INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018

Similar documents
FHWA Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) Tool

Innovative Intersections

PennDOT ICE Policy An Introduction

J-Turn An Intersection Safety Improvement Purdue Road School 2016 Tuesday, March 8, 2016 Brian Malone, INDOT & Josh Cook, HNTB

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Roundabout Feasibility Memorandum

RETREAT AGENDA ITEM MIDTOWN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Alternative Intersection Analysis Using SIDRA INTERSECTION

Alternative Intersection Analysis Using SIDRA INTERSECTION

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION SOLUTIONS. Jay Bockisch, PE, PTOE Senior Associate

Public Information Meeting. Orange Camp Road. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Beltway to I-4. Presented by: Volusia County August 2, 2018

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

FDOT Northern US 19 - Pinellas County Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Projects Updates

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

ALLEY 24 TRAFFIC STUDY

Safety Evaluation at Innovative Geometric Designs Gilbert Chlewicki, PE Advanced Transportation Solutions

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Florida s Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP)

APPENDIX G: INTERSECTION NEEDS AT OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Innovative Intersections Presented by: Matt Crim P.E., PTOE Stantec Consulting Services Inc. October 29, 2015

Brooklyn Boulevard (County Road 152) Reconstruction Project Phase I. OPEN HOUSE June 20, 2017

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIONS

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Community Meeting #1

Roundabouts are good for business

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT WIDE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Presentation Outline. PD&E Study Process Project Overview Proposed Alternatives & Evaluation Schedule Contact Information

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

I-35 COMAL COUNTY OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

Access Management Regulations and Standards

PRESENTATION WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 6:05 P.M. I-90 EXIT 406 INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARKET

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY STUDY

Bay to Bay Boulevard Complete Streets Project

Design Criteria. Design Criteria

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Version 1.0 September View Disclaimer. Modified from FHWA's Capacity Analysis for Junctions (CAP-X)

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

Table of Figures. Table of Tables. Table 1: Traffic Volumes Ramblas Delay. Table 2: Las

Financial Project ID No(s).: and ETDM No(s).: and 14181

David Agacinski FDOT District One Bicycle & Pedestrian Coordinator Daniels Parkway Ft. Myers, Florida 33913

County Road 2 Long Sault Improvements EA Study Schedule C Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Environmental Study Report

League City Parkway at Brittany Lakes/Fennigan Intersection Evaluation/ Traffic Study. Second Public Meeting February 6, 2018

FY 2017 FY 2021 PRIORITY PROJECT LIST ADOPTION. June 26, 2015

Evaluation of M-99 (Broad Street) Road Diet and Intersection Operational Investigation

APPENDIX E Evaluation of Improvement Alternatives

Roundabouts. By: Nezamuddin, Valparaiso University. February 19, 2015

SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

CITY OF FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE. Columbia Avenue. Widening & Improvements Project. Public Meeting May 16, 2017

The current document is revised based on the comments received on:

US 41 COMPLETE STREETS CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY from University Parkway to Whitfield Avenue

City of Sammamish. Welcome. Issaquah-Fall City Road Improvements Project Phase I Design: 242nd Avenue SE to Klahanie Drive SE

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

Update to DOTD Roundabout Design Policy

7.0 Preferred Alternative with Service Road Concept

IH 20 RANGER HILL PUBLIC MEETING

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2015/16 thru FY 2019/20 Summary of Projects in FDOT District Five

AGENDA ITEM 6 D THOMASVILLE ROAD (HERMITAGE BOULEVARD TO LIVE OAK PLANTATION ROAD) ROADWAY SAFETY AUDIT

General References Definitions. (1) Design Guidance. (2) Supporting Information

County Board Workshop

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Improving intersections for people that walk in Minneapolis

Mandan Commission Meeting August 2, 2016 Mandan City Hall

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Intersection Design. Leah Ness, Craig Hardy and Eric Sorensen

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT STUDY

Figure 1: East West Connector Alignment Alternatives Concept Drawing

Queensgate Drive Corridor Traffic Study

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

SR 53 Corridor Study. Final Report Presentation. Friday, October 3, :00 AM to noon

Executive Summary. North Florida Transportation Planning Organization Argyle Traffic Study

Road Diets FDOT Process

Fairfax County Parkway Widening Fairfax County

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

VT15 / Allen Martin Drive Intersection Scoping Study

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

SR 9/I-95 Interchange at 45 th Street PD&E Study Palm Beach County, Florida FPID No.: FAP No.: ETDM No.

MEMORANDUM. DATE March 1, 2012 TO Town of Milton Mark Abbott, Seth Asante, and Efi Pagitsas Boston Region MPO Staff

Date: 09/22/2016 Subject: To: From: PennDOT Engineering District 5-0. Dear Applicant,

Comments EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Joshua Saak, P.E., PTOE Traffic Design Engineer Ada County Highway District May 23, 2013

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

TRANSPORTATION FACILITY PLANNING Waugh Chapel Road Maytime Drive to New Market Lane

PERFORMANCE ACTIVITY 613 IMPACT ATTENUATOR WORK DESCRIPTION 3

Transcription:

INTERSECTION CONTROL NOVEMBER 2018

ICE OVERVIEW AGENDA Why ICE? When ICE is Required? Applicability and Process 2

AVAILABLE RESOURCES http://www.fdot.gov/traffic/trafficservices/intersection_operations.shtm 3

INTERSECTION TYPES Roundabout ICE will replace the 3 step roundabout evaluation process in 2020 4

INTERSECTION TYPES Median U Turn (MUT) No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 5

INTERSECTION TYPES Median U Turn (MUT) No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 6

INTERSECTION TYPES Restricted Crossing U Turn (RCUT) Unsignalized Signalized 7

INTERSECTION TYPES Jughandle 8

INTERSECTION TYPES Displaced Left Turn Left turns and through movements operate concurrently Also called continuous flow intersection Could have displaced lefts on 2 legs instead of all 4 9

INTERSECTION TYPES Quadrant Roadway No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 10

INTERSECTION TYPES Quadrant Roadway No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 11

INTERSECTION TYPES Quadrant Roadway No left turns allowed at main signalized intersection 12

STAGES OF ICE 13 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 1; Page 7

ICE STAGE 1 PROCESS 14 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 2; Page 10

1.1 A PROJECT APPLICABILITY CHECK ICE is REQUIRED when New signalization is proposed Major reconstruction of existing signalized intersection is proposed Adding exclusive left turns, adding intersection legs Conversion of a directional or bi directional median opening to a full median opening is proposed Driveway/Connection permit applications for Category E, F, G District Design Engineer (DDE) and District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) consider an ICE a good fit for the project 15 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Section 2.3; Page 5

1.1 A PROJECT APPLICABILITY CHECK ICE NOT REQUIRED Work does not include substantive proposed changes to intersection Mill and resurface pavement; changing full median opening to directional median opening Minor intersection operational improvements Adding right turn lane or signal phasing changes or equipment upgrades Encouraged for local roadways, not required Recommended for ramp terminal intersections (stop control, signalized, or yield), not required 16 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Section 2.3; Page 5

ICE STAGE 2 PROCESS 17 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 3; Page 14

ICE STAGE 3 PROCESS 18 Reference: FDOT Manual of Intersection Control Evaluation; Nov. 1, 2017; Figure 4. Page 18

FDOT ICE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2018: Training and Acclimation Implementation Focus: District Training Two intersections per district 2019: Districts Identify & Conduct ICE Analysis for Additional Locations Implementation Focus: Refine ICE Process Evaluate minimum of three projects in these offices/focus areas PD&E Traffic Operations Access Management/Permitting 2020: Full ICE Procedure Implementation by Districts Implementation Focus: Mainstream ICE Process ICE Manual Procedures fully effective January 1, 2020 Quality Assistance Reviews (QAR) starting in Year 4 19

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 20

S.R. 535 EXISTING 21

S.R. 535 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized Restricted Crossing U Turn N S Construction $1,300,000 Design Cost $430,000 ROW Cost $500,000 22

Median U Turn N S Construction $1,220,000 Design Cost $320,000 ROW Cost $510,000 S.R. 535 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 23

Partial DLT N S Construction $1,170,000 Design Cost $320,000 ROW Cost $4,500,000 S.R. 535 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 24

US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD EXISTING Signal Existing Construction and Design Cost $0 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 25

US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PMUT Construction and Design Cost $1,480,000 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 26

US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PDLT Construction and Design Cost $2,160,000 ROW Cost $9,000,000 D1 Training 27

US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Roadway Construction and Design Cost $3,080,000 ROW Cost $2,250,000 D1 Training 28

US 41 / PINE ISLAND RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Roadway Continued D1 Training 29

US 27 / CALIFORNIA BLVD EXISTING D1 Training 30

US 27 / CALIFORNIA BLVD - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PMUT Construction and Design Cost $1,130,000 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 31

US 27 / CALIFORNIA BLVD - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,160,000 ROW Cost $0 D1 Training 32

33 US 1 / RATLIFF RD. EXISTING

US 1 / RATLIFF RD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT RCUT Alternative Construction and Design Cost $1,440,000 ROW Cost $0 34

US 1 / RATLIFF RD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Alternative Construction and Design Cost $1,350,000 ROW Cost $300,000 35

SR 392A / CLARA AVE EXISTING D3 Training 36

SR 392A / CLARA AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signal Construction and Design Cost $430,000 ROW Cost $0 D3 Training 37

SR 392A / CLARA AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Construction and Design Cost $1,520,000 ROW Cost $300,000 D3 Training 38

US 27 / TALPECO RD EXISTING D3 Training 39

US 27 / TALPECO RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized Construction and Design Cost $510,000 ROW Cost $0 D3 Training 40

US 27 / TALPECO RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,520,000 ROW Cost $0 D3 Training 41

US 27 / TALPECO RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Construction and Design Cost $2,150,000 ROW Cost $300,000 D3 Training 42

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. EXISTING D4 Training 43

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Construction and Design Cost $1,350,000 ROW Cost $0 D4 Training 44

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Zone 1 D4 Training 45

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Zone 2 D4 Training 46

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quad SE Zone 3 D4 Training 47

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT MUT Construction and Design Cost $1,060,000 ROW Cost $0 D4 Training 48

SR 710 / NORTHLAKE BLVD. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Partial DLT Construction and Design Cost $2,500,000 ROW Cost $100,000 D4 Training 49

SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE EXISTING D4 Training 50

SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,710,000 ROW Cost $1,000,000 D4 Training 51

SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT MUT/PDLT Construction and Design Cost $2,090,000 ROW Cost $4,500,000 D4 Training 52

SR 414 / MAITLAND AVE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PMUT/PDLT Construction and Design Cost $2,060,000 ROW Cost $4,500,000 D4 Training 53

US 92 / TOMOKA FARMS RD EXISTING D4 Training 54

US 92 / TOMOKA FARMS RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Signalized RCUT Construction and Design Cost $1,490,000 ROW Cost $0 DEVELOPMENTS D4 Training 55

US 92 / TOMOKA FARMS RD PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Partial MUT Construction and Design Cost $1,480,000 ROW Cost $0 DEVELOPMENTANALYSIS D4 Training 56

US 27 / NW 138 ST EXISTING D6 Training 57

US 27 / NW 138 ST - PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Median U Turn Alternative Construction and Design Cost $2,710,000 ROW Cost $3,400,000 D6 Training 58

US 27 / NW 138 ST PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT RCUT Alternative Construction and Design Cost $9,230,000 ROW Cost $3,200,000 D6 Training 59

US 27 / NW 138 ST PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Partial Displaced Left Turn Alternative Construction and Design Cost $1,410,000 ROW Cost $3,000,000 D6 Training 60

U.S. 41 / S.R. 44 EXISTING D7 Training 61

U.S. 41 / S.R. 44 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Quadrant Roadway Construction and Design Cost $1,190,000 ROW Cost $2,000,000 D7 Training 62

U.S. 41 / S.R. 44 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Roundabout Construction and Design Cost $2,120,000 ROW Cost $725,000 D7 Training 63

FDOT Road and Bridge Staff Hour Guidelines for ICE Analysis 64

FDOT ROAD/BRIDGE STAFF HOUR GUIDELINES - DRAFT 65

US 98 at TRILBY ROAD ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS 66

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Roundabout Analysis Intersection identified for potential signalization Existing intersection is TWSC Conducted ICE analysis instead of 3 Step Roundabout Analysis Data Collection Obtained existing AM and PM TMCs Obtained opening year and design year AADTs for both roads Safety Data 2 fatalities in 2009 Over 3 crashes per year (2011 2015) ½ angle crashes ½ injury crashes Conducted field review 67

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Existing Conditions U.S. 98 is two lanes; 55 mph posted speed U.S. 98 has 16% to 19% daily trucks; WB 67 design vehicle Trilby Road is two lanes; 30 mph posted speed Trilby Road has 10% trucks westbound 68

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road CAP-X Analysis Existing AM Peak Hour Existing PM Peak Hour 69

Roundabout is: 80% lower in Fatal & Injury crashes than traffic signal 65% lower in Total crashes than traffic signal U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 1 SPICE Analysis 70

Stage 1 ICE Form Evaluation Summary U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 1 Analysis 71

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Concept Development 72

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Concept Development 73

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Operations Analysis TWSC Synchro Analysis Conduct for Opening Year and Design Year AM and PM peak periods Shows Trilby Road Approach Delay and U.S. 98 Left Turn delay Traffic Signal Synchro Analysis Conduct for Opening Year and Design Year AM and PM peak periods Shows average vehicle delay for all movements 74

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 Operations Analysis Roundabout Analysis in Sidra Conduct for Opening Year and Design Year AM and PM peak periods Shows average vehicle delay for all movements 75

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 76

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 77

U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 78

Roundabout is: 80% lower in Fatal & Injury crashes than traffic signal 65% lower in Total crashes than traffic signal U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 SPICE Analysis 79

FDOT ICE TOOL OVERVIEW 80

Roundabout results: Overall B/C is 1.78 and NPV is $1.5M TWSC better than traffic signal U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 2 B/C and NPV Analysis 81

Stage 2 ICE Form Evaluation Summary Roundabout recommended U.S. 98 at Trilby Road Stage 1 Analysis 82

DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS 83