APPENDIX A: BENEFITS Introduction Quantitative Benefits of Street Furniture

Similar documents
A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

SETTINGS AND OPPORTUNITIES MOBILITY & ACCESS

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

PUBLIC REALM MASTER PLAN

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

PEDALING FORWARD. A Glance at the SFMTA s Bike Program for SFMTA.COM

Planning Regionally With Transit

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

5. Automobile Circulation, Wayfinding and Signage

Public Workshop #2. September 14, 2016

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

El Centro Mobility Hub

Community Improvement Plans: Creating walkable and liveable communities that support local business

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

summary of issues and opportunities

ALTERNATIVES TO BE CONSIDERED

Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

Why invest in the 1 Street S.W. Corridor?

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Vision. cultural identity, income group, neighborhood identity, or mobility level. Rendering by Robin Chiang

The best indicator of an individual s and expanding access to parks and open space.

EAST VILLAGE SHOPPERS STUDY A SNAPSHOT OF TRAVEL AND SPENDING PATTERNS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS IN THE EAST VILLAGE

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

THE NEXUS OF LIVABILITY, TRANSIT, AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica

14 TH STREET TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY PLAN B PLAN B TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Smart Growth, Climate Change and Prosperity Steve Winkelman Chuck Kooshian

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

GENERAL. 1. Description

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

Use this guide to learn more about walkability and how you can make your community safer to walk

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Walkability Audit Cities of Olympia, Tumwater and Lacey, Washington. Next Steps Memorandum September FINAL

Public Transport and Development: Making It Work

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Complete Streets 101: Placemaking, Mobility and Parking

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO TRANSPORTATION AT SUNTRUST PARK AND THE BATTERY ATLANTA

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

Safer Stops for Vulnerable Customers

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Figure 4-10: Pedestrian Improvements Types of Potential Station Area Improvements - Place-Making Improvements

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

MIXED USE AND STREETSCAPE INTEGRATION Avondale Will Basil Juliana Zannotto

CURB EXTENSIONS BULB OUTS DPS 201 NECKDOWNS

THE PHILADELPHIA COMPLETE. an overview

Markham Sports, Entertainment and Cultural Centre Transportation Overview

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Cluster 5/Module 2 (C5/M2): Pedestrians and Transit Oriented Development (TOD)

The Who and What: Bus Rapid Transit Riders and Systems in the U.S.

How familiar are you with BRT?

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Thesis Presentation. Moorhead City Walk: A Master Plan to Reimage Moorhead, Minnesota s Urban Core. Brad Garcia Advisors: Jason Kost & Dominic Fischer

A GIS APPROACH TO EVALUATE BUS STOP ACCESSIBILITY

Mainstreet Master Plan Land Use

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Capital Improvement Project Application: Bike Racks, Bus Stop Shelters, Sidewalks in Kings Canyon/Ventura Corridor Page 1 of 10

POLICY AGENDA For Elder Pedestrian Safety

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

2013 Candidate Questionnaire

Living Streets Policy

Governor s Transportation Vision Panel

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Richmond Connects Visioning Update

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER Identifying Priorities 7.2 Maintenance 7.3 Funding 7.4 Education and Enforcement IMPLEMENTATION

About the Active Transportation Alliance

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

41st Avenue B-Line Kerrisdale Village Street Improvements

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Transcription:

Introduction Great Streets are a careful combination of architecture, land use, transportation, urban design, landscape, and culture- all in the right quantities and at the right scale. Great streets are under-pinned by great placemaking. By providing excellent infrastructure including lighting, furniture and art; streets can become places for people to linger and stay, enjoying the public realm and creating the type of livable streets that Seattle strives for. By upgrading our transit shelters and information displays in Seattle through the coordinated street furniture program, we encourage a safe and comfortable environment that can better support all the benefits of great streets and a great Center City. This appendix is an overview of some of the quantitative and qualitative benefits of street furniture and a coordinated street furniture program. Quantitative Benefits of Street Furniture Updates to the streetscape, especially to transit stops can have positive effects for transit riders as well as for the local community. These outcomes include easier and safer pedestrian access to transit, improved transit 1

experience and personal economic value, increased transit ridership, and economic benefits to local businesses. Increased Ridership One of the challenges that transit agencies face in attracting new ridership is the ability of potential riders to get to the transit stop. Desirable pedestrian infrastructure on the route to the transit stop can include sidewalks, curb ramps, street lighting, street crossings, and resting places. Once at the stop most passengers prefer to wait in conditions of comfort, cleanliness, safety and protection from the weather. These comfort and safety elements are particularly important for older passengers who may have trouble with mobility. When street furniture especially bus shelters with walls, roof, and seating is added to transit stops, it has been found that passengers particularly notice the presence of the amenity and that this can increase ridership by more than double at an improved stop. Bus stop amenities enhance the transit experience and encourage increased ridership frequency. Studies have found that adding shelters to bus stops is one of the primary amenities that transit riders would like to see added to their stops. Along with shelters, desirable amenities include; benches, garbage receptacles, vending machines, appropriate signage, lighting, and information kiosks. It is important to note, however, that bus stop amenities are best and most utilized by riders when clustered together. This clustering means that benches should be under shelter, near light, arranged so the bus information is not blocked by someone seated, etc. so that the amenities which have individual benefit can have a far greater combined benefit. As with bus stops, transit stations realize increased ridership following improvements. Denver, CO s remodel of Union Station helped to increase third quarter transit ridership by 6.3%, 0.75% of which was bus ridership. With the assistance of the Project for Public Spaces, Plainfield, 2

NJ renovated the Netherwood train station resulting in a 40% increase in ridership. It has also been proven that artistic enhancements to transit stations will increase ridership. This is demonstrated in cities such as Buenos Aires, AR, Naples, IT, Vancouver, B.C. and New York, NY. Value of Time A well designed bus stop with excellent amenities can increase the value of a transit riders commute time. A Transportation Research Board study shows that the time spent in public transportation could have a higher value for passengers than time spent driving because they are able to use transportation time for work rather than commute alone. While this applies to time on the bus, it also applies to stop amenities like shelters, benches and information kiosks. So long as the wait time is sufficiently comfortable and protected it can also be used productively, there is wait utility while a wait at a stop with fewer amenities may constitute a wait disutility. Wait disutility, which could be standing on a full bus rather than sitting and working, discourages while wait utility encourages ridership. Information kiosks help transit riders to plan for least wait time, shelters and benches give comfort and space to work if desired during the wait. 3

In addition, a study has found that having a shelter alters people s perceived wait time and signage that tells the rider when the next bus will arrive makes the bus seem faster, even if the actual wait time has not changed at all. Economic Benefits for Business A NYC DOT report found that urban design interventions cause people to linger in the space for longer, and that this in turn encourages visitors to spend more time and eventually money at local businesses. Using several case studies that last approximately 3-4 years NYC DOT was able to conclude that the urban design interventions they make in neighborhoods do indeed have significant, positive economic impacts for local businesses. Beyond simply making the transit experience better for riders, transit stop improvements can make positive economic impacts on the community. Innovative and strategic bus stop shelter placement and design can create a thriving area that promote(s) neighborhood vitality. Other Benefits Perception of safety and security Improved transit shelters and kiosks with appropriate lighting can also promote the perception of safety and security. This can extend the hours of street activity that promotes social interactions into the evening. This can snowball by supporting longer retail hours. Visibility of retail The design guidelines for transit shelters for Coordinated Street Furniture in Seattle recommends transparency that can provide better sightlines for both personal security and support on-site retail signage by providing better visual clarity than the existing patterned glass panels. In addition, providing walk-through access from both the front and the back of the shelter, patrons have easy access to both retail behind the sidewalk and access to arriving 4

transit vehicles, making the entire stop area more usable by expanding the viable waiting area. Pride of place Seattle s Center City is a growing national and international center for commerce, entertainment, and the arts; while increasing residents have provided a stronger sense of ownership and place through strong neighborhoods including Belltown and South Lake Union. Wayfinding Updated and consistent transit shelters can help visitors and locals orient themselves within the city. Public informational displays, deisnged well and strategically placed can become nodes of interest and provide both structural and digital Conclusion Improvements to the streetscape and to the wait time for transit users have overall positive effects on rider experience, ridership frequency and local businesses. People are more likely to use public transit that they can easily access and feel safe and comfortable waiting for. Safety and comfort of wait time increases the wait utility, giving public transit a greater time value than commuting alone. Finally, streetscape improvements around transit stops encourage walking and more time spent on the pedestrian right of way. Time spent walking to or waiting on the street encourages people to patronize local businesses, and in turn can boost the local economy. In addition, indeterminite benfits like pride of place, perception of safety, and wayfinding all contribute to better streets and a greater, more livable Center City for Seattle. 5

Hess, D. (2009). Access to Public Transit and Its Influence on Ridership for Older Adults in Two U.S. Cities. Journal of Transport and Land Use JTLU, 2(1), 3-27. Transportation Research Laboratory. (2004). The Demand for Public Transport: A Practical Guide. Berkshire, UK: Balcombe, R., Mackett, R., Paulley, N., Preston, J., Shires, J., Titheridge, H., White, P. Hess, D. Access to Public Transit and Its Influence on Ridership for Older Adults in Two U.S. Cities. 3. Stover, V. & McCormack, E. D. (2012). The Impact of Weather on Bus Ridership in Pierce County, Washington. Journal of Public Transportation, 15(1), 95-110. Talbott, M. (2011). Bus Stop Amenities and Their Relationship with Ridership: A Transportation Equity Approach, Received from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (AAT 1494284). 130-132. Transit Cooperative Research Program. (1999). The Role of Transit Amenities and Vehicle Characteristics in Building Transit Ridership: Amenities for Transit Handbook and The Transit Design Game Workbook. Washington, DC: Project for Public Spaces & MultiSystems, Inc. Talbott, M. (2011). Bus Stop Amenities and Their Relationship with Ridership: A Transportation Equity Approach, Received from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (AAT 1494284) State of Florida Department of Transportation. (2003). Safer Stop for Vulnerable Customers. Tallahassee, FL: Tucker, L. E. Transit Cooperative Research Program. (1999). The Role of Transit Amenities Workbook. Washington, DC: Project for Public Spaces & MultiSystems, Inc. (33). Patterson, T. (2015). Five Signs America is Falling in Love with Public Transit. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/17/travel/public-transportation-ridership-increasing/ Project for Public Spaces. 10 Benefits of Creating Good Public Spaces. Retrieved from http://www.pps.org/reference/10benefits/ SubArtsSF. Community Livability. Retrieved from http://subartsf.org/livability/ American Public Transportation Association. (2009). Economic Impact of Public Transportation Investment. Weisbrod, G. & Reno, A. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (2001). Guidebook for Assessing the Social and Economic Effects of Transportation Projects. Washington, DC: Forkenbrock, D. & Weisbrod, G. Lindeke, B. Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Bus Stops (and More). MinnPost, October 16. 2014. New York City Department of Transportation. (2013). The Economic Benefits of Sustainable Streets. New York, NY: NYC DOT. Law, P. & Taylor, B. D. Shelter from the Storm: Optimizing Distribution of Bus Stop Shelters in Los Angeles. Transportation Research Record, 1753, 79-85. 6