North Dakota Department of Transportation. Certification Renewal Program Flexible Pavement Smoothness Tolerance

Similar documents
Item 585 Ride Quality for Pavement Surfaces

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIDE QUALITY SPECIFICATION AND CASE STUDIES

State of Nevada Department of Transportation Materials Division

(PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (MSCR)). REVISED 02/03/17 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS.

ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION STRATEGIES. Selection and Impact

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (September 2015)

Access Routes from US 101 to the Richmond San Rafael Bridge

Welcome. 53 Avenue Overpass over Whitemud Drive Rehabilitation. Public Information Session. Wednesday, March 9, :30-8:00 p.m.

Five Years Later. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting March 9, William J. Pine, P.E. Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research

The first lift, mainline, shall be placed using a spray paver.

An Overview of Mn/DOT s Pavement Condition Rating Procedures and Indices (March 27, 2003)

Chapter 3 Tex-1001-S, Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

Safety Implications of Managed Lane Cross Sectional Elements (Buffer Width vs. Shoulder Width vs. Lane Width)

Driving Indiana s Economic Growth

FY 2006 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

Summary of Findings Concerning Longitudinal Cracking on 16' Wide Ramps

Tex-1001-S, Operating Inertial Profilers and Evaluating Pavement Profiles. Chapter 10 Special Procedures. Overview

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. Non-NHS State Highways

WYDOT DESIGN GUIDES. Guide for. NHS Arterial (Non-Interstate)

B741 TEMPORARY CONCRETE BARRIERS - OPSS 741

S.R. 3009, Section A20 South Park & Logan Road Intersection Improvement Project

Smoothing Out the Bumpy Road Ahead

Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement: The Severance of a Major Bicycling and Ped Route

State Route 160 (Blue Diamond Highway)

Use of Performance Metrics on The Pennsylvania Turnpike. Pamela Hatalowich, Penn Turnpike Commission Paul Wilke, Applied Research Associates, Inc.

Pavement and Asset Management from a City s Perspective Mike Rief, PE, DBIA and Andrea Azary, EIT. February 12, 2015

Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce. October 28, 2014

Real-Time Smoothness Measurements on Concrete Pavements During Construction

Act 47 Exception Application Process (Permitting Bicycle Travel on Freeways)

Sign Designs and Markings Manual (TEM 295-2) Page 8-3

Downtown Signals Traffic Analysis

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 7581 Performance Based Vegetation Management

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Theodore Roosevelt Expressway (TRE) study was completed in Conducted Public meetings Analyzed traffic Provided good information

Using Real-Time Smoothness Measurements to Improve the Initial Smoothness of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement SHRP2 Solutions Webinar 13 November

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

09/28/2011 NEW/UPDATED ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND RESTRICTIONS:

MnROAD Mainline IRI Data and Lane Ride Quality MnROAD Lessons Learned December 2006

Lake Zurich Police Department Traffic Safety Division 200 Mohawk Trail Lake Zurich, IL 60047

Weymouth - Abington Route 18 Widening and Reconstruction Project File No

Airfield Pavement Smoothness Airport Pavement Workshop. Michael Gerardi APR Consultants

OPERATING INERTIAL PROFILERS AND EVALUATING PAVEMENT PROFILES

Northern Virginia Express Lanes Design Challenges and Solutions. IBTTA Maintenance and Roadway Operations Workshop June 25, 2018

PARDON OUR DUST. Arlington Boulevard (Route 50), 10 th Street and Courthouse Road Interchange (ARRA) Project No. (FO) , C501, B612, B611

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: May 10, 2017 MPO Executive Board: May 17, 2017

Low Traffic Volume LR 159 Low Traffic Preservation

BARRIER OFFSET 0" A 6" 6" A 12" 12" A 26" A 26" 3A OR 4A L OR S * ** L OR S L OR S

Kansas Department of Transportation DISTRICT 1. Project(s): Max: Min:

Freeway System Considerations

Transportation Knowledge

The Use and Performance of Geogrids in Kentucky

MDX SR 836/DOLPHIN EXPRESSWAY SOUTHWEST EXTENSION Project Development and Environment PD&E Study Miami-Dade County, Florida

Tacoma Streets 101. City of Tacoma - Citizen Neighborhood Street Improvement and Safety Task Force

I-64 BATTLEFIELD BLVD: PERFORMANCE MEETS EXPECTATION

SECTION 1A NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE GEOMETRIC DESIGN

ADA PRESENTATION (CURB RAMPS)

STATION #3 INITIAL ALTERNATIVES

General Notes. Project No /15/2018 Page 1 of 1

RE: 2007 NPA Text (Clean Version)

LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION

FREEWAY AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

SECTION 48 - TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Bluffdale South (SR140) Bicycle/Shoulder Lanes Project Type Bicycle

I-264 CORRIDOR EVALUATION STUDY. September 7, 2016 Eric Stringfield VDOT Planning Director Chris Lawrence AECOM Senior Transportation Engineer

General Notes. Project No /15/2018 Page 1 of 1

MPO Staff Report MPO Technical Advisory Committee: December 13, 2017 MPO Executive Board: December 20, 2017

Non-Motorized Overpass at SR 5/US1

Paul Huston, P.E., Design-Build Coordinator Chuck Gonderinger, HDR Engineering. Minnesota Department of Transportation (the Department)

PRESENTATION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 6:05 P.M. I-90 EXIT 406 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARKET

MNDOT PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL

Major Grady Carrick Florida Highway Patrol PROCEDURES FOR

Update on Performance of Thin Asphalt Overlays

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

FOR HISTORICAL REFERENCE ONLY

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

Grade Separated Intersection

Use of Roller Compacted Concrete By GDOT. Presented By: Joe W. Sheffield, PE Georgia Department of Transportation District Engineer, Tifton, GA

Arterial Traffic Analysis Some critical concepts. Prepared by Philip J. Tarnoff

FREEWAY, WEAVING LANE, AND SERVICE ROAD CONNECTIONS

Sign Design Manual (TEM 295-2)

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

ARTINSVILLE ENRY OUNTY REA RANSPORTATION TUDY

Road Surface Characteristics and Accidents. Mike Mamlouk, Ph.D., P.E. Arizona State University

91 Express Lanes Model Update 2006 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. Gerald V. Nielsten May 18, 2007

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Designing with the Railroad

Friday, May 20, :46 PM Cambria N Armstrong Fw: Wolf Creek REV.pdf

European Road Profile Users Group Copenhagen September2013. Harmonization in pavement smoothness rating of new and old pavements

Chapter 33. Grade Separated Intersection Overview Classification of Intersection Grade Separated Intersection

1 2 I N T R O D U C T I O 6 G E N E R A L I N F O R M A T I O N. Across. 6. Knowledge communicated in a brief overview

A: PLANNED P ROJECTS PROJECTS

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

Operational & Geometrical Analysis Technical Memorandum

Perched Box Caisson Overview. January 2014

Figure 3B-1. Examples of Two-Lane, Two-Way Marking Applications

ICM Monthly Performance Measures

Project Mobility - Route 3 South Express Toll Lanes. Industry Day Overview

Transcription:

North Dakota Department of Transportation Certification Renewal Program 2010-2011 Flexible Pavement Smoothness Tolerance

Special Provision Status Flexible Pavement Surface Tolerance In Addition to Standard Specifications: 408.04L Class 1 Profiler (ASTM E-90) NDDOT Measures for Acceptance & Pay Adjustment Unit: IRI (in./mile) = International Roughness Index Average of Right/Left Wheelpaths

Ames Engineering Website

IRI and Profiling IRI International Roughness Index (in/mi) Measures variance over a specified distance and performs a summation 1+1+1+.=12 IRI Profiling distance (lot) is 0.1 miles or 528', short sections (< 370.0 ft.) will be added to previous section.

Specification Overview Exclusions Start or End 150' from the following: Bridge Decks and/or Approach Slabs Side Roads & Approaches Shoulders, Ramps and Gore Areas At-Grade Railroad Crossings

Specification Overview Exclusions Start or End 50' from the following: Beginning and End of Project Where the Contractor is not responsible for the adjoining pavement. Where Safe and Roadway Geometrics don t allow proper operation of the profiler speed limit As Determined by the Engineer

Specification Overview Incentive 0 Adjustment Disincentive Thin Lift Overlay Selected Projects Variable Targets Structural Overlay Multiple Lifts (2) FDR/M&B/Base and Surfacing Bonus Below 42 IRI ($100-$400) Disincentive Above 50 IRI (-$100 - -$400)

Specification Overview Fixed Lot Payments Two Week Notice/5-day Processing-Final Lift Only Traffic Control/Sweeping 40-degree F. Ambient Temp. Minimum Dry & Favorable Conditions Corrective Actions for Non-Specification: M&O/Milling Bump Grinds (>0.25 in./16 ft.) 3/16 in./16 ft. ~ Discretion of Engr.

Year Construction Type Length (Miles) Lane Average IRI (inches/mile) Incentive/ Disincentive Cost/Lane-Mile Total 2006 Structural Overlay 9.942 2006 2006 2006 11.940 11.942 3.425 2006 Structural Overlay 12.671 2006 3.819 2006 Structural Overlay 13.003 2006 Structural Overlay 10.147 2006 Thin Lift Overlay 14.469 2006 Thin Lift Overlay 15.130 2006 Thin Lift Overlay 16.023 Drive 35.2 $24,375 $2,452 Pass 37.4 $21,375 $2,150 Drive 33.1 $37,000 $3,099 Pass 41.7 $13,300 $1,114 Drive 34.1 $37,000 $3,098 Pass 45.4 $3,700 $310 WB 40.6 $4,200 $1,226 EB 44.0 $1,900 $555 WB 38.8 $24,150 $1,906 EB 38.4 $25,275 $1,995 NB 55.9 -$18,600 -$4,870 SB 53.9 -$14,100 -$3,692 Drive 43.7 $15,075 $1,159 Pass 46.3 $10,425 $802 Drive 39.1 $19,650 $1,937 Pass 50.9 $1,500 $148 WB 55.9 $9,150 $632 EB 53.9 $11,600 $802 WB 57.2 $9,500 $628 EB 56.2 $12,000 $793 NB 42.0 $19,550 $1,220 SB 45.9 $15,700 $980 $45,750 $50,300 $40,700 $6,100 $49,425 -$32,700 $25,500 $21,150 $20,750 $21,500 $35,250

Year Construction Type Length (Miles) Lane Average IRI (inches/mile) Incentive/ Disincentive Cost/Lane-Mile Total 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 1.040 7.239 19.250 18.778 10.267 9.941 2007 Thin Lift Overlay 10.000 2007 Thin Lift Overlay 21.344 2007 Structural Overlay 7.735 2007 Structural Overlay 7.754 WB 58.8 -$1,600 -$1,538 EB 68.4 -$1,700 -$1,635 WB 39.2 $10,300 $1,423 EB 43.1 $4,000 $553 WB 39.4 $29,000 $1,506 EB 38.1 $38,500 $2,000 NB 33.6 $53,500 $2,849 SB 33.2 $56,500 $3,009 Drive 35.1 $23,600 $2,299 Pass 36.6 $21,500 $2,094 Drive 31.4 $33,300 $3,350 Pass 32.7 $31,000 $3,119 Drive 37.8 $11,150 $1,115 Pass 32.6 $12,950 $1,295 NB 44.5 $12,050 $565 SB 43.7 $14,100 $661 Drive 50.7 $1,575 $204 Pass 52.0 $300 $39 Drive 46.5 $6,225 $803 Pass 49.3 $3,000 $387 -$3,300 $14,300 $67,500 $110,000 $45,100 $64,300 $24,100 $26,150 $1,875 $9,225

Year Construction Type Structural Overlay Structural Overlay Structural Overlay Length (Miles) 12.116 5.916 8.800 12.665 6.576 11.360 16.746 12.900 8.300 Thin Lift Overlay 12.950 Thin Lift Overlay 12.6426 Lane Average IRI (inches/mile ) Incentive/ Disincentive Cost/Lane- Mile Drive 37.5 $23,500 $1,940 Pass 37.2 $26,500 $2,187 Drive 36.9 $12,700 $2,147 Pass 36.9 $12,100 $2,045 NB 41.0 $10,600 $1,205 SB 40.9 $10,800 $1,227 NB 37.5 $26,700 $2,108 SB 36.1 $31,200 $2,464 WB 61.9 -$8,500 -$1,293 EB 53.6 -$2,500 -$380 Drive 37.8 $16,100 $1,417 Pass 35.7 $19,800 $1,743 EB 42.5 $23,175 $1,384 WB 43.4 $21,300 $1,272 Pass 41.8 $19,050 $1,477 Drive 37.9 $25,950 $2,012 Drive 48.6 $750 $90 Pass 53.1 -$4,350 -$524 WB 36.3 $15,350 $1,185 EB 38.0 $14,550 $1,124 Drive 41.4 $10,650 $842 Pass 49.3 $2,100 $166 Total $50,000 $24,800 $21,400 $57,900 -$11,000 $35,900 $44,475 $45,000 -$3,600 $29,900 $12,750

Year Construction Type Length (Miles) Lane Average IRI (inches/mile) Incentive/ Disincentive Cost/Lane-Mile Total 2009 Thin Lift Overlay 4.953 2009 Thin Lift Overlay 7.7637 2009 Thin Lift Overlay 16.4655 2009 Thin Lift Overlay 30.7724 2009 Thin Lift Overlay 17.0871 2009 Thin Lift Overlay 6.5672 2009 Structural Overlay 10.047 2009 Structural Overlay 12.399 2009 Structural Overlay 0.9100 2009 Structural Overlay 42.565 2009 Structural Overlay 10.5800 2009 Structural Overlay 9.0243 2009 Structural Overlay 5.1000 2009 Structural Overlay 8.2000 2009 Structural Overlay 6.2014 2009 Structural Overlay 8.7547 2009 Structural Overlay 1.8865 2009 Structural Overlay 5.9526 2009 6.517 2009 31.300 DL 35.8 $6,350 $1,282 PL 37.6 $6,000 $1,211 DL 39.2 $8,950 $1,153 PL 32.8 $10,700 $1,378 NB 34.3 $21,950 $1,333 SB 36.5 $19,750 $1,199 EB 42.4 $22,850 $743 WB 42.4 $24,250 $788 EB 43.0 $12,100 $708 WB 43.0 $13,550 $793 EB 30.8 $9,300 $1,416 WB 34.1 $9,050 $1,378 Drive 37.4 $10,200 $1,015 Pass 40.1 $8,400 $836 DL 30.5 $34,800 $2,807 PL 35.1 $29,400 $2,371 NB 69.4 $150 $165 SB 66.3 -$150 -$165 NB 32.7 $57,075 $1,341 SB 35.9 $49,125 $1,154 NB 25.1 $29,300 $2,769 SB 25.9 $31,350 $2,963 SB 41.6 $13,800 $1,529 NB 38.6 $17,700 $1,961 DL 28.1 $14,700 $2,882 PL 29.3 $14,775 $2,897 DL 32.6 $25,350 $3,091 PL 31.8 $25,875 $3,155 DL 41.3 $4,725 $762 PL 48.8 -$1,500 -$242 DL 33.5 $23,175 $2,647 PL 30.9 $24,675 $2,818 EB 43.8 $2,325 $1,232 WB 42.3 $2,700 $1,431 NB 39.6 $10,800 $1,814 SB 39.0 $13,125 $2,205 NB 37.4 $15,000 $2,302 SB 40.1 $17,100 $2,624 NB 37.7 $30,800 $984 SB 41.1 $18,400 $588 $12,350 $19,650 $41,700 $47,100 $25,650 $18,350 $18,600 $64,200 $0 $106,200 $60,650 $31,500 $29,475 $51,225 $3,225 $47,850 $5,025 $23,925 $32,100 $49,200

Total Incentive $283,725 2006 $359,250 2007 $307,525 $687,975 2009