottom without a true marsh. The distinction between upland and marsh was that the marsh substrate is usually a low bank subject to washover processes, whereas the upland area offered a backstop to land beach/dune migration. If the site was not Natural (), then the nature of man s impact was determined by the type of modification. The shore structures include Groins (G.), Bulkheads and Revetments (G.), Breakwaters (G.), Jetties (G.), and Beach Fill (G.5). The degree of impact any given structure or combination of structures had on the dune site was not always clear. The Relative Stability (E) relates in part to whether man s influence was erosive (destructive) or accretionary/stable (constructive). measured, but the back or landward extent of the secondary dune could not always be reached. The dimensions, including lateral position and elevation of various profile components were measured. These include: primary dune crest elevation, distance from primary dune crest to back of dune, distance from primary dune crest to, secondary dune crest elevation, secondary dune crest to back of primary dune, secondary dune crest to back of secondary dune, distance from back of primary dune to back of secondary dune, width of secondary dune, and width of primary and secondary dune. During each site visit, dominant plant communities occupying the primary and secondary dunes (if present) were analyzed (Figure ). Plant species distribution is based on observed percent cover in the general area of profiling and sampling within the identified dune reach.. Site Characteristics Coastal zone profile and vegetation types present on dunes were determined by site visit. Beach profile transects were performed at most sites to measure the primary and secondary dune (where present) within feet of the shoreline. Standard surveying and biological procedures were utilized. Not all dune sites were surveyed. Each surveyed transect used the crest of the primary dune as the horizontal control and mean low water () as the vertical control. The primary dune crest was determined on site. The line was indirectly obtained from water level measurements. The observed water level position and elevation were checked against recorded tidal elevations at the nearest NOAA tide station and time of day to establish on the profile. The typical dune profile has several components (Figure ). A continuous sand sheet exists from the offshore landward and consists of a ) nearshore region, bayward of, ) an intertidal beach, berm, and backshore region between and base of primary dune, ) a primary dune from bayside to landside including the crest, and, where present, ) a secondary dune. All profiles extended bayward beyond and landward to at least the back of the primary dune. The secondary dune crest was always Maritime Forest Back of Secondary Dune Typical Chesapeake Bay Dune Profile S. patens, shrubs, trees Secondary Dune (where present) Secondary Dune Crest Back of Primary Dune Vegetation Zones Figure. Typical profile of a Chesapeake Bay dune system (from Hardaway et al., ). Ammophila S. Patens Primary Dune Primary Dune Crest ft Sea Rocket Inter- Backshore tidal Front of Primary Dune Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Nearshore Beach Berm ft

DUNE DATA SUMMARY Approximately.8 miles of dune shore have been identified along Lancaster s riverine and Bay shores. Previous work by Hardaway et al. () indicated a total of 7 possible dune sites in Lancaster, but site visits verified 5 (Table ). Due to inaccessibility, sites 7,,,,,, 8, and 9 were not profiled or photographed. Site 9 was profiled in two different locations in order to adequately describe the morphology of the entire site. All the dunes cover a wide variety of fetch exposures and site conditions. Dune lengths vary from a hundred feet to a thousand feet. Dunes reside in areas of sand accretion and stability such as around tidal creek mouths, embayed shorelines, in front of older dune features, as washovers, as spits and against man-made structures like channel jetties or groin fields. Site visits occurred in 999 and ; site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. In Lancaster County, 6 of the 5 dune sites have both primary and secondary dunes (Table ). The average length of primary dune only sites is ft while the average length of the primary with secondary dunes is 6 feet. Clearly, the wider sites with secondary dunes are also the longest. The main categories of Natural, Man-Influenced and Man-Made were initially utilized to portray a sites most influential element. In Lancaster County, 8% are Natural, 6% are Man-Influenced and % are Man-Made. In terms of shore length however, 6% are Natural and 5% are Man-Influenced. This is evidence of shoreline development in Lancaster County particularly along the Rappannock River coast where 77% of the Riverine dune sites reside. Lancaster County dune sites are quite variable and include the highest number of riverine dunes of the 8 jurisdictional dune localities (Table ). Riverine dunes are characterized by relatively low primary dunes due to a lesser wind/wave climate than Open Bay or Riverine Bay influenced dunes. These riverine dunes are also often occur in isolated settings; Lancaster County has a higher percentage of isolated dune sites than any other jurisdictional locality. Table. Identified dune sites in Lancaster County as of. Site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. *Public ownership includes governmental entities including local, state, and federal; otherwise ownership is by the private individual. ^Location is in Virginia State Plane South, NAD 97. Sites were noted as dunes but were not photographed or surveyed. 5

Table. Dune site measurements in Lancaster County as of. Site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. Table. Dune site parameters in Lancaster County as of. Site characteristics may now be different due to natural or man-induced shoreline change. 6

INVENTORY Each dune site is located on plates in Appendix A. The individual site inventory sheets are in Appendix B. Due to the mobile nature of dunes, their extent and morphology changes through time. The data presented in this report represents the status of the site at the time of assessment and to the best of the author s knowledge. This information is for general management purposes and should not be used for delineation. For detailed delineation of any dune site, the reader should contact the local wetlands board or Virginia Marine Resources Commission. See Figures and for description of the site parameters and measurements listed below. Each dune site has the following information on its inventory page:. Date visited. Central site coordinates in Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97. Coordinates of profile origin. Site length in feet 5. Ownership 6. Site Type 7. Fetch Exposure 8. Shoreline Direction of Face 9. Nearshore gradient. Morphologic Setting. Relative Stability. Underlying Substrate. Type of structure or fill (man-influenced only). Elevation in feet above Mean Low Water () 5. Landward extent of Primary Dune from Dune Crest in feet 6. Distance from Dune Crest to 7. Secondary Dune Crest Elevation in feet above (if present) 8. Distance between Secondary Dune Crest and 9. Landward extent of Secondary Dune from Secondary Dune Crest. Primary Dune vegetation communities. Secondary Dune vegetation communities. General Remarks 5 REFERENCES Hardaway, C.S., Jr., G.R. Thomas, J.B. Glover, J.B. Smithson, M.R. Berman, and A.K. Kenne, 99. Bank Erosion Study. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering Number 9. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Hardaway, C.S., Jr., L.M. Varnell, D.A. Milligan, G.R. Thomas, C.H. Hobbs, III,. Chesapeake Bay Dune Systems: Evolution and Status. Technical Report. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Varnell, L.M. and C.S. Hardaway,. An Analysis of Shoreline Development Risk for Secondary Dune Systems in Tidewater Virginia With Associated Management Recommendations. Final report to the Virginia Coastal Program. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Carl Hobbs, III, for his critical review and editing of the report as well as the personnel in VIMS Publications Center, particularly Susan Stein, Ruth Hershner, and Sylvia Motley, for their work in printing and compiling the final report. Also included on the dune site inventory page is the site cross-section, if surveyed, and ground photos, if taken. Long sites may have been represented with two or more profiles because the general morphology differs alongshore. Each profile was intended to be representative of that dune portion of the site (LN 9A and LN 9B). Several dune sites are listed in the Tables as dunes, but they were not surveyed or photographed. These sites are very isolated, hard to approach, and mostly natural features. 7

Appendix A Location of Dune Sites Plate - Plate - Plate - Plate - Plate 5-6 Plate 5-6 Plate 7-8 Plate 7-8 Plate 9- Plate 9

Appendix B Individual Dune Inventory Sheets LN LN LN5 LN6 LN7 LN8 LN LN LN LN LN6 LN8 LN9 LN5 LN LN LN6 LN9A LN9B LNA LN LN7 LN5 LN5 LN5 LN6 LN65 LN66 LN67 LN68 LN69 LN7 LN7 LN7 LN7

5 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 55,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 55,5 ft E:,555, ft E:,555, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 5 ft Plate: 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting:. Relative Stability:. Underlying Substrate: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Pocket Stable Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 8 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking downriver. Looking upriver. Note the wood groin in the foreground.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Site LN is a low isolated riverine dune that is maintained by a series of three low-profile wood groins. B-

- - - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 LN Jul 99 LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 5,6 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 5,6 ft E:,555,75 ft E:,555,75 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting:. Relative Stability:. Underlying Substrate: Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit Land Transgressive/Erosional Marsh. Structure or Fill: Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.9 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Looking upriver, Note the erosional beach scarp. Looking downriver across the end of a spit and tidal inlet. Site LN is a lowland spit that is controlled, in part, by the mouth and tidal inlet of an unnamed creek. B-

- LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 5 - - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 5 Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 58, ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 58, ft E:,557,7 ft E:,557,7 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: West 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting:. Relative Stability: Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit Stable. Underlying Substrate: Marsh. Structure or Fill: Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver across the site and at the marsh headland at the creek mouth. Looking downriver across the site and at the downriver marsh headland.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Site LN 5 is a small pocket beach/dune on the downriver side of Midway Creek. The site is bounded by marsh headlands. B-

- LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 6 - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 6 Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 55,75 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 55,75 ft E:,558,75 ft E:,558,75 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 67 ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Pocket. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.7 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Looking upriver toward prominent point. Note the erosional nature of the site with shrubs on the beach. Looking downriver. Note the narrow beach and exposed salt bushes. Site LN 6 resides on the downstream side of a prominent point of land. At one time, the sand beach must have been wider in order to allow the shrubs and grasses to flourish. Now the site is very erosional, possibly because of reduced sand supply from shore hardening upriver. B-

6 5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 7 - - - - 5 6 7 8 LN 7 Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 5,87 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 5,87 ft E:,559,8 ft E:,559,8 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length:,5 ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver. Note the wide backshore and advancing vegetation at the time of this survey. Looking downriver.. Phragmites australis (reed grass) Cakile edentulata (sea rocket) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hayg). Secondary Dune: Site LN 7 is a stable if not an accretionary dune/beach system that has evolved across the mouth of a low backshore of a small unnamed creek. B-5

6 5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 8 - - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 8 Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 5,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 5,5 ft E:,56,5 ft E:,56,5 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 58 ft Plate: 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Pocket. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.8 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 9 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver from the downriver boundary. Note the wood groins alongshore. Looking downriver from the upriver boundary. Note the wide dune terrace protecting the stable upland banks.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Site LN 8 is actually a downriver extension of LN 7 except for a gap of about ft. This site is controlled, in part, by several wood groins on the downriver half. B-6

5 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 59,65 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 59,65 ft E:,56, ft E:,56, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: West 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore /LInear. Relative Stability: Land Trangressive/ Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking downriver. Looking upriver.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Site LN is a small dune feature that has evolved on the upriver side of a prominent wooded/marsh headland feature. B-7

- Secondary Dune Crest LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - -5 - - - - 5 6 7 LN Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 59,8 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 59,8 ft E:,56,66 ft E:,56,66 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 99 ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Shallow Bay. Relative Stability:. Underlying Substrate: Stable Upland. Structure or Fill: Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.5 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 8 Secondary Dune: 7. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): 9. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Panicum amarum (running beach grass) Phragmites australis (reed grass) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Looking downriver. Looking upriver. Site LN resides on the downriver side of the same prominent headland spit as LN. This dune field sits in a stable geomorphic setting. B-8

- LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 57,8 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 57,8 ft E:,56,5 ft E:,56,5 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 9 ft Plate: 5 6. Type: Man Infuenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit. Relative Stability:. Underlying Substrate: Accretionary Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Revetment/Bulkhead Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.9 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 9 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Looking upriver across the creek mouth. Note the stone revetment in the background. Looking downriver. Note the stone revetment in the background. LN exist as a stable pocket beach that has developed across a small tidal creek. It is bounded on each side by stone revetments. B-9

5 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - - - 5 6 7 LN Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 57,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 57,5 ft E:,565, ft E:,565, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 5 6. Type: Man Infuenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.6 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 8 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver. Looking downriver.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Panicum amarum (running beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: LN is controlled, in part, by a series of low profile wood groins. B-

LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 5. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 57,6 ft N: 57,6 ft E:,565,95 ft E:,565,95 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5] Elevation (ft). Site Length: 5 ft Plate: 6. Type: Man Infuenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 5 - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 5 Jul 99 9. Nearshore Gradient:, ft. To, ft /No Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft alongshore/linear. Relative Stability: Land Transgressional/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Beach Fill Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.8 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 9 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking northward across the mouth of Greenvale Creek. Looking downriver.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Panicum amarum (running beach grass) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Site LN 5 results from erosion of a dredge material disposal area just downriver that provides sand to the beach. This has created a spot feature that has become vegetated with time. B-

- LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 6 - - - 5 6 LN 6 Jul 99. Date Surveyed: Jul 999. Central Coordinates: N: 5,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 5,5 ft E:,567,75 ft E:,567,75 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 5 ft Plate: 5 6. Type: Man Infuenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: West 9. Nearshore Gradient:, ft. To, ft /No Bars. Morphologic Setting: Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit. Relative Stability: Land Transgressional/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Revetment/Bulkhead Jul 99 Jul 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.8 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody Looking downriver. Looking upriver.. Secondary Dune: Ln6 is a small vegetated spit that occurs across the upstream side of Paynes Creek. B-

6 5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 8 - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 LN 8 Dec 99. Date Surveyed: Dec999. Central Coordinates: N: 9,75 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 9,75 ft E:,568,5 ft E:,568,5 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 6 6. Type: Man Infuenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: West 9. Nearshore Gradient:, ft. To, ft /No Bars. Morphologic Setting: Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit. Relative Stability: Land Transgressional/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Revetment/Bulkhead No Photos. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 8 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Site LN 8 is on the downriver side of a Bulls Creek opposite of LN 7. B-

6 5 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 9 - - - - 5 6 7 LN 9 Dec 99. Date Surveyed: Dec 999. Central Coordinates: N: 9,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 9,5 ft E:,568,5 ft E:,568,5 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 6 6. Type: Man Infuenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: West 9. Nearshore Gradient:, ft. To, ft /No Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin Dec 99 Dec 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5.8 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking downriver along an upland bank from the upriver side of this site. Looking downriver along a Barrier Island. Note the detached groins along the shore.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: LN 9 is the most upriver of 6 isolated dune sites along a barrier island like spit that defines the western side of Beach Creek. Sites LN, LN, LN, LN and LN were viewed as isolated dune sites that were not surveyed or photographed. Therefore, individual pages were not created, but site parameter data is included in Table of the text. B-

5 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 5 - -7-6 -5 - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 5 Dec 99. Date Surveyed: Dec 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 88,75 ft N: 88,75 ft E:,57, ft E:,57, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 6 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Beach Fill Dec 99 Dec 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.6 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver. Looking downriver.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Site LN 5 occurs on a long spit on the downriver side of the entrance to Beach Creek. Much of the sand is beach nourishment that came from dredging the new inlet to Beach Creek several years prior to the site visit. B-5

6 5 - - Secondary Dune Crest LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - - -8-6 - - 6 8 LN Apr 99. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 8,5 ft N: 8,5 ft E:,6,55 ft E:,6,55 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 9 ft Plate: 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Jetty Apr 99 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.5 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 8 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 Secondary Dune: 7. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): 9. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Looking upriver. Looking downriver toward the bridge abutment. Site LN occurs on the upriver side of the Route bridge across the Rappahannock River. The bridge abutment has acted as a large jetty and trapped southerly moving littoral sands, thus creating the dune site over time. In addition, a secondary dune also has evolved. B-6

6 5 - - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - - LN Apr 99. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 78,65 ft N: 78,65 ft E:,68,9 ft E:,68,9 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length:, ft Plate: 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Creek Mouth Barrier/Spit. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Groin Apr 99 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5.5 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 8 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 6 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver toward Cherry Point. Looking downriver.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: Site LN is a long, wide sand barrier across a tidal creek just downriver of Cherry Point. It is bounded on the upriver end by a groin and revetment and bounded on the downriver end by the tidal inlet. B-7

LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 6. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 79, ft N: 79, ft E:,6,7 ft E:,6,7 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South Plate: LN 6 = Field Sketch 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Shallow Bay. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate:. Structure or Fill: Groin Upland Apr 99 No Data. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking downriver from the landing/pier.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Site LN 6 resides on the downriver side of a small landing/pier at the end of Route 69. B-8

- - - - Secondary Dune Crest LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 9A -5 - - - LN 9A Apr 99. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates: N: 7,98 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 7,98 ft E:,68,8 ft E:,68,8 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 85 ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: West 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Salient. Relative Stability: Accretionary. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Apr 99 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.7 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 6 Secondary Dune: 7. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): 5 57. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody Looking upriver along the low primary dune. Looking landward across the low dune field. Site LN 9 is a large prominent spit at Mosquito Point. LN 9A is located on the upriver side of Mosquito Point and faces up and across the Rappahannock River. B-9

6 5 - - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 9B - - - - LN 9B Apr 99. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 7,75 ft N: 7,75 ft E:,68,96 ft E:,68,96 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 6 ft Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft./no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Salient. Relative Stability: Land Transgresive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Apr 99 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 7 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 65 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking downriver along the primary dune crest. Looking downriver along the curvilinear embayed beach shoreline.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Site LN 9B is the downriver side of the Mosquito Point site where it is more exposed to the Chesapeake Bay. B-

LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE A. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: ft 76,69 ft N: 76,69 ft E:,6,9 ft ft E:,6,9 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft - - 5 6 Plate: 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southeast LN 9C = ft Field Sketch 9. Nearshore Gradient: Greater than, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Shallow Bay. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Revetment/Bulkhead Apr 99 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5.5 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Ammophilia breviligulata (American beach grass) Panicum virgatum ( switch grass). Secondary Dune: Looking southeast across towards the remnants of Deep Hole Point Spit which separates this site from the Rappahannock River. Looking east along the low primary dune. Site A is bounded by an upriver bulkheaded headland that acts as a groin. It is relatively open to the Cheapeake Bay. B-

LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE - - 5 6 Apr 99 Apr 99 Looking upriver along the primary dune. Note the lagoon to the right. LN = ft Field Sketch Looking downriver at the east boundary of the site that is defined by groins and a stone revetment.. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 76, ft N: 76, ft E:,6,65 ft E:,6,65 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 5. Ownership: 8 ft Private Plate: 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southeast 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Loand Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill:. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grasss) Phragmites australis (reed grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Shrub/woody. Secondary Dune: LN is located on a sandy barrier, that has a small lagoon between the upland and the site. It connects to the upland marsh at the end. B-

LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 7. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 75,75 ft N: 75,75 ft E:,66,5 ft E:,66,5 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 6 ft Plate: 5 - - - LN 7 = ft Field Sketch 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate:. Structure or Fill: Groin Upland Apr 99 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking west along the groin field and primary dune. Looking east toward the Chesapeake Bay.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Sapartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Site LN 7 has developed due, in large part, to the existing wood groin field. Accreted sand at LN 7 has created a wide beach and backshore that provided the setting for dune development. B-

5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 5 - -5 - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 LN 5 Apr 99. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 7,85 ft N: 7,85 ft E:,68,5 ft E:,68,5 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 58 ft Plate: 5 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field <5 ft. Curvilinear Bay. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin/Spur Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 6 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Panicum virgatum (switch grass) Looking upriver. Apr 99 Looking northward along the primary dune. Site LN 5 is a long curvilinear embayed shoreline defined on the upriver end by a revetment and on the downriver end by a groin and spur. B-

LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 5. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 7,8 ft N: 7,8 ft E:,68,86 ft E:,68,86 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 5 ft Plate: 5 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Southwest - - 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/no Bars LN 5 = ft Field Sketch. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 8 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking upriver from an old wharf.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Site NL 5 and NL 5 reside on either side of the headland formed by an old wharf/groin at the end of State Road 695. NL 5 is on the upriver side and NL 5 on the downriver side. The net sand transport is upriver. B-5

8 6 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 5 - - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 LN 5 Apr 99. Date Surveyed: Apr 999. Central Coordinates: N: 7,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 7,5 ft E:,69, ft E:,69, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 5 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin LN 5 99 55 Apr 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 7. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 6 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking eastward toward the Chesapeake Bay. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Site LN 5 sits on the downriver side of an old wharf/groin at the end of State Road 695 and is bounded on the downriver end by a series of stone groins. This site is exposed to the open bay, thus has a higher primary dune crest (due, in part, to increased wave run-up) than it s sister site NL 5. B-6

6 5 - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 6A - -5 - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 LN 6A May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates: N: 89,996 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 89,996 ft E:,66,6 ft E:,66,6 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 7 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: East 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Beach Fill May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5.8 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Looking north. Looking south. Note the exposed peat in the foreground.. Secondary Dune: Site LN 6A, LN 65, LN 66, LN 67 and LN 68 are isolated dunes scattered across the distal end of Poplar Neck. LN 6A is the southernmost site. The small, primary dune crest is the remnant of a recent storm event. B-7

5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 65 - -5 - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 LN 65 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates: N: 9,5 ft. Profile Coordinates: N: 9,5 ft E:,66, ft E:,66, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 5 ft Plate: 8 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Open Bay 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: East 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Pocket. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Revetment/Bulkhead May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.9 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 8 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Looking north. Looking south. Site LN 65 is a small pocket beach/dune bounded on the south by a marsh headland and on the north by a stone revetment. B-8

- LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 66 - -7-6 -5 - - - - 5 LN 66 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 9,6 ft N: 9,6 ft E:,66, ft E:,66, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 7 ft Plate: 8 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northeast 9. Nearshore Gradient: Greater than, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Salient. Relative Stability: Accretionary. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.7 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 7 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking north. Looking south.. Solidago sempervirens (seaside goldenrod) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: LN 66 sits inside an embayment and occurs as a salient spit. This embayment was once isolated by a barrier spit that has since breached. B-9

6 5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 67 - -7-6 -5 - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 67 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 9,5 ft N: 9,5 ft E:,65,75 ft E:,65,75 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 8 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: East 9. Nearshore Gradient:, to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Pocket. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking north along the site. Looking south.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Panicum virgatum (switch grass). Secondary Dune: LN 67 is at the opposite end of the embayment from LN 66 and occurs as a pocket beach. B-

- Secondary Dune Crest LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 68 - -8-7 -6-5 - - - - 5 6 7 8 9 LN 68 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 9,9 ft N: 9,9 ft E:,65,55 ft E:,65,55 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 5 ft Plate: 8 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Salient. Relative Stability: Accretionary. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: May 99 May 99 Grog Island. Crest Elevation (ft ):.6 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 8 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 79 Secondary Dune: 7. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): 6 Looking west up Dyer Creek shoreline. Looking east out into Fleets Bay. Note Grog Island in the distance.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay) Panicum virgatum (switch grass). Secondary Dune: LN 68 is an accretionary spit with salient features on the Dymer Creek side of Poplar Neck. B-

6 5 - - LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 69 - - LN 69 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 9, ft N: 9, ft E:,68,8 ft E:,68,8 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 9 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: South 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Pocket. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 65 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking east to the Fleets Bay and Chesapeake Bay. Looking west across Roanes Bay.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Panicum virgatum (switch grass) Panicum amarum (running beach grass). Secondary Dune: Site LN 69 is a small pocket beach/dune that has developed between two stone groins. B-

- LN 7 May 99 LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 7 - -. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 96,5 ft N: 96,5 ft E:,68,55 ft E:,68,55 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 9 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northeast 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Land Transgressive/Erosional. Underlying Substrate: Marsh/Creek Bottom. Structure or Fill: Breakwater May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):.9 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): Looking west. Looking east. Note the breakwater in the foreground. The sand attachment is called a tombolo.. Spartina patens (saltmeadow hay). Secondary Dune: Site LN 7 exist between two stone revetments and has a single breakwater near the western end. Sites LN 7, LN 7, LN 7 and LN 7 are a series of dunes along the northside of Fleets Bay Neck that are separated by a groin field and revetments. B-

6 5 - LN 7 May 99 LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 7 - - 5 6 7 8 9. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 96,956 ft N: 96,956 ft E:,68,77 ft E:,68,77 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 9 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northeast 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/extensive Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Linear. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Groin May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 9. Second Crest Landward (ft):. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Looking west. Looking east. Site LN 7 is controlled and stabilized, in large part, by the existing groin field. B-

- - Secondary Dune Crest LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 7 - -6-5 - - - - 5 LN 7 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 97,65 ft N: 97,65 ft E:,67, ft E:,67, ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: 57 ft Plate: 9 6. Type: Natural 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: North 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Dune Field >5 ft. Alongshore/Shallow Bay. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 8 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 9 Secondary Dune: 7. Crest Elevation (ft ):. 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): 8. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass). Secondary Dune: Looking west. Looking east out of the mouth of Indian Creek. Site LN 7 is a low primary dune field along Indian Creek that occurs as a relatively stable embayment. B-5

7 6 5 - Secondary Dune Crest LANCASTER COUNTY DUNE SITE 7 - - - LN 7 May 99. Date Surveyed: May 999. Central Coordinates:. Profile Coordinates: N: 98,5 ft N: 98,5 ft E:,66,77 ft E:,66,77 ft Virginia South State Plane Grid NAD 97 [5]. Site Length: ft Plate: 9 6. Type: Man Influenced 7. Fetch Exposure: Riverine, Bay Influenced 8. Shoreline Direction of Face: Northeast 9. Nearshore Gradient: to, ft/no Bars. Morphologic Setting: Isolated <5 ft. Alongshore/Salient. Relative Stability: Stable. Underlying Substrate: Upland. Structure or Fill: Jetty May 99 May 99. Crest Elevation (ft ): 7 5. Extent from Crest: Landward (ft): 5 6. Extent from Crest: To (ft): 5 Secondary Dune: 7. Crest Elevation (ft ): 5. 9. Second Crest Landward (ft): 5 5 Looking west. Looking east at site LN 7.. Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Panicum virgatum (switch grass). Secondary Dune: Ammophila breviligulata (American beach grass) Panicum virgatum (switch grass) Site LN 7 resides on the upriver, but downdrift, end of the shore reach. It is bounded on each end by groins and a jetty. B-6