M. DAVID WILDE Coordinateur National du département investigation et analyse des accidents Trafikverket PALAIS DES CONGRÈS NAMUR 15/06/2012
1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 2 2012-06-20 Number of killed (Swe), 1950-2010 Killed 1950 1952 1954 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 1956
1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 3 2012-06-20 Number of killed (Swe), 1950-2010 Vision Zero adopted Killed 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 4 2012-06-20 Number of killed & number of cars (Swe) 1950 2010 Vision Zero adopted Killed Number of cars, end of year (10000) 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Vision Zero is An ethical view upon the transport system It is unacceptable that people sustain fatal or impairing injuries through in the road transport system Safety philosofy (culture) Clear agenda of responsibilities Driving force for change (setting targets) Vision for many stakeholders (basis for safe system approach) Basing actions to increase safety through knowledge The transport system that is open and complex A major mismatch between the componets of the system 5 2012-06-20
Responsibility must be shared by all those who participates in and create safe road traffic Politicians Road network responsible The Police Vehicle manufacturers Private companies, public entities who buy transport services and vehicles Health sector, Working environment sector Insurance companies etc Traditional 6 2012-06-20
Shared responsibility System designers are responsible for the design, operation and the use of the road transport system and are thereby responsible for the level of safety within the entire system. Road users are responsible for following the rules for using the road transport system set by the system designers. If the users fail to comply with these rules due to a lack of knowledge, acceptance or ability, the system designers are required to take the necessary further steps to counteract people being killed or injured. 7 2012-06-20
Setting interim targets (a drivning force to change) Target for 2007 Objective: 270 killed Actual number: 440 killed Target for 2020 Swedish objective: 220 killed (partly based on turn out 2007) EU objective for Sweden: 133 killed (based on turn out 2010, 266 killed) 8 2012-06-20
Setting interim targets (a drivning force to change) Target for 2007 Objective: 270 killed Actual number: 440 killed Target for 2020 Swedish objective: 220 killed (partly based on turn out 2007) EU objective for Sweden: 133 killed (based on turn out 2010, 266 killed) Accepting the EU objective creates a new challenge! 9 2012-06-20
Setting interim targets (a drivning force to change) Target for 2007 Objective: 270 killed Actual number: 440 killed Target for 2020 Swedish objective: 220 killed (partly based on turn out 2007) EU objective for Sweden: 133 killed (based on turn out 2010, 266 killed) Accepting the EU objective creates a new challenge! 87 fatalaties left to adress* 10 2012-06-20
What type of fatal crashes are left in the residual? Passenger car Motorcycle Moped Bicycle Pedestrian Loss-of-control, no ESC2020 Lane departure, no LDW 2020 Unrestrained occupants, no SBR 2020 Wheel-locking, no ABS 2020 Single-vehicle crashes in combination with alcohol Extremebehaviour Nohelmet Collision withother vehicles at intersections Collision with other Loss-of-control, no Tuning vehicles at motorcycle-friendly intersections roadsides /barriers Extremebehavior, alcohol Illness prior to crash Loss-of-control despite ESC, understeering with high speed Railway crossing Wild life Collision withother vehicles at intersections Single-vehicle crashes Turning vehicles in urban areas Rear-end and other collisionsat intersections Turning or reversing vehiclesin urban areas Crossingon urban roads Rear-end onrural roads 11 2012-06-20
New Safety Performance Indicators SPI 1. Speed compliance, national road network 2. Speed compliance, municipal road network Baseline 2007 Baseline 2010 Earlier target New target 43 % Ca 43 % 80 % 80% 52 % Ca52 % 80 % 80% 3. Sober driving 99,71 % 99,74 % 99,90 % 99,9%/ 100 % 4. Belt use 96 % 96 % 99% 99 % 5. Helmet use -Bicycle 27 % 27 % 70 % 65 % -Moped 6. Safe passenger cars 20 % 35 % Not defined 80% 7. Safe motorcycles (ABS) 9 % 18 % Not defined 70 % 8. Saferoads 50 % 67 % 75 % 95 % 9. Safe passages for vulnerable road users 10. Safe roadsurfaces for cyclists and mopeds Ca 25 % Unknown Not defined Unknown Not defined 12 2012-06-20
A safe system approach Progress Progress does not happen liniar, but exponentially All progress - biological - technical - cultural Time 13 2012-06-20
A safe system approach Progress Life cycle of one approach Stagnation Growth Development Time 14 2012-06-20
All progress consists of many approaches (Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution) 15 2012-06-20
A safe system approach Management Active safety systems Passive safety systems (Vehicles) Injury prevention through design and adjustment of road environment Rules & Regulations All responsibility on road user 16 2012-06-20 1
A safe system approach Set conditions: -Access -Design - Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash Design of the road environment Active & Passive vehicle safety Rules & Regulations Driver responsibility Enforcement 17 2012-06-20
A safe system approach Set conditions: -Access -Design - Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash Design of the road environment Active & Passive vehicle safety Enforcement Rules & Regulations Driver responsibility Management 18 2012-06-20
A safe system approach basics Passive Active 80 40 Head-on Pedestrians 60 10 + + 20 30 70 Side 40 Rear-end 20 + 20 40 110 Large animals 55 20 80 + + + 15 20 30 19 2012-06-20
A safe system approach set conditions (Access) Driving license Sober Alcohol: In legal terms less than 0,2 = Drugs: In legal terms zero tolerance Vision Cognitive ability Medical conditions 20 2012-06-20
A modern camera system Adresses (Set conditions) Deviation from normal driving 21 2012-06-20 21
Deviation from normal driving Support systems Seat belt reminders ISA/Speed Alert Alcolocks Impaired driving detection Etc. Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash 22 2012-06-20
Emerging situation Support systems Adaptive Cruise Control Lane departure warning Electronic stability control (ESC) Pre Impact Emergency Braking Etc. Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash 23 2012-06-20
Intersections to roundabouts Adresses Critical situation Crash unaviodable Crash Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash 24 2012-06-20
Controlling on-coming traffic Adresses Crash unaviodable Crash Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash 25 2012-06-20
Reducing injuries Adresses Critical situation Crash unaviodable Crash Normal driving Deviation from normal driving Emerging situation Critical situation Crash unavoidable Crash 26 2012-06-20
Management Travelpolicies Purchasing demands on products and services Labeling systems Systematic work: ISO 39001 27 2012-06-20
Thank you! Questions? David Wilde Mobile phone nr +4670-590 08 85 E-mail: david.wilde@trafikverket.se 28 2012-06-20