New Planning Code Summary: Better Streets Plan and Curb Cut Restrictions

Similar documents
San Jose Transportation Policy

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Classification Criteria

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Road Alterations - Wellington Street East, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection

El Camino Real Specific Plan. TAC/CAC Meeting #2 Aug 1, 2018

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

10A. DATE: October 5, Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee. Kevin Colin, Deputy Planning Manager Curt Bates, City Engineer

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

CHAPTER 4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan for Public Right-of-Way Improvements

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Street Paving and Sidewalk Policy

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

UDC Street Cross Sections

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

SECTION 3 STREET DESIGN

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. North Central Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

Report. Typical Sections. City of Middleton, WI

FM 1092/Murphy Road Access Management Study Pulic Meeting #1. Wednesday, August 31, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Magnolia Place. Traffic Impact Analysis. Prepared for: City of San Mateo. Prepared by: Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Freeway ramp intersection study

Polk Streetscape Project

Sidewalk Cafe City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

DPW Order No:

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

Houma-Thibodaux Metropolitan Planning Organization STP<200K Funding Application APPLICATION

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

2.0 LANE WIDTHS GUIDELINE

SR-203 Sidewalks and Town-Wide Mobility Improvements. Town Council Presentation September 7, 2016

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

East 12 th Street Bikeway Feasibility Study

FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2011

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

San Francisco s Capital Plan & the Mayor s Transportation Task Force 2030: Funding the next steps for transportation

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Vision Zero Priority Projects (March 2017)

MEMORANDUM. Sutter Street Bicycle Lanes, Stockton, CA SF

Safe Streets. City of Lake Forest Park. March 21, 2017

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Welcome to the Quebec Alternatives Analysis Public Meeting

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

Article 3.0 circulation plan

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 2012

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

Board-Approved Funding Awards for Cycle 4 Active Transportation Grant Program Projects (in Order of Project Rankings) Approved on

Complete Streets Policy DAVID CRONIN, P.E., CITY ENGINEER

STREETSCAPE CONCEPTS

10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE

Anne Arundel County BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, TRANSIT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

City of Atlanta-MARTA Sales Tax Referendum Draft Project List. Atlanta City Council Work Session May 19, 2016

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

OneBayArea Grant Application

Appendix T CCMP TRAIL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION DESIGN STANDARD

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

This page intentionally left blank.

This page intentionally left blank.

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

County of Greenville South Carolina. Traffic Calming Program Neighborhood Traffic Education Program and Speed Hump Program

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

Metro Nashville Sidewalk Requirements. Section (Provision of sidewalks) Effective July 1, 2017

14 TH STREET TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY PLAN B PLAN B TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Memo. Ocean Avenue Corridor Design Project Public Workshop #2 Summary

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan

2. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT.

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Transcription:

New ning Code Summary: Better Streets and Curb Cut Restrictions Amended Sections: 138.1, 155(r) and 303(y) Case Number: 2018-008862PCA Board File/Enactment #: 180914/277-18 Initiated by: Supervisors Kim Effective Date: December 20, 2018 Ordinance amending the ning Code to add new standard required streetscape improvements under the Better Streets ; modifying the triggers that would require project sponsors to construct streetscape improvements in the public right-of-way; clarifying the recommended sidewalk width for street types; expanding curb cut restrictions for off-street parking and loading to nearly all zoning districts and certain designated streets, including those on the Citywide Transit Network and any officially adopted bicycle routes or lanes, and requiring a Conditional Use authorization or a Section 309 or 329 exception for new or expanded curb cuts in the applicable areas; adding criteria for the ning Commission to consider when granting a Conditional Use authorization or an exception as part of a Downtown C-3-0(SD) (Downtown, Office (Special Development)) or large project authorization in mixed-use districts for such curb cuts; prohibiting new curb cuts in bus stops and on Folsom Street between Essex and Second Street; and eliminating minimum off-street parking requirements for projects subject to the curb cut restrictions or prohibitions. ning Code Section 138.1 Recommended and Required Streetscape Features 138.1(b)(2) Table 1 Under the Better Streets, the City can require projects to construct standard streetscape improvements and request that projects construct non-standard streetscape improvements. 1. The City may have requested a project that triggers Section 138.1 to construct extended bulb-outs, mid-block bulb-outs and raised crosswalks, adjacent to their project. The City may require a project that triggers Section 138.1 to construct extended bulbouts, mid-block bulb-outs and raised crosswalks adjacent to their project provided any raised crosswalk spans a ROW that is 40 feet or less and is installed www.sfplanning.org

at a street corner. 2. The ning Code did not authorize the City to require projects to remove on-street parking at crosswalks adjacent to their property (also known as intersection delighting ). The City may require a project that triggers Section 138.1 to remove on-street parking at crosswalks adjacent to their property (also known as intersection daylighting ). Triggers 138.1(c)(2)(A) To trigger Section 138.1, projects must meet at least one of three conditions related to site geometry and one or three conditions related to the project s scope. 3. Projects that contain 250 or greater of street frontages on one or more public rights-ofways met one of the geometric triggers for Projects that contain 150 or greater of street frontages on one or more public rights-ofways meet one of the geometric triggers for 4. 5. 6. All new construction projects (including residential projects) met one of the project scope triggers for All new construction projects (including nonresidential projects) met one of the project scope triggers for All change-of-use projects were currently exempt from Section 138.1 New construction projects with residential components must include at least 10 or more units of housing in the project scope to meet one of the project scope triggers for Section 138.1. New construction projects with nonresidential components must include 10,000 gross square feet of non-residential space to meet one of the project scope triggers for Change-of-use projects involving the conversion of 10,000 gross square feet or greater of PDR use to residential or office use PDR use trigger Other types of change-of-use projects remain exempt from Sidewalk Widths 138.1(c)(2)(b) The Better Streets established a system of street types for all streets in San Francisco. Street types are based on a street segment s contextual zoning. For most street types, the Better Streets establishes a recommended sidewalk width. These widths are codified in 2

7. 8. In some instances, City policy indicates a preference for a sidewalk width greater than the sidewalk width established in Section 138.1. The ning code made no provisions for the City to require a project sponsor to build a sidewalk to the wider dimension. Examples of such policies include: Streetscape plans or community-based plans adopted by the Board of Supervisors which specified sidewalk widths greater than the Sidewalk width established in the Better Streets Legislated sidewalk widths previously approved by the Board of Supervisors that exceeded the recommended sidewalk width established in the Better Streets Section 138.1, allocated recommended sidewalk widths for all street types except for Downtown Commercial Streets (streets within the C-3, C-2, and CCB zoning districts). The Code deferred to the City s Downtown Streetscape to determine sidewalk widths on Downtown Commercial Streets. However, some Downtown Commercial Streets are sited outside of the Downtown Streetscape Area and thus had no recommended sidewalk width. The City may require a project sponsor to widen sidewalks by dimensions that exceed the recommended sidewalk widths in the Better Streets where existing policies justify such a widening. Instances where this provision may apply include: Streetscape plans or communitybased plans adopted by the Board of Supervisors which specify sidewalk widths greater than the Sidewalk width established in the Better Streets Legislated sidewalk widths previously approved by the Board of Supervisors that exceed the recommended sidewalk width in the Better Streets The recommended sidewalk width for Downtown Commercial Streets that are sited outside of the Downtown Streetscape Area is 15 feet. Review and Approvals 138.1(c)(2)(C) 9. Section 138.1 required project sponsors to submit a required streetscape plan 60 days prior to any Department or ning Commission Approval Action. 10. Under the existing code, a project s public realm improvements were required to be installed prior to the City s issuance of a project's final Certificate of Occupancy or Projects are required to submit a streetscape plan with the project s first Development Application. The Zoning Administrator is authorized to extend the timeframe for a completion of required streetscape improvements for change-of-use projects after a project has been 3

Temporary Certificate of Occupancy unless otherwise extended by the Zoning Administrator. constructed. ning Code Section 155 Restrictions on new Curb Cuts 155 (r) 11. Project s whose only available frontage is on a street where a curb cut is prohibited or is only allowed via a Conditional Use Authorization were not explicitly exempted from their off-street parking requirements. Project s whose only available frontage is on a street where a curb cut is prohibited or is only allowed via a Conditional Use Authorization are exempted from their offstreet parking requirements. 12. Vehicular access to off-street parking was not prohibited on Folsom Street between The Embarcadero and Essex Street. Vehicular access to off-street parking is prohibited on Folsom Street between The Embarcadero and 2 nd Street. 13. Projects were allowed seek a Conditional Use Authorization to install a curb cut in a bus stop. 14. Projects in C-3, NCT or RTO Districts were required to seek a Conditional Use Authorization to be granted a curb on any Transit Preferential Street, the Citywide Pedestrian Network or Neighborhood Commercial Streets or on a street fronting a bike lane if no other frontage is available. 15. Projects in Neighborhood Commercial Districts were not required to seek a Commercial Street. Projects in Neighborhood Commercial Transit Districts were required to seek a Commercial Street. 16. The ning Code prohibited curb cuts on the Citywide Pedestrian Network as defined Projects are prohibited from installing a new curb cut in a bus stop. Projects in all zoning districts except for M, P, PDR, all RH1, RH2, RH3 and SALI Districts are required to seek a Conditional Use Authorization to be granted a curb on any Transit Preferential Street, the or Neighborhood Commercial Streets or on a street fronting a bike lane or protected bikeway if no other frontage is available. Projects in both Neighborhood Commercial Districts and Neighborhood Commercial Transit Districts are required to seek a Commercial Street regardless no minimum parking requirement and be required to. The reference to the Citywide Pedestrian Network has been removed from the 4

in the City s General where other frontages are available. 17. Projects that trigger both Section 155(r) and either Section 309 or 329 were required to schedule two separate items at the ning Commission. ning Code because the the Citywide Pedestrian Network was recently removed from the City s General. Projects that trigger both Section 155(r) and either Section 309 or 329 may schedule one item at the ning Commission resulting in more efficient use of staff time. ning Code Section 303 Conditional Uses 303 (x) 18. The ning Code included no additional criteria the Commission should consider when determining whether a CUA for a curb cut on a protected corridor should be granted. The ning Code includes additional criteria for the Commission to Consider when determining whether a CUA for a curb cut on a protected corridor should be granted Link to Signed Legislation: https://sfgov.legistar.com/view.ashx?m=f&id=6797067&guid=f6db5973-9768-48ad- B217-F8E46FF0C86A 5