Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

Similar documents
Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

APPROVE A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENLO PARK ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Living Streets Policy

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND

Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

BUDGET FOR RESEDA BOULEVARD, STREET RECONSTRUCTION / VISION ZERO PROGRAM, REPORT BACK, COUNCIL FILE

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

Non-Motorized Transportation 7-1

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Implementing Complete Streets in Ottawa. Project Delivery Process and Tools Complete Streets Forum 2015 October 1, 2015

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

May 12, 2016 Metro Potential Ballot Measure Issue Brief: Local Return

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

UDC Street Cross Sections

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #8 May 5, Welcome. Today s meeting will focus on: Land Use & Transportation CHARLOTTEPLANNING.

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

Commerce Street Complete Street Project from Good Latimer Expressway to Exposition Avenue

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

DISTRICT BICYCLE PROGRAM

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

Outreach Approach RENEW SF served as the primary liaison with the North Beach community; the Chinatown. Executive Summary

BICYCLE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE. Transportation and Trinity River Project Council Committee June 13, 2016

TULSA CITY COUNCIL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TASK FORCE MEETING JANUARY

Transportation Assessment

General Plan Circulation Element Update Scoping Meeting April 16, 2014 Santa Ana Senior Center, 424 W. 3rd Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF AUSTIN COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN:

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans and Improvements

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

WELCOME! To the Centennial Neighbourhoods Secondary Plan and Transportation Management Plan Information Centre. City of Hamilton

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

City Council Agenda Item #6-A CITY OF ALAMEDA Memorandum. To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. John A. Russo City Manager

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY Exhibit A to Ordinance

Promoting Active Communities Award Application

Eastern PA Trail Summit October 1, 2018

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH PLANNING DEPARTMENT

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

CRESTON ROAD COMPLETE AND SUSTAINABLE STREETS CORRIDOR PLAN

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Derby Street. Project Updates. Salem, Massachusetts

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL NORTH CAROLINA

Org Chart. Steering. Committee. Project Advisory. Committee. Nicole Losch, PTP Senior Transportation. Bryan Davis, AICP Senior Transportation

We believe the following comments and suggestions can help the department meet those goals.

ORDINANCE NO

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

TRASBURG RANSPORTATION

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

Making Phoenix Streets Complete. City of Phoenix Complete Streets Initiative

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Study Phase 2

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Transportation Planning Division

Polk Streetscape Project

2. Vision & Goals. Vision. Santa Rosa is a community where walking and bicycling are comfortable and convenient for people of all ages and abilities.


Complete Streets 101: The Basics

Bicycle Friendly Niagara Falls

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Transcription:

Mixed Use Centers Complete Streets Guidelines Project Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation December 10, 2008 Project Objectives: Conduct an inter-departmental and agency process to study the potential application of complete streets principles in Tacoma s Mixed-use Centers. Develop recommended draft streetscape guidelines. Since the project began the scope has expanded due to a high level of interest in complete streets, including: City Council consideration of a Complete Streets Policy in the Comprehensive Plan; the Safe and Clean Initiative Complete Streets Team; the Green Ribbon Taskforce on Climate Change recommendations; streetscape guidelines in the Downtown Plan; and, a newly launched effort to develop Residential Complete Streets Guidelines. As a result, the long-term objectives now include developing a complete streets approach for the whole city. Desired Meeting Outcomes: Informational Overview of report and guidelines, discussion of next steps Input Check our direction and solicit guidance from the Committee The report and guidelines will be provided at the meeting. A document providing an overview is attached. MUC Complete Streets Goals 1. Make transportation mode shift possible by safely and efficiently accommodating bicycles, transit, pedestrians, and automobiles. 2. Design streets to accommodate larger vehicles such as buses, fire service vehicles, and freight delivery trucks without compromising pedestrian and bicycle safety. 3. Support the livability of Mixed-use Centers by providing transportation choices and integrating amenities that create a safe and inviting pedestrian environment. 4. Support the City s efforts to reduce environmental impacts. 5. Allow for design flexibility to better respond to different street functions and neighborhood contexts. 6. Consider all users and transportation modes in the planning, design, building, and operating of streets within Mixed-use Centers. 7. Use infrastructure to create or contribute to neighborhood character and identity.

MUC Complete Streets and key policy objectives Make Tacoma Safe and Clean Initiative Green Ribbon Taskforce on Climate Change Streetcars Planning Parking study Non-motorized Transportation Planning Comprehensive Plan Policies: Mixed-use Centers Transportation Environment green infrastructure Neighborhood and economic development MUC Complete Streets Project Timeline June-Dec 2008 Downtown Preparation of draft Guidelines and Report Sept-Nov Inter-departmental and inter-agency review and analysis Sept 24 Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee initial findings Oct 8 th Community Focus Group Meeting Nov 5 th Planning Commission presentation Dec 10 th EPW Committee review of draft report and guidelines Jan-Feb 2009 Public and stakeholder review of draft guidelines and report To include resident surveys, website, walking tour(s), outreach to various stakeholder groups, presentations to neighborhood and business groups 2009 Implementation and follow-up steps, including: Residential Complete Streets Guidelines Compile Complete Streets guidelines for the whole City Public Works Design Manual Update and code review Council consideration of implementation and funding approaches Coordination with non-motorized transportation planning Coordinate with Safe and Clean Initiative Background The report and guidelines were prepared under the direction of an interdepartmental and interagency team including Community and Economic Development, Public Works, Fire, Tacoma Public Utilities, Pierce Transit, Tacoma-Pierce County Health Dept. and other staff members, with input from community stakeholders. Funding: State of Washington CTED Competitive Planning Grant Consultants: Julia Walton, AHBL Steve Shanafelt, David Evans & Associates Staff Contacts: Peter Huffman, Planning Division Manager Elliott Barnett, Urban Planner, elliott.barnett@cityoftacoma.org, 591-5389 Website: www.cityoftacoma.org/planning; select MUC Complete Streets Guidelines

Transportation Element Policy adopted by the City Council on December 9 th : T-MS-10 Complete Streets Apply the Complete Streets guiding principle (1), where appropriate, in the planning and design for new construction, reconstruction and major transportation improvement projects (2), to appropriately accommodate all users, moving by car, truck, transit, bicycle, wheelchair, or foot to move along and across streets. The Complete Streets guiding principle shall also be used to evaluate potential transportation projects, and to amend and revise design manuals, regulations, standards and programs as appropriate to create over time an integrated and connected network of complete streets that meets user needs while recognizing the function and context of each street. (1) The Complete Streets guiding principle is to design, operate and maintain streets to enable safe and convenient access and travel for all users pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and people of all ages and abilities, as well as freight and motor vehicle drivers and to foster a sense of place in the public realm. (2) Major transportation improvement projects include but are not limited to street and sidewalk construction; street and sidewalk lighting; street trees and landscaping; street amenities; drainage, pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements; access improvements for freight; access improvements, including compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act; and public transit facilities accommodation including, but not limited to, pedestrian access improvements to transit stops and stations.

Implementation of Complete Streets 1. General Recommendations Adoption of the Mixed-use Centers Complete Streets Guidelines Establish the Mixed-use Centers, including downtown, as the first priority for implementation Direct staff to develop design standards that are consistent with the guidelines Direct staff to develop conceptual streetscape plans for the Mixed-use Centers Direct staff to develop budget strategies for both the capital and maintenance requirements for implementation Direct staff to analyze options for expanding Complete Streets to the entire City 2. Create Cross Functional Team Approach Develop recommended code changes o Review all applicable codes - Tacoma Municipal Code, International Building Code and Comprehensive Plan, for consistency with the adopted Complete Streets policies. The team should identify any inconsistent provisions and develop proposed policy or code changes. Develop design standards o Transportation elements o Utility elements o Sustainable/Low Impact development elements Coordinate with stakeholders Track implementation and update the City Council 3. Integrate implementation into existing processes Public Works Review Panel Citywide Infrastructure Team Public Works Standard Plans Review Team Community and Economic Development Ad hoc Comprehensive Plan revision teams. Mobility Taskforce 4. Develop conceptual plans for the designated streets

5. Cost Capital and Maintenance Cost per Average Block Item Unit Unit Capital Cost Units per Block Capital Cost per Block Unit Maint. Cost Annual Maint. Per Block Planted Median including trees Lin. Ft. $300.00 250 $75,000 $14.00 $3,500 Curb Extension @ intersection corner Each $30,000.00 4 $120,000 N/A $0 Curb Extension @ mid block location Each $20,000.00 2 $40,000 N/A $0 Widen Sidewalk ( removal, paving & c &g) Sq.Yd. $380.00 220 $83,600 N/A $0 Pedestrian Signal Enhancement Each $25,000.00 1 $25,000 $500.00 $500 Bicycle Loop Detector Each $1,000.00 2 $2,000 $50.00 $100 Bicycle Lane Marking Stripe Lin. Ft. $0.15 600 $90 $0.05 $30 Bicycle Symbols Each $175.00 6 $1,050 $58.33 $350 Sharrow Symbols Lin. Ft. $175.00 6 $1,050 $58.33 $350 Bike Box Each $250.00 2 $500 $83.33 $167 Parking Pavement Marking Stripe Lin. Ft. $0.15 600 $90 $0.05 $30 Street Tree in Amenity Zone Each $1,200.00 20 $24,000 $42.00 $840 Low Impact Development Treatment L S $20,000.00 1 $20,000 $1,000.00 $1,000 N/A - Maintenance costs are assumed equal to current costs since the existing streets are paved and maintained Cost Estimate for Designated Pedestrian Streets at Build Out Item Capital Cost per Block Annual Maint. Per Block Blocks of Treatment Est. Capital Cost @ Build Out Est. Annual Maint. Cost @ Build Out Planted Median including trees $75,000 $3,500 60 $4,500,000 $210,000 Curb Extension @ intersection corner $120,000 $2,400 150 $18,000,000 $0 Curb Extension @ mid block location $40,000 $800 150 $6,000,000 $0 Widen Sidewalk (removal, paving & c &g) $83,600 $1,672 60 $5,016,000 $0 Pedestrian Signal Enhancement $25,000 $500 80 $2,000,000 $40,000 Bicycle Loop Detector $2,000 $100 80 $160,000 $8,000 Bicycle Lane Marking Stripe $90 $30 150 $13,500 $4,500 Bicycle Symbols $1,050 $350 150 $157,500 $52,500 Sharrow Symbols $1,050 $350 150 $157,500 $52,500 Bike Box $500 $167 80 $40,000 $13,333 Parking Pavement Marking Stripe $90 $30 300 $27,000 $9,000 Street Tree in Amneity Zone $24,000 $840 200 $4,800,000 $168,000 Low Impact Development Treatment $20,000 $1,000 60 $1,200,000 $60,000 Total $42,071,500 $617,833

6. Phasing implementation 5 Year Implementation for Mixed Use Centers Avg. Annual Capital 5th Year Maint. Cost Annual Cost $8.4 million $0.6 million Potential Revenue Sources $4.2 mil. $4.2 mil. $0.3 mil. $0.3 mil. Gas Tax General Fund Real Estate Excise Tax Local Improvement District Business Improvement Area *Impact Fees *Vehicle License Fees Complete Street Bond Issue State and / or Federal Grants *Latecomer Fees *Street Utility Private Development Requirements *New potential revenue source requiring City Council action 10 Year Implementation for Mixed Use Centers Avg. Annual Capital Cost 10th Year Maint. Cost Annual Cost $4.2 million $0.6 million Potential Revenue Sources $1.2 mil. $3.0 mil. $0.3 mil. $0.3 mil. Gas Tax General Fund Real Estate Excise Tax Local Improvement District Business Improvement Area *Impact Fees *Vehicle License Fees Complete Street Bond Issue State and / or Federal Grants *Latecomer Fees *Street Utility Private Development Requirements *New potential revenue source requiring City Council action

20 Year Implementation for Mixed Use Centers Avg. Annual Capital 20th Year Maint. Cost Annual Cost $2.1 million $0.6 million Potential Revenue Sources $0.1 mil. $2.0 mil. $0.3 mil. $0.3 mil. Gas Tax General Fund Real Estate Excise Tax Local Improvement District Business Improvement Area *Impact Fees *Vehicle License Fees Complete Street Bond Issue State and / or Federal Grants *Latecomer Fees *Street Utility Private Development Requirements *New potential revenue source requiring City Council action