Info Sheet - Operations

Similar documents
Info Sheet - Operations Office for Human Research Studies

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

IRB Staff Administration Guide

Click IRB Resources Frequently Asked Questions

Pearls of Wisdom. Debra Herzan, Josh Lachewitz, Kurombi Wade-Oliver Alliance Chicago Office. May 2015

Pearls of Wisdom. Debra Herzan, Josh Lachewitz, Kurombi Wade-Oliver Alliance Chicago Office. May 2015

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Purpose: The following serves to aid Principal Investigators (PI) in the submission of Amendments to AURA-IRB. Document includes: Acronyms and Legend

Screening and Enrollment Log. List of all subjects screened and all subjects screened and enrolled in the study.

IRBMED: Ceding IRB Review to an External IRB

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

External IRB Instructions for the Registration Pathway in OSIRIS

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

JeffTrial IRB Submission Regulatory Coordinator Training. Kimmel Cancer Center 09/16/2013 Ver. 1.0

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus Human Research Subjects Protection Office

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

IRB 7. Network for Clinical Research Professionals (NCRP) Seminar June 18, 2013

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Getting Started with SMART IRB & the Online Reliance System

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Getting Started with SMART IRB & the Online Reliance System

HOW TO CONDUCT AN IRB RELIANCE AGREEMENT. What Reliance Agreements Are, How They Are Reviewed, and What It Means for Submitting Research

IRB APPLICATION CHECKLIST

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

A Guide to SMART IRB s Resources for IRB and HRPP Personnel

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Lapse in IRB Approval

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Cayuse IRB Policy and Procedure Manual

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

Human Research Protection Program Policy

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

How to Setup and Score a Tournament. May 2018

November 30, Efficient Startup of Multi-site Research Studies: Central IRBs and National IRB Reliance Platforms

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Single IRB Review. Jeannie Barone Director, HRPO. Institutional Review Board

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

IRBManager Instructions

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

BRITISH OPEN IRB CHAMPIONSHIPS MASTERS IRB CHAMPIONSHIPS ENTRY PACK Additional Information Exmouth 29 th September

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

Commercial/ Central IRB An independent organization that provides IRB review services

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

The ICC Duckworth-Lewis-Stern calculator. DLS Edition 2016

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

<:\_J Senior Manager- Safety, Security & Emergency Response. Ell ORIGINAL DELIVERED BY COURIER. June 7, 2017

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

HUMAN SUBJECTS INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES

Expedited Review for Initial Review, Continuing Review, and Amendments

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

Transcription:

DANA-FARBER / HARVARD CANCER CENTER Info Sheet - Operations Office for Human Research Studies Use of Informed Consent Documents Posted to OncPro General Information Upon activation of a research study, the IRB-approved protocol documents and consent form will be posted to the Oncology Protocol System (OncPro). Investigators must ensure that the most current IRBapproved version of the protocol is followed and the consent form from OncPro is used when obtaining informed consent. For details on obtaining informed consent please see 1) Guide to Human Research Activities; 2) DF/HCC SOP CON-100 Informed Consent Process; 3) DF/HCC CON-101 Obtaining Informed Consent for Non- English Speakers; and 4) DF/HCC CON-OP-01 Reconsent/Patient Notification Guidance. For information regarding use of IRB-approved consents posted to OncPro, please see below. Official IRB-Approved PDF Versions: The most current version of the consent is posted to OncPro. The expiration date is located on the footer of every informed consent document. The consent form must not be used after the expiration date (see Expired Protocols below). The OHRS Online Communications team will email the study team when a new consent form is posted. Study teams should review the consent form posted to OncPro as soon as possible to make sure that the correct version is posted. o o If the IRB waives the requirement for informed consent or authorization, then a notice to that effect will be posted in lieu of the informed consent document. If the IRB waives the requirement for documentation of informed consent/authorization, but requires that an information sheet or script be used, the information sheet or script will be posted to OncPro as an appendix to the protocol. Print, Do Not Save: Study team members should always download the most current version of the consent from OncPro before obtaining the informed consent of a new study participant. Saving the consent form to a desktop, or printing numerous copies for future use, could result in a participant signing an outdated version. Unofficial Not For Subject Use Word Versions: At the time of IRB approval, OHRS will email an unofficial copy of the consent form which will include a Not for Subject Use header. These versions are forwarded to study teams as an editable Word version of what is posted for use when submitting future amendments. It is not to be used to consent study participants. o An unofficial version is only emailed to study teams when the substance (body of the consent form) has been updated. Accordingly, when the IRB approves a change in status or the continuation of a study without requesting changes to the informed consent document, an unofficial version will not be sent to the study team. Expired Protocols: If a continuing review submission is not approved and IRB approval expires, the protocol will be put on hold. The consent form will not be revised, and no new subjects can be consented or enrolled beyond the indicated expiration date. Version: 03.01.18

Protocols in Data Analysis Only: As of October 2, 2015, consent documents will be removed from OncPro at the time that the continuing review approval is posted. Header and Footer: OHRS maintains the header and footer. Study teams are advised NOT TO EDIT the consent form header or footer information. Consent Header Information There are several items in the consent header that OHRS has inserted into the templates and items inserted prior to posting. Please see below for details. A. Prior to posting, OHRS inserts a date/time stamp that updates each time the document is opened. B. The document includes the name of the Consent template in the header. C. Prior to posting, OHRS adds two blue boxes: a. The top box is for the subjects name b. The bottom box is for the subjects Medical Record Number (MRN). D. The document includes a QR code in the upper right hand corner used by sites to identify the document as Research Consent Form in Epic. E. The document includes the version date of the template that was used to initially create the consent. Consent Form Footer Information Every consent form posted to OncPro has a footer enabling version control. The consent form footer is edited by OHRS before it is posted to OncPro and different footer formats (versions) have been used historically. Explanation of these footer versions are explained below. Note: Depending on the date posted for use, the consent form will fall within one of these three categories. Starting with the current version, if the consent form was posted on or after (Please note that there may be a few exceptions around the transition date as a backlog of workflows are processed): 1) October 11 th, 2016 to Present This current footer format version was developed to clarify and more closely match the information found in OnCore. This includes reviews, versions, approvals and expirations dates. - 2 -

Page xx of xx Info Sheet - Operations DFCI Protocol Number: 12-000 Approved Date (DFCI IRB Approval): 01/10/2015 Date Posted for Use: 01/25/2015 Expiration Date (Invalid for use on or after): 02/13/2016 Version Date (OnCore): 01/24/2015 Content Last Revised with OHRS Review: AM #10 DFCI Protocol Number: This number is assigned by OHRS and is used by both the DF/HCC SRC and DFCI IRB to identify research protocols submitted for their review and approval. Approved Date (DFCI IRB Approval): The date the IRB granted final approval of the consent form. Please Note: The Approved Date for Central IRB (CIRB) studies is the date the DFCI IRB acknowledged/accepted the amendment. Date Posted for Use: The date the OHRS Online Team posted the protocol/consent to OncPro. Expiration Date (Invalid for use on or after): This date represents the day the consent form can NO longer be used. The expiration date on the Consent footer posted on OncPro will now match the date in OnCore. Note: When matching the footer of a signed consent with the appropriate option in OnCore, the OnCore Expiration date may not match depending on the following scenarios: a. The posted consent was due to a submission other than an Initial Review or continuing review (e.g., an amendment), which would result in the Expiration Date being blank. b. At some point the IRB determined that the Expiration Date should be shortened. In this case, the signed consent may have the original date in the footer, while OnCore would display the new date. Version Date (OnCore): This is the Consent Form Version Date entered into OnCore by OHRS staff. This version date corresponds with the consent form version date that study teams view in the clinical trials management system OnCore. Content Last Revised with OHRS Review: The OHRS Review Number associated with the Consent Form is included as a reference. This review number corresponds with an OHRS generated New Protocol (NP #1, same as Activation), Amendment (AM #), Continuing Review (CR#), Adverse Event (AE #), and Other Event (OE #) where the corresponding submission resulted in a revision to the content of the consent form document. 2) July 13 th, 2015 through September 8 th, 2016 Differences in this footer (highlighted) from the current footer format are: Date DFCI IRB Approved this Consent Form: This date is the first date the IRB conditionally approved or approved the submission. Note: This date will not match the date found in OnCore if the submission was conditionally approved. Date DFCI IRB Approval Expires: This date represents the day before IRB approval expires and is the last day the consent form can be used. On the following day, in the event of IRB expiration, the consent form will be removed from OncPro. Accordingly, the expiration date on the footer of the consent form posted in OncPro will have a date that is one day earlier than the expiration date on the approval memo. - 3 -

Please note: a. If the Expiration date does not appear in OnCore when selecting the appropriate consent, it is most likely because the consent was approved due to an amendment. b. When matching the footer of a signed consent with the appropriate option in OnCore, the OnCore Expiration date may sometimes be blank. This occurs if the posted consent was due to a submission other than an Initial Review or continuing review (e.g., an amendment). Page xx of xx DFCI Protocol Number: 12-000 Date DFCI IRB Approved this Consent Form: 01/10/2015 Date Posted for Use: 01/25/2015 Date DFCI IRB Approval Expires: 02/13/2016 OnCore Version Date: 01/24/2015 Content Last Revised with OHRS Review: AM #10 3) Prior to July 13 th, 2015 The main differences between this footer and format versions above are that: 1) OHRS Version Date stated rather than OnCore Version Date, and 2) footer does not have Content last reviewed with ORHS Review: (note blank) OHRS Version Date: This is the date that a OHRS Human Research Coordinator routed the IRB-approved version of the submission to the OHRS Online Team for posting to OncPro. This version date is a required field in the OnCore database which is used for tracking versions for registration. Page xx of xx DFCI Protocol Number: 12-000 Date DFCI IRB Approved this Consent Form: 01/15/2012 Date Posted for Use: 01/21/2012 Date DFCI IRB Approval Expires: 02/13/2013 OHRS Version Date: 01/20/2012 Log Sheet Information The Log Sheet is a document posted to OncPro to summarize submissions. The Log Sheet is posted after the Front Sheet with all of the other protocol-related documents. The Log Sheet is only updated after a submission has been activated and the revised documents have been posted to OncPro. As of September 9 th, 2016, the Log Sheet will use the following headers: Date Posted: The date the OHRS Online Team posts the most current version of the protocol/consent to OncPro. Revised Sections: A brief description of which documents have been posted / updated on OncPro. Approved Date: The final date the DFCI IRB approved the submission that prompted the change to the documents posted to OncPro. Prior to this date this field was called IRB Approval Date. - 4 -

Version Date (OnCore): As of 7/13/2015 this date will match the OnCore Version Date in the consent form footer and in OnCore. Prior to this date this field was called OHRS Version Date and/or OnCore Version Date. Date Approved Version Date Revised Sections Posted Date (OnCore) 1/16/15 Consent Form replaced due to AM #2 1/15/15 1/15/15 1/21/15 Consent Form replaced due to AM #1 (including AM #2 revisions) 1/10/15 1/20/15 Consent Form Addendums Consent Addendums should only be used when a limited amount of new information or changes that need to be communicated to subjects. Please reference DF/HCC CON-OP-01 Reconsent / Patient Notification Guide for examples and further guidance on when a Consent Form Addendum may be used. Consent Addendums should be created using the current OHRS Consent Addendum Template and submitted to OHRS as an amendment. In most cases, the main consent form must also be revised with the new information and posted to OncPro alongside the addendum. Multiple addendums for the same study may be active simultaneously. Each addendum must be given a unique title (or unique number) referencing the new information to be communicated to subjects (e.g. Safety Update 1, Safety Update 2). Study teams are responsible implementing the consenting plan as approved by the IRB of Record. Study teas are also responsible for knowing which addendum needs to be used when and with what subject(s). Study teams are also responsible for advising OHRS to remove addendums from OncPro that are no longer needed. Once all affected subjects have been reconsented using the addendum, OHRS should be advised by the study team to remove the addendum from OncPro. Special Cases and Examples The following notes are provided to help explain how the footer information is updated for specific submission types or when submissions are approved and posted out of order: Continuing Review Approvals without Consent Form Content Changes: All footer dates will be updated but the Content Last Revised with OHRS Review field will remain the OHRS Review # where the body of the consent was last revised. [e.g. NP #1 if there have been no other changes to the consent from between the initial review and the continuing review.] Continuing Review Approvals with Consent Form Content Changes: All footer dates will be updated and the Content Last Revised with OHRS Review field will be changed to reflect the corresponding Continuing Review #. Status Changes Amendments without Consent Form Content Changes: Only the Date Posted for Use will be revised when the status watermark is changed. Submissions approved and/or posted out of order: The footer will always reflect the latest IRB approval date. Here is an example: - 5 -

AM #2: Submitted 1/12/15; Approved 1/15/15; No Activation Needed; Posted on 1/16/15 o The consent form that was revised under AM #2 is posted on 1/16/15. o The footer will reflect an IRB approval date of 1/15/15. AM #1: Submitted: 1/1/15; Approved 1/10/15; Activation Signoff 1/20/15; Posted on 1/21/15 o The consent form that was revised with AM #1 is posted on 1/21/15. o The footer will reflect an IRB approval date of 1/15/15 because that is the latest IRB approval date. o OHRS staff will confirm that the changes to the consent form posted as part of AM #2 are incorporated into the consent form posted in AM #1 and confirm that the date entered into OnCore [01/20/2015] matches the OnCore Version date in the footer. o Content Last Revised with OHRS Review field will reflect the latest OHRS Review, AM #2. The consent form footer when AM #1 is posted would look like the following: Page xx of xx DFCI Protocol Number: 12-000 Approved Date (DFCI IRB Approval): 01/15/2015 Date Posted for Use: 01/21/2015 Expiration Date (Invalid for use on or after): 02/13/2016 Version Date (OnCore): 01/20/2015 Content Last Revised with OHRS Review: AM #2 For this example, the Log Sheet would read: Date Approved Version Date Revised Sections Posted Date (OnCore) 1/16/15 Consent Form replaced due to AM #2 1/15/15 1/15/15 1/21/15 Consent Form replaced due to AM #1 (including AM #2 revisions) 1/10/15 1/20/15-6 -