MGB 203B Homework # LSD = 1 1

Similar documents
Analysis of Variance. Copyright 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.

A few things to remember about ANOVA

Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) The Structural Model, The Summary Table, and the One- Way ANOVA

Week 7 One-way ANOVA

One-factor ANOVA by example

Unit 4: Inference for numerical variables Lecture 3: ANOVA

Experimental Design and Data Analysis Part 2

Factorial ANOVA Problems

Unit4: Inferencefornumericaldata 4. ANOVA. Sta Spring Duke University, Department of Statistical Science

PLANNED ORTHOGONAL CONTRASTS

Factorial Analysis of Variance

One Way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance)

Biostatistics & SAS programming

Select Boxplot -> Multiple Y's (simple) and select all variable names.

Stat 139 Homework 3 Solutions, Spring 2015

ANOVA - Implementation.

Example 1: One Way ANOVA in MINITAB

Stats 2002: Probabilities for Wins and Losses of Online Gambling

AP 11.1 Notes WEB.notebook March 25, 2014

Legendre et al Appendices and Supplements, p. 1

One-way ANOVA: round, narrow, wide

Name May 3, 2007 Math Probability and Statistics

Empirical Example II of Chapter 7

Setting up group models Part 1 NITP, 2011

Running head: DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 1

Lesson 3 Pre-Visit Teams & Players by the Numbers

A Statistical Analysis of the Factors that Potentially Affect the Price of A Horse

Class 23: Chapter 14 & Nested ANOVA NOTES: NOTES: NOTES:

Descriptive Stats. Review

1. In a hypothesis test involving two-samples, the hypothesized difference in means must be 0. True. False

Chapter 13. Factorial ANOVA. Patrick Mair 2015 Psych Factorial ANOVA 0 / 19

A Combined Recruitment Index for Demersal Juvenile Cod in NAFO Divisions 3K and 3L

Members & Firms

DOCUMENT RESUME. A Comparison of Type I Error Rates of Alpha-Max with Established Multiple Comparison Procedures. PUB DATE NOTE

Design of Experiments Example: A Two-Way Split-Plot Experiment

1. Answer this student s question: Is a random sample of 5% of the students at my school large enough, or should I use 10%?

Data Set 7: Bioerosion by Parrotfish Background volume of bites The question:

Pressured Applied by the Emergency/Israeli Bandage

Nonlife Actuarial Models. Chapter 7 Bühlmann Credibility

Guide to Computing Minitab commands used in labs (mtbcode.out)

The Simple Linear Regression Model ECONOMETRICS (ECON 360) BEN VAN KAMMEN, PHD

IDENTIFYING SUBJECTIVE VALUE IN WOMEN S COLLEGE GOLF RECRUITING REGARDLESS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLASS. Victoria Allred

Statistical Analysis of PGA Tour Skill Rankings USGA Research and Test Center June 1, 2007

5.1 Introduction. Learning Objectives

Lesson 21: Special Relationships within Right Triangles Dividing into Two Similar Sub-Triangles

Bivariate Data. Frequency Table Line Plot Box and Whisker Plot

Chapter 12 Practice Test

STANDARDIZED CATCH RATES OF BLUEFIN TUNA, THUNNUS THYNNUS, FROM THE ROD AND REEL/HANDLINE FISHERY OFF THE NORTHEAST UNITED STATES DURING

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHYSICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ATHLETES OF SELECTED EVENTS IN TRACK AND FIELD

Chapter 2: ANOVA and regression. Caroline Verhoeven

BIOL 101L: Principles of Biology Laboratory

Paul M. Sommers. March 2010 MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE ECONOMICS DISCUSSION PAPER NO

Ranking teams in partially-disjoint tournaments

DISMAS Evaluation: Dr. Elizabeth C. McMullan. Grambling State University

Case Processing Summary. Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent % 0 0.0% % % 0 0.0%

Section I: Multiple Choice Select the best answer for each problem.

HYPOTHESIS TESTING OF ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA IN INDIA

Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US:

Distancei = BrandAi + 2 BrandBi + 3 BrandCi + i

STAT 155 Introductory Statistics. Lecture 2-2: Displaying Distributions with Graphs

Chapter 3 Displaying and Describing Categorical Data

Math SL Internal Assessment What is the relationship between free throw shooting percentage and 3 point shooting percentages?

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in-Tariffs on International Markets.

Note that all proportions are between 0 and 1. at risk. How to construct a sentence describing a. proportion:

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

The Coach then sorts the 25 players into separate teams and positions

WATER OIL RELATIVE PERMEABILITY COMPARATIVE STUDY: STEADY VERSUS UNSTEADY STATE

8 Tidal Variations in the Earth s Rotation

Driv e accu racy. Green s in regul ation

Art[,' c ""j) 01/1 /

b) (2 pts.) Does the study show that drinking 4 or more cups of coffee a day caused the higher death rate?

This article has been downloaded from JPES Journal of Physical Education an Sport Vol 25, no 4, December, 2009 e ISSN: p ISSN:

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Harold and Inge Marcus. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Hunters vs. Non-hunters Attitudes Toward Canada Goose Management in Illinois

Hypothesis testing: ANOVA Test of the equality of means among c groups. Flow-chart

Quantitative Literacy: Thinking Between the Lines

Robust specification testing in regression: the FRESET test and autocorrelated disturbances

GLMM standardisation of the commercial abalone CPUE for Zones A-D over the period

Analysis of Shear Lag in Steel Angle Connectors

COMPLETING THE RESULTS OF THE 2013 BOSTON MARATHON

Standardized CPUE of Indian Albacore caught by Taiwanese longliners from 1980 to 2014 with simultaneous nominal CPUE portion from observer data

Behavior under Social Pressure: Empty Italian Stadiums and Referee Bias

Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences

Accident data analysis using Statistical methods A case study of Indian Highway

Objective Determine how the speed of a runner depends on the distance of the race, and predict what the record would be for 2750 m.

IMPROVED RICE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THEORETICAL MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES

STATISTICS ELEMENTARY MARIO F. TRIOLA. Descriptive Statistics EIGHTH EDITION

Fruit Fly Exercise 1- Level 1

Major League Baseball Offensive Production in the Designated Hitter Era (1973 Present)

Northwest Fishery Resource Bulletin

Reminders. Homework scores will be up by tomorrow morning. Please me and the TAs with any grading questions by tomorrow at 5pm

Three New Methods to Find Initial Basic Feasible. Solution of Transportation Problems

MJA Rev 10/17/2011 1:53:00 PM

Analysis of Car-Pedestrian Impact Scenarios for the Evaluation of a Pedestrian Sensor System Based on the Accident Data from Sweden

Safety at Intersections in Oregon A Preliminary Update of Statewide Intersection Crash Rates

Confidence Interval Notes Calculating Confidence Intervals

Sports Predictive Analytics: NFL Prediction Model

Modelling and Simulation of Environmental Disturbances

NCSS Statistical Software

Midterm Exam 1, section 2. Thursday, September hour, 15 minutes

Transcription:

MGB 0B Homework # 4.4 a α =.05: t = =.05 LSD = α /,n k t.05, 7 t α /,n k MSE + =.05 700 + = 4.8 n i n j 0 0 i =, j = 8.7 0.4 7. i =, j = 8.7.7 5.0 i =, j = 0.4.7. Conclusion: µ differs from µ and µ. b C = ()/ =, α =.05, α = α E / C =.067: t α /,n k = t.008, 7 =.55 (from Excel) LSD = E t α /,n k MSE + =.55 700 + = 0.0 n i n j 0 0 i =, j = 8.7 0.4 7. i =, j = 8.7.7 5.0 i =, j = 0.4.7. Conclusion: µ and µ differ. c q (k, ν = α ) q. 05 (,7).5 MSE ϖ = q α (k, ν) =.5 n g 700 = 9.5 0 i =, j = 8.7 0.4 7. i =, j = 8.7.7 5.0 i =, j = 0.4.7. Conclusion: µ and µ differ. 4.5 a = µ = µ H 0 : µ H : At least two means differ. 0(5.7) + 0(49.7) + 0(44.) x = = 48.96 0 + 0 + 0

SST = n j (x j x) = 0(5.7 48.96) +0(49.7 48.96) + 0(44. 48.96) =,78 j s j SSE = ( n ) = (0 )(94.6) + (0 )(5.6) + (0 )(9.9) =,86 SST,78 Treatments k = SST =,78 = = 589. 0 k SSE,86 Error n k = 87 SSE =,86 = = 59. 0 n k 87 MST MSE = 589.0 =.70 59.0 F =.70, p-value =.086. There is enough evidence to infer that speed of promotion varies between the three sizes of engineering firms. 59.0 b q α (k, ν) = q. 05 (,87).40 ϖ =.40 = 7. 8 0 i =, j = 5.7 49.7.80 i =, j = 5.7 44.44 8.8 i =, j = 49.7 44. 5.04 The means of small and large firms differ. Answer (v) is correct. 4.0 a H 0 : µ = µ = µ = µ 4 = µ 5 4 5 6 7 H : At least two means differ. A B C D E F G ANOVA Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Between Groups 747.4 4 46.86 4.46 0.007.4 Within Groups 98.7 45 97.89 Total 57. 49 F = 4.46, p-value =.007. There is enough evidence to infer that there are differences in the effect of the new assessment system between the five boroughs.

b Multiple Comparisons LSD Omega Treatment Treatment Difference Alpha = 0.05 Alpha = 0.05 Borough A Borough B -7.4.90 5.40 Borough C -6.8.90 5.40 Borough D -.4.90 5.40 Borough E -.94.90 5.40 Borough B Borough C.4.90 5.40 Borough D 5.00.90 5.40 Borough E.48.90 5.40 Borough C Borough D.76.90 5.40 Borough E.4.90 5.40 Borough D Borough E -.5.90 5.40 The mean assessments in borough A differs from the means in boroughs B and C. c The assessments for each borough are required to be normally distributed with equal variances. d The histograms are approximately bell-shaped and the sample variances are similar. 4.7 Treatments 75 9.67 7.99 Blocks 9 65 69.44 6.05 Error 7 0.48 Total 9,0 > 7 a Rejection region: F Fα,k,n k b+ = F.0,, = 4.60 Conclusion: F = 7.99, p-value =.0006. There is enough evidence to conclude that the treatment means differ. b Rejection region: F > Fα,b,n k b+ = F.0,9, 7 =.5 Conclusion: F = 6.05, p-value =.000. There is enough evidence to conclude that the block means differ. 4.7 a. k =, b = 5, Grand mean = 0.4 SS(Total) = k b i= ij ( x x) = (7 0.4) + (0 0.4) + ( 0.4) + (9 0.4) + ( 0.4)

k + ( 0.4) + (8 0.4) + (6 0.4) + ( 0.4) + (0 0.4) + ( 8 0.4) + (9 0.4) + ( 0.4) + (6 0.4) + ( 0.4) = 99.6 j = SST = b(x[t] x) = 5[(0 0.4) + (.8 0.4) + (9.4 0.4) ] 5. 6 b i = SSB = k(x[b] x) = [(9 0.4) + (9 0.4) + (.7 0.4) + (9. 0.4) + ( 0.4) ] 48. i= SSE = SS(Total) SST SSB = 99.6 5.6 48. = 5.7 b SS(Total) = k b i= ij ( x x) = (7 0.4) + (0 0.4) + ( 0.4) + (9 0.4) + ( 0.4) k + ( 0.4) + (8 0.4) + (6 0.4) + ( 0.4) + (0 0.4) + ( 8 0.4) + (9 0.4) + ( 0.4) + (6 0.4) + ( 0.4) = 99.6 j j = SST = n (x x) = 5(0 0.4) + 5(.8 0.4) + 5(9.4 0.4) 5. 6 SSE = SS(Total) SST = 99.6 5.6 = 84.0 c The variation between all the data is the same for both designs. d The variation between treatments is the same for both designs. e Because the randomized block design divides the sum of squares for error in the one-way analysis of variance into two parts. 4.79 Treatments 0.6 5..86 Blocks 9,00 59.0 6.64 Error 8 6.7 5.97 a = µ = µ H 0 : µ H : At least two means differ. Rejection region: F > Fα,k,n k b+ = F.05,, 8. F =.86, p-value =.4. There is not enough evidence to conclude that there are differences in sales ability between the holders of the three degrees. b H 0 : µ = µ = = µ 0 H : At least two means differ. 4

F = 6.64, p-value = 0. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that there are differences between the blocks of students. The independent samples design would not be recommended. c The commissions for each type of degree are required to be normally distributed with the same variance. d The histograms are bell shaped and the sample variances are similar. 4.89 Factor A 0 67.67.7 Factor B 859 49.5 4.60 Interaction 6 5 85.5.9 Error 84 7845 9.9 Total 95 940 a Rejection region: F > Fα,(a )(b ),n ab F.05,6, 84 =.5 F =.9. There is not enough evidence to conclude that factors A and B interact. b Rejection region: F > Fα,a,n ab F.05,, 84 =.76 F =.7. There is not enough evidence to conclude that differences exist between the levels of factor A. c Rejection region: F > Fα,b,n ab F.05,, 84 =.5 F = 4.60. There is enough evidence to conclude that differences exist between the levels of factor B. 4.95 a Detergents and temperatures b The response variable is the whiteness score. c There are a = 5 detergents and b = temperatures. 9 0 4 5 6 A B C D E F G ANOVA Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Sample 97 968.5 7.8 0.0000.06 Columns 967 4 74.9 6.7 0.000.44 Interaction 45 8 06.5.78 0.007.0 Within 490 5 0.4 Total 467 49 d Test for interaction: F =.78, p-value =.007. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that detergents and temperatures interact. The F-tests in Parts e and f are irrelevant. 5

4. H 0 : µ = µ = µ = µ 4 H : At least two means differ. 4 5 6 A B C D E F G ANOVA Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit Between Groups. 0.705 9.7 0.0000.69 Within Groups 7.99 04 0.0769 Total 0. 07 F = 9.7, p-value = 0. There is sufficient evidence to infer that there are differences in changes to the TSE depending on the loss the previous day. 5.5 H 0 : p =.05, p =.07, p =.04, p =.84 4 Cell i H : At least one pi is not equal to its specified value. f i e f e ) i ( i i ( f i ei ) / ei 9 50(.05) =.5 6.5.8 50(.07) = 7.5 5.5.7 4 50(.04) = 0.0 4.0.60 4 94 50(.84) = 0.0-6.0. Total 50 50 χ = 7.9 Rejection region: χ > χα,k = χ.05, = 7.8 χ = 7.9, p-value =.0475. There is enough evidence to infer that the reported side effects of the placebo differ from that of the cold remedy. 5.9 H 0 : The two variables economic option and political affiliation) are independent Cell i H : The two variables are dependent f i e f e ) i ( i i ( f i ei ) / ei 0 444()/000 = 46.96-45.96 4.76 8 444(557)/000 =.99 48.0 9.85 6 444(4)/000 = 6.05 -.05 0.067 4 8 0()/000 = 4.0-5.0 0.588 6

5 67 0(557)/000 = 68.5 -.5 0.0 6 5 0(4)/000 = 8.46 6.54.7 7 50()/000 = 8.75 48.5 8.4 8 88 50(557)/000 =.75-4.75 4.58 9 50(4)/000 = 5.50-4.50 0.570 0 6 76()/000 = 58.6.74 0.9 90 76(557)/000 = 9.75 -.75 0.08 5 76(4)/000 = 4.99 0.0 0.000 Total 000 000 χ = 70.675 Rejection region: α (r )(c.0, 6 χ > χ, = χ = 6.8 χ = 70.675, p-value = 0. There is sufficient evidence to infer that political affiliation affects support for economic options. 5.75 H 0 : The two variables (cold and group) are independent 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 4 5 H : The two variables are dependent χ = 4.9, p-value =.468. There is not enough evidence to infer there are differences between the four groups. A B C D E Contingency Table Group Cold TOTAL 7 8 5 9 8 7 4 6 8 4 TOTAL 54 60 4 chi-squared Stat 4.9 df p-value 0.468 chi-squared Critical 7.847 7