AFRL-RX-WP-TP

Similar documents
AFRL-RH-WP-TR

z Interim Report for May 2004 to October 2005 Aircrew Performance and Protection Branch Wright-Patterson AFB, OH AFRL-HE-WP-TP

Kelly Legault, Ph.D., P.E. USACE SAJ

Using SolidWorks & CFD to Create The Next Generation Airlocks

M2.50-cal. Multishot Capabilities at the US Army Research Laboratory

Navy Shipbuilding Industrial Base

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SPILLING BREAKERS

Development of Low Volume Shape Memory Alloy Variable Ballast System for AUV Use

Internal Waves and Mixing in the Aegean Sea

DoD Coral Reef Protection and Management Program

Temporary Flying Restrictions Due to Exogenous Factors

Remote Monitoring of Dolphins and Whales in the High Naval Activity Areas in Hawaiian Waters

BRRAKING WAVE FORCES ON WALLS

TITLE: Assessing the Hydrodynamic Performance of Fouling-Release Surfaces (ONR Research Contract # N WR )

( max)o Wind Waves 10 Short Swell (large wave steepness) 25 Long Swell (small wave steepness) 75

Stability & Control Aspects of UCAV Configurations

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

High-Frequency Scattering from the Sea Surface and Multiple Scattering from Bubbles

Long-Term Autonomous Measurement of Ocean Dissipation with EPS-MAPPER

Waves, Turbulence and Boundary Layers

Air-Sea Interaction Spar Buoy Systems

DEVELOPMENT OF PRIMARY FRAGMENTATION SEPARATION DISTANCES FOR CASED CYLINDRICAL MUNITIONS

Marine Mammal Acoustic Tracking from Adapting HARP Technologies

Aircraft Fuel Cell Repair Equipment

AFRL-RH-WP-TP

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Imaging the Lung Under Pressure

Internal Waves in Straits Experiment Progress Report

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Global Ocean Internal Wave Database

THE EFFECTS OF ULTRAHIGH-PRESSURE WATERJET IMPACT ON HIGH EXPLOSIVES

Inlet Influence on the Pressure and Temperature Distortion Entering the Compressor of an Air Vehicle

Frostbite in Ski Boots for Marines

Rogue Wave Statistics and Dynamics Using Large-Scale Direct Simulations

AFRL-RI-RS-TR

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Waves, Bubbles, Noise and Underwater Communications

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

Three Dimensional Shallow Water Adaptive Hydraulics (ADH-SW3): Waterborne Vessels

Behavioral Response of Dolphins to Signals Simulating Mid-Frequency Sonar

Concrete Obstacle Vulnerability

Cost-Effectiveness of CC&D Measures and their Interaction

STUDIES OF FINITE AMPLITUDE SHEAR WAVE INSTABILITIES. James T. Kirby. Center for Applied Coastal Research. University of Delaware.

Calculation of the Internal Blast Pressures for Tunnel Magazine Tests

Anthropogenic Noise and the Marine Environment

OE Barricade Guide Development. Michelle Crull, PhD, PE Wallace Watanabe James Manthey, PE Charles Barker, PE

Observations of Velocity Fields Under Moderately Forced Wind Waves

TEST RESULTS OF PHASE 2 LEVEL B SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Acoustic Focusing in Shallow Water and Bubble Radiation Effects

Determination Of Nearshore Wave Conditions And Bathymetry From X-Band Radar Systems

DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS: PROTECTION FACTOR TESTING OF THE SE-SHIELD SUIT WITH THE SE400 POWERED AIR PURIFYING RESPIRATOR (PAPR)

TEST RESULTS OF PHASE 2 LEVEL A SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Determination of Nearshore Wave Conditions and Bathymetry from X-Band Radar Systems

PREDICTION OF ERODED VERSUS ACCRETED BEACHES

Understanding the Dynamics of Shallow-Water Oceanographic Moorings

Rip Currents Onshore Submarine Canyons: NCEX Analysis

Implementation of Structures in the CMS: Part IV, Tide Gate

Right Whale Diving and Foraging Behavior in the Southwestern Gulf of Maine

Water Ingress Failure Analysis of Whistler II Unit

At-Sea Measurements of Diver Target Strengths at 100 khz: Measurement Technique and First Results

Hydro-Thermal Vent Mapping with Multiple AUV's AZORES-2001

Tests of Level A Suits Protection Against Chemical and Biological Warfare Agents and Simulants: Executive Summary

TEST RESULTS OF AIR-PERMEABLE CHARCOAL IMPREGNATED SUITS TO CHALLENGE BY CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICALWARFARE AGENTS AND SIMULANTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Domestic Preparedness: Corn Oil Protection Factor (PF) Testing of Commercial Air-Purifying Negative Pressure Respirators with P-100 Filter Cartridges

Next Generation Modeling for Deep Water Wave Breaking and Langmuir Circulation

NONLINEAR INTERNAL WAVES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA

Acoustic Seaglider for Beaked Whale Detection

Aircrew Endurance and Effectiveness NACES Endurance Improvement

Finalizing the DTAG: Implementation and Testing of Design Improvements for Reliability and Availability

AFT'LICATION OF M3vABLE-RED F'HYSICAL MODHIS To FBED1crslWM-INDUCED ERmIoN

RIP CURRENTS. Award # N

Development of a Low-Magnetic Power Source for a Diver Propulsion Vehicle

Plankton Distribution in Internal Waves in Massachusetts Bay

The Great Coastal Gale of 2007 from Coastal Storms Program Buoy 46089

MIL-DTL-5886G Ballistic Fragmentation Qualification of the Carleton Life Support Systems Oxygen Cylinder, Part Number

AIAA Brush Seal Performance Evaluation. P. F. Crudgington Cross Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Devizes, ENGLAND

Award Number: N

Harbor Threat Detection, Classification, and Identification

Vibration-Free Joule-Thomson Cryocoolers for Distributed Microcooling

Evaluation of Microphone Windscreen Performance in a Wind Tunnel

AFRL-RH-WP-TP

Ice Penetrating Communication Buoy for Underwater Vehicles Operating in the Arctic

Secretary of the Navy Professor of Oceanography

EDGEWOOD CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL CENTER U.S. ARMY SOLDIER AND BIOLOGICAL CHEMICAL COMMAND

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

ADIABATIC INITIATION SENSITIVITY OF LIQUID ENERGETIC MATERIALS. Twenty-Seventh DOD Explosives Safety Seminar Las Vegas, Nevada August 1996

Adib R. Farsoun. U.S. Army Engineer Division, Huntsville 106 Wynn Dr. Huntsville, AL ABSTRACT

THE NEW DDESB BLAST EFFECTS COMPUTER

Chemical Plume Mapping with an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle

The Influence of Breaking at the Ocean Surface on Oceanic Radiance and Imaging

Distributed Integrated Ocean Prediction System (DIOPS) / SWAN Rapid Transition Program

SHOCK WAVE PROPAGATION THROUGH AERATED WATER

Tradition & Technology

Cruise Report Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Observer UNDET Monitoring Hawaii Range Complex: 3 April 2014

Application of a Slotted Airfoil for UH-60A Helicopter Performance

Enhanced Passive Thermal Propulsion System

Regulatory Concerns for Leakage Testing of Packagings with Three 0-Ring Closure Seals

Shoreline Erosion and Proposed Control at Experimental Facility 15 Spesutie Island

Transcription:

AFRL-RX-WP-TP-2012-0215 REVERSE PRESSURE CAPABLE FINGER SEAL (PREPRINT) Nathan Gibson and Joe Yanof Honeywell International, Inc. JANUARY 2012. See additional restrictions described on inside pages STINFO COPY AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING DIRECTORATE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OH 45433-7750 AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) January 2012 Technical Paper Preprint 01 January 2012 01 January 2012 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE REVERSE PRESSURE CAPABLE FINGER SEAL (PREPRINT) 6. AUTHOR(S) Nathan Gibson and Joe Yanof 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER FA8650-09-D-2925-0003 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 63930F 5d. PROJECT NUMBER ES10 5e. TASK NUMBER 00 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER LM1191R3 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER Honeywell International, Inc. 111 South 34th Street Phoenix, AZ 85034 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY ACRONYM(S) AFRL/RXLM Air Force Research Laboratory Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433-7750 Air Force Materiel Command United States Air Force 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES PAO Case Number: 88ABW 2011-6102; Clearance Date: 18 Nov 2011. Document contains color. 11. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER(S) AFRL-RX-WP-TP-2012-0215 14. ABSTRACT Current pressure balanced finger seals are designed to be operated with the axial pressure difference across the seal acting in one direction. This limits their application and prevents finger seals from being used in locations where the axial pressure differential may reverse. Currently, the typical solution for locations requiring reverse capable sealing are labyrinth seals which can exhibit significantly higher leakage than finger seals as well as more degradation due to rubbing against the seal land. In this paper we discuss the application of two separate stacks of finger seal laminates oriented in axially opposed directions thereby providing sealing in both directions. 15. SUBJECT TERMS air-to-air seals, finger seals, gas turbine engines 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION a. REPORT Unclassified b. ABSTRACT Unclassified c. THIS PAGE Unclassified OF ABSTRACT: SAR 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 10 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON (Monitor) Rollie Dutton 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code) N/A Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18

Reverse Pressure Capable Finger Seal Nathan Gibson and Joe Yanof Honeywell International, Phoenix, Arizona, 85034 Finger seals are a contacting air to air seal technology which allows for low leakage in high speed and high temperature operating conditions. Each finger seal consists of a number of multiple thin metal laminates, each with a multitude of flexible projections that are referred to as fingers. A section of a laminate is shown in Figure 1. Note the thin slots between each finger. To form a functional seal multiple laminates are formed into a stack, with each laminate oriented so that the slots between its fingers cover the slots of the neighboring laminates. For protection and support of the laminates a forward and aft cover plate are placed on each side of the finger seal stack. A high pressure exists on one side of the seal, providing a driving force to push the air from one side of the seal to the other. Each finger of the seal remains in light contact with the rotating shaft, limiting leakage that can pass between the seal and shaft. The pressure acting on the face of the upstream laminate can cause axial loading of the fingers against the downstream plate. In some seals this axial loading is high enough to result in a high amount of friction between the downstream laminate and aft plate, as well as between the laminates themselves. This friction restricts the free motion of the fingers, preventing them from remaining in contact with the shaft and harming the seal s performance. Figure 1. Finger Seal Laminate. Each laminate contains multiple flexible fingers, separated by narrow slots. A finger seal contains two or more of these laminates, each oriented so its fingers cover the slots of the neighboring laminates. Figure 2. Typical Finger Seal Cross Section. This four laminate seal includes a pressure balance circuit. A small amount of air from the pressure balance circuit leaks down between the fingers, past the dam, and to the low pressure side. To reduce this pressure induced friction a design has been created which includes a pressure balance circuit 1,2. A schematic of a pressure balanced finger seal can be seen in Figure 2. As pressure is 1

applied to the finger seal the laminates are pressed back into the dam near the inner diameter of the aft (downstream) plate. This creates a sealed cavity between the aft plate and downstream most laminate, where air from the high pressure side can be routed, which reduces the axial loading that acts on the laminate stack. While the inclusion of this pressure balance circuit has improved the finger seal, it has caused the seal to be functional in only a single direction as shown in Figure 3. During pressure loading in the design direction, shown in Figure 3 (a), the laminates of the finger seal are pressed into the dam by the pressure induced axial load, sealing the pressure balance cavity, except for a small flow that leaks down between the finger slots. The overall leakage of the seal is low, and the majority of air passing through the seal occurs between the shaft and laminates. For reverse pressure loading, as shown in Figure 3 (b), the pressure induced axial load pushes the laminates away from the dam on the aft plate, opening an area for leakage. This allows a large amount of leakage to flow into the pressure balance cavity, through the pressure balance circuit and to the low pressure side. The overall leakage for a reverse pressured seal will be high, with the majority of leakage passing through the pressure balance circuit. To prevent this high leakage when pressure is reversed the pressure balanced finger seal design can only be used in applications where the pressure will never reverse. Figure 3. Flow Through Finger Seal in Intended and Reversed Direction. (a) The finger seal has the pressure applied in the intended direction. Axial loading from pressure pushes the laminates into the dam, limiting leakage from the pressure balance cavity to the low pressure side. (b) The finger seal is loaded in the reverse direction. This pushes the laminates away from the dam, opening a leak path from the high pressure side into the pressure balance cavity. High pressure air in the pressure balance cavity flows in the reverse direction through the pressure balance circuit into the low pressure side of the seal. To extend the benefits of finger seals to applications that may have reversing pressures a new design is required that prevents air from traveling directly from the low side to the high side by passing through the pressure balance circuit. This can be accomplished by designing a seal that includes two 2

separate stacks of laminates, oriented so that air passing between the two cavities on either side of the seal must pass through both sets of laminates. A cavity exists between the two sets of laminates and a plate may be installed between them. This intermediate plate between each stack of laminates is optional and omitting it does not change the overall function of the seal. Cover plates are installed at either end of this seal which each contain a pressure balance cavity and dam. This reverse capable finger seal arrangement is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Reverse Pressure Capable Finger Seal. Two stacks of finger seals are installed in line with each other. At either end, cover plates with their own pressure balance cavities and dams are installed. When a cavity on one side of the seal is pressurized higher than the other the laminates on that side will be deflected away from the dam by the pressure induced axial load, allowing air to flow through the pressure balance circuit to the cavity between the seals. This pressure then acts on the second set of laminates which is pushed into its cover plate, limiting leakage through the pressure balance circuit. When pressure is applied to the reverse capable finger seal design the upstream set of laminates (the set of laminates on the side of the seal facing the high pressure) is pushed away from the dam on its cover plate, similar to the laminates of the seal shown in Figure 3 (b). As air leaks past the upstream laminates it flows into the pressure balance cavity, through the pressure balance circuit and into the cavity between the two sets of laminates, causing it to pressurize. Due to the rising pressure in the cavity between the sets of laminates the downstream set is axially loaded into the dam on the downstream cover plate. This causes the downstream set of laminates to function similarly to the 3

laminates of the seal shown in Figure 3 (a) which prevents air from leaking to the low pressure side of the seal. The direction of pressure applied to the seal shown in Figure 4 can be reversed and the two sets of laminates will also reverse roles, with the set formerly acting as the upstream laminates become the downstream and vice versa. In this reversed pressure case the one set again will be pushed away from its dam, allowing leakage to occur while the other set will be pressed into the dam on its cover plate. This allows the seal to function equally well in either direction The following aspects of this design have been considered and could be incorporated into the design of the reverse pressure capable finger seal if needed for particular applications: 1. Different diameters for the two different sets of laminates 2. Omission of the intermediate plate between the two sets of laminates 3. Fastening all laminates and cover plates together as a single assembly 4. Incorporating the features of the cover plates into neighboring hardware 5. Use of laminates with different finger stiffnesses than other laminates of the same seal 1 Arora, G.K., and Glick, D.I., Allied Signal (Now Honeywell International), Morris Township, NJ, U.S. Patent Pressure Balanced Finger Seals, U.S. Patent No. 6,196,550, Mar. 6, 2001 2 Arora, G.K., Proctor, M.P., Steinetz, B.M., and Delgado, I.R., Pressure Balanced, Low Hysteresis, Finger Seal Test Results, AIAA 99 2686, 1999 Acknowledgement of Sponsorship: The project or effort depicted is sponsored by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) under contract FA8650 09 D 2925 Task Order 0003. 4