City Council Agenda Item #6-A CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. John A. Russo City Manager

Similar documents
APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Living Streets Policy

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Complete Streets: Policy to Pavement

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Madison Urban Area and Dane County. Bicycle Transportation Plan Summary. September Introduction. Bicycle Plan Scope and Planning Process

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

York Region Population and Employment Growth

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

North Coast Corridor:

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

CITY OF SEATTLE RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) led the Seattle

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study (KATS) Complete Streets Policy Approved: Effective: FY 2018 Projects

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Complete Streets for Louisiana

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

MnDOT Implementation of Complete Streets Policy. January 2014

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY GUIDE

T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

2040 RTP. Chapter 6: Investments in our Transportation Future

ADA Transition Plan. City of Gainesville FY19-FY28. Date: November 5, Prepared by: City Of Gainesville Department of Mobility

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

ITEM 3 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO

Transportation Development Act Grant Center Avenue Pedestrian Signal Project

Bike San Mateo County San Mateo County Bicycle Plan Recommendations August 30, 2010

Section 9. Implementation

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

CITY OF BURIEN, WASHINGTON MEMORANDUM

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

Nomination. Halton Region in Context

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Princeton Avenue and Spruce Street Transportation and Site Access Enhancements Project

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

Transportation Policy Manual

USDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Initiative: Safer People and Safer Streets. Barbara McCann, USDOT Office of Policy

Transportation Development Act Grant Radar Check Speed Signs

INCORPORATING COMPLETE STREETS PRINCIPLES IN GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENTS

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

C C C

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

Transcription:

CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council John A. Russo City Manager Date: January 14, 2013 Re: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Complete Streets Policy, in Accordance With Requirements From the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Alameda County Transportation Commission BACKGROUND Complete streets are defined as streets that are safe and convenient for all users of the street, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, persons with disabilities, users and operators of public transit, seniors, children, and movers of commercial goods. A complete street is the result of comprehensive planning, programming, design, construction, operation and maintenance, and should be appropriate to the function and context of the street. Complete streets also help reduce motor vehicle trips, which improve air quality and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. Over 400 communities in the United States have committed to building complete streets through the adoption of complete streets policies. The California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (Assembly Bill 1358), which took effect in January 2011, requires cities and counties to include complete streets policies in their General Plans. This requirement must be met with the first substantive revision of the Circulation Element of a jurisdiction's General Plan. To be eligible for OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) funding, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) requires that by June 30, 2013, jurisdictions either adopt a Complete Streets Policy resolution consistent with regional guidelines, or have a General Plan Circulation Element that complies with the state Complete Streets Act. The OBAG program integrates federal transportation programs with the region's Sustainable Communities Strategy and would provide transportation funding for Priority Development Areas such as Alameda Point, as well as funding for bicycle and pedestrian improvements, street repairs, and Safe Routes to School Program. In addition, to be eligible for future transportation funding cycles, MTC requires local jurisdictions to update their General Plan to comply with the state Complete Streets Act by October 31, 2014. City Council Agenda Item #6-A 1-14-13

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 14, 2013 Page 2 of 6 The City of Alameda's Master Program Funding Agreement (MPFA) with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) requires the City to have a Complete Streets Policy in place by June 30, 2013, to continue to receive Measure B and Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) funding. The MPFA also requires compliance with the State Act, but there is no deadline for this action. DISCUSSION Transportation Element Update of the General Plan: The City's 2009 Transportation Element (TE) update of the General Plan is based on the same multi modal principles as the Complete Streets Policy. The TE has the following components that make it comply with the Complete Streets Act: The overarching vision of the TE is stated in its introduction as follows: "As has been the goal in Alameda for decades, the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) envisions a city that is actively supportive of a multimodal transportation system (incorporating automobiles, transit, bicycles, walking, and the needs of people with disabilities). Traffic volume is one of the key concerns of Alamedans, and the TMP recognizes that our city cannot reduce traffic volumes while implementing projects and programs that rely heavily on automotive use only and negatively impact the use of other modes. The main island of Alameda's historic street grid and the entire City's overall flatness and temperate weather make Alameda a city that can effectively encourage bicycling and walking for a lot of intra-island trips. Traffic congestion concerns on our bridges and tubes call for increasing High Occupancy Vehicle trips (e.g. buses, carpools, and ferries) for off-island trips. It is important that with the upcoming build-out of Alameda Point and other large scale projects, the City work to reduce the impact of automobile trips on the quality of life for residents and on the easy, safe use of nonautomotive transportation modes." The four goals focus on the movement of people not automobiles (Circulation Goal), balance the mobility needs for all modes throughout the city (Livability Goal), encourage the use of modes other than the single-occupant vehicle (Multimodal Goal), and require implementation in a cost effective manner (Implementation Goal) as shown below:

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 14, 2013 Page 3 of 6 o Circulation: Plan, develop, and maintain a safe, barrier-free, and efficient transportation system to provide the community with adequate present and future mobility. o Livability: Balance the mobility needs of the community with the overall community objective of creating a livable human and natural environment. Coordinate the interaction of transportation systems development with land use planning activities. o Multimodal: Encourage the use of transportation modes, especially at peak-period, other than the single-occupant automobile in such a way as to allow all modes to be mutually supportive and to function together as one transportation system. o Implementation: Implement and maintain the planned transportation system in a coordinated and cost-effective manner. The policies and objectives in the TE include all the users of the street. For example the TE lists the words "transit," "pedestrian," and "bicycle" in far greater frequency than the words "congestion," "automobiles," and "volumes" as shown below: o Automobiles: two instances o Bicycles: 45 instances o Congestion: 22 instances o Pedestrian: 79 instances o Transit: 102 instances o Vehicle: 27 instances o Volumes: 14 instances Policy 4.1.1.a requires the City to "Maintain a consistent multimodal classification system of streets throughout the City that will be the basis for identifying vehicle commuter routes, transit routes, bike lanes, as well as corridors for other modes of transportation." The TE divides streets into the following three categories: o Street Types: Regional Arterial, Island Arterial, Transitional Arterial, Island Collector, Transitional Collector, and Local Street. o Land-use Classifications: Residential Corridor Street, Commercial Main Street, General Commercial and Industrial Street, School and Recreational Zone, and Gateway Street. o Transportation Mode Classification: Transit Priority, Bicycle Priority, and Truck Route. The land use and transportation mode classifications were developed to provide additional information about the context of each street. To apply this information

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 14, 2013 Page 4 of 6 to the City's street network, these classifications are overlaid on the street type layer. The land use and modal overlays then are used to identify appropriate design treatments and modal preferences for each street. All streets have a limited amount of right of way available and the modal network connectivity should be preserved within these constraints. Existing Transportation Plans: The City of Alameda has adopted the following transportation plans, which are all consistent with the proposed Complete Streets Policy resolution: Modal Plans o Alameda Transit Plan (2001 ) o Bicycle Master Plan Update (2010) o Community Based Transportation Plan (2009) o Pedestrian Plan (2009) o TE of the General Plan (2009) Special Plans o Alameda Point General Plan Amendment (2003) o Alameda Point Station Area Plan (2008) - considered a feeder plan for the Alameda Transit Plan until it is updated o Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan Update (2008) o Climate Action Plan (2008) o Economic Development Strategic Plan Update (2008) o Northern Waterfront Plan General Plan Amendment (2007) Outreach: Public Works staff worked with other City departments/divisions and ACTC staff to craft the proposed Complete Streets Policy resolution for the City Council's consideration. The Transportation Commission reviewed the resolution and recommended its approval at the November 28, 2012 meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT Approval of the resolution is required for the City to continue to receive the City's passthrough Measure B (Fund 215.1) and VRF (Fund 288) funding, estimated at $1.5 million and $300,000 respectively. These monies are used to maintain the City's transportation infrastructure and provide alternative transportation programs and projects. Failure to adopt this resolution will place these funds in jeopardy.

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 14, 2013 Page 5 of 6 MUNICIPAL CODE/POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code, and is consistent with the Transportation Element of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project is Categorically Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations. Complete Streets Policy is one of the recommended actions of the TE Update (2009) of the General Plan. The related TE objectives and policies are as follows: Policy 4.1.1.a: Maintain a consistent multimodal classification system of streets throughout the City that will be the basis for identifying vehicle commuter routes, transit routes, bike lanes, as well as corridors for other modes of transportation. Objective 4.1.7: Identify facilities, corridors, mode transfer points, and rights-of-way needed to enhance the viability of non-automobile transportation. Meet long-term mobility needs in order to minimize the need for increased cross-island roadway capacity. Policy 4.2.4.b Integrate planning for Environmentally Friendly Modes, including transit, bicycling and walking, into the City's development review process. Objective 4.3.6: Coordinate and integrate the planning and development of transportation system facilities to meet the needs of users of all transportation modes. Policies 4.3.6.a Review and update multimodal design standards for lane widths, parking, planting area, sidewalks, and bicycle lanes to guide construction, maintenance, and redevelopment of transportation facilities consistent with the street classification system. 4.3.6.b Identify areas of conflict and of compatibility between modes (e.g. walking, bicycling, transit, automobiles, and people

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council January 14, 2013 Page 6 of 6 with disabilities). Pursue strategies to reduce or eliminate conflicts, increase accessibility, and foster multimodal compatibility. 4.3.6.c Maintain a committee (such as the Interagency Liaison Committee) that works with transit service providers to resolve transit-related problems. 4.3.6.d Coordinate efforts with regional funding agencies in order to address Alameda's regional transportation issues. When the City Council approved the TE Update, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines permits local jurisdictions to use a previous certified EIR when substantial changes to it are not proposed. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution approving the Complete Streets Policy in accordance with requirements from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Alameda County Transportation Commission. Respectfully submitted, Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director By, G Payne Transportation Coordinator Financial Impact section reviewed, Fred Marsh Controller

~ i: ~ CITY OF ALAMEDA RESOLUTION NO. ~~ ee.08 ~< ~ ~ APPROVE A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH,m ~ REQUIREMENTS FROM THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION i i COMMISSION AND THE ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ~ 'iii COMMISSION ~~ WHEREAS, the term "Complete Streets" describes a comprehensive, integrated transportation network with infrastructure and design that allows safe and convenient travel along and across streets for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, users and operators of public transportation, seniors, children, youth, and families; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda recognizes that the planning and coordinated development of Complete Streets infrastructure provides benefits for local governments in the areas of infrastructure cost savings; public health; and environmental sustainability; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda acknowledges the benefits and value for the public health and welfare of reducing vehicle miles traveled and increasing transportation by walking, bicycling and public transportation; and WHEREAS, the State of California has emphasized the importance of Complete Streets by enacting the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (also known as AS 1358), which requires that when cities or counties revise general plans, they identify how they will provide for the mobility needs of all street users, as well as through Deputy Directive 64, in which the California Department of Transportation explained that it "views all transportation improvements as opportunities to improve safety, access and mobility for all travelers in California, and recognizes bicycle, pedestrian and transit modes as integral elements of the transportation system"; and WHEREAS, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (known as AS 32) sets a mandate for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in California, and the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008 (known as S8 375) requires emissions reductions through coordinated regional planning that integrates transportation, housing, and land-use policy, and achieving the goals of these laws will require significant increases in travel by public transit, bicycling, and walking; and WHEREAS, numerous California counties, cities, and agencies have adopted Complete Streets policies and legislation to further the health, safety, welfare, economic vitality, and environmental well-being of their communities; and Resolution #6-A 01-14-13

WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, through its One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program, described in Resolution 4035, requires that all jurisdictions, to be eligible for OBAG funds, need to address complete streets policies at the local level through the adoption of a complete streets policy resolution or through a general plan that complies with the California Complete Streets Act of 2008; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda's Local Action Plan for Climate Protection, adopted in 2008, recommends revising street design standards and reengineering existing streets if economically feasible to promote pedestrian and bicycle use, and to encourage alternative transportation modes; and WHEREAS, the Alameda County Transportation Commission, through its Master Program Funding Agreements with local jurisdictions, requires that all jurisdictions must have an adopted complete streets policy to receive Measure B pass-through and Vehicle Registration Fund funding; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda, therefore, in light of the foregoing benefits and considerations, wishes to improve its commitment to Complete Streets, and desires that its streets form a comprehensive and integrated transportation network promoting safe and convenient travel for all users while preserving flexibility, recognizing community context, and using design guidelines and standards that support best practices; and WHEREAS, the City of Alameda's 2009 Transportation Element update of the General Plan is based on the same multimodal principles and elements required in the Complete Streets Act of 2008, contains a Multimodal Goal to encourage the use of transportation modes to be mutually supportive and to function together as one transportation system as well as numerous policies and objectives that prioritize alternative transportation modes over single occupancy vehicles, and specifically identifies Transit Priority and Bicycle Priority streets within the city; and WHEREAS the City of Alameda has actively pursued enhancements to new infrastructure to encourage alternative transportation modes, and is one of the first cities in the county of Alameda to install and operate a bus priority signal, which is at Willie Stargell Avenue and Webster Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Alameda adopts the Complete Streets Policy, in accordance with requirements from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Alameda County Transportation Commission, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and made part of this Resolution, and that said exhibit is hereby approved and adopted; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Alameda will review its existing General Plan to determine if it currently meets the Complete Streets policies and 2

principles of the California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (AB 1358) and the Complete Streets Policy adopted by this resolution and if not, the City of Alameda will incorporate the necessary changes with the next substantial revision of the City of Alameda General Plan Transportation Element. * * * * * * I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the Council of the City of Alameda in a regular meeting assembled on the 14th day of January, 2013, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSENTIONS: IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of said City this 15th day of January 2013. Lara Weisiger, City Clerk City of Alameda Attachment: Exhibit A 3

Exhibit A: Complete Streets Policy of City of Alameda This Complete Streets Policy was adopted by Resolution No. by the City Council of the City of Alameda on, 2013. Recognizing the many benefits to the community of Complete Streets, the City of Alameda will, to the maximum extent feasible and practicable, plan, fund, design, construct, operate and maintain its transportation system and facilities so that they are safe and convenient for all users and modes, as appropriate to the function and context of each facility, and in ways that reflect local conditions and community values. A. Complete Streets Principles 1. Complete Streets Serving All Users and Modes. The City of Alameda, through its 2009 Transportation Element update of the General Plan, has committed to creating and maintaining Complete Streets that provide safe, comfortable and convenient travel along and across streets (including streets, highways, bridges and other portions of the transportation system) through a comprehensive, integrated transportation network that serves all categories of users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, users and operators of public transportation, emergency responders, seniors, children, youth and families. More specifically, the Transportation Element update encourages the use of transportation modes to be mutually supportive and to function together as one transportation system. 2. Context Sensitivity. In planning and implementing street projects, departments and agencies of the City of Alameda will maintain sensitivity to local conditions in both residential and business districts as well as urban and suburban areas, and will work with residents, merchants and other stakeholders to ensure that a strong sense of place ensues. Improvements that will be considered include sidewalks, shared use paths, bicycle lanes, bicycle routes, paved shoulders, street trees and landscaping, planting strips, accessible curb ramps, crosswalks, refuge islands, pedestrian signals, signs, street furniture, bicycle parking facilities, public transportation stops and facilities, transit priority signalization, and other features assisting in the provision of safe travel for all users as identified in adopted plans. 3. Complete Streets Routinely Addressed by All Departments. All relevant departments of the City of Alameda will work towards making Complete Streets practices a routine part of everyday operations, approach every relevant project, program and practice as an opportunity to improve streets and the transportation network for all categories of users, and work in coordination with other agencies and jurisdictions to maximize opportunities for Complete Streets, connectivity and cooperation. 4. All Projects and Phases. Complete Streets infrastructure sufficient to enable reasonably safe travel along and across the right of way for each category of users,

consistent with the City's Transportation Element update, will be incorporated into all planning, funding, design, approval and implementation processes for any construction, reconstruction, retrofit, maintenance, operations, alteration or repair of streets (including streets, highways, bridges and other portions of the transportation system), except that specific infrastructure for a given category of users may be excluded if an exception is approved via the process set forth in section C.1 of this policy. 8. Implementation 1. Design. The City of Alameda will follow its own accepted or adopted design standards, and will also evaluate using the latest design standards and innovative design options, with a goal of balancing user needs. For example, the City of Alameda will use its Pedestrian Design Guidelines (2011), the City's Transportation Element update, and, when adopted, the Bicycle Facility Design Standards (expected to be approved in early 2013). 2. Network/Connectivity. Consistent with the City's Transportation Element update, the City of Alameda will incorporate Complete Streets infrastructure into existing streets to improve the safety and convenience of all users, with the particular goal of creating a connected network of facilities accommodating each category of users, and increasing connectivity across jurisdictional boundaries and for anticipated future transportation investments. 3. Implementation Next Steps. The City of Alameda will take the following specific next steps to implement this Complete Streets Policy: A. Plan Consultation and Consistency: Maintenance, planning and design of projects affecting the transportation system will be consistent with the City's Transportation Element update, local bicycle, pedestrian, transit, multimodal and other relevant plans. B. Stakeholder Consultation: Allow for stakeholder involvement, as early in the development process as possible, on projects and plans as necessary to support implementation of this Complete Streets policy by the City of Alameda. At this time, the key stakeholders for bicycle-related issues is BikeAlameda, for pedestrian-related issues is Pedestrian Friendly Alameda and for transit-related issues is AC Transit. In addition, the Planning Board will be consulted on land development projects; the Transportation Commission will be consulted on capital improvement projects. 4. Performance Measures. All relevant departments will perform evaluations of how well the transportation network of the City of Alameda is serving each category of users by collecting baseline data and collecting follow-up data on a regular basis such as transit ridership and turning movement counts at select intersections. In 2006, the City collected turning movements at select intersections for motor vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. AC Transit staff provides Public Works staff with ridership data on a Complete Streets Policy - City of Alameda 2

regular basis. The City will use the Transportation Element policy 4.3.1.g as the established performance measure. 4.3.1.g Establish targets for increasing mode share of non-sov transportation modes. 1. Increase daily non-sov mode share (transit, walking, bicycling) by 10 percentage points by 2015 as compared to 2000. 2. Increase the share of children who walk or bicycle to school by 10 percentage points by 2015 as compared to 2000. Public Works staff will collect follow-up intersection turning movement data on a regular basis to determine how well the City's transportation network is serving different categories of users. C. Exceptions 1. Exception Approvals. Exceptions to this Complete Streets policy may be allowed on a case-by-case basis. In general, the Planning Board will have the authority to approve an exception in the case of a land development project, while the Transportation Commission will have this authority in the case of a capital improvement project. Prior to granting the exception, the Community Development Director, in the case of the Planning Board, and the Public Works Director, in the case of the Transportation Commission, will provide as part of the staff report written findings for the exception explaining the need for the exception and why accommodations for all users and modes could not be included in the development plan or project. Complete Streets Policy - City of Alameda 3