C Line Planning Phase Public Engagement Plan

Similar documents
WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Encouraging walking & biking in Latino communities

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION CHAPTER 8

42nd Ave N Reconstruction

City of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force

Transit Choices December 8, 2016

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Regional Bicycle System Master Study. Preliminary Results Update

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

Ottewell Traffic Shortcutting Pilot Project

Stakeholder Communication and Public Involvement Plan

Good Neighbor Plan Initiative Update. Transportation & Trinity River Project Committee 9 September 2013 Dallas Love Field Phase One Final Report

1. What is the Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project (Project)?

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

City of San Diego Vision Zero Draft Strategic Plan FY 2017

Twin Cities Regional Bicycle System Study

Bottineau Transitway Health Impact Assessment Summary

Owl Canyon Corridor Project Overview and Summary

EXHIBIT B. Rodney Wojtanik, Project Manager, Portland Parks & Recreation

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Memorandum. Fund Allocation Fund Programming Policy/Legislation Plan/Study Capital Project Oversight/Delivery Budget/Finance Contract/Agreement Other:

Portland International Airport Public Involvement. Chris White Community Affairs Manager June 7, 2012

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Multi-Modal Facility Feasibility Study (WFC006)

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

3 FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF LAKE-TO-LAKE CYCLING ROUTE

C Line Rapid Bus Preliminary Station Design

CITY OF ANN ARBOR TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROCESS OVERVIEW. Petitioner defines the project area limits and gathers petition signatures.

Cecil County, Maryland. Bicycle Master Plan

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Chapter PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND ACCOUNTABILITY. Introduction

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

FALL 2014 WORKSHOPS TAKEAWAYS

September 2017 I City of New Westminster

ACTION: SELECT PREFERRED LIGHT RAIL ALIGNMENT FOR PHASE 2 OF THE EXPOSITION CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT

Ormsby Place Traffic Calming Pilot Project

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Beach Cities Living Streets Design Manual and Aviation Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Plan

Rochester Area Bike Sharing Program Study

Saltwater Recreational Fisheries POLICY. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 1

Staff Report City of Manhattan Beach

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

Pennsylvania Avenue (CR 484) Design Alternatives Study

INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND

Connecting Sacramento: A Trip-Making and Accessibility Study

Members of the Board of Directors. Wendy Knowles, Clerk of the Board

Impacts and opportunities: Results from a discussion of Cycles for Change s work in the Twin Cities metropolitan area

Organising the National Technology Needs Assessment (TNA) Process: An Explanatory Note

HOUSTON BIKE PLAN: SUPPLEMENTAL OUTREACH RESULTS & FINDINGS

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

County Donegal Public Participation Network Work Plan

SUBJECT Memorandum of Understanding to Complete a Caltrain Grade Separation Study for the Whipple Avenue Crossing

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

PROJECT BACKGROUND/DESCRIPTION

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

Introduction. North 12 th Complete Street Project Overview

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

CML s 91 st Annual Conference June 18 21, 2013 Vail, Colorado. Why a Campaign? Learn More. City of Brush! 6/13/2013

Hennepin County Transportation Department

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

APPENDIX A. Outreach Summary

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM NO. _1A_

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Mayor s Bicycle Advisory Council. Wednesday, December 13 th, 2017

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

City of Ann Arbor Pedestrian Safety & Access Task Force

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Austin Avenue Bridges Project. Public Meeting Summary

5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years

VDOT I-66 Inside the Beltway Eastbound Widening Environmental Assessment. Staff Recommendations

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

REPORT. Draft Outdoor Ice Rink Policy and Procedures File: R05 OU

City of SeaTac 2013 Joint APA-PAW Awards Program Nomination Draft Safe & Complete Streets Plan. Transportation Category

Saltwater Recreational Fisheries POLICY. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Page 1

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT. 3. Walkshops: Small scale walking meetings took place in all participating communities including a walk audit.

POLICY STATEMENT: VISION ZERO

Bicycle Advisory Committee. April 5, :00-4:00pm City Hall Annex Council Chambers


CASE STUDY City of Monrovia: Leveraging emerging ridesharing services to expand mobility options

*Presenter at the 2008 TAC Conference

Report Purpose To seek Council s approval of the Wye Road Functional Planning Study (January 2015).

Mineral Avenue Corridor Assessment. ITE 2017 Western District Annual Meeting San Diego, CA June 21 st

Service Business Plan

EBOTS Phase 1 Outreach Summary

Interstate 66 Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement. Cooperating and Participating Agencies Meeting March 19, 2012

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan DRAFT PROJECT SCOPE SUBMITTED TO CALTRANS FALL 2014

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Transcription:

C Line Planning Phase Public Engagement Plan 1. Introduction 3-2 1.1. Planning Phase Decision Making 3-2 1.2. Planning Phase Public Engagement Goals 3-2 2. Community and Station Neighbor Outreach and Engagement 3-3 2.1. Engagement Schedule 3-3 2.2. Electronic and Social Media 3-3 2.3. Printed Materials 3-4 2.4. Media 3-4 3. NEPA Outreach 3-5 4. Incorporating Input into Decision Making 3-5

1. Introduction The primary goal of the C Line Planning Phase was to finalize station locations and prepare the C Line Station Plan to be presented to the Metropolitan Council for adoption in early 2016. Metro Transit staff completed a Preliminary Planning Phase in 2015 that included outreach and engagement with several neighborhood associations in North Minneapolis and Brooklyn Center, as well as outreach to individual residents and business owners. Coordination with the Penn Avenue Community Works (PACW) Project played an important role in establishing engagement opportunities within the community. As part of the PACW project, input was gathered from neighborhood associations, community councils, and other local organizations. Blue Line Extension open houses were also utilized to gather public input. Community involvement continued through fall and early 2016 and provided stakeholders opportunities to review the C Line Station Plan, a document that will guide the project s detailed engineering phase. Stakeholders gained information regarding C Line development in the Preliminary Planning Phase, provided input on final C Line station locations, and gained insight on the remaining process including funding, final design and engineering, and construction. Stakeholders were able to engage the process through electronic communication and workshops. 1.1. Planning Phase Decision Making The key decision made during the Planning Phase was where to locate C Line stations. The station location process was informed by input by various organizations, agencies, and the general public. The members, roles, and responsibilities of each of these groups are described below. 1.2. Planning Phase Public Engagement Goals Establishing clear goals help ensure a transparent process that clearly defines what input Metro Transit is receiving. Goals also help outline the scope of the work being completed during the C Line Planning Phase. The goals of the C Line Planning Phase are provided below: Gain support for the C Line Station Plan being presented to the Metropolitan Council in early 2016 Gain input on station locations to solidify for the C Line Station Plan being presented to Metropolitan Council Communicate the work that was done in the pre-planning stage Build support for the project by ensuring that the C Line Station Plan reflects the needs of the North Minneapolis and Brooklyn Center communities C Line Planning Phase Public Engagement Plan 3-2

2. Community and Station Neighbor Outreach and Engagement A variety of methods were used to engage stakeholders during the C Line Planning Phase. The project utilized both traditional and non-traditional methods for stakeholders to participate in the C Line project. Residents had the opportunity to meet with Metro Transit project staff and provide input. Stakeholders were encouraged to participate by providing input on the C Line Station Plan. Station neighbors businesses and residents located in the immediate vicinity of a proposed station were engaged through in-person visits and mailed letters. In-person visits provided a meaningful space for station neighbors to gather information regarding station locations and other relevant information. See Appendix A for a full list of outreach and engagement activities with specific dates. The general planning phase outreach process is outlined below:: 2.1. Engagement Schedule OCTOBER 2015 Metro Transit staff conducted outreach to station neighbors and reached out to stakeholders to provide information on the C Line and encourage their participation to provide input on the draft C Line Station Plan. Outreach activities included pop-up outreach and presentations to community groups. NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2015 In November, Metro Transit hosted open houses and neighborhood meetings for stakeholders to provide input on the draft C Line Station Plan. Open house attendees learned about Metro Transit s C Line planning process and reviewed draft station locations. Public comments on the draft C Line Station Plan and specific station locations were also collected to inform development of final station location recommendations. DECEMBER 2015 In December, project staff continued to meet with neighborhood organizations and community groups to allow more opportunity to provide input on the draft C Line Station Plan. Station neighbor outreach continued throughout the draft C Line Station Plan comment period to capture public input corridor-wide. 2.2. Electronic and Social Media Electronic media are essential to reaching those businesses, residents, students, commuters, and policy makers who have daily computer access. Having an effective website is critical for reaching students and other younger people in addition to stakeholders unable to attend a workshop. Several additions were made to the C Line webpage to improve communication related to the Planning Phase. These additions are as follows: Electronic Newsletter Webpage outlining the planning phase Notification of release of draft and recommended C Line Station Plan on social media C Line Planning Phase Public Engagement Plan 3-3

Social media was not used as a method of engagement, but as a connection to engagement. Effectively used, social media reached audiences that are not traditionally engaged in Metro Transit s outreach activities. The challenge was effectiveness; C Line social media competes with many organizations for attention. C Line social media can play a valuable role to bring more attention to the C Line engagement process. Materials were provided on the C Line webpage that allowed stakeholders to view the draft and recommended C Line Station Plan, materials from meetings and presentations, and newsletter publications. See Appendix A for list social media activities. 2.3. Printed Materials Print media was utilized to inform station neighbors of upcoming meetings and information on how to get in contact with project staff. Informational leaflets and materials supplemented public workshops. Printed materials utilized throughout the Planning Phase included door hangers, flyers in Route 19 shelters, C Line Fact Sheets, and comment forms. 2.4. Media Local media is a vital tool to connect stakeholders to the C Line engagement process. Radio stations, television, and newspaper have a broad base of consumers and with effective campaigns, the C Line can reach new audiences in the North Minneapolis and Brooklyn Center communities. Throughout the Planning Phase, publications regarding the C Line were included in the Sun Post and Star Tribune. The C Line Station Plan was also the subject of news stories. C Line related news stories can be found on the C Line project website. C Line Planning Phase Public Engagement Plan 3-4

3. NEPA Outreach Metro Transit is currently completing required National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation for the C Line, including Section 106 cultural resources analysis. NEPA information was incorporated into the C Line Station Plan public engagement process and will continue to be provided on an ongoing basis on the C Line project website. As necessary, Metro Transit staff will post NEPA-related documents as they become finalized. 4. Incorporating Input into Decision Making Metro Transit staff collected public comments, questions, and suggestions throughout the C Line engagement process. As part of the Planning Phase, Metro Transit hosted five open houses and several mobile open houses for stakeholders to provide input on the draft C Line Station Plan. Metro Transit staff also gave several presentations to community groups and government agencies to gather input on the C Line Station Plan. Input from agencies and community stakeholders was influential in recommending final station locations. Additional agency coordination and community engagement work was focused at several stations, including: Osseo & 46th/Victory Area: This station was removed from C Line Project consideration after further coordination with the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, the City of Minneapolis, the Victory Neighborhood Association (ViNA), and other community members. Penn & 43rd: Additional agency coordination occurred with the City of Minneapolis to review an alternative station location at Penn & 44th; this alternative was ultimately not recommended for approval. Penn & 36th: An alternative station location at Penn & 35th was explored in coordination with the Cleveland Neighborhood Association (CNA) and a community survey; this alternative was ultimately not recommended for approval. See Appendix C and C Line Station Plan for more information on how input was incorporated into decision making. C Line Planning Phase Public Engagement Plan 3-5