The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Similar documents
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

AI TKA '[ Attorney Docket No Date: 28 June 2007

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER DIVISION NEWPORT

NOTICE. The above identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

Inventor Michael M. Canadav NOTICE

Inventor Laurent Bissonnette NOTICE

Inventor Michael M. Canadav NOTICE

Matthew J. Sanford Larry E. Crabtree Roger L. Ellis James F. Cahill NOTICE

The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to:

System and Method for a Submersible Underwater Storage. Inventor: John D. Houvener

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,893,786 Stevens 45 Date of Patent: Apr. 13, 1999

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2001/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY DIVISION NEWPORT OFFICE OF COUNSEL PHONE: FAX: DSN:

Device for atomizing a liquid

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

Lightweight portable training device to simulate kayaking

BALL ACTUATED DOWNHOLE TOOL BACKGROUND

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,424 B2

5.0 Neutral Buoyancy Test

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

CONSIDERATION OF DENSITY VARIATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF A VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR ROAD TUNNELS

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,834,776 B1

DISCLAIMER. Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

USOO6O76829A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,076,829 Oblack (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 20, 2000

Lab 5: Forces on Submerged Objects

1. A tendency to roll or heel when turning (a known and typically constant disturbance) 2. Motion induced by surface waves of certain frequencies.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

United States Patent (19) Condo et al.

STABILITY OF MULTIHULLS Author: Jean Sans

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,393,587 B2

P LAGERS CHACK LLP. May 29, 2014 VIA Mr. Anthony P. Boniface 4645 Broadway, Unit A4 Boulder, CO 80304

58) Field of searby 36, so asso's "... includes a pair of Support Straps connected at opposed ends

@ -4 Inventors: Daniel L Mensink 3578 Gregory Lane Lynchburg, Virginia 24503

E2IB (7/02 ( ) (52) U.S. Cl /19: 464/155 (58) Field of Classification Search / , 175/325.6

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

Ice skate blade alignment mechanism

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8, B1. Koski (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 23, 2011

Wang 45 Date of Patent: Sep. 23, 1997

United States Patent (19)

III IIHIII. United States Patent (19) 5,575,725 Nov. 19, Olsavsky. 11 Patent Number: 45 Date of Patent:

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,757,647 B1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,316,194 B1. Shen et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 8, 2008

Attorney Docket No Date: 19 July 2002

Egg...","...7. Primary Examiner-Dean Kramer

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,601,826 B1

United States Patent 19

Applied Fluid Mechanics

The Usage of Propeller Tunnels For Higher Efficiency and Lower Vibration. M. Burak Şamşul

(10) Patent No.: US 7,331,117 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,733,739 B2

. United States Patent (19) Oonuma et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,052,416 B2. Chang (45) Date of Patent: May 30, 2006

An underwater explosion is an explosion where the point of detonation is below the surface of the water.

I

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,780,559 B2

Blade guard for rotary lawn mowers

MODELLING OF FUME EXTRACTORS C. R.

United States Patent (19) Salandre

III III IIII. United States Patent (19) Dolan et al. Appl. No.: 311,676 Filed: Sep. 23, 1994

Designing a Model Rocket

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,984,723 B2

Fluid pressure actuated net weighing device with pneumatic taring

PHYS 101 Previous Exam Problems

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,923,737 B1

Give Wings to Imagination

III IIII - USOO550545OA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,505,450 Stuff (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 9, 1996

The water supply for a hydroelectric plant is a reservoir with a large surface area. An outlet pipe takes the water to a turbine.

Density of Individual Airborne Wind Energy Systems in AWES Farms

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1

National Technical Information Service U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Chapter 13 Fluids. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,493,591 Kadowaki 45 Date of Patent: Feb. 20, 1996

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) United States Patent

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,428,068 B1

(Refer Slide Time: 2:16)

Parasite Drag. by David F. Rogers Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved.

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

United States Patent (19)

Determination of the wind pressure distribution on the facade of the triangularly shaped high-rise building structure

United States Patent (19) Herro

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HAWT BLADES

9 Mixing. I Fundamental relations and definitions. Milan Jahoda revision Radim Petříček, Lukáš Valenz

United States Patent 6,064,035 Toller, et al. May 16, Abstract

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1 Chen (43) Pub. Date: Aug.

Transcription:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF COUNSEL NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER DIVISION 1176 HOWELL STREET NEWPORT Rl 02841-1708 IN REPLY REFER TO Attorney Docket No. 300170 20 March 2018 The below identified patent application is available for licensing. Requests for information should be addressed to: TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP ENTERPRISE OFFICE NAVAL UNDERSEA WARFARE CENTER 1176 HOWELL ST. CODE 00T2, BLDG. 102T NEWPORT, RI 02841 Serial Number 15/718,076 Filing Date 28 September 2017 Inventor Anthony A. Ruffa Address any questions concerning this matter to the Office of Technology Transfer at (401) 832-1511. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT Approved for Public Release Distribution is unlimited

A RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR UNMANNED UNDERWATER VEHICLES STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST [0001] The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor. [0002] None. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PATENT APPLICATIONS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION (1) Field of the Invention [0003] The present invention is an improvement to existing and future capture mechanisms and a method of use that employs the use of water jets and a Bernoulli Effect to stabilize an unmanned underwater vehicle and to simplify recovery efforts of the underwater vehicle from a surface vessel. (2) Description of the Prior Art [0004] The automated launch and recovery of unmanned vehicles in general and unmanned underwater vehicles in particular is an ongoing issue. The automated recovery of unmanned underwater vehicles is a more difficult problem than the automated launch of unmanned underwater vehicle 1 of 10

[0005] In the prior art shown in FIG. 1, a ball 10 in a vertical air jet 20 is shown where the ball remains at the center or centerline of the air jet because of the velocity profile of the air jet. The velocity profile is defined as the velocity of the jet as a function of the distance from the jet centerline. The range of pressure varies. See Equation [1] and [2] p a p p a 1 2 ρu2 [1] p a = 10 5 + ρgz; [2] where p a is the ambient pressure in Pascals; ρ = 1024 kg/m 3 is the density of water; g = 9.81 m/s 2 ; u is the velocity in meters/second; and z is the depth in meters. [0006] The flow rate for the air jet 20 is a design parameter. Typically, the flow rate can range from 0 to 5 meters per second. The velocity is highest (and the pressure is lowest) at the center of the air jet 20 as a result of the Bernoulli effect. The Bernoulli effect is a consequence of the Bernoulli equation which is valid along any point on a streamline See Equation [3]. u 2 + gz + p = constant [3] 2 ρ 2 of 10

[0007] If and as described further, the air jets 20 are typically horizontal, z does not change along a streamline, so p = p a 1 2 ρu2 [4] [0008] An interpretation of Equations [2] and [3] is that the pressure in the air jet 20 is always lower than the ambient pressure surrounding the air jet, so that an object in the air jet will always be pushed by the higher ambient pressure toward the middle of the jet, effectively stabilizing the object. [0009] As shown in prior art FIG. 2, if the ball 10 moves laterally to an outer boundary of the air jet 20, the ball will be moved back toward the center of the air jet by ambient pressure in adjacent regions. The surrounding pressure is one atmosphere (10 5 Pascals) at sea level. At a depth z, the surrounding pressure is 10 5 + pgz. [0010] Based on the utility of the air jets with the Bernoulli effect, there is a need for controlling the recovery of an unmanned underwater vehicle using a technology similar to that of the air jets. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0011] Accordingly, it is a general purpose and primary object of the present invention to provide a capture mechanism and method of use that employs the Bernoulli Effect to stabilize an unmanned underwater vehicle as the vehicle is automatically recovered. 3 of 10

[0012] To attain the object of the present invention, a capture mechanism uses water jets flowing in a horizontal direction and acting similar to prior art vertical air jets to move an unmanned underwater vehicle toward a centerline region of the water jets. The water jets remedy the effect of wave forces on the unmanned underwater vehicle by moving the vehicle back to the centerline region. [0013] The Bernoulli Effect is implemented with the water jet directed at the unmanned underwater vehicle as part of a capture mechanism. The unmanned underwater vehicle transits into the capture mechanism and can be guided by a homing device. Water jets can also be used with a wide variety of known capture mechanisms. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0014] Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by means of a detailed description of the drawings that illustrate the principals of the present invention in which: [0015] FIG. 1 depicts a prior art example of the dynamics of an object in which the object is centered in a vertical air jet due to a low pressure region along a centerline a result of the Bernoulli effect; 4 of 10

[0016] FIG. 2 depicts a prior art example of the dynamics of an object in which the object is displaced to outer boundaries of a vertical air jet; and [0017] FIG. 3 depicts an unmanned underwater vehicle transiting into a capture mechanism of the present invention with the underwater vehicle being stabilized by water jets of the capture mechanism. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [0018] As shown in FIG. 3, the present invention uses water jets 100 flowing in a horizontal direction but the water jets act in a way similar to the prior art air jets of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 to move an unmanned underwater vehicle 200 toward a centerline region of the water jets. The unmanned underwater vehicle 200 can be displaced by wave forces during vehicle recovery efforts but the water jets 100 remedy the effect of the wave forces by moving the underwater vehicle back to the centerline region. [0019] The Bernoulli effect is implemented with the water jets 100 directed at the unmanned underwater vehicle 200 as part of the capture mechanism 300. As one water jet 100 or a plurality of the water jets align the unmanned underwater vehicle 200 toward the centerline of the water jets; the underwater vehicle stabilizes. [0020] In the absence of the water jets 100, the dynamics of the underwater vehicle 200 can be dominated by wave forces. Wave 5 of 10

forces cannot be easily predicted and can be strong enough to require a significantly larger handling system and significantly more complex control methods to accommodate such forces. As noted, the water jets 100 cause the underwater vehicle 200 to stay in the center of the water jets which minimizes the effect of wave forces. [0021] In the figure, the unmanned underwater vehicle 200 transits into a known cone capture mechanism 400 and can be guided by a homing device 402 to clamps 404, with the clamping mechanism and homing device attached to a ship hull 500. The water jets 100 then stabilize the underwater vehicle 200. The water jets 100 can also be used with a wide variety of other capture mechanisms such as those disclosed in United States Patent No. 6,600,695 or a telescopic arm in United States Patent No. 6,770,475. [0022] Water jets 100 positioned on the sides are more effective for stabilizing the unmanned underwater vehicle 200 as the vehicle approaches the capture mechanism 400. Water jets 100 in the center are more effective for stabilizing the underwater vehicle 200 as the vehicle is entering the capture mechanism 400. [0023] A cross-section of the flow profile of each water jet 100 has a diameter that relates to a length scale associated with a lateral dimension of the unmanned underwater vehicle 200. The typical diameter of an unmanned underwater vehicle is twelve inches. In addition, the centerline velocity of the water jets 6 of 10

100 should be sufficiently high that a pressure difference (relative to the ambient pressure of the surrounding environment) will be large relative to the lateral pressures associated with wave motions. These parameters would vary as a function of the sea state, the ship handling system, the capture mechanism and the design of the capture mechanism 400. [0024] The water jets 100 will increase drag on the unmanned underwater vehicle 200. This increased drag will increase the axial force (along the longitudinal axis of the underwater vehicle)required to recover the underwater vehicle 200. However, the axial force is largely, a constant and known force. The design tradeoff for a handling system will involve increasing the power of the underwater vehicle 200 during recovery (due to the increased drag) rather than increasing the size of the handling system to accommodate the larger lateral motions due to wave forces. [0025] It has been determined experimentally by Equation [5] that turbulent jets have a velocity profile u that is well modeled by a Gaussian function: u(x, r, σ) = u max e r2 2σ 2 [5] [0026] Here x" is the length coordinate along the centerline of the water jets 100, "r" is the radial distance from the 7 of 10

centerline, "u max " is the maximum speed (i.e., at the centerline), and "σ" is the standard deviation associated with the velocity profile. It has also been determined that the velocity along the centerline decreases linearly with distance as defined by Equation [5]. These parameters can be used to model UUV recovery systems with stabilizing jets for the purposes of performing tradeoff or comparative effect studies. [0027] The present invention provides a system and method of use to stabilize unmanned underwater vehicles in order to facilitate recovery (both automated and manned) by reducing the forces that handling systems must accommodate and to reduce lateral motion. These less stressful forces on the handling systems can lead to smaller and more simplified control systems. [0028] It will be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangement of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of the invention, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principle and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims. [0029] The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. It is not intended to be exhaustive nor to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed; and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the 8 of 10

above teaching. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to a person skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined by the accompanying claims. 9 of 10

A RECOVERY SYSTEM FOR UNMANNED UNDERWATER VEHICLES ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A capture mechanism is provided that employs water jets flowing in a horizontal direction to move an unmanned underwater vehicle toward a centerline region of the water jets. The Bernoulli effect is implemented with the water jets directed at the underwater vehicle. As the water jets align the vehicle toward the centerline of the water jets; the vehicle stabilizes. The underwater vehicle transits into the capture mechanism and can be guided by a homing device. 10 of 10