MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Similar documents
Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSED ONLY, 10/26/13 MOBILITY PLAN UPDATE DESIGN TOOLBOX

BALANCING TRAVEL MODES

3.0 EXISTING FACILITIES AND NEEDS

SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD CORRIDOR


Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

Bicycle Facilities Planning

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Draft MOBILITY ELEMENET. Community Meeting May 22, 2013

Roadways. Roadways III.

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

THE NACTO MANUALS AND DESIGNING FOR VISION ZERO ZAKI MUSTAFA SHIRLEY ZAMORA

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Innovations & Applications

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Road Diets FDOT Process

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

Town of Bethlehem. Planning Assessment. Bethlehem Town Board

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

The DC Pedestrian Master Plan

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

WELCOME. Traffic & Parking Commission Special Meeting May 30, Iteris, Inc. All rights reserved.

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Community Workshop

City of Beverly Hills North Santa Monica Blvd Reconstruction. Community Meeting Presentation September 30 and October 1, 2015

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Transportation Planning Division

California Department of Transportation, District 4. Sloat Boulevard Project Skyline Blvd. to 19 th Ave. Community Update January 13, 2016

Designing for Pedestrian Safety in Washington, DC

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

REVIEW OF LOCAL TRAFFIC FLOW / LONG RANGE PLANNING SOLUTIONS STUDY

Existing Pedestrian Conditions. PSAC February 8, 2011

Scope of the Transit Priority Project

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

San Jose Transportation Policy

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

Ocean Park Boulevard Streetscape Improvement Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

BALBOA AREA: TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & PLANNING

Complete Streets Policies in Charlotte

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SR2S)

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 9. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Bicycle Boulevards and Neighborhood Greenways

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Lessons Learned from Cycle Tracks (Class IV Bikeways) Design Practice

Metro Bike/Bus Interface Study

Traffic Engineering and Operations for BRT in Los Angeles

WEHO to go. A guide to exploring West Hollywood car-free, on foot, on bike, or on transit

Westside Transportation Access Needs Assessment - Short and Long Term Improvements

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

Highway 217 Corridor Study. Phase I Overview Report

95 th Street Corridor Transportation Plan. Steering Committee Meeting #2

San Pablo High Treatment applied incrementally at each N + ++

Transportation Planning Division

HILLSDALE/US101 BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Citywide Sidewalk and Crosswalk Programs

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

Richmond-Adelaide Cycle Tracks

GLOSSARY CROSSWALK. CROSSING TYPES

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

4 MOBILITY PLAN. Mobility Plan Objectives. Mobility Context. 1. Integrate with Local and Regional Transit Improvements

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Arlington Public Schools Thomas Jefferson Site Evaluation Transportation Networks. Thomas Jefferson Working Group Meeting #6 November 10, 2014

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Complete Streets: Planning, Policy & Performance

ELEMENT 11 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Bridgewater Complete Streets Prioritization Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment

Station 1: Street & Sidewalk Upgrades

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS TRAFFIC & PARKING COMMISSION

Central Avenue Bikeway Traffic and Safety Impact Assessment

Transcription:

MOBILITY WORKSHOP Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

Review of General Plan M-1 Develop world-class transit system M-3 Maintain/enhance pedestrian-oriented City M-4 Create comprehensive bike network M-5 Create environmentally & financially sustainable transportation network M-7 Protect/preserve residential neighborhoods from nonresidential traffic

Traffic Congestion

Santa Monica Boulevard

Sunset Boulevard

Daily Traffic Volumes Santa Monica Boulevard (between Doheny & La Cienega) 1988 ADT = 41,000 2008 ADT = 53,388 30% increase Sunset Boulevard (between Doheny & La Cienega) 1988 ADT = 41,000 2008 ADT =51,462 26% increase Doheny Drive (@ Santa Monica Boulevard) 1988 ADT = 22,000 2008 ADT = 14,545 34% decrease

Daily Traffic Volumes (Cont.) La Cienega (@ Santa Monica Boulevard) 1988 ADT = 35,500 2008 ADT = 35,501 No Change Fairfax Avenue (@ Santa Monica Boulevard) 1988 ADT = 28,000 2008 ADT = 30,457 9% increase La Brea Avenue (@ Santa Monica Boulevard) 1988 ADT = 40,500 2008 ADT = 39,173 3% decrease

Transit Santa Monica & Sunset Boulevards High transit ridership on Santa Monica (approx. 15,000 per day) Key Commercial Corridors Routes 4 & 704 (Santa Monica) Routes 2, 302, 217 (Sunset) La Cienega, Fairfax & La Brea Lower transit ridership (up to 3,000 per day) Key Commercial Corridors Routes 105 & 705 (La Cienega), 217/218 (Fairfax) & 212, 213 (La Brea)

Transit

Pedestrians Santa Monica Boulevard High pedestrian activity Enhancements such as bulb outs and crosswalk treatments 21 Signalized Crossing locations (traffic signal) 8 uncontrolled mid block pedestrian crossing locations 2 Rapid Flashing Beacon controlled pedestrian crossing locations (Orange Grove & Westmount) Future Rapid Flashing Beacon locations at Hancock & Palm

Pedestrians Sunset Boulevard High pedestrian activity Enhancements such bulb outs & pedestrians refuges (Wetherly Dr and Sunset Plaza Dr) 12 Signalized Crossing locations (traffic signal) 4 uncontrolled mid block pedestrian crossing locations No current or proposed Rapid Flashing Beacon locations

Pedestrians

Parking Santa Monica & Sunset Boulevard Multiple locations to park on street (EB & WB) All parking parallel to the street Serves local business and land uses on both streets

Parking

Traffic Signals West Hollywood has 61 traffic signals 21 are located on Santa Monica Boulevard 12 are located on Sunset Boulevard 55% of the signals are located on 2 streets

Traffic Signals (Cont.) Signal Density West Hollywood (1.89 sq. miles) = 32 per square mile Santa Monica (15.9 sq. miles) = 13 per square mile Burbank (17.4 sq. miles) = 11 per square mile Pasadena (23.1 sq. miles) = 14 per square mile Los Angeles (503 sq. miles) = 9 per square mile

Other U- Turns & Medians Access limited on Santa Monica Boulevard Medians restrict left turns Results in U-turns in the corridor Trade off: Helps traffic flow in certain locations Through Traffic Data indicates that a significant amount of traffic has an origin/destination in West Hollywood Cut through traffic approximately 35% of the total

What has been done to improve mobility?

City Signal System 61 signalized intersections Majority signalized by LA County and Caltrans New signals - traffic safety issues Santa Monica/La Jolla Santa Monica/Martel Fountain/Fuller Sunset/Roxbury Beverly/George Burns New signals - new developments mitigation Beverly/Wetherly (Bristol Farms Market) La Brea/Romaine (Gateway Shopping Center) La Brea/Lexington (Monarch Mixed-Use Development) Agreements with City of Los Angeles and Beverly Hills

Traffic Signal Operations Originally operated on fixed timing plans - minimal coordination 1991 - started to build communication between the signals Traffic Management Center (TMC) Upgraded controllers and vehicle detection Coordinated timing plans (Quic-Net) Corridors currently operating on the Quic-Net System: Sunset Blvd Fountain Ave Santa Monica Blvd Fairfax Ave La Brea Ave

Traffic Signal Operations - Local The City contracts with KOA Corporation for technical expertise with traffic signal timing Frequently update timing plans Constraints Federal mandates (pedestrian, bicycles, and yellow clearance) Short blocks between signals High traffic - peak periods High turn volumes at major intersections Pedestrians crossing - unsignalized intersections Non-residential traffic shortcut/detouring through neighborhoods

Traffic Signal Operations Regional Coordination WeHo s TMC linked to County Information Exchange Network (IEN) IEN website shared timing data (including City of LA) IEN - ongoing and successful to reduce delay where possible. WeHo represented at METRO s Technical Advisory Committee and Streets and Freeways Subcommittee (monthly meetings) WeHo participates on METRO s Arterial Intelligent Transportation System Committee

Recent and Upcoming System Improvements METRO Rapid Bus Grant - $1.6 million project to implement transit priority on 4 Rapid Bus Routes Currently under construction Controller and communication system upgrades at 33 intersections Implementation of coordinated traffic signal operations to improve transit reliability and reduce passenger travel times. Expanding operation of the Quic-Net System for San Vicente, Melrose, and Beverly corridors Countdown Pedestrian Signal Heads and Upgraded/ADA Compliant Pedestrian Push Buttons Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons to enhance pedestrian visibility at unsignalized crosswalks Enhancements installed during Santa Monica Blvd and Sunset Blvd Reconstruction Projects: Protected/Permissive Left Turn Arrows High visibility roadway markings/signage Bulb outs - reduce pedestrian crossing time Median islands - provide pedestrian refuge/prevent autos shortcutting Bus stops location - maximize rider use, minimize pedestrian crossings, no bus pull-outs to keep bus moving Bike Lanes

Multi-Modal Infrastructure and Programs Transit Pedestrian Bicycle Plan Alternate mode incentives TDM Mixed-use

Current Anti-Gridlock Enforcement Location Fountain & La Brea Fountain & Crescent Heights Sunset & Cory Sunset & Doheny Sunset & Sunset Plaza Santa Monica & San Vicente

MOBILITY OPTIONS MOBILITY OPTIONS

New Technologies

Bluetooth/WiFi

Camera Detection

Wireless Pavement Detection

Increase Anti-Gridlock Strategies Advantages Limitations Costs Stop gridlock at key intersections in West Hollywood Traffic Assist Officers Small or no decrease in corridor travel times One intersection for 6 months = $45,000 Can reduce north south congestion Potentially requires large numbers of officers

Transit Pull Outs Advantages Limitations Trade offs Buses no longer block travel lanes More delay to bus operations. Harder to merge back into traffic Unpopular with Metro Improvement in vehicular flow and reduced delay Requires dedicated space. Potential loss of parking New Infrastructure required

Far Side Bus Stops Advantages Limitations Trade offs Buses no longer conflict with right turning vehicles Pedestrians more likely to cross behind buses Potential intersection blockages due to new location Can obstruct site distances for vehicles and pedestrians May increase through traffic queueing New Infrastructure required

Peak Period Bus Only Lanes Advantages Limitations Trade offs Buses no longer block travel lanes Requires removal of pedestrian Bulb outs Unpopular with local business due to lost parking Improvement in vehicular flow and reduced delay Requires dedicated space. Peak period parking loss Expensive to implement New Infrastructure required

Crosswalk Consolidation (removal of unsignalized crosswalks) Advantages Limitations Trade offs Improvement in vehicular flow due to decreased pedestrian/vehicle interaction Pedestrians have to walk further to cross Santa Monica Gives priority to drivers over pedestrians Relatively inexpensive to implement Requires physical changes in infrastructure May result in an increase in illegal pedestrian crossings in high activity areas

Left turn & U-turn prohibitions Advantages Limitations Trade offs Less delay to vehicle through movements Residents may no longer be able to directly access their streets Illegal turns anticipated Improvement in vehicular flow Limited cost to implement Secondary congestion and delay impacts as a result of moving the traffic to new locations Likely unpopular with local business and residents

Peak Period Parking Restrictions (additional travel lane on Santa Monica) Advantages Limitations Trade offs Potential additional travel lane Large increase in vehicle capacity during peak travel hours Improved travel times and reduced delay Loss of parking during the peak period Requires physical changes in infrastructure removal of pedestrian Bulb outs Gives priority to vehicles over other modes Impacts to pedestrians and bicycles May be unpopular with local business and residents Expensive to implement

Pedestrian Scramble Phase Advantages Limitations Trade offs Prioritizes pedestrian activity in busy areas Vehicle operations more efficient Increased safety for pedestrians Longer waiting times for cars/pedestrians Clear signage required Difficult to synchronize signals Requires new signal equipment Potential increase in illegal pedestrian crossings

Recommendations Near Term Improvements New Technologies Long Term Options Anti Gridlock Far side bus stops Left turn prohibitions Peak Period Parking Restrictions Transit Pull Outs Crosswalk Consolidation Travel Time Improvement Small Large Cost Low High