Athletic Facility Safety/Performance Evaluation

Similar documents
Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

Sports Turf Research Focusing on Athlete Performance & Safety

Minnesota Park and Sports Turf Managers Association. November 16, 2016

Summary of Guardian Protective Cover Impact Testing April 5, 2011

Paul Viscogliosi MD WTF anti-doping & Medical Committee Chair WTF Vice-Chairman Technical Committee

Do playground surfacing standards reflect reality?

There a variety of reasons as to why these misconceptions have developed and most are

Level 3 Award in First Aid

Paediatric First Aid Instructor s Pack

Level 2 Award Activity First Aid at Work (RQF) 2 Units

Venue Name / Location Complex Esportiu - Futbal Salou Report Number R A1. Primary Sport(s) Football

ASBA MULTI-FIELD FACILITY AWARDS APPLICATION. Please complete the following or refer to site plan.

Evidence Summary: Mountain Biking

Stephen F. Austin State University Dance Teams Dance Workshop Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Baker Patillo Student Center SFA Campus

Motorcyclist Injuries and Protective Clothing: Research with TAC Clients. Dr Allison McIntyre 1, Mr Michael Nieuwesteeg 2 & Ms Samantha Cockfield 2

Surface Rescue Swimmer Course

FAA LEVEL 3 AWARD IN FIRST AID AT WORK (RQF) AWARD IN FIRST AID AT WORK AT SCQF LEVEL 6 PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT RECORD

The development of this workbook was undertaken by trainers and developers within SAMPLE

Unit 1 ASSESSMENT MATRIX - Theory

First Aid - immediate care that is given to the victim of an injury or illness until experts can take over - Oftentimes, it s the difference between

Elementary Rugby 2017

Effective Strikes are KING!

Sports Field Safety Presenta2on Amy Sa5erfield, Director of Business Development

QCF/RQF First Aid Changes Oct 2017

First Recorded Automobile Race. PARIS to ROUEN, FRANCE July 22, miles

Your Name. Detailed Course Outline and Learning Objectives. Welcome to American Red Cross Wilderness and Remote First Aid - WaRFA!

12/6/2017. Evidence-Based Practice: Head Impacts in Lacrosse: Should We Be Concerned? Disclaimer. Concussions in Lacrosse

Emergency First Aid at Work Qualification Specification

First Aid at Work Qualification Specification

Snowsport Helmets: The Good and Bad

WARNING! DO NOT THROW AWAY THESE INSTRUCTIONS! READ AND UNDERSTAND BEFORE USING EQUIPMENT!

Discussion on the Selection of the Recommended Fish Passage Design Discharge

Bleeding and Trauma. Emergency Medical Response

Singapore Resuscitation and First Aid Council SYLLABUS OUTLINE for

1. Determine his speed when he reaches the photo radar car.

Mini Soccer Guide & Rules

Athletic Shoes. Tips for Finding the Right Athletic Shoe

Fall Protection 4/7/16

HPW Biomechanics

Nina Elisabeth N Storvik Theres Arulf

Manual Tasks Minimum Standard. October, 2014

Partners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report October 2006

Hockey Injury Prevention

IRB Regulation 22 Performance Specification Re-test Field Report

WARNING! DO NOT THROW AWAY THESE INSTRUCTIONS! READ AND UNDERSTAND BEFORE USING EQUIPMENT!

Technical Briefing Note

Competent Person - Fall Protection Presented by Turner Safety- your instructor is Steve Turner

User Instructions 1790 Rail Anchor

THE FA LAWS FOR 9V9 FOOTBALL

General Rules. Substitutions. Restarts

APPLICATION OF HUMAN COMPUTER MODELS IN MODELLING MARITIME CRASHES.

Monthly Lifeguard Training & Competency Assessment Register

Children are essentially self-oriented and only relate naturally to a friend or two, not to groups of six or more.

Cambridge East School Activities at Camp Raglan 2018

This is your guide to practical training sessions and warm up exercises for Match Officials in Ontario.

The purchase of a new artificial turf system TURF TACTICS

School Playgrounds How do we Maintain Them? By Shelley Wagner Active Recreation Inc.

FACILITY NAME: ASBA SINGLE FIELD FACILITY AWARDS APPLICATION. New Construction Upgrade of Existing Facility. Date of completed project:


Marlton Soccer In-Town / Recreational Simplified Rules of Soccer

'he Effects of Playing Surfaces on Injuries in College Intramural Touch Football

Laws of the Game Modified

Risk Assessment Sheet - Zorb

Athens Youth Sports Association Laws of the Game 2013

Topic: Passing and Receiving for Possession

Product Name: Internal Shock Lanyard

As interpreted and modified by Hub Soccer of Denville, Inc. for the use in the Recreation Soccer Program

Laws of the Game Modified

Problem Statement. After head injury during the final lap of the 2001 Daytona 500 race.

Rate Group 704 Electrical and Incidental Construction Services

Activities for Measuring Acceleration and Deceleration due to Gravity and Friction. Grade Level: Middle School

1.3 LIMITATIONS: The following application limitations must be recognized and considered before using this product:

First Aid Training Monarch Little League. John Milanski EMT-Basic, Louisville Fire

SURVIVING THE FALL: Leader s Guide. The Proper Use Of Your Personal Fall Arrest System. ERI Safety Videos

Florida Safe Routes to School Walking School Bus Program

Player Information Today s Date:

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Road Safety Partnership Handbook

Running Stretches and Flexibility Exercises

workplace fatalities involving falls to a lower level. Fall related fatalities make up 16% of workplace fatalities

B A L L R E B O U N D

User Instructions 1789 Parapet Wall Anchor

USA Synchro General Athletic Skills Testing. Vertical Jump

Fall Hazards, Anchor Points and Fall Clearances OSH-2 August 7, 0900

sliding? Waterslides-are safety standards C. J. Gordon & K. L. H. STEVENS St George's Hospital, London, England

8U-10U Coaches Package

"SLIPS, TRIPS AND FALLS"

DCASL FUTSAL LAWS OF THE GAME

AYSO Region 13 s Guidance, Interpretations & Modifications for U10 Referees on the Laws of the Game

Is the airway open? Is the victim breathing? Is there circulation (pulse)? Is there severe bleeding?

To: Mike Pfieffer, ICC CTC RE: Climbability sample From: Tony Leto, The Wagner Companies 9/22/2005

ART Competition. The Discover Dow & Sports. Dow invites you and your family to explore the connection between science and sports with

Physics in Tang Soo Do Jack Sanders-Reed, Ph.D.

ISS Qualifying Report. Fall Sports Steve Marshall, PhD Jill Corlette, MS ATC

Generalized Pressure Drop Correlation

V393.R46. NalupwL UNITED STATES EXPERIMENTAL MODEL BASIN NAVY YARD, WASHINGTON, D.C. BILGE KEEL CAVITATION J. G. THEWS SEPTEMBER REPORT NO.

The Academy of Model Aeronautics ALPHA: Potential Energy Background Information for the Teacher

Product Name: Non-Shock Lanyard

Contest Description: Under Equipment and Materials

COACH QUESTIONNAIRE Name:

2016 University of Delaware Futsal Classic

Transcription:

+ + Athletic Facility Safety/Performance Evaluation St. Timothy s School 8400 Greenspring Ave Stevenson, MD 21153 July 23, 2012 Prepared for: Geo Turf 224 W30th Street, Suite 606 New York, NY 10001 Contact: Domenic Carapella Prepared by: ISA USA / DMA Sports Design Group Pembroke, NH *Seattle, WA*Lubbock, TX Phone: (508) 259-0030 Contact: Mr. Jeffrey Gentile

July 23, 2012 Geo Turf 224 W. 30 th Street, Suite 606 New York, NY 10001 Attn: Domenic Carapella RE: St. Timothy s School G-Max Impact Test Evaluation Mr. Carapella, On July 19, 2012, DMA Sports personnel conducted field tests at St. Timothy s School. The purpose of the tests was to evaluate the shock absorbing characteristics of the synthetic grass field. Gmax/HIC The Standard Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials (ASTM F1936-10) was followed. The tests were performed using a Triax 2000 A- missile G max registration unit (www.triax2000.com). This report presents Background information on the test procedures, Conditions Summary, Test Results and Observations. Background The ASTM F-355 Procedure A and ASTM 1936-10 test methods covers the measurement of certain shock-absorbing characteristics, impact force-time relationships and rebound properties of playing surface systems. The test procedure involves dropping a 20 lb missile three times at the same location under a controlled consistent height of 24 inches. The G max testing was developed by NASA in association with the automotive industry to determine the magnitude of sustained force the human body (in particular, the head) could withstand before serious effects would occur. The G force, or acceleration of the mass that is applying the force, is correlated with the sustained duration of the force. As an example, a fighter pilot may be subject to G forces of as much as 8 times normal gravitational force (8 Gs) for up to several minutes at which time unconsciousness (a blackout) could occur. Relative to athletic fields, a player will encounter G forces of 100 to 200 G s over a period of less than 10 milliseconds. It has been determined that a G force of 200 over a period of at least 10 milliseconds is considered concussion level. This is for a single encounter. It has been shown by studies conducted by the AMA, that repetitive blows or encounters of up to four to five during an event reduces the needs to 160 G s. In the early 70 s, the artificial turf companies started to use this standard (G < 200) to determine the safety of their carpet systems. The artificial turf needed to stay inside this Pembroke, NH Sturbridge, MA Lubbock, TX Seattle, WA Ph (603) 731-6248

St. Timothy s School Stevenson, MD envelope, so it was determined by the turf manufacturers that a drop height of 24-inches should be the standard. This particular drop height was established because the artificial turf systems would exceed the maximum allowable G max (> 200 G s) with a drop of 30-inches or more. As the industry has grown in sports surfacing and playground safety surfacing, so has the performance of these synthetics. Playground surfaces are now required to meet shock absorbency standards from minimum drop heights of 36-inches to as much as 8-feet. In addition, the antiquated carpet systems were directly accountable for sports injuries related to the carpet itself. Injuries such as turf toe and foot lock, and ankle, knee and shoulder sprains and breaks occurred, along with carpet burns and abrasions that were season long. The new synthetic grass systems offer much better results; achieving G max values of less than 200 from drop heights as much as 48-inches. Another important value tested is the Head Injury Criteria (HIC). HIC is a value that relates to the probability at which a head injury will occur as a result of an impact generating fall. The value is a mathematical interrogation of the impact deceleration curve over a time interval. HIC values as related to Minor, Moderate, Critical, and Fatal head injury probability are shown in the table below HIC Value HIC Related to Head Injury Probability Minor Head Injury Moderate Head Injury Critical Head Injury Fatal Head Injury 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 250 40% 20% 0% 0% 500 80% 40% 2% 0% 750 95% 70% 4% 0% 1000 98% 90% 8% 2% 1250 100% 95% 10% 2% 1500 100% 98% 20% 4% 1750 100% 100% 45% 10% 2000 100% 100% 70% 30% 2250 100% 100% 90% 70% 2500 100% 100% 95% 90% 2750 100% 100% 98% 95% 3000 100% 100% 100% 100% The ASTM defines the head severities shown as the following: Minor Head Injury: A skull trauma without loss of consciousness; fracture of nose or teeth; superficial face injuries. Moderate Head Injury: A skull trauma with or without dislocated skull fracture and brief loss of consciousness. Fracture of facial bones, without dislocation; deep wound(s). July 23, 2012 Page 3

Probability of Injury St. Timothy s School Stevenson, MD Critical Injury: a skull trauma with loss of consciousness for 12 hours and having nonrecoverable brain damage 120% HIC Related to Head Injury Probability 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% Injury Severity None Minor Moderate Critical Fatal 0% 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 HIC Value Conditions Summary The synthetic surface is a Limonta Sports Turf with Geo Fill organic infill. A complete ASTM 1936-10 Soccer Field test procedure was performed. Three consecutive drops were made at each location for each 24 drop height, at roughly 1 minute intervals. The second and third drops are averaged together. The data is summarized in the attached table. Field Testing Date: 7/19/2012 Local Air Temperature: 96 F Avg. Humidity: 70% Test Locations Wind Speed: 2.1 mph Turf Backing Temp: 124 F *End A is West July 23, 2012 Page 4

St. Timothy s School Stevenson, MD TRIAX 2000 - Data Acquisition and Analysis Report Test Methods: ASTM F-355 Procedure A, ASTM F 1936-10 Loc # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Drop # Gmax (G) Velocity (ft/sec) H.I.C Loc Description Gmax Avg (G) HIC Avg (HIC) Surface Temp (ºF) Infill Depth in MM 1 103 11.3 242 Penalty Kick Line, End A, 2 113 11.3 264 113.50 266 126 32 Center of Field 3 114 11.3 268 1 95 11.3 208 63 ft. from center of 2 108 11.3 254 field to corner of Penalty 110.50 260 125 32 Box. Touch Line C. End 3 113 11.3 266 A 1 101 11.3 230 75 ft. from the half-way 2 108 11.3 248 line to End A. 40 ft. from 109 248.50 107 29 center of field to touch 3 110 11.3 249 line C 1 108 11.3 273 Half-way Line, Center of 2 113 11.3 258 113.50 259.50 125 29 field 3 114 11.3 261 1 106 11.3 255 75 ft. from half-way line 2 117 11.3 287 to End B. 63 ft. from 118 290 124 29 center of field to touch 3 119 11.3 293 line D 1 108 11.3 257 ½ the distance from 2 114 11.3 271 3 114 11.3 269 penalty restraining arc to leading edge of Penalty Box at end B, center of field 114 270 126 1 102 11.3 229 Touch Line D Team area, 2 112 11.3 263 112 264 127 30 A side of the field 3 112 11.3 265 1 99 11.3 221 End B Touchline C 2 109 11.3 254 110.50 257 126 30 Southwest Corner Kick 3 112 11.3 260 1 96 11.3 209 3 ft. from the goal line 2 110 11.3 256 to half-way line, End A, 111 256 126 31 3 112 11.3 256 Center of Field 1 110 11.3 261 15 ft. from Goal line to 2 117 11.3 290 half-way line, End B, 118.50 294 129 28 3 120 11.3 298 Center of field Averages: 113.05 266.50 124 29.9 29 July 23, 2012 Page 5

Location Number Location Number St. Timothy s School Stevenson, MD Average G-Max Reading per Location 10 118.50 9 8 7 111.00 110.50 112.00 6 5 114.00 118.00 4 3 2 1 109.00 110.50 113.50 113.50 104.00 106.00 108.00 110.00 112.00 114.00 116.00 118.00 120.00 Average G-Max Reading 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Average Head Injury Criteria (HIC) Reading per Location 248.50 256.00 257.00 259.50 260.00 264.00 266.00 270.00 290.00 294.00 220.00 230.00 240.00 250.00 260.00 270.00 280.00 290.00 300.00 Average HIC Reading July 23, 2012 Page 6

Average Infill Depth (mm) St. Timothy s School Stevenson, MD Average Infill Depth per Location 33.0 32.0 31.0 30.0 29.0 28.0 27.0 32.0 32.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 30.0 30.0 31.0 28.0 26.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Location Number Pictures July 23, 2012 Page 7

St. Timothy s School Stevenson, MD Gmax Field Summary The G-max test results for the 24-inch drop indicated that the field is well within safe standards, ranging from 109 to 118.50. The average for the entire field was 113.05. This range and average meets ASTM Standards. The data for the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) is also shown and is within a safe and acceptable range. It is important to continue monitoring G-max values throughout the life of a synthetic turf field. The shock absorbency characteristics of a field will degrade over time as a result of material degradation and material re-distribution. Annual athletic facility safety evaluations produce court permissible evidence that can protect an owner from impact injury related lawsuits. These annual evaluations can also help to improve the quality and extend the life of an athletic facility Yours truly, Jeffrey T Gentile Vice President of Operations July 23, 2012 Page 8