Surface Test Report. IMPORTANT NOTE: This report does not constitute an ITF Court Pace Classification.

Similar documents
ITF Court Surface Classification Scheme. ISSS Technical Meeting Nyon, October 2002

Surfaces of the tennis courts

Court Speeding Developments in Surface Pace measurement. International Tennis Federation

Performance Standards for Non-Turf Cricket Pitches Intended for Outdoor Use [TS6] ecb.co.uk

TECHNICAL DATA SHEET INNOPUR COURT AC-200 ( RESURFACER ) WATERBORNE REPAIR AND ADHESION MATERIAL FOR ASPHALT AND CONCRETE

Measurement of court speed and bounce. Rod Cross, Physics Department, Sydney University 2nd July 2006

BREAK,SHOT,UMPIRE, ETURN,MATCH,BASELIN WHATEVER YOUR GAME, PLAY IT WITH PLAYRITE.

IRB Regulation 22 Performance Specification Re-test Field Report

PADEL BALLS FIP APPROVED

Ball Test Report. Ball Type 2 Test Result: Pass. Test code: BAT a Prepared by: Items tested: Top One (Thailand)

Venue Name / Location Complex Esportiu - Futbal Salou Report Number R A1. Primary Sport(s) Football

ARTIFICIAL GRASS PITCHES FOR RUGBY performance standards and design guides for community use pitches and training areas

Guide to Artificial Grass Pitches for Community Use. Part 1. Performance Standards for Surfaces and Pitches used Outdoors

Agood tennis player knows instinctively how hard to hit a ball and at what angle to get the ball over the. Ball Trajectories

The Ground is the total area shown on the plan. The Ground includes:

TEST REPORT. BS :2002+A1:2013 Pendulum testers method of operation. UKSRG Guidelines-4:2011 The assessment of floor slip resistance.

ARTIFICIAL GRASS PITCHES FOR RUGBY AND ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDES FOR COMMUNITY USE PITCHES AND TRAINING AREAS

B A L L R E B O U N D

EF 151 Exam #3, Spring, 2015 Page 1 of 5

Explosion Protection Technology Pty Ltd

Impact of a ball on a surface with tangential compliance

REGULATIONS FOR THE LICENSING OF MATS

Figure 1. The distance the train travels between A and B is not the same as the displacement of the train.

PPE: RESPIRATORY PROTECTION EQUIPMENT

Furthermore, the Manufacturer receives an access to the artwork of the FIBA logo in the applicable reference to be put on the basketball.

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE

NFRC U-FACTOR, SHGC, VT, & CONDENSATION RESISTANCE COMPUTER SIMULATION REPORT. (Revised) Rendered to: NORTH EAST WINDOWS, USA, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS International Racquetball Federation officially approved specifications. Copyright 01/13/1983; rev.

REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE

Guidance on piling, heavy loads, excavations, tunnelling and dewatering

Challenges of Tack Coat

Waves. Name and Surname: Class: L E A R N I N G O U T C O M E. What are waves? Why are waves formed?

Level 3 Cambridge Technical in Engineering 05822/05823/05824/05825/05873 Unit 3: Principles of mechanical engineering

ScienceDirect. Friction at the tennis shoe-court interface: how biomechanically informed lab-based testing can enhance understanding

Performance Overview calibration Laboratory EP Instruments Messtechnik und Kalibrierung GmbH

means the Australian Karate Federation Incorporated; means Chair of the Athlete Selection Committee means the National Coaching Coordinator;

AP Physics 1 Lesson 4 Homework Outcomes Quiz 4 Preparation. Name. Date. Period

(i) Write down equations for x and y in terms of t. (iii) Find the range of the golf ball.

SmartCal. SmartCal Troubleshooting Checklist


Classification Rules for ITTF Para Table Tennis

Standards for football surfaces why different tests?

DEVIL PHYSICS THE BADDEST CLASS ON CAMPUS AP PHYSICS

HOCKEY TURF & FIELD STANDARDS. Part 1. Introduction & General Guidance 2017 Edition QUALITY PROGRAMME FOR HOCKEY TURF

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION DESCRIPTION OF TEST SAMPLE TEST RIG GENERAL ARRANGEMENT TEST SEQUENCE...7

ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Mini-project 3 Tennis ball launcher

Procedia Engineering 00 2 (2010) (2009) Properties of friction during the impact between tennis racket surface and ball

Procedia Engineering Procedia Engineering 2 (2010)

CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 147 (2016 )

EF 151 Final Exam - Spring, 2017 Page 3 Copy 223

Initial Velocity (IV) Test Replacement

The FA Cup, The FA Trophy, The FA Vase and The FA Youth Cup Competitions

Article II - Double Disc Court Revised March 23, 2016

GOOD AFTERNOON!!! 2012 FDOT / FTBA Conference. Dave Drehmer. Mariani Asphalt an Associated Asphalt Company

Trends and advances in tennis courts. Tim Freeman BA Dip Arch RIBA SAPCA Director and Vice Chairman of Tennis, Projects Director at Trevor May

The effect of back spin on a table tennis ball moving in a viscous fluid.

Physics 8, Fall 2017, Homework #5. Due at start of class on Friday, October 13, 2017

published by ITF ltd bank lane RoehampTon

DNVGL-CP-0187 Edition March 2016

Oblique impact of a tennis ball on the strings of a tennis racket

Advisory Opinion. Advisory Opinion No Tokyo, Japan CHIYODA INTEGRE CO. LTD. Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan

TENNIS SENIORS AUSTRALIA - SELECTION POLICY

Exam 3 Phys Fall 2002 Version A. Name ID Section

How are waves generated? Waves are generated by

Kinematics-Projectiles

OP CHECKLIST FOR 1D CONSOLIDATION LABORATORY TEST

Explosion Protection Technology Pty Ltd

2 THE LAWS OF TABLE TENNIS

Chapter 11 Waves. Waves transport energy without transporting matter. The intensity is the average power per unit area. It is measured in W/m 2.

Fixed Displacement Motor A4FM

TR Test Report Complementary Testing RKN e1 Container (+5 C) Protection by Insulation Version: 01 Page: 2 (22)

THE CURVE OF THE CRICKET BALL SWING AND REVERSE SWING

A tennis player hits a ball at a height of 2.4 m. The ball has an initial horizontal velocity.

Period: Date: 1. A single disturbance that moves from point to point through a medium is called a. a. period b. periodic wave c. wavelength d.

TEST REPORT TS EN : TS EN A1 Windows and doors - Product standard. Testing Reference. : BM 72 Gizli Kanat Pencere (Hidden Vent Window)

Higher Projectile Motion Questions

Summary Safety Investigation Report

POLICY Netball Queensland Policy Number 001 Affiliation and Membership Policy

Chapter 14: Waves. What s disturbing you?

FIFA Quality Programme for Football Turf. Handbook of Test Methods October 2015 Edition

Implementing Provisions for Art. 411 of the ICR Ski Jumping

Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.

Ping Pong Rules Legal Service

Flow in a shock tube

SPECIFICATION FOR RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS

PTR Master of Tennis - Performance

2 THE LAWS OF TABLE TENNIS

Technical Report. Comparison of Ventilation Standard Calibration Methods

5. A bead slides on a curved wire, starting from rest at point A in the figure below. If the wire is frictionless, find each of the following.

Blind and Visually Impaired Regional Tennis Series 2018 Information, Rules and Format

Project 1 Those amazing Red Sox!

Pressure coefficient on flat roofs of rectangular buildings

Australian Football League and Cricket Australia Handbook of Testing for Synthetic Turf

OCEAN WAVES NAME. I. Introduction

Waves. harmonic wave wave equation one dimensional wave equation principle of wave fronts plane waves law of reflection

x 2 = (60 m) 2 + (60 m) 2 x 2 = 3600 m m 2 x = m

Club Pro 1 Summary of Course Results Date: Evaluations Prof. Workbooks Practical Exam #1 Practical Exam #2 #1 #2 #3 #4

The table below shows how the thinking distance and braking distance vary with speed. Thinking distance in m

Players experiences of artificial turf. Ties Joosten General Manager ISA Sport 7 March 2003

Transcription:

Surface Test Report IMPORTANT NOTE: This report does not constitute an ITF Court Pace Classification. Test type: Classification Prepared by: Xavier Hérouin Test code: ITF CS/01/02-14-407 Test location: Laboratory Authorised by: Pascal Haxaire Surface name: RESITOP STANDARD Distribution: Copy 1 - LABOSPORT Surface type: Acrylic Copy 2 - Pinturas Serrano 2011 S.L. Copy 3 - ITF Test laboratory: LABOSPORT NOTE: An application for Technoparc du Circuit des 24h00 Test date: May 28th, 2014 ITF Classification must be 72100 LE MANS submitted within 6 months France Issue date: June 3rd, 2014 of the issue date. Client: Pinturas Serrano 2011 S.L. Poligono Industrial El Savador Coefficient of restitution (COR): 0,80 Medium Avenida 2 Parcela 81 Coefficient of friction (COF): 0,63 Medium 02630 LA RODA (ALBACETE) Court pace rating (CPR): 39 Medium SPAIN Alternative category * Medium-fast Agreed classification ITF to complete * see note 11 of Test protocol on Explanation page of this report Form: ITF-M-040 rev.15, April 2012 1 of 5 Court Pace - ITF CS 01/02

Test Explanation - Court Pace : Test protocol: 1. For tests in the laboratory, the ITF Accredited laboratory requires either three samples of minimum dimensions 0.5 0.5 m, or (in the case of infilled and carpet surfaces) one sample measuring 1 1 m. In addition, a reference sample shall be sent to the ITF Technical Centre. 2. Test specimens should be flat. The body requesting the test should advise the laboratory on the preparation and storage of samples. 3. The body requesting the test is required to provide a detailed specification of the surface construction, which will be included in the Comments page of this report. 4. The test specimens shall be conditioned at 23 ± 2 C for a minimum of 3 hours prior to testing. Unless the surface is designed to be damp/wet when in its optimum condition, tests shall be made with the surface in a dry condition. 5. The laboratory shall use three high-specification balls to test the surface. The balls should be stored in their cans at 23 ± 2 C and pre-compressed before use. 6. The test balls shall be fired at an incident angle of 16 ± 2 and speed of 30 ± 2 m/s onto the surface, and the ball velocity shall be recorded before and after the impact. 7. Each of the three test balls shall be fired onto the surface three times (nine impacts in total), moving impact location for each shot. If the surface is disturbed or damaged by the test (e.g. movement of clay particles), the surface shall be restored before the next shot. 8. For any surfaces that have an inherent directional pattern such as natural or artificial grass test shots shall be fired in the typical directions of play, i.e. parallel to the length of the court. Where samples are used, the supplier shall indicate the direction the surface would be laid on court. 9. The temperature of the tests balls, surface and ambient conditions shall be monitored during the test, along with the relative humidity of the laboratory. 10. On completion of the test, the ITF Accredited laboratory will submit this test report to the ITF and subsequently to the body requesting the test. On receipt of this report, the body requesting the test may apply to the ITF for inclusion on the ITF list of classified tennis court surfaces. An application for ITF Classification must be submitted within 6 months of the report issue date. 11. If the mean CPR value for the three samples lies within 2 points of an adjacent category, the body requesting the test will be given the choice between the two categories. ITF CS/01/02-14-407 Notation definitions & calculation of results: ix = horizontal incident velocity (m/s) iy = vertical incident velocity (m/s) fx = horizontal rebound velocity (m/s) fy = vertical rebound velocity (m/s) e = coefficient of restitution (COR) µ = coefficient of friction (COF) T = mean ball temperature for test sample (ºC) c = temperature coefficient (0.003) e T = coefficient of restitution (COR) a = pace perception constant (150) b = mean COR for all surface types (0.81) CPR = court pace rating CPR = 100 1 µ + a b e T Procedure for obtaining ITF Court Pace Classification: 1. Contact the ITF Technical Centre by email to technical@itftennis.com to obtain an application form and a quotation for the classification fee. 2. Submit the completed application form to the ITF, from which the ITF shall raise an invoice. 3. Upon receipt of payment the surface will become ITF Classified and a certificate will be issued. The surface will be listed on the ITF website www.itftennis.com/technical and also published in the ITF Approved Balls, Classified Surfaces & Recognised Courts booklet. 4. ITF Classification is valid for 3 years from date of listing. If a client wishes a product to remain on the ITF Classified list, it shall arrange for the product to be reassessed by an ITF Accredited laboratory within 6 months prior to expiry. Notes: a. The ITF reserves the right to refuse to classify a surface product which it does not consider to be suitable for the game of tennis. b. A surface product included on the list of ITF Classified Court Surfaces is classified purely on the basis of its court pace rating. ITF Classification listing does not imply any form of ITF approval or endorsement. e = fy iy e T µ = = e + c 23 ix iy ( T ) fx ( 1 + e) ( ) ( ) Form: ITF-M-040 rev.15, April 2012 2 of 5 Court Pace - ITF CS 01/02

Test Results - Court Pace : ITF CS/01/02-14-407 Surface name: RESITOP STANDARD Humidity: 52% Test laboratory: LABOSPORT Surface type: Acrylic Ambient temp: 24ºC Surface temp: 24ºC Test date: May 28th, 2014 SAMPLE 1: Shot 1 (Ball 1) Shot 2 (Ball 2) Shot 3 (Ball 3) Shot 4 (Ball 1) Shot 5 (Ball 2) Shot 6 (Ball 3) Shot 7 (Ball 1) Shot 8 (Ball 2) (Ball 3) Mean ball temp: 24ºC v ix 29,53 29,31 29,67 28,98 28,14 29,94 29,86 28,93 29,66 v iy 8,49 8,48 8,57 8,37 8,14 8,62 8,54 8,31 8,59 v fx 20,04 19,51 19,72 19,41 19,05 19,97 19,88 19,29 19,89 v fy 6,70 6,77 6,90 6,56 6,52 6,85 6,80 6,67 6,74 COR T 0,79 0,80 0,80 0,78 0,80 0,79 0,79 0,80 0,78 COF 0,63 0,64 0,64 0,64 0,62 0,64 0,65 0,64 0,64 CPR 40,9 37,8 36,8 40,1 39,6 38,1 37,2 37,0 40,4 SAMPLE 2: Shot 1 (Ball 1) Shot 2 (Ball 2) Shot 3 (Ball 3) Shot 4 (Ball 1) Shot 5 (Ball 2) Shot 6 (Ball 3) Shot 7 (Ball 1) Shot 8 (Ball 2) (Ball 3) Mean ball temp: 24ºC. v ix 29,30 28,32 29,68 30,38 29,58 27,90 29,23 27,79 30,24 v iy 8,51 8,26 8,61 8,77 8,62 8,09 8,43 8,06 8,78 v fx 19,85 19,18 20,11 20,42 19,89 18,57 19,43 18,76 20,55 v fy 6,84 6,53 6,90 7,02 6,87 6,54 6,95 6,39 6,99 COR T 0,80 0,79 0,80 0,80 0,79 0,81 0,82 0,79 0,79 COF 0,62 0,62 0,62 0,63 0,63 0,64 0,64 0,63 0,61 CPR 39,7 41,3 39,9 38,7 39,8 36,7 34,4 40,2 40,9 SAMPLE 3: Shot 1 (Ball 1) Shot 2 (Ball 2) Shot 3 (Ball 3) Shot 4 (Ball 1) Shot 5 (Ball 2) Shot 6 (Ball 3) Shot 7 (Ball 1) Shot 8 (Ball 2) (Ball 3) Mean ball temp: 24ºC v ix 30,28 30,38 29,35 28,42 29,62 27,90 29,52 29,60 28,88 v iy 8,76 8,75 8,48 8,23 8,62 8,03 8,51 8,54 8,36 v fx 20,45 20,52 19,70 18,96 19,74 19,10 19,98 19,83 19,23 v fy 6,90 6,90 6,88 6,71 6,92 6,35 6,83 6,85 6,61 COR T 0,79 0,79 0,81 0,81 0,80 0,79 0,80 0,80 0,79 COF 0,63 0,63 0,63 0,63 0,64 0,61 0,62 0,64 0,64 CPR 41,0 40,5 37,3 36,1 37,7 42,0 39,1 37,9 38,8 Form: ITF-M-040 rev.15, April 2012 3 of 5 Court Pace - ITF CS 01/02

Test Summary - Court Pace : ITF CS/01/02-14-407 Surface name: RESITOP STANDARD Humidity: 52% Test laboratory: LABOSPORT Surface type: Acrylic Ambient temp: 24ºC Surface temp: 24ºC Test date: May 28th, 2014 Coefficient of restitution Court pace rating 1 70 0,9 0,8 0,79 0,80 0,80 0,80 60 50 40 39 39 39 39 COR 0,7 CPR 30 0,6 20 10 0,5 0 Coefficient of friction Summary COF 1 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0 0,64 0,62 0,63 0,63 COR COF CPR Mean 0,80 0,63 39 SE 0,00 0,00 0 Range 0,01 0,01 0 ITF criteria: COR Low (0-0.78) Medium (0.79-0.84) High (0.85+) COF Low (0-0.55) Medium (0.56-0.70) High (0.71+) CPR Slow (0-29) Medium-slow (30-34) Medium (35-39) Medium-fast (40-44) Fast (45+) Form: ITF-M-040 rev.15, April 2012 4 of 5 Court Pace - ITF CS 01/02

Test Comments - Court Pace : ITF CS/01/02-14-407 Surface name: RESITOP STANDARD Test laboratory: LABOSPORT Surface type: Acrylic Test date: May 28th, 2014 Full description of court surface - including manufacturer's reference, the type of supporting layers and their method of attachment: Laboratory comments: Although the tests were carried out on laboratory samples the appearance and finish of the test specimens was considered by Labosport to be representative of the surface when laid on a tennis court. Labosport defines a tennis court surface as the top (playing) surface and any underlying layers of construction that influence the sports performance (or biomechanical) response of a court. If any elements of the surface's construction change the response, performance and classification of the surface may be different. As such the results detailed in this report only apply to the surface when laid on a rigid (concrete, asphalt, etc.) base. Installation over new standard asphalt, system with cushion : -1 coat of Concentrado or Premix -2 coats of Premix -3 coats of Flexitop + Concentrado -1 coat of Topseal Laboratory recommendations: The results detailed in this report are considered to be a valid assessment of the Court Pace characteristics of the product. In Labosport's opinion the product satisfies the technical criteria required for tennis court surfaces wishing to appear in the ITF's Court Surface Classification Scheme. Labosport recommends, subject to ITF approval, that "RESITOP STANDARD" is included on the list of classified surfaces. Additional test information: Test ball: ITF High-Specification ball 2014 (INA) Form: ITF-M-040 rev.15, April 2012 5 of 5 Court Pace - ITF CS 01/02