ORDINANCE NO

Similar documents
APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

WHEREAS, the New Jersey Department of Transportation' s Complete Streets

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Living Streets Policy

Land Use Bicycle Spaces Required Type Residential

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

Complete Streets: Building Momentum in Connecticut

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

What is Going on with Complete Streets

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY GUIDE

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

City of Saline. Complete Streets Ordinance

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Town of Babylon Sustainable Complete Streets Policy

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

Walking & Bicycling Questionnaire for Candidates

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Chapter 9: Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

City Council Agenda Item #6-A CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. John A. Russo City Manager

Complete streets serve the 1/3 of Hoosiers who do not drive.

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Community Bicycle Planning

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Randy Neufeld National Complete Streets Coalition. September 8, 2008

Planning Guidance in the 2012 AASHTO Bike Guide

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Cities Connect. Cities Connect! How Urbanity Supports Social Inclusion

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

New Measure A Expenditure Categories DEFINITIONS OF ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Adopted March 8, 2007

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

Developing a Regional Complete Streets Policy Statement for North Central Texas. Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee August 17, 2011

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Sustainable Transportation Planning in the Portland Region

About the Active Transportation Alliance

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

The Florida Bicycle and Pedestrian Partnership Council

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

BEAR CREEK PARK AND RIDE

Connecting cyclists to work. Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

FINAL PLAN APPENDIX D CITY OF BERKELEY BIKE PLAN D-1

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Fargo Moorhead Metropolitan Area Complete Streets Policy Statement

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Appendix C 3. Bicycle / Pedestrian Planning

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

General Design Factors

City of Jeffersonville Complete Streets Workshop

Multimodal Transportation Plan

Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan Public Comment Report

Section 9. Implementation

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY March 5, 2019 City Council

4. Mobility and Transportation Element. Page Bikes and Pedestrians

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Complete Streets Policy and Practice

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

Tacoma & Pierce County Construction Update

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

North Coast Corridor:

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Transcription:

1 Sponsored by: Councilmembers Stan Flemming, Connie Ladenburg, and Rick Talbert 2 Requested by: Executive/Public Works and Utilities - Transportation Services 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 ORDINANCE NO. 2014-445 12 An Ordinance of the Pierce County Council Endorsing the Concept of 13 Complete Streets, Which Promotes Roadways that are Safe and 14 Convenient for all Modes of Travel; and Identifying 15 Circumstances for Exceptions to Complete Streets 16 Construction. 1 Whereas, the Complete Streets concept promotes streets that are safe and 1 convenient for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motor 20 vehicle drivers of all ages and abilities; and 21 22 Whereas, streets constitute a large portion of the public space and should be 23 corridors for all modes of transportation, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit; 24 and 25 26 Whereas, streets that support and invite multiple uses, including safe, active, 27 and ample space for pedestrians, bicycles, and transit, are more conducive to the public 2 life and efficient movement of people than streets designed primarily to move 2 automobiles and trucks; and 30 31 Whereas, Pierce County currently has a number of land use and transportation 32 policies, plans, programs and regulatory requirements that focus on various 33 components of the transportation system including congestion management, multimodal 34 coordination, non-motorized improvements, access control, street trees, street lighting, 35 traffic calming, and transit services; and 36 37 Whereas, trends in energy and transportation costs, air quality and public health 3 necessitate a more comprehensive approach to mobility within communities that offer a 3 greater variety of mobility choices and which is not strictly automobile based; and 40 41 Ordinance No. 2014-44s Page 1 of 5 30 Tacoma Alle S, Rm 1046. TBcoma, WA 6402

1 Whereas, many of the existing roadways where Pierce County residents walk 2 and bicycle are incomplete and lack sidewalks or crosswalks, have lanes too narrow to 3 share with bicyclists, and make no accommodation for transit riders or for people with 4 disabilities; and 5 6 Whereas, recent trends indicate that Pierce County will experience increased 7 traffic congestion and travel times as the population increases and the number of commuters to employment centers within the County increases; and 10 Whereas, there are practical limits to the expansion of road ways in response to 11 traffic congestion; and 12 13 Whereas, promoting pedestrian, bicycle and transit travel as an alternative to the 14 automobile reduces negative environmental impacts, promotes healthy living and is less 15 costly to the commuter; and 16 Whereas, the development of a more complete transportation network or 1 Complete Streets can improve pedestrian safety, increase the capacity of the 1 transportation network and promote improvements in public health; and 20 21 Whereas, the Federal Highway Administration has confirmed that designing the 22 street with pedestrians in mind significantly reduces pedestrian risk. About one-third of 23 Americans do not drive, including low-income Americans who cannot afford cars, and 24 an increasing number of older adults. Whether they walk or bicycle directly to their 25 destinations or to public transportation, these individuals require safe access to get to 26 work, school, shops and medical visits, and to take part in social, civic and volunteer 27 activities. In 2006, nearly one quarter of pedestrian fatalities were children ( percent) 2 and older adults (15 percent); and 2 30 Whereas, studies have found that providing more travel options, including public 31 transportation, bicycling and walking facilities, is an important element in reducing 32 congestion. Many studies show that when roads are better designed for bicycling, 33 walking, and taking transit, more people do so; and 34 35 Page 2 of 5 Pierce County Council 30 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Taooma, WA 402

1 Whereas, the construction of Complete Streets can be an essential component 2 in reducing automobile trips as evidenced by the 2001 National Household 3 Transportation Survey which revealed that 50 percent of all trips in metropolitan areas 4 are three miles or less and 2 percent are one mile or less--distances easily traversed 5 by foot or bicycle. Yet, 65 percent of trips under one mile are now made by automobile, 6 in part because of incomplete streets that make it dangerous or unpleasant to walk, 7 bicycle, or take transit; and Whereas, a 2007 Washington State Department of Transportation survey found 10 that a lack of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, such as sidewalks and bicycle lanes, 11 is a primary reason why Washington residents do not walk or bicycle more frequently; 12 and 13 14 Whereas, the United States Congress and the National Association of Local 15 Boards of Health specifically recommend Complete Streets policies as a strategy to 16 increase pedestrian and bicycle travel modes; and 1 Whereas, other jurisdictions and agencies nationwide have adopted Complete 1 Streets legislation, including the United States Department of Transportation, numerous 20 state transportation agencies, and cities such as San Francisco, Sacramento, San 21 Diego, Boulder, Chicago, Seattle, Kirkland, Redmond, and Portland; and 22 23 Whereas, the Complete Streets concept is supported by the Institute of Traffic 24 Engineers, American Planning Association, United States Centers for Disease Control 25 and Prevention, American Public Health Association, and many other transportation, 26 planning, and public health professionals; and 27 2 Whereas, on August 26, 200, the Pierce County Council adopted Resolution 2 No. R200-s, which expressed support for the Complete Streets concept and 30 requested that a Complete Streets policy be included as a component of the 31 Transportation Plan Update; and 32 33 Whereas, the 2015 update to the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan will 34 contain policies supporting Complete Streets; and 35 36 Whereas, the Washington State Legislature adopted a Complete Streets Grant 37 Program in 2011, codified in Section 47.04.320 of the Revised Code of Washington; 3 and 3 Page 3 of 5 30 Tacoma Ava S, Rm 1046 Tacoma, WA 402

Whereas, funding from the Washington State Complete Streets Grant Program 2 will only be available to jurisdictions that have adopted a Complete Streets Ordinance; 3 and 4 5 Whereas, Sections 4-5,4-7, and 4-11 of the "Manual on Design Guidelines and 6 Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in Pierce County" contain requirements 7 of the County for providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and bus turnouts; and Whereas, the Pierce County "Standard Drawings" contains design standards for 10 sidewalks, walkways, and paved shoulders; and 11 12 Whereas, Titles B, "Construction and Infrastructure Regulations - Road and 13 Bridge Design and Construction Standards," and 1J, "Development Regulations- 14 Design Standards and Guidelines," of the Pierce County Code contain requirements of 15 private developers for providing pedestrian and bicycle facilities and bus turnouts on 16 both public and private roads; Now Therefore, 1 BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of Pierce County: 1 20 Section 1. Pierce County endorses the concept of Complete Streets, which 21 promotes roadways that are safe and convenient for those of all ages and abilities, 22 including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motor vehicle drivers. Pierce County 23 strives to provide and require the implementation of facilities for all users on newly 24 constructed or reconstructed roads. The County Engineer may, in his or her sole 25 discretion, determine that there are exceptions to the provision of these facilities. 26 Among the conditions that may preclude the construction of such facilities are the 27 following: 2 2 a. Their establishment would be contrary to public safety; or 30 b. Their construction is not practically feasible because of significant adverse 31 environmental impacts to streams, wetlands, steep slopes, or other critical 32 areas; or 33 c. Their construction is not practically feasible because of significant adverse 34 impacts on neighboring land uses, including impacts from right-of-way 35 acquisition; or 36 d. There is no identified need for the improvement; or 37 e. In instances where a documented exception is granted by the County 3 Engineer. 3 40 Page 4 of 5 Pierce County Council 30 Tacoma Ave 5, Rm 1046 Taooma, WA 402

Where these facilities are omitted from a roadway project, the County should 2 consider whether bicyclists and pedestrians can be accommodated by nearby facilities. 3 Aside from new and reconstructed roadways, the County shall consider other measures 4 that can benefit bicyclists and pedestrians, such as standalone shoulder paving 5 projects. Pierce County strives to provide complete street connections to similarly 6 designed road ways of the Washington State Department of Transportation and local 7 Cities and Towns. 10 11 ATTEST: 12 13 PASSEO this 5.ft.. day of A-v-.<f0:>'t,2014. PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL Pierce County, Washington ~; &~~,h.~~ A-d flth 16 -o"'"e-nlis-e""o--'.""j=-o-h"'n'-'s<.. o.l.n---..:.--=-===----=---- I oa~ Clerk of the Council 7 ~ouncil Chair -----... 1 1 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Date of Publication of 2 Notice of Public Hearing: ;;5",,1'1 ('?>, &01 '-f 2 30 Effective Date of Ordinance: ~ la. ~ -t -"t;.}vi '1 31 Pat McCarthy Pierce County~ xecuti APpr t '/ V 0, this day of ---..L~~f44=, 2014. Page 5 of 5 30 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Tacoma, WA 402