Site Assessment Report. Wind farm: Ascog Farm (GB)

Similar documents
PARK - Main Result Calculation: PARK calculation (5 x 166m, + LT CORR + MITIGATION) N.O. Jensen (RISØ/EMD)

WindPRO version Nov 2012 Project:

Measured wake losses By Per Nielsen

Torrild - WindSIM Case study

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :55 / 1. SHADOW - Main Result

HOUTEN WIND FARM WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

8 SHADOW FLICKER 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8.2 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT

windnavigator Site Analyst Report

The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites

Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment

Power curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor

On the use of rotor equivalent wind speed to improve CFD wind resource mapping. Yavor V. Hristov, PhD Plant Performance and Modeling Vestas TSS

WindPRO version Jan 2011 Printed/Page :09 / 1. SHADOW - Main Result

Scoping analysis of the potential yield of the Hollandse Kust (noord) wind farm and the influence on the existing wind farms in the proximity

Poland is one of the new countries, which seems to have the potential of being a large market for wind energy projects in the near future.

COLLECTOR WIND FARM SHADOW FLICKER ASSESSMENT

Bankable Wind Resource Assessment

Advanced pre and post-processing in Windsim

Increased Project Bankability : Thailand's First Ground-Based LiDAR Wind Measurement Campaign

Session 2a: Wind power spatial planning techniques. IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar

Session 2: Wind power spatial planning techniques

New IEC and Site Conditions in Reality

Wind Farm Power Performance Test, in the scope of the IEC

Wind Resource Assessment Østerild National Test Centre for Large Wind Turbines

Datum Projectnummer

Scoping analysis of the potential yield of the Hollandse Kust (zuid) wind farm sites and the influence on the existing wind farms in the proximity

NordFoU: External Influences on Spray Patterns (EPAS) Report 16: Wind exposure on the test road at Bygholm

Global Flow Solutions Mark Zagar, Cheng Hu-Hu, Yavor Hristov, Søren Holm Mogensen, Line Gulstad Vestas Wind & Site Competence Centre, Technology R&D

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Session 2b: Wind power spatial planning techniques

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

Lely Aircon LA30 Wind turbine

7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017

Investigation on Deep-Array Wake Losses Under Stable Atmospheric Conditions

Wind Energy Resources Assessment and Micrositting on Different Areas of Libya: The Case Study in Darnah

Gorge Wind Characteristics in Mountainous Area in South-West China Based on Field Measurement

Wave Energy Resources Assessment for the China Sea Based on AVISO Altimeter and ERA Reanalysis Data (ID:10412)

Why does T7 underperform? Individual turbine performance relative to preconstruction estimates.

Control Strategies for operation of pitch regulated turbines above cut-out wind speeds

3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain

Ris0-I-668(EN) PARK- User's Guide. A PC-program for calculation of wind turbine park performance. Peter Sanderhoff

Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar

Site Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date

THE HORNS REV WIND FARM AND THE OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE WIND FARM MAIN CONTROLLER

Rotor Average wind speed for power curve performance. Ioannis Antoniou (LAC), Jochen Cleve (LAC), Apostolos Piperas (LAC)

Predicting climate conditions for turbine performance

Wake effects at Horns Rev and their influence on energy production. Kraftværksvej 53 Frederiksborgvej 399. Ph.: Ph.

Test Summary Report Giraffe 2.0 Hybrid Wind-Solar Power Station - for wind: according to IEC Annex M - for solar: measurement report

Energy Output. Outline. Characterizing Wind Variability. Characterizing Wind Variability 3/7/2015. for Wind Power Management

Wind farm performance

Wind Projects: Optimizing Site Selection

Shorter wind measurement campaigns Re-thinking with LiDAR

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control

LES* IS MORE! * L ARGE E DDY S IMULATIONS BY VORTEX. WindEnergy Hamburg 2016

windpro WP A15-Lingewaard WTGs Shadow receptor-input

Background Preliminary Review... 3

Upgrading Vestas V47-660kW

Evaluation of aerodynamic criteria in the design of a small wind turbine with the lifting line model

Stefan Emeis

renewable energy projects by renewable energy people

Yawing and performance of an offshore wind farm

Assessment and Testing of Island Wind Resources without Masts

Site Description: Tower Site

Tidal influence on offshore and coastal wind resource predictions at North Sea. Barbara Jimenez 1,2, Bernhard Lange 3, and Detlev Heinemann 1.

Inves&ga&on of Dynamic Loading for 13.2 MW Downwind Pre- Aligned Rotor

V MW. Exceptional performance and reliability at high-wind-speed sites. vestas.com

Background noise maps

Wind Power. Kevin Clifford METR 112 April 19, 2011

Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association

Wind Farm Blockage: Searching for Suitable Validation Data

WIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA

FEASIBILITY STUDY Small Scale Wind Park

Effect of wind flow direction on the loads at wind farm. Romans Kazacoks Lindsey Amos Prof William Leithead

Computationally Efficient Determination of Long Term Extreme Out-of-Plane Loads for Offshore Turbines

European wind turbine testing procedure developments. Task 1: Measurement method to verify wind turbine performance characteristics

July Interim Report. National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) Wind Resource Assessment & Offshore Unit Chennai, India.

Modelling Wind for Wind Farm Layout Optimization Using Joint Distribution of Wind Speed and Wind Direction

Comparing the calculated coefficients of performance of a class of wind turbines that produce power between 330 kw and 7,500 kw

10 th WindSim User Meeting June 2015, Tønsberg

Vindatlas i Ægypten. Mortensen, Niels Gylling; Badger, Jake; Hansen, Jens Carsten. Publication date: Document Version Peer reviewed version

Wake Effects from Wind Turbines

Investigating Wind Flow properties in Complex Terrain using 3 Lidars and a Meteorological Mast. Dimitri Foussekis

Fundamentals of Wind Energy

Hollandse Kust (zuid) Wind resource assessment. 17 January 2017 Anthony Crockford

Meteorological Measurements OWEZ

Wind Turbine, Layout and AEP

Wind Turbine Noise Measurements How are Results influenced by different Methods of deriving Wind Speeds? Sylvia Broneske

General Specification. V MW 60 Hz OptiSlip Wind Turbine. Item no R3 Class 1

MEMO CC: Summary. ESMWT16419: _MEM_RVO_HKZ floating LiDAR uncertainty_v3.docx 1/8

Performance Evaluation of the Wavestar Prototype

Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)

WindProspector TM Lockheed Martin Corporation

Miscalculations on the estimation of annual energy output (AEO) of wind farm projects

Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok

IMPLICATIONS OF THE WEIBULL K FACTOR IN RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Status: Rev: Comments Date: Author: Reviewer:

Influence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines

Dick Bowdler Acoustic Consultant

Transcription:

Site Assessment Report Energy Yield Estimation Wind farm: (GB) 3 x E- kw with 5m hh

Imprint Publisher Copyright notice ENERCON GmbH 5 Aurich Germany Phone: +9 91 97- Fax: +9 91 97-19 E-mail: info@enercon.de Internet: http://www.enercon.de Managing Directors: Aloys Wobben, Hans-Dieter Kettwig, Nicole Fritsch-Nehring Local court: Aurich Company registration number: HRB 11 VAT ID no.: DE 11 977 3 The entire content of this document is protected by the German Copyright Act (UrhG) and international agreements. All copyrights concerning the content of this document are held by ENERCON GmbH, unless another copyright holder is expressly indicated or identified. Any content made available does not grant the user any industrial property rights, rights of use or any other rights. The user is not allowed to register any intellectual property rights or rights for parts thereof. Any transmission, surrender and distribution of the contents of this document to third parties, any reproduction or copying, and any application and use - also in part - require the express and written permission of the copyright holder, unless any of the above issues is permitted by mandatory legal regulations. Any infringement of the copyright is contrary to law, may be prosecuted according to 1 et seq. of the German Copyright Act (UrhG), and grants the copyright holder the right to file for injunctive relief and to claim for punitive damages. Registered trademarks Any trademarks mentioned in this document are intellectual property of the respective registered trademark holders; the stipulations of the applicable trademark law are valid without restriction. Reservation of right of modification ENERCON GmbH reserves the right to change, improve and expand this document and the subject matter described herein at any time without prior notice, unless contractual agreements or legal requirements provide otherwise. Date: 13-- File name: Report number: GB 3xE_kW_5m_hh_Yield_13.pdf Rev

PARK - Main Result Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hh Wake Model N.O. Jensen (RISØ/EMD) 13-- 13:1 / 1 DE-5 Aurich 91/97- Calculation Settings Air density calculation mode Individual per WTG Result for WTG at hub altitude 1.3 kg/m³ to 1.37 kg/m³ Air density relative to standard 1. % to 11. % Hub altitude above sea level (asl) 1. m to 15. m Annual mean temperature at hub alt. 7.7 C to 7. C Pressure at WTGs 995. hpa to 997. hpa Wake Model Parameters From angle To angle Terrain type Wake Decay Constant [ ] [ ] 35. 15..9 15. 5..7 5. 75..51 75. 15..59 15. 135..53 135. 15.. 15. 195..7 195. 5..1 5. 55..57 55. 5..5 5. 315.. 315. 35.. Wake calculation settings Angle [ ] Wind speed [m/s] start end step start end step.5 3. 1..5 3.5 1. Wind statistics GB Ascog WMM (Wind Index MCP using MERRA_basic_W.5_N5.).wws WAsP version WAsP -9..579 New WTG Scale 1:, Site Data Key results for height 5. m above ground level Terrain BN (AIRY) (Normal) East North Name of wind distribution Type Wind energy Mean wind speed Equivalent roughness [kwh/m²] [m/s] A 1, 3,9 PARK TDO WAsP (WAsP -9..579) 5,15 7.9 -. Calculated Annual Energy for Wind Farm Specific results ) WTG combination Result Result-1.% GROSS (no loss) Park Capacity Mean WTG Full load Mean wind speed PARK Free WTGs efficiency factor result hours @hub height [MWh/y] [MWh] [MWh/y] [%] [%] [MWh/y] [Hours/year] [m/s] Wind farm 7,917.,97.,1. 97.7 33.1,3.5,93 7.7 ) Based on Result-1.% Calculated Annual Energy for each of 3 new WTGs with total. MW rated power WTG type Power curve Annual Energy Park Terrain Valid Manufact. Type-generator Power, Rotor Hub Creator Name Result Result-1.% Efficiency Mean rated diameter height wind speed [kw] [m] [m] [MWh] [MWh] [%] [m/s] 1 A Yes ENERCON GmbH E--. 5. USER Power curve Guar. Rev..,75., 9.9 7.9 A Yes ENERCON GmbH E--. 5. USER Power curve Guar. Rev..,.,35 9.9 7.7 3 A Yes ENERCON GmbH E--. 5. USER Power curve Guar. Rev..,51.3,19 99. 7.3 WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - Main Result Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hh WTG siting BN (AIRY) (Normal) East North Z Row data/description [m] 1 New 1,3 3,535 1. ENERCON GmbH E-.!O! hub: 5. m (TOT: 7. m) () New 1,3 3,35 9.5 ENERCON GmbH E-.!O! hub: 5. m (TOT: 7. m) (9) 3 New 1,3 3,15 7. ENERCON GmbH E-.!O! hub: 5. m (TOT: 7. m) (1) 13-- 13:1 / DE-5 Aurich 91/97- WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - Production Analysis 13-- 13:1 / 3 DE-5 Aurich 91/97- Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hhwtg: All new WTGs, Air density varies with WTG position 1.3 kg/m³ - 1.37 kg/m³ Directional Analysis Sector N 1 NNE ENE 3 E ESE 5 SSE S 7 SSW WSW 9 W 1 WNW 11 NNW Total Roughness based energy [MWh].9 35. 1,1. 39.1 17.1 11. 57.3 51. 99.5 1,5.5.9 13.9,39. +Increase due to hills [MWh] 3.5 55.3 5.1.3 9.7 15. 7..7 9.9 3.9. 79. 1,. -Decrease due to array losses [MWh] 5..... 9.1 11..... 9. 1. Resulting energy [MWh] 7.9.9 1,7.7 59. 5. 3.1 5. 57.5 1,. 1,9. 75. 53.7 7,917. Specific energy [kwh/m²] 1,59 Specific energy [kwh/kw] 3,99 Increase due to hills [%] 9. 15. 1.1 51. 53.7 9.9 15.1 1. 1.. 5. 3.3 9. Decrease due to array losses [%].5.1....9 1..1... 3.7.3 Utilization [%] 33.1 3.9. 3. 3. 33..5 9.1.9 3.1 3.5 1.5 3. Operational [Hours/year] 97 5 1,5 3 31 5 5 915 1, 37 5, Full Load Equivalent [Hours/year] 33 17 13 9 17 1 1 5 5 3 1 3,99 Energy vs. sector 1, Energy [MWh/year] 1, 1, N NNE ENE E ESE SSE S Sector SSW WSW W WNW NNW Annual Energy Array Losses Impact of hills and obstacles vs. sector Energy [MWh/year] 35 3 5 15 1 5 N NNE ENE E ESE SSE S Sector SSW WSW W WNW NNW Hill Obstacle WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - Power Curve Analysis 13-- 13:1 / DE-5 Aurich 91/97- Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hhwtg: 1 - ENERCON GmbH E-.!O! Power curve Guar. Rev.., Hub height: 5. m Name: Power curve Guar. Rev.. Source: ENERCON GmbH Source/Date Created by Created Edited Stop wind speed Power control CT curve type Generator type Specific power [m/s] kw/m² 9-11-5 USER 1-11-7 1-3- 5. Pitch User defined One generator. Ct-curve Rev.. (3.3.1) Power curve Original data from Windcat, Air density: 1.5 kg/m³ Wind speed Power Ce Wind speed Ct curve [m/s] [kw] [m/s] 1... 1....... 3. 5..17 3..7. 5..35..9 5...3 5..9. 11....9 7. 1..7 7..9. 75....9 9...5 9.. 1. 555..5 1..9 11. 71..5 11..9 1. 75..39 1.. 13. 79..3 13..3 1. 1..7 1..33 15. 1.. 15..7 1. 1..1 1.. 17. 1..15 17..1 1. 1..13 1..15 19. 1..11 19..13. 1..9..11 1. 1.. 1..1. 1..7..9 3. 1.. 3... 1..5..7 5. 1..5 5.. Power, Efficiency and energy vs. wind speed Data used in calculation, Air density: 1.3 kg/m³ New WindPRO method (adjusted IEC method, improved to match turbine control) <RECOMMENDED> Wind speed Power Ce Interval Energy Acc.Energy Relative [m/s] [kw] [m/s] [MWh] [MWh] [%] 1....5-1.5...... 1.5-.5... 3. 5.1.17.5-3.5 5.... 5.3.35 3.5-.5 1. 7. 1. 5...3.5-5.5 5. 77... 111.. 5.5-.5 9. 19.7. 7. 11..7.5-7.5 1. 31. 11.5. 77.5.9 7.5-.5.5 5.5 19. 9. 3.7.5.5-9.5 7. 797..9 1. 55..5 9.5-1.5 319.7 1,11.7.5 11. 7..5 1.5-11.5 33.1 1,. 5.5 1. 751..39 11.5-1.5 35.1 1,751.9 3. 13. 791..3 1.5-13.5 59.,11.7 73. 1. 1.. 13.5-1.5.,19.9. 15. 1..1 1.5-15.5 159.,379.. 1. 1..1 15.5-1.5 11.,97.5 9.7 17. 1..15 1.5-17.5 5.3,5.9 93. 1. 1..1 17.5-1.5.1,3. 9. 19. 1..11 1.5-19.5 1.,. 97.5. 1..9 19.5-.5 7.5,711.7 9.5 1. 1...5-1.5 1.,79.7 99.1. 1..7 1.5-.5 11.,71.1 99.5 3. 1...5-3.5 7.1,7.1 99.. 1..5 3.5-.5.3,75. 99.9 5. 1..5.5-5.5 1.,75. 1. Pow er curve Data used in calculation.5 Ce and Ct curve 1 Power [kw] 75 7 5 55 5 5 35 3 5 15 1 5 1 1 1 1 Wind speed [m/s] 1..3..1 Ce 1 1 1 1 Wind speed [m/s] Ct 1.... WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - Wind Data Analysis 13-- 13:1 / 5 DE-5 Aurich 91/97- Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hhwind data: A - PARK TDO; Hub height: 5. Site coordinates BN (AIRY) (Normal) East: 1, North: 3,9 Wind statistics Sector GB Ascog WMM (Wind Index MCP using MERRA_basic_W.5_N5.).wws Weibull Data Current site A- parameter Wind speed k- parameter Frequency [m/s] [m/s] [%] N 5.55.93 1. 3. 1 NNE 7.5.73 1.73.5 ENE 9..7. 15.1 3 E.7 7.73 1.5 7.9 ESE 7.3.5 1.73.7 5 SSE 7.59.7 1.779 5.5 S 9.1.1.5 7. 7 SSW 9..57.. WSW 1.3 9..1 1.9 9 W 1.1..197 15.3 1 WNW.3 7.3.9 1.3 11 NNW.7 5.95.. All.9 7.9 1.93 1. Frequency [%] 9 7 5 3 Weibull Distribution WNW W Energy Rose (kwh/m²/year) NNW N 1, NNE 75 5 5 5 ENE E 1, - m/s - 1 m/s 1 - m/s - 3 m/s 3 - m/s 1 WSW ESE 1 1 1 1 Wind speed [m/s] 1 SSW S SSE WNW NNW Mean w ind speed (m/s) N NNE ENE WNW NNW Frequency (%) N 15 1.5 1 7.5 5.5 NNE ENE - m/s - 1 m/s 1 - m/s - 3 m/s 3 - m/s W E W 5 1 E 15 WSW ESE WSW ESE SSW SSW SSE SSE S S WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - Park power curve Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hh 13-- 13:1 / DE-5 Aurich 91/97- Power Wind speed Free WTGs Park WTGs N NNE ENE E ESE SSE S SSW WSW W WNW NNW [m/s] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw] [kw].5 1.5.5 7 7 7 3.5 3 7 5 3 5.5 19 1 1 1 19 19 19 1 7 19 19 19 19 1 5.5 57 5 17 57 57 57 57 15 57 57 57 57 5.5 39 9 3 39 39 39 9 3 39 39 39 1 7.5 59 73 7 59 59 7 5.5 1, 97 73 1,19 1, 1, 1, 979 3 1, 1, 1, 1, 97 9.5 1,7 1,35 99 1,3 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,37 9 1, 1,7 1,7 1,7 1,3 1.5 1,5 1,7 1,31 1,9 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,77 1,77 1,51 1,5 1,5 1,5 1,7 11.5,13,3 1,7,11,13,13,13,97 1,55,1,13,13,13,99 1.5,31,,9,31,31,31,31,31,3,31,31,31,31,31 13.5,3,39,3,3,3,3,3,39,3,3,3,3,3,39 1.5,3,,1,3,3,3,3,3,1,3,3,3,3,3 15.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 1.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 17.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 1.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 19.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 1.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 3.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3.5,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 5.5.5 7.5.5 9.5 The park power curve is similar to a WTG power curve, meaning that when a given wind speed appears in front of the park with same speed in the entire wind farm area (before influence from the park), the output from the park can be found in the park power curve. Another way to say this: The park power curve includes array losses, but do NOT include terrain given variations in the wind speed over the park area. Measuring a park power curve is not as simple as measuring a WTG power curve due to the fact that the park power curve depends on the wind direction and that the same wind speed normally will not appear for the entire park area at the same time (only in very flat non-complex terrain). The idea with this version of the park power curve is not to use it for validation based on measurements. This would require at least measurement masts at two sides of the park, unless only a few direction sectors should be tested, AND non complex terrain (normally only useable off shore). Another park power curve version for complex terrain is available in WindPRO. The park power curve can be used for: 1. Forecast systems, based on more rough (approximated) wind data, the park power curve would be an efficient way to make the connection from wind speed (and direction) to power.. Construction of duration curves, telling how often a given power output will appear, the park power curve can be used together with the average wind distribution for the Wind farm area in hub height. The average wind distribution can eventually be obtained based on the Weibull parameters for each WTG position. These are found at print menu: >Result to file< in the >Park result< which can be saved to file or copied to clipboard and pasted in Excel. 3. Calculation of wind energy index based on the PARK production (see below).. Estimation of the expected PARK production for an existing wind farm based on wind measurements at minimum measurement masts at two sides of wind farm. The masts must be used for obtaining the free wind speed. The free wind speed is used in the simulation of expected energy production with the PARK power curve. This procedure will only work suitable in non complex terrains. For complex terrain another park power curve calculation is available in WindPRO (PPV-model). Note: From the >Result to file< the >Wind Speeds Inside Wind farm< is also available. These can (e.g. via Excel) be used for extracting the wake induced reductions in measured wind speed. WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - WTG distances Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hh WTG distances Z Nearest WTG Z Horizontal distance Distance in rotor diameters [m] [m] [m] 1 1. 9.5 171 3. 9.5 1 1. 171 3. 3 7. 9.5 1 3.7 Min 7. 9.5 171 3. Max 1. 1. 1 3.7 13-- 13:1 / 7 DE-5 Aurich 91/97- New WTG Scale 1:, WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

PARK - Map Calculation: Energy Yield Estimation: 3 x ENERCON E- kw with 5m hh 13-- 13:1 / DE-5 Aurich 91/97- New WTG 5 1 15 m Map: WindPRO map, Print scale 1:3,, Map center BN (AIRY) (Normal) East: 1,53 North: 3,3 WindPRO is developed by EMD International A/S, Niels Jernesvej 1, DK-9 Aalborg Ø, Tel. +5 9 35, Fax +5 9 35, e-mail: windpro@emd.dk

Special notes and disclaimer: Energy yield estimations with met masts The energy yield was estimated using wind data achieved by wind measurements. The wind data was long-term correlated by means of MERRA reanalysis data (provided by EMD). The modelled wind conditions of the WEC locations have been transferred from the met mast using WAsP. The annual energy production (AEP) is measured at the WEC reference point (at the V AC terminals behind the power cabinets). The AEP takes wake losses into account. If not expressly stated below, any other losses were not considered (e.g. electrical losses after WEC reference point, losses due to lack of availability or operation outside design parameters, blade icing events, grid curtailment, noise or shadow shut-downs or sector management, etc.). For the definition of wind class the air density of the site has to be taken into account. Note: Energy yield estimations are affected by uncertainties (in the calculation model or in the information on landscape roughness and obstacles or due to inaccuracy of available maps). Therefore, it is strongly recommended to apply the safety margin as stated in the report. Disclaimer: This report has been created by ENERCON GmbH to the best of its knowledge and with reasonable skill, care and diligence. Other than in case of fraud, deliberate default or reckless misconduct attributable to ENERCON GmbH, ENERCON GmbH cannot be held liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage suffered by the client in relying on the contents of this report. Rev