STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Similar documents
STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Future of Lake Whitefish and Lake Trout Populations in The Great Lakes

Status and Trends of the Lake Superior Fish Community,

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Dauphin Lake Fishery. Status of Walleye Stocks and Conservation Measures

Red Cliff Hatchery bolsters Lake Superior coaster population - Stocks walleye in local lakes

Impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species on the Lake Superior Fishery. by Jeff Gunderson Minnesota Sea Grant Program

Status of the shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Lake Superior

Job 3. Title: Coordinate with other studies, process and analyze data; write reports.

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Lake Trout Working Group Report Lake Michigan Committee Meeting March 23, 2010 Windsor, ON

THE STATE OF LAKE SUPERIOR IN 1992

P.O. Box 9 Odanah, WI Phone LAKE SUPERIOR

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDROACOUSTIC SURVEY DESIGN TO QUANTIFY PREY FISH ABUNDANCE IN THE MINNESOTA WATERS OF LAKE SUPERIOR

Population Dynamics of Lake Whitefish in the Apostle Islands Region of Lake Superior

RESEARCH REPORT. Contribution of Hatchery Fish to Chinook Salmon Populations and Sport Harvest in Michigan Waters of Lake Superior,

Fish Conservation and Management

Cedar Lake Comprehensive Survey Report Steve Hogler and Steve Surendonk WDNR-Mishicot

Miles Falck Wildlife Biologist Jonathan Gilbert Wildlife Section Leader and Nick McCann Wildlife Biologist

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Lake trout, Lake whitefish, Rainbow smelt, Walleye, Yellow perch. Image New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

Agenda and minutes. Minnesota 1837 Ceded Territory Fisheries Committee January 17, 2018, 10:00 a.m. WebEx

Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (4T) Herring

ASSESSMENT OF HERRING IN THE SOUTHERN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE (NAFO DIV. 4T)

Status of Yellow Perch in Lake Michigan

Southern Gulf of St. Lawrence (4T) Herring

Minutes of the Lake Superior Technical Committee Meeting July 29-30, 2003 USFWS Marquette Biological Station Marquette, Michigan

Fish Lake Informational Meeting. Dan Wilfond, Fisheries Specialist Deserae Hendrickson, Area Fisheries Supervisor MN DNR Fisheries - Duluth

Genetic Heritage of Wild Lake Trout in Lake Michigan

During the mid-to-late 1980s

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

West Coast Rock Lobster. Description of sector. History of the fishery: Catch history

Lake Monitoring Program: Lesser Slave Lake Stock Assessment

Salmonid Community of Lake Michigan: 2017 Fall Harbor Assessment

Cod in the Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

PROGRESS REPORT NEW HAMPSHIRE S MARINE FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS MONITORING OF THE RAINBOW SMELT RESOURCE AND WINTER ICE FISHERY

Walleye Stocking Sites - Grand Traverse Bay

Current projects for Fisheries Research Unit of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

Lake Wanapitei Summer Profundal Index Netting (SPIN) Technical Report

Technical Briefing. Northern Cod (NAFO Div. 2J3KL) Newfoundland & Labrador March 23, 2018

Status of the Lake Erie Fish Community Jeff Tyson, Ohio Division of Wildlife

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

2014 Lake Michigan Lake Trout Working Group Report

Status of Yellow Perch in Lake Michigan and Yellow Perch Task Group Progress Report

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Evaluating the impact of fishing forage fish on predators. Ray Hilborn School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington

Minutes of the LAKE SUPERIOR TECHNICAL COMMITTEE. Hampton Inn Duluth, Minnesota January 16-17, 2001

Miles Falck Wildlife Biologist. Jonathan Gilbert Wildlife Section Leader. and. Nick McCann Wildlife Biologist

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Stocking Summary for Lake Michigan

Overview of the Great Lakes Mass Marking Program

Laurentian Great Lakes and their invasive species. Jeff Gunderson Minnesota Sea Grant College Program

2014 Winnebago System Walleye Report

ATLANTIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION. Winter Flounder Abundance and Biomass Indices from State Fishery-Independent Surveys

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Atlantic Menhaden

JadEco, LLC PO BOX 445 Shannon, IL 61078

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

North Carolina. Striped Mullet FMP. Update

STOCK STATUS OF SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA

HADDOCK ON THE SOUTHERN SCOTIAN SHELF AND IN THE BAY OF FUNDY (DIV. 4X/5Y)

BIG TWIN LAKE Kalkaska County (T28N, R05W, Section 18, and T28N, R06W, Section 13) Surveyed May 1999

Executive Summary Lavoie Lake 2000

Status of Yellow Perch in Lake Michigan and Yellow Perch Task Group Progress Report

Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1. Weber Lake Cheboygan County, T34N, R3W, Sec.

Diet Analysis of Burbot from Eastern Lake Michigan:

In each summer issue of Lake

Current Status and Management Recommendations for the Fishery in the Cloverleaf Chain of Lakes

FOOD OF SALMONINE PREDATORS IN LAKE SUPERIOR,

Open-Water Spearing and Netting in the 1837 Minnesota Ceded Territory During the Quota Year

2011 Status of Major Stocks. Lake Erie Management Unit March 2012

REFE;ENCE. LIBRARY I ~'iilr~~l\1~1\~11111~ ~111lli11~r. Cl LEGISLATl~E I,

Highly Migratory Species SWFSC/NMFS Report

State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME. Jerome D. Spratt

Arizona Game and Fish Department Region I Fisheries Program. Chevelon Canyon Lake Fish Survey Report Trip Report April 2015

Michigan Department of Natural Resource Fisheries Division

ASSESSMENT OF THE WEST COAST OF NEWFOUNDLAND (DIVISION 4R) HERRING STOCKS IN 2011

A Sport Fish Stock Assessment of Long Lake, Alberta, 2004

NORTHWEST SCIENCE AND INFORMATION

TESLIN LAKE 1997, 2003, 2009

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISH MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES DELAVAN LAKE SPRING 2012

Sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in subdivisions (Baltic Sea)

2017 Lake Michigan Lake Trout Working Group Report 1,2

Application of a New Method for Monitoring Lake Trout Abundance in Yukon: Summer Profundal Index Netting (SPIN)

Lake Butte des Morts Commercial Seining Project Report

COMPILED REPORTS TO THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION OF THE ANNUAL BOTTOM TRAWL AND ACOUSTICS SURVEYS FOR 2016

Fall Walleye Index Netting at Jackson Lake, Alberta, 2010

Stock characteristics, fisheries and management of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides (Walbaum)) in the Northeast Arctic

Ohio Lake Erie Fisheries Report For 2002

Executive Summary Mount Milligan 2004

LAKE TROUT POPULATION ASSESSMENT SEKULMUN LAKE Prepared by: Lars Jessup and Nathan Millar

Potomac River Fisheries Commission s. American Shad Fishing / Recovery Plan. Submitted to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

2012 Maryland FMP Report (July 2013) Section 15. Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division, Lake Superior Area

Transcription:

TUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT tate: Michigan Project No.: F-81-R-2 tudy No.: 495 Title: Assessment of lake trout populations in Michigan waters of Lake uperior Period Covered: October 1, 2000 to eptember 30, 2001 Cooperators: Bay Mills Indian Community, Brimley, Michigan; Biology Department, Northern Michigan University; Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority (CORA; formerly called Chippewa- Ottawa Treaty Fisheries Management Authority, ault te. Marie, Michigan; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan tate University; Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, Odanah, Wisconsin; Isle Royale National Park, National Park ervice; Peterson Fisheries, Hancock, MI; Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Baraga, Michigan; ivertson Fisheries, Duluth, Minnesota; Red Cliff Band of Lake uperior Chippewas, Bayfield, Wisconsin; and U.. Geological urvey, Biological Research Division, Ashland, Wisconsin. tudy Objectives: (1) To annually (or semi-annually) determine relative abundance, length and age composition, sex and maturity, sea lamprey wounding, growth rate, and mortality rate for lean and siscowet lake trout in Michigan s Lake uperior lake trout management units. (2) To periodically determine relative abundance, diet, and biological variables (age, growth rate, etc.) of lake trout varieties, other predator fish, and forage fish at various depth strata in Lake uperior. (3) To calculate total allowable catch (TAC) for lake trout in Michigan s Lake uperior management units. ummary: Compared to 2000, spring survey relative abundance of lean lake trout in 2001 increased in MI-3, MI-4, and MI-6 and declined in MI-5 and MI-7. iscowet relative abundance as indexed in spring surveys remained relatively constant in all areas and was less than lean lake trout relative abundance. Pre-recruit lean lake trout relative abundance declined in all management areas sampled during 2001. Relative abundance in 2001 of pre-recruit siscowets increased in MI-3, MI-4, MI-6, and MI-7 and declined in MI-2 and MI-5. Pre-recruit siscowet relative abundance was higher than lean values in MI-2, MI-3, MI-6, and MI-7. During the spring of 2000 and 2001, rainbow smelt were the dominant prey fish observed in the diet of lean lake trout. Coregonines were the next most frequently observed prey fish followed by sculpins. Insects were observed in over 30% of stomachs in MI-6 and over 10% of stomachs in MI-5 during the springs of 2000 and 2001. Wild lake trout statistical catch-at-age models for MI-5, MI-6, and MI-7 were used to estimate recommended lake trout harvest quotas for state and tribal fisheries for 2001 in support of the mandates of the 2000 Consent Decree of the 1836 Great Lakes Fishing Treaty. Average total annual mortality rates (1998-2000) for ages 6 to 11 were 28% in MI-5, 38% in MI-6, and 32% in MI-7. pawning stock biomass per recruit values for MI-6 were below the reference value for a stable population indicating excessive mortality rates. In MI-5 and MI-7, spawning stock biomass per recruit values were above the reference values indicating endurable mortality rates.

Job 1. Title: Assess commercial-sized lake trout. Findings: On October 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27, 2001, Marquette Fisheries Research tation (MFR) personnel conducted a lean lake trout (alvelinus namaycush namaycush) spawning survey in Presque Isle Harbor, Marquette, MI (MI-5). This was part of an ongoing cooperative study with the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC) to index spawner relative abundance. Furthermore, this survey had an objective to tag lake trout to study movement patterns in support of the lake trout stock assessment models. The total number of lake trout caught was 552 with 87% being of wild origin. There were 478 lake trout tagged with anchor tags and 10 recaptures from previous years. Otoliths were archived and weights were recorded for dead lake trout. Eggs were collected from gravid or ripe dead female lake trout to assess fecundity. Commercial-sized lean lake trout were sampled in the spring starting on April 30 and ending June 08, 2001. A contracted commercial fisher (Peterson Fisheries) under permit from GLIFWC fished five stations in Management Unit MI-3 (Figure 1). Marquette Fisheries Research tation (MFR) personnel aboard the R/V Judy sampled 11 stations in MI-4, six stations in MI-5, and nine stations in MI-6. Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority personnel sampled eight stations in MI-7. The total number of fish sampled was 4,309, including 3,470 lake trout. All spring and fall data collected during this performance period were entered into a computer database and proofed for errors by MFR personnel. tratified-random subsamples of the total fish catch for each management unit from the spring survey will be assessed for age using scales or otoliths collected from each fish. During this performance period, commercial-sized lean lake trout were also sampled in MI-1 (Isle Royale) by the National Park ervice (June-August 2001) and ivertson Fisheries (eptember-october 2000). These data have not been processed due to staff shortages at MFR. Job 2. Title: Assess pre-recruit lake trout. Findings: Pre-recruit lake trout were sampled in the summer starting on July 31 and ending eptember 11, 2001. Marquette Fisheries Research tation personnel aboard R/V Judy sampled four stations in MI-2, seven stations in MI-3, eight stations in MI-4, four stations in MI-5, four stations in MI-6, and two stations in MI-7 (Figure 1). The total number of fish sampled was 2,769, including 999 lake trout. tomach samples were collected from 1,149 fish and will be analyzed during the winter months. All data have been entered into a computer database and were proofed for errors. Fish ages will be assessed during the winter months using scales or otoliths collected during sampling. Job 3. Title: Assess lake trout variety composition. Findings: No fieldwork was done for this job during this performance period. Marquette Fisheries Research tation personnel participated in a Lake uperior lake trout and deepwater coregonine workshop sponsored by the Lake uperior Technical Committee of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission. The purpose of the workshop was to evaluate and coordinate the identification of the lake trout morphotypes (i.e., lean lake trout, siscowet alvelinus namaycush siscowet, and humper lake trout) and the various deepwater coregonines (i.e., lake herring Coregonus artedi, bloater, C. hoyi, shortjaw cisco C. zenithicus, and kiyi C. kiyi). 2

Job 4. Title: Analyze assessment data. Findings: pawner survey-average wild lean lake trout relative abundance (CPUE= catch per unit effort) in Presque Isle Harbor was 196 fish/km/day and average hatchery lake trout CPUE was 27 fish/km/day. Only one ripe female siscowet was captured on the spawning reefs. The percentage of the daily catch of wild lake trout that were females ranged from 16% on 23 October to 37% on 27 October. Percentage females caught for hatchery lake trout ranged from 20% on 23 October to 67% on 26 October. There were no hatchery female lake trout caught on 27 October. The percentage of wild lean lake trout females that were ripe averaged 42.3%. pring survey During 2001, relative abundance (GMCPUE= Geometric Mean Catch Per Unit Effort) of lean lake trout was higher than during 2000 in MI-3, MI-4, and MI-6 (Figure 2a). Lean lake trout GMCPUE declined in MI-5 and MI-7. iscowet GMCPUE has remained relatively constant during the last two years (Figure 2b). iscowet GMCPUE was highest in MI-7. Overall, wild lake trout composed more than 75% of all lean lake trout catch (not adjusted for sampling effort). pring sea lamprey wounding rates for 534-635 mm lean lake trout were lower than in 2000. Wounding rate was highest in MI-6 at 7 wounds (Type A1-A3) per 100 fish and was less than 4 wounds per 100 fish in all other management units. Pre-recruit survey Pre-recruit lean lake trout GMCPUE in 2001 declined in all management units from 2000 (Figure 3a). Pre-recruit siscowet GMCPUE was higher than lean GMCPUE in MI-2, MI-3, MI-6, and MI-7. Pre-recruit siscowet relative abundance declined from 2000 values in MI-2 and MI-5 (Figure 3b). Job 5. Title: Analyze diet data. Findings: Diet data for fish sampled in MI-7 during 2000 and 2001 were not available from CORA at the time of this report. 2000 pring urvey In general, rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax were the most frequently observed prey fish in lean lake trout stomachs in all management units sampled (Table 1). Coregonines (lake herring Coregonus artedi, bloater, C. hoyi, shortjaw cisco C. zenithicus, and kiyi C. kiyi) were the next most frequent fish in lean stomachs, followed by sculpins (slimy sculpin Cottus bairdi, mottled sculpin C. cognatus, and deepwater sculpin Myoxocephalus thompsoni). Insects were observed in 33.3% of lean stomachs in MI-6 and 10.6% of lean stomachs in MI-5. Nearly all these insects were terrestrial, indicating that lean lake trout were foraging at the lake surface during the spring. The percentage of lean lake trout stomachs that were empty ranged from 7.1% in MI-3 to 28.7% in MI-6. In general, fishes were the most frequent prey items observed in siscowet stomachs with the exception being MI-6 where insects were observed in stomachs almost as frequently as fishes (Table 1). The most frequent prey fish observed in siscowet stomachs were rainbow smelt in MI- 4, coregonines in MI-5, and sculpins in MI-6. Percent frequency of empty stomachs ranged from 0% in MI-5 to 15.8% in MI-6. 2001 pring urvey Overall, rainbow smelt were the most frequent prey fish in lean lake trout stomachs in all management units that were sampled except in MI-3 where coregonines were most frequently observed (Table 1). Coregonines were the next most frequent fish in lean stomachs followed by sculpins and then burbot Lota lota. Insects were observed in 39.5% of lean stomachs in MI-6 and 21.8% of lean stomachs in MI-5. Nearly all these insects were 3

terrestrial, indicating that lean lake trout were foraging at the lake surface during spring. The percentage of lean lake trout stomachs that were empty ranged from 13.1% in MI-4 to 28.7% in MI-5. In general, fishes were the most frequent prey items observed in siscowet stomachs, with the exception being MI-6 where insects were observed in 52.8% of the stomachs (Table 1). The most frequent prey fish observed in siscowet stomachs were coregonines in MI-3, coregonines and smelt in MI-4, and sculpins in MI-5 and MI-6. Percent frequency of empty stomachs ranged from 10.8% in MI-4 to 27% in MI-3. 2000 Pre-recruit survey Diet samples collected during the summer of 2001 will be processed this winter. tomach samples from 2000 were collected from 104 leans and 86 siscowets in MI-3, and from 124 leans and 78 siscowets in MI-6. MFR personnel and volunteer students from Northern Michigan University analyzed stomach samples. Overall, fishes were the most frequent prey item observed in both pre-recruit (total length <432 mm) lean and siscowet stomachs except for MI-6 siscowets where crustaceans (Diporeia spp., Mysis relicta) were the dominant prey items (Table 2). The most frequent fish species observed in lean lake trout were sculpins in MI-3 and rainbow smelt in MI-6. The major fish in siscowets were sculpins in both MI-3 and MI-6. In comparing invertebrate prey items, crustaceans were observed more frequently than insects in MI-6 for both leans and siscowets while the inverse occurred in MI-3. Job 6. Title: Model lean lake trout populations. Findings: tatistical catch-at-age models have been developed for wild lake trout populations in MI-5, MI-6, and MI-7 (Figure 1). These models have been used to develop harvest quotas (also termed Total Allowable Catch or TAC) for lake trout in accordance with the 2000 Consent Decree of the 1836 Great Lakes Fishing Treaty between the tate of Michigan and Native American Tribes. Overall, model results indicated abundant wild lake trout populations in MI-5 and MI-7 with mortality rates below the target maximum rate established by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (target maximum A=40%). The model for MI-6 indicated that the population is suffering mortality rates slightly above the target maximum rate. The status of the lake trout populations was indexed by comparing pawning tock Biomass produced per Recruit (BR) values with the target value. This index is a measure of the reproductive capacity of the population in the context of mortality rates. The BR for each population is the sum of the mature female biomass produced per recruit under recent mortality rates (mean of 1998-2000 rates). The target BR is the theoretical amount of BR produced if all fish older than age 7 suffer the target maximum total annual mortality rate of 40%. This method of indexing population health accounts for the age-specific differences in mortality rates from fishing and sea lamprey predation and incorporates the reproductive capacities of each population. Recent total abundance (mean of 1998-2000) of ages 3 to 15 wild lake trout was estimated to be about 1.1 million fish in MI-5; 160,000 fish in MI-6; and 690,000 fish in MI-7 (Figure 4). Mean total annual mortality rates during 1998-2000 for ages 6 to 11 wild lake trout were 0.28 year -1 in MI-5, 0.38 year -1 in MI-6, and 0.32 year -1 in MI-7 (Figure 5). Recreational fishing mortality was the dominant mortality source in MI-6 during 1998-2000. ea lamprey mortality was the dominant mortality source in MI-5 and MI-7. The BR values were above the target in MI-5 and MI-7 (Figure 6). In MI-6, BR was 15% below the target value. 4

These modeling results have been used to estimate lake trout harvest quotas for 2001. Currently, hatchery lake trout models have been partially developed for MI-5, MI-6, and MI-7. Data have been partially assembled for MI-2, MI-3, and MI-4 wild and hatchery lake trout models. Job 7. Title: Prepare reports. Findings: Draft reports on lake trout TAC recommendations for 2001 have been written for the 1836 Treaty Technical Fisheries Committee, and this progress report was prepared. Prepared by:.p. itar Dated: eptember 27, 2001 5

MI-1 MI-3 MI-4 MI-2 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 MI-8 N Ú MI-1 Ú Isle Royale MI-2 MI-3 $T $T$T $T$T$T $T$T $T $T $T$T $T $T $T$T$T$T $T$T$T Keweenaw Peninsula 50 0 50 100 150 200 Kilometers MI-4 MI-6 MI-7 MI-5 $T$T$T $T$T $T $T $T $T $T$T $T$T $T$T $T$T$T$T Marquette # Figure 1. Lake trout management units and lake trout survey sampling stations in Michigan waters of Lake uperior for 2001. Triangles represent spring survey stations, circles represent summer pre-recruit survey stations, and stars represent Isle Royale survey stations. 6

GM CPUE (fish/km/day) 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 a MI-3 MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 Management Unit 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 GM CPUE (fish/km/day) 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 b MI-3 MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 Management Unit 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Figure 2. Relative abundance of (a) lean and (b) siscowet lake trout during spring surveys from 1992 to 2001 in Michigan waters of Lake uperior. Data expressed as geometric mean catch per unit effort (GMCPUE) based on 11.4 cm stretched-mesh bottom gill nets. No survey was conducted in MI-7 during 1992. 7

GM CPUE (fish/km/day) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 a 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 10 5 0 MI-2 MI-3 MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 Management Unit GM CPUE (fish/km/day) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 b 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 10 5 0 MI-2 MI-3 MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 Management Unit Figure 3. Relative abundance of pre-recruit (< 432 mm total length) (a) lean and (b) siscowet lake trout during summer surveys from 1991 to 2001 in Michigan waters of Lake uperior. Data expressed as geometric mean catch per unit effort (GMCPUE) based on graded-mesh bottom gill nets (stretched mesh sizes=5.1, 5.7, 6.4, 7.0, 7.6, 8.9 cm). No pre-recruit survey was conducted in 1997. 8

Number of fish x 1000 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 200 0 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 Year Figure 4. Annual abundance of ages 3-15 wild lake trout in MI-5, MI-6, and MI-7 based on estimates from statistical catch-at-age models. 9

0.8 0.7 0.6 Target maximum t MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 Total mortality rate 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 Year Figure 5. Total annual mortality rates for wild lake trout (average of ages 6 to 11 fish) during 1975-2000 in MI-5, MI-6, and MI-7 based on statistical catch-at-age models. The thin dashed line indicates the Great Lakes Fishery Commission s lake trout rehabilitation target maximum mortality rate of 0.4. 10

0.60 0.50 BR BR_T 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 MI-5 MI-6 MI-7 Management Unit Figure 6. Reproductive index of wild lake trout populations in MI-5, MI-6, and MI-7 based on results from statistical catch-at-age models. Reproductive index was measured using pawning tock Biomass produced per Recruit (BR) values. BR was based on the average of 1998-2000 mortality rates and female maturity schedules for each management unit. BR_T was the target BR value based on the Great Lakes Fishery Commission target maximum total annual mortality rate of 40%. 11

Table 1. pring lean and siscowet lake trout diet compositions for Michigan waters of Lake uperior in 2000 and 2001. Data expressed as percent frequency occurrence among sampled stomachs in each management unit. Prey category other fish comprised mainly unidentified fish remains, which were assumed to be composed of species in the same proportion as identified fishes. Prey category other included plant material, stones, sand, and other unidentifiable biological matter. Diet data for MI-7 were not available at the time of this report. Lean lake trout iscowet Year Prey category MI-3 MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 MI-3 MI-4 MI-5 MI-6 2000 melt 77.6 68.0 72.1 10.1 35.6 6.1 culpin 1.0 2.0 5.8 3.1 2.2 51.3 10.5 Coregonine 16.3 6.0 8.7 7.8 20.0 53.8 7.0 Burbot 12.2 5.1 4.4 Other fish 23.5 31.0 26.0 21.7 40.0 2.6 36.0 Insect 3.1 2.0 10.6 33.3 2.2 36.8 Crustacean 6.0 2.9 14.7 13.3 14.0 Bird 1.8 Mollusk 0.9 Other 1.0 3.0 2.9 7.0 6.7 13.2 Empty 7.1 9.0 9.6 28.7 11.1 15.8 n 98 100 104 129 90 39 114 2001 melt 18.1 50.5 15.8 8.9 1.4 30.4 3.1 3.7 culpin 1.1 1.9 5.0 4.8 4.1 6.9 13.8 14.8 Coregonine 43.6 21.5 12.9 6.5 28.4 30.4 6.2 0.9 Burbot 2.1 1.9 2.4 1.4 9.8 9.2 5.6 Other fish 25.5 20.6 29.7 28.2 35.1 20.6 38.5 42.6 Insect 1.1 6.5 21.8 39.5 9.5 4.9 23.1 52.8 Crustacean 4.7 6.9 10.5 8.8 10.8 8.3 Bird 1.4 Mollusk 1.4 1.5 0.9 Other 1.9 2.0 3.2 9.5 2.9 6.2 7.4 Empty 25.5 13.1 28.7 21.0 27.0 10.8 15.4 11.1 n 94 107 101 124 74 102 65 108 12

Table 2. ummer pre-recruit (<432 mm) lean and siscowet lake trout diet compositions for Michigan waters of Lake uperior in 2000. Data expressed as percent frequency occurrence among sampled stomachs in each management unit. Prey category other fish comprised sticklebacks (threespine Gasterosteus aculeatus, ninespine Pungitius pungitius), trout-perch Percopsis omiscomaycus, and unidentified fish remains, which were assumed to be composed of species in the same proportion as identified fishes. Prey category other included plant material, stones, sand, and other unidentifiable biological matter. Lean lake trout iscowet Prey category MI-3 MI-6 MI-3 MI-6 melt 7.58 13.48 6.25 culpin 31.82 11.24 40 12.5 Coregonine 3.03 2.25 3.13 Other fish 27.27 33.71 38.18 21.88 Insect 7.58 15.73 5.45 18.75 Crustacean 4.55 30.34 1.82 43.75 Other 7.58 4.49 9.09 9.38 Empty 24.24 14.61 20 9.38 n 66 89 55 32 13