Evaluation of LED-Outlined Backplates at Intersections With Light Rail Lines In Houston, Texas

Similar documents
ATTACHMENT NO. 11. RRLRT No. 2. Railroad / Light Rail Transit Technical Committee TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Busway Grade Crossings STATUS/DATE OF ACTION

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Final Report. Evaluation of Flashing Yellow Right Turn Arrow at Silverbell Rd and Cortaro Rd. FHWA Experimentation #4-329(E)

RE: City of Portland Request to Experiment with HAWK/Bike signal

Road Safety Audit Course Participant Guidebook. August 22 & 23, Cleveland Avenue Columbus, Ohio

FYG Backing for Work Zone Signs

Pavement Markings (1 of 3)

MEMORANDUM. Nantasket Road at Kingsley Road Kingsley Road at Sumner Street Kingsley Road at Revere Street Kingsley Road at Kenberma Street

2004 NC Supplement to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Shawn Turner, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute

Pedestrian Treatments by

Evaluation of Blue Confirmation Lights on Red Light Running at Signalized Intersections

RED COLORED TRANSIT-ONLY LANES REQUEST TO EXPERIMENT

Super 2: Recent Research in Energy Corridors

STEP. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons. Safe Transportation for Every Pedestrian

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

Work Zone Traffic Safety

Evaluation of Blue Confirmation Lights at Signalized Intersections in Overland Park, Kansas, to Reduce Red Light Running Violations

2014 FHWA Aging Road User Handbook. Recommendations to Accommodate Aging Pedestrians. Lifesaver National Conference. What is the Handbook?

Evaluation of Pavement Markings within the Dynamic Envelope

Homework Module 7.01 Drivers Manual Study Questions

New in the MUTCD: The Flashing Yellow Arrow Presented at the 57 th Annual Traffic and Safety Conference May 17, 2006

Rock Road Transit. Northwest Plaza. Charles Rock Rd. Shopping Center Woodson & St. Center

Overview. Updated pictures of the intersection are shown in Exhibits 1 thru 4, and the aerial photo provided by Google Maps is shown in Exhibit 5.

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

CHAPTER 1 STANDARD PRACTICES

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ON EDGEWATER BOULEVARD AT PORT ROYAL AVENUE (NORTH)

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

What's in the 2012 California MUTCD for Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and School Areas?

Driver Behavior Characteristics at Urban Signalized Intersections

TRAFFIC AND SAFETY CONFERENCE October 18, 2017 FLASHING YELLOW ARROWS

Columbia Pike Implementation Team (CPIT) Meeting

Outline. TAMU Campus Projects TxDOT Innovative Research Project Mobileye Shield+ Pilot

On Road Bikeways Part 1: Bicycle Lane Design

Evaluation of Blue Confirmation Lights on Red Light Running at Signalized Intersections in. Lawrence, Kansas: A Case Study Kwaku Frimpong Boakye

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STATISTICS

POWELL BUTTE HIGHWAY/NEFF ROAD INTERSECTION Interim Report: Existing Conditions, Needs, and Alternatives Review

In-Roadway Warning Light Systems Overview, Evaluation, Installation and Investment Considerations

TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

PART 4 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Yellow and Red Intervals It s Just a Matter of Time. 58 th Annual Alabama Transportation Conference February 9, 2015

Development of Left-Turn Operations Guidelines at Signalized Intersections

Lf Wv-11 L_ Mario Dupigny-G iroux, P.E. Traffic Safety Engineer. ja WTtffiti. _J~?feL. \~tk 1pp Research Technician

SCOPE Application, Design, Operations,

Designing for Bicyclist Safety at Crossings and Intersections

LED Blank-Out Signs. City of Toronto. Presentation to ITS Canada June 19, 2018

Attachment No. 4 Approved by National Committee Council

Bicycle - Motor Vehicle Collisions on Controlled Access Highways in Arizona

Acknowledgements. Mr. David Nicol 3/23/2012. Daniel Camacho, P.E. Highway Engineer Federal Highway Administration Puerto Rico Division

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan Workshop JUNE 2, 2016

PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOLUTIONS ANDREA HARTH, PE, PTOE TEC ENGINEERING, INC.

REPORT ON RED-LIGHT MONITORING SYSTEMS

Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons

Conversion of One-Way Couplet Streets to Two-Way

Parisi TRANSPORTATION CONSUtllHG

Monroe County Department of Transportation Vertical Curve Safety Study

Shortening or omitting a pedestrian change interval when transitioning into preemption

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

Human factors studies were simulator-based studies not transferable Safety impacts were not well understood

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

Introduction to Traffic Signal Timing

Traffic Control Devices

New Trends In Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) Spring Occupational Safety & Health Committee Conference Philadelphia, PA

Pavement Markings: Past, Present, and Future. TxDOT Short Course October 2016

Enclosure 1. Crimson Drive Traffic Safety and Calming Review Report

Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

ONTARIO REGULATION 239/02 MUNICIPAL ACT MINIMUM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAYS

IMPROVING SAFETY AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS NEAR ERTICAL CURVES

Hard Shoulder Running is a valuable tool July 14, Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE State Operations Engineer VDOT Operations Division

Public Works Update Safety Campaign. Second Quarter Report

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Designing for Pedestrians: An Engineering Symposium. Rutgers University March 21, 2013

Transforming Traffic Signals to Support Sustainability: Applications, Ideas, & Research

Lake Zurich Police Department Traffic Safety Division 200 Mohawk Trail Lake Zurich, IL 60047

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices RWSTC RECOMMENDATION FOLLOWING SPONSOR COMMENTS

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

Per the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 625 ILCS 5/ Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System:

CARE AND VIGILANCE SAVE LIVES!

Comparison of Turning Movement Count Data Collection Methods for a Signal Optimization Study. White Paper

CROSSING GUARD PLACEMENT CONSIDERATIONS AND GAP ASSESSMENT

TRIAL EVALUATION OF WIDE, AUDIO-TACTILE, CENTRELINE CONFIGURATIONS ON THE NEWELL HIGHWAY

Advance Yield Markings Reduce Motor Vehicle/Pedestrian. Conflicts at Multilane Crosswalks with an Uncontrolled Approach.

Washington St. Corridor Study

Texas Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (ISIP): Project Overview & Preliminary Findings. April 15, 2016

Revisions to the TxDOT Guide for Determining Time Requirements for Traffic Signal Preemption at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings

Orange County Rail-Highway Grade Crossing Safety Enhancement Program. City of San Juan Capistrano April 17, 2012

SUPERSTREETS IN TEXAS. ITS Texas Annual Meeting San Marcos, Texas Session 6A - Operations November 11, 2011

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF TWO ALLOWABLE PERMISSIVE LEFT-TURN INDICATIONS

Analysis of the Red Light Camera Program in Garden Grove, CA By Jay Beeber, Executive Director, Safer Streets L.A., Member ITE

Pavement Markings to Reduce Lane Departure Crashes. Paul Carlson, PhD, PE Road Infrastructure Inc.

Dynamic Change of Left Turn Phase Sequence between Time-Of- Day Patterns Operational and Safety Impacts Abstract

What Engineering Can Do for You! Low Cost Countermeasures for Transportation Safety

INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY State Route 57 / Seville Road

THE DEVELOPMENT OF MALAYSIAN HIGHWAY RAIL LEVEL CROSSING SAFETY SYSTEMS: A PROPOSED RESEARCH FRAMEWORK. Siti Zaharah Ishak

HSIS. Association of Selected Intersection Factors With Red-Light-Running Crashes. State Databases Used SUMMARY REPORT

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Designing Safety into Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Projects

Transcription:

Evaluation of LED-Outlined Backplates at Intersections With Light Rail Lines In Houston, Texas ITS Texas Annual Meeting, November 2015 Jonathan Tydlacka, P.E. (TTI)

Why Are We Here Today? Great forum to present evaluations of unique & innovative traffic control devices Gain feedback and comments on the operational concepts

METRORail History METRORail Red Line opened in Houston, Texas - January 2004 Extended North - January 2014 Completely at-grade with shared left turn lanes in some areas Line operates from North Loop, CBD, down to Texas Medical Center, and Reliant Park Currently carries about 42,000 passengers per day

Initial Operational Issues High Frequency of Accidents (15) in 6 weeks of testing & 1 st month of revenue operation All with motor vehicles All attributed to motorist error Initial safety assessment recommendations Increase visibility of red signal indications

TCD Experimentation Stop bar location & visibility Lighted Stop Bar Increase visibility of red signal indications LED-outlined Backplates

Evaluation Methodology TCD Experimentation Request Driver Surveys Operational Evaluations Before / After Measures of Effectiveness (violations) Long Term Crash Monitoring Crashes by type/causation Semi-annual reports

Lighted Stop Bar Pilot Installation EB Jefferson Street at Main Street FHWA Approved Experiment 4-295-EX Operational Aspects as Initially Evaluated: Markers operated in a steady red mode during every red signal indication of the traffic signal Markers off at all other times Markers located prior to painted stop line

Pilot Installation

Replacement System & Additional Locations Several failures at pilot site Pilot site & additional sites outfitted to 3G & 4G system FHWA granted request to expand experimentation

Lighted Stop Bar Problems Newer 3G and 4G systems had durability issues Failures of the individual markers and the systems High traffic volumes, moisture, debris penetration all factors leading to failure. Systems had IP addressable markers, so failures were reported BUT The costs for repairs and replacements were too great in terms of dollars and manpower A change was necessary.

LED-Outlined Traffic Signal Backplates Around the same time that the first pilot lighted stop bar was being tested, METRO was also testing a pilot location of LED-outlined traffic signal backplates. The backplates were part of the same FHWA Experimentation Request.

LED-Outlined Backplates Pilot Installation WB Gray at Main Street FHWA Approved Experiment 4-295-EX Operational Aspects: Red LEDs create a red border around the standard black traffic signal backplate for each signal head on the approach. Operate in a steady red mode during every red signal indication of the traffic signal & Off at all other times (including red or yellow flash).

LED-Outlined Backplates

LED-Outlined Backplates Mounted to signal mast arm Two signal faces No backplates before LED-outlined backplates added

Evaluation Period LED-Outlined Backplates Results Motorist Violation Data Pilot Site 24-hour Totals of WB Vehicles Left Turn Thru Right Turn WB Violations per Day WB Violations per Day per 10,000 Vehicles RLR* RTOR* RLR RTOR Before (3 Day Average) 401 8089 381 19 68 22 76 After (3 Day Average) 273 6870 351 8 53 11 71 *RLR = Red Light Running *RTOR = Right Turn on Red Note: RTOR prohibited on all cross street approaches to the Red Line

LED Backplate - Vehicle Crash Statistics Crash statistics compiled for 24 months before and after the installation of the LED Backplates. Period Total Crashes Ran Red Light (WB) Before 24 Months After 24 Months 3 2 1 0

Observational Study of Additional Sites Three LED-outlined backplate treatment sites for Before & After Study Westbound Pease at Main Westbound Bell at Main Eastbound Franklin at Main Pease & Bell are five-lane, one-way approaches to the Red Line Replaced standard backplates with LED-outlined backplates Franklin is a three-lane, one-way street Did not have any backplates in before data

Observational Study of Additional Sites Before & After Study using recorded video 3 days (three 24-hour periods) of video before 3 days of video after LED backplates installed and activated Approx 5-8 weeks after activation Manually reduced video

Observational Study of Additional Sites Several differences from pilot location Mounted to signal poles (one on each side) Pease and Bell sites had backplates before LED-outlined backplates added. Franklin site had no backplates at all before LED-outlined backplates added.

Observational Study of Additional Sites Data included traffic volumes and violations Red Light Running (RLR) Right Turn On Red (RTOR) RTOR prohibited on all cross street approaches to the Red Line Some deliberate RLR violations in both before and after periods Removed violations at Pease which occurred after more than 90 seconds of red time Removed violations by emergency vehicles

Three Day Average Violation Frequency Before (3 Day Average) After (3 Day Average) 24-hour Totals of WB Vehicles Left Turn Westbound Pease at Main Thru Right Turn WB Violations per Day RLR RTOR RLR WB Violations per Day Day* (Daylight) Night (No Daylight) RTOR RLR RTOR 106 10794 223 10.33 24.33 7.67 20.33 2.67 3.67 84 10115 176 8.67 19.33 7.00 15.33 1.67 4.00 % Change -21% -6% -21% -16% -21% -9% -25% -37% +9% *Note: Day includes daylight and twilight periods of the day.

Three Day Average Violation Frequency Before (3 Day Average) After (3 Day Average) 24-hour Totals of WB Vehicles Left Turn Westbound Bell at Main Thru Right Turn WB Violations per Day RLR RTOR RLR WB Violations per Day Day* (Daylight) Night (No Daylight) RTOR RLR RTOR 48 2928 213 1.33 33.33 1.00 27.67 0.33 5.67 48 2264 206 0.67 23.33 0.67 22.00 0 2.33 % Change 0% -23% -3% -50% -27% -33% -20% -100% -59% *Note: Day includes daylight and twilight periods of the day.

Three Day Average Violation Frequency Before (3 Day Average) After (3 Day Average) 24-hour Totals of EB Vehicles Left Turn Eastbound Franklin at Main Thru Right Turn EB Violations per Day EB Violations per Day Day* (Daylight) Night (No Daylight) RLR RTOR RLR RTOR RLR RTOR 624 8290 484 3.67 63.67 2.33 32.00 1.33 31.67 560 7907 618 1.67 81.33 1.67 54.33 0 27.00 % Change -10% -5% +28% -55% +28% -29% +70% -100% -15% *Note: Day includes daylight and twilight periods of the day.

Notes on Violation Frequency Reduction of RLR and RTOR at each treatment site With the exception of the special circumstances at Franklin We generally observed reductions for both RLR and RTOR violations for both day and night Appears to have slightly greater effect at nighttime Normalized data to account for different approach traffic volumes Violations per 10,000 cross street approach vehicles Pooled t-test used to determine significant differences in Before vs. After data

Normalized Violation Data Study Site Study Period 3-Day Average Number of Violations per Day per 10,000 Vehicles Statistically Significant Reduction in Violations per Day per 10,000 Vehicles? RLR RTOR RLR RTOR Pease at Main Before 9.3 21.9 After 8.4 18.6 NO YES, 90% Confidence Bell at Main Before 1.3 33.3 After 0.7 24.3 NO NO Franklin at Main Before 3.7 63.7 YES, 95% After 1.7 81.3 Confidence NO

Additional Observational Study Data Time of violation after onset of red signal (> 2) Signal red more than 2 seconds ( 2) Signal red less than or equal to 2 seconds RLR More RLR in 2 data (about 80%) Reduction of 40% for > 2 Reduction of 25% for 2

Crash Monitoring Long-term crash analysis still ongoing for these and all LED-outlined backplate locations Being done to provide additional data points at FHWA & TxDOT request

In Summary LED-outlined backplates show potential to supplement the effectiveness of standard TCD s along the LRT Reduction in red light running Reduction in illegal right turn on red movements Helped to reduce RLR and RTOR violations at the treatment sites.

METRO s View On Experimental TCD s Working with its local, state and federal partners, METRO plans to continue developing and deploying innovative TCD s where in the best interest of its passengers and the traveling public. METRO is seeking to garner support for interim approval to use these devices within its jurisdiction. NCUTCD (National Committee) is currently making decisions about what is included in next MUTCD

For More Information TTI Jonathan Tydlacka, P.E. j-tydlacka@tamu.edu 713-613-9215 Houston METRO Walter Langford, III Walter.Langford@ridemetro.org 713-652-4377