Design Considerations for Complete Streets. The Kiewit Center for Infrastructure and Transportation

Similar documents
The Influence of Human Factors on Access Management Design

LECTUR 10 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DRIVER, THE PEDESTRIAN, THE VEHICLE AND THE ROAD. One problem that faces traffic and transportation engineers is:

INDEX. Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads INDEX

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

ROUNDABOUTS/TRAFFIC CIRCLES

Safety Impacts: Presentation Overview

Designing Complete Streets: What you need to know

MUTCD Part 6G: Type of Temporary Traffic Control Zone Activities

Retrofitting Urban Arterials into Complete Streets

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT ROUNDABOUTS

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

Gateway Signs. Description: Sign reminding drivers of the need to drive slowly Issues addressed: speeding Cautions/Limitations: Application:

Geometric Design Tables

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts

RAISED MEDIAN EFFECTIVENESS

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

Appendix C. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM TOOLBOX

Development of Arlington County s Marked Crosswalk Guidelines. Jon Lawler, P.E. Design Engineer Arlington County, VA

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

Chapter Twenty-eight SIGHT DISTANCE BUREAU OF LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS MANUAL

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Introduction to Transportation Engineering. Discussion of Stopping and Passing Distances

General Design Factors

What Is a Complete Street?

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

Design of Suburban Highways

Guidance. ATTACHMENT F: Draft Additional Pages for Bicycle Facility Design Toolkit Separated Bike Lanes: Two-Way to One-Way Transitions

C. Best Practice Pedestrian Treatment Toolbox

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

Freeway System Considerations

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Table of Contents. Introduction. Prompt List Arterials and Streets. Prompt List Interchange. Prompt List Intersections. Prompt List Limited Access

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TOOLBOX

ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC INVESTIGATIONS

$ 12" $#&%$ 86.) *1! *1 /3 )00, , (1* Neighborhood Traffic Calming Part 3 Solutions Bradley William Yarger, P.E.

Driveway Design Criteria

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 2 - Land Development and Roadway Access

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Central Arkansas Regional Transportation Study Area ROADWAY DESIGN STANDARDS And Implementation Procedures

MEMORANDUM TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESTRICTING PARKING ADJACENT TO 170 AND 171 BRISCO ROAD

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Road Diets FDOT Process

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Introduction to Transportation Engineering. Discussion of Stopping and Passing Distances

PEDESTRIAN ACCOMMODATIONS DPS 201 AT INTERCHANGES

Off-road Trails. Guidance

3.1 TRAFFIC CALMING PROCESS SUMMARY

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

CHAPTER 16 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pedestrian Safety at Interchanges

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Technical Summary Access Management in the Vicinity of Intersections

Intersection Design. Leah Ness, Craig Hardy and Eric Sorensen

Classification Criteria

Broadway Complete Streets Project

PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EVALUATION GUIDELINE FOR UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES. Figure Title

Safety of U-turns at Unsignalized Median Openings

Including Revision 1 dated May 2012 and Revision 2 dated May 2012

Retrofitting for Complete Streets

Application of a Complete Street

Pedestrian Safety Field Guide and Workbook Crosswalks at Intersections. 1. Introduction. 2. Human factors. 3. A word on the Guide and Workbook

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

Designing for Pedestrian Safety

Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts. Presentation to the Howard-Suamico School Board November 26, 2007

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

JUNE, 2000 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 5-0(1) CHAPTER 5 AT-GRADE INTERSECTIONS

Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications

JCE 4600 Transportation Engineering. Traffic Control

DEFINITIONS Activity Area - Advance Warning Area Advance Warning Sign Spacing Advisory Speed Approach Sight Distance Attended Work Space

ROUNDABOUTS. Improving Safety and Efficiency. SR83 & Smithville Western Rd. Joel Montgomery, PE Director of Administration

400 Intersection Design. Table of Contents. 401 Intersections At-Grade Two Way Left Turn Lanes (TWLTL)... 9

City of Sammamish. Welcome. Issaquah-Fall City Road Improvements Project Phase I Design: 242nd Avenue SE to Klahanie Drive SE

Appendix A: Crosswalk Policy

Intersec ons. Alignment. Chapter 3 Design Elements. Standards AASHTO & PennDOT: As close to 90 as possible, but a minimum of 60.

American Fork City Access Management Manual

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

October 2004 REVISIONS (2) SUPERELEVATION DEVELOPMENT 11.3(2)

Speed Management Action Plan

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

CHAPTER 6H. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

Welcome! Urban Work Zone Design. Training Course 0-1

How Might Connected Vehicles and Autonomous Vehicles Influence Geometric Design? October 10, 2017

Geometric designs for Safe Highways. Dr. Manoj M. Asst. Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Delhi

2018 AASHTO BIKE GUIDE

Who is Toole Design Group?

4.1 CONTEXT. The existing terrain and sight conditions will affect available sight lines and approach speeds of bicyclists and motorists.

Considerations in the Review and Approval of a Driveway in Your Jurisdiction

Modern Roundabouts: a guide for application

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

Speed. Scale/design geometrics

Addendum to SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55 17: Better Military Traffic Engineering Revision 1 Effective: 24 Aug Crosswalk Guidelines

A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways

Transcription:

Design Considerations for Complete Streets

Objective Provide design geometrics and features that accommodate balanced operations of bicycles, pedestrians and vehicles on a complete street

Cul-de-sacs, 10-15 mph Locals, 15-55 mph Minor Collector, 20-30 mph Major Collector, 25-35 mph Arterials, 40-50 mph Interstate (freeways), 55-70 mph

Arterials are high volume, high speed streets Make up 10% of street system Carry 48% of vehicle miles of travel Provide separate bike lane / path Cross pedestrians at intersections or mid-block with high type design and control

Design Considerations Speed Volume / conflicts User / vehicle characteristics Human factors

Vehicle Conflicts

Bicycle Conflicts

Pedestrian Conflicts

Speed Speed determines: Horizontal curvature Sight distance Intersection layout and elements Roundabout design

Speed and Safety Accident severity is a function of speed magnitude Accident potential is more a function of speed differential

Mean SPD Maintain 10-15 mph, or less, speed differential

Human Factors 90-95% of operating information is visual Ability to see 3-5 cone of vision - excellent vision 10 cone - good vision 20 cone - satisfactory vision 70-90 cone - peripheral vision

Human Factors How drivers / humans see ~0.25 sec eye shift ~0.25 sec eye focus 0.5-1.0 sec head/body movement

Human Factors Perception Reaction Time Perception Intellection Emotion Volition Typically 0.5 sec - 4.0 sec

Human Factors Design Perception Reaction Time Source: 2001 AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design

Stopping Sight Distance Must be provided for 100% of roadway SSD = Perception + Reaction Distance Braking Distance Speed SSD Time 15 mph 80 ft 3.6 sec 20 mph 115 ft 3.9 sec 25 mph 155 ft 4.2 sec 30 mph 200 ft 4.5 sec 35 mph 40 mph 250 ft 305 ft 4.9 sec 5.2 sec

Driver Expectancy The psychological impact on driver expectations and behavior from the combined formal and informal information based on previous knowledge and experiences: Formal info signs, markings, signals Informal info curbs, parked vehicles, street furniture

Complete Street Design Situation - Mixed users - Varying speeds - Numerous conflicts - High degree of complexity - User workload is high

Complete Street Design Objectives Control speeds Achieve uniformity in speeds Reduce volumes / conflicts Provide adequate sight distance Demonstrate a pedestrian/bicycle environment

Control Speeds Control speeding Maintain uniform speeds Conflicts become more problematic Crashes become more severe Keep speeds within 10-15 mph of bicycle, or provide safe separation

Control Conflicts Eliminate most severe conflicts Prohibit crossing conflicts Eliminate left turns 75% of accidents are left-turn related

Provide Adequate Sight Distance Stopping sight distance provides adequate sight distance to clearly discernible conflict As conflicts increase, perception reaction time must increase by about 0.5 sec 1.5 sec for each major conflict Must increase sight distance for large perception reaction time Eliminate sight obstructions, such as parked vehicles Eliminate trees or their low limbs (up to 6.0 ft)

Reduce Parking Reduce lateral conflicts Improves sight distance Increases traffic flow 30% Reduces crashes 20-40%

Accident Rates* by Median Type Access Points per mile <20 20.01-40 40.01-60 >60 Total Undivided 3.8 7.3 9.4 10.6 9.0 * Crashes per million vehicle miles TWLTL 3.4 5.9 7.9 9.2 6.9 Non- Traversable 2.9 5.1 6.8 8.2 5.6

Pedestrian Crash Rates* on Suburban Arterials Intersection: 2.32* - Undivided 2.49 - TWLTL 0.97 - Non-Traversable Median * Crashes per 100-million entering vehicles Midblock: 6.69** - Undivided 6.66 - TWLTL 3.86 - Non-Traversable Median ** Crashes per 100-million vehicle miles

Bulb-Outs at Intersections or Mid-Block Use bulb-outs at pedestrian crossings Provides very visible evidence of pedestrian environment Shortens pedestrian crossing time Provides visual restrictions of street geometrics Changes driver expectancy

Demonstrate Pedestrian / Bicycle Environment Drivers not intimidated by pedestrians / bicyclists since not a threat Show drivers through traffic control devices, geometrics and surfacing they are in pedestrian / bicycle environment

Use One-Way Streets Conflicts are dramatically reduced Severity of conflicts that occur are not as great Signalization and progression are more efficient

Use Roundabouts Reduce conflicts Control speeds Limit severity Dictate who has right-of-way

Roundabout Design Features Provide uniform speeds throughout the roundabout Accommodate bicycles in roundabout Accommodate pedestrians close to roundabout Use vertical features, but do not restrict sight distance

Conclusions Use decision sight distance to accommodate increased conflicts Control facility speed Use bulb-outs at pedestrian crossings Control parking Use roundabouts at intersections

Problems with Elderly Drivers Progressive loss of focusing ability Greater sensitivity to glare Eye diseases reduce acuity: cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma Dynamic visual acuity to see moving targets decreases Twice as much brightness needed to see per decade over 25 By 75, 32x the brightness of 25

Night Time Problems These facilities must function at night People see more from silhouette than from reflected light at night Non-reflectorized material can be seen from; 55 ft blue 80 ft red 120 ft yellow 500 ft retro-reflective material Glare recovery 2 sec 15 yrs 9 sec 65 yrs

Source: 2001 AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design